Introduction

Habitats with harsh environmental conditions are spread all over the world ranging from hot springs, dry desserts to high altitude mountaintops (Füreder, 1999; Jacobsen & Dangles, 2012). Streams in the alpine zone are among the most extreme freshwater ecosystems, characterized by harsh environmental conditions like high solar radiation, year-round low air and water temperatures, scarce vegetation, short snow free season and often draining glaciers in the catchments (Milner & Petts, 1994; Ward, 1994; Lods-Crozet et al., 2001; Füreder et al., 2005; Brown et al., 2015). In the future, climate change effects intensify the already rough abiotic conditions by accelerated glacier melt, leading to enhanced discharge with lower water temperatures, increased turbidity, higher abrasion, lower habitat stability, little algal growth, and hence decreased nutrient retention compared to the current situation (Brown et al., 2007, 2010; Finn et al., 2010; Robinson et al., 2014).

Glacier recession will also create new ice-free habitats in glacier-fed (kryal, sensu Steffan, 1971) streams (Robinson et al., 2014), representing a refuge for alpine benthic invertebrates in times of climate change (Brittain & Milner, 2001; Finn et al., 2010). The larval community of these aquatic insects, dominated by chironomids (Steffan, 1971), has to face and master the stressful living conditions in order to successfully colonize and inhabit the uppermost stream reaches of alpine rivers. Former studies pointed out that highly adapted species, mainly from the chironomid genus Diamesa (Milner & Petts, 1994; Brittain et al., 2001; Robinson et al., 2001) withstand the tough abiotic conditions and inhabit kryal streams directly from the glacier snout, partially reaching high individual numbers at suited microhabitats (Finn et al., 2010; Robinson et al., 2014; Rossaro et al., 2016). Recently, significant knowledge concerning species habitat preferences and harshness resistance has been gained (e.g., Niedrist & Füreder, 2016), identifying water temperature and nutrient availability as the major driving forces for species appearance and benthic community composition (e.g., Milner & Petts, 1994; Brittain et al., 2001; Finn et al., 2010; Marziali & Rossaro, 2013).

Chironomids are holometabolic insects following a defined life cycle pattern. The larva is hatching from the egg, goes through four larval instars (L1, L2, L3 and L4) to a pupa stage, and finally emerges as an adult, terrestrial insect (Walker, 1987). Despite this relatively simple development, chironomid growth and life cycles in the colder climatic zones have hardly been investigated (but see Nolte & Hoffmann, 1992; Hannesdottir et al., 2012). This is particularly true for high alpine species. Most studies so far concentrated on the benthic larval life of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (e.g., Brittain, 1983; Dobrin & Gibberson, 2003; Finn & Poff, 2008; Resh & Rosenberg, 2010; Beracko et al., 2016; Carlos & Puliafico, 2016).

Some of these former studies revealed correlations of changing environmental conditions and the benthic larval growth in temperate streams below the tree line. In other studies, water temperature and/or nutrient availability seemed to be the main driving forces shifting benthic larval life (Erba et al., 2003; Reynolds & Benke, 2005; Sand & Brittain, 2009). Quite a number of surveys in the past were set up as laboratory experiments to manipulate the most important abiotic factors and strictly follow the nymphal reactions on the altered environmental conditions (e.g., Mackey, 1977; Sweeney et al., 1986; Corkum & Hanes, 1991; Stanko-Mishic et al., 1999; Hooper et al., 2003). Thereby, increased water temperature or nutrient availability, compared to the control conditions, partially led to improved larval growth and increased biovolume (e.g., Sweeney et al., 1986; Reynolds & Benke, 2005; Wagner, 2005). These laboratory experiments were a crucial step to understand the principal mechanisms of benthic larval growth and development in temperate and low alpine streams.

By simulating changing environmental conditions on the benthic larval life, relevant interactions of the naturally predominant abiotic conditions might be missed, leading to misinterpretations of current processes, future changes and adaptions of benthic species to changing environmental conditions (Sweeney et al., 1986). Moreover, the complex and harsh abiotic characteristics of a highly glaciated stream are hardly reproducible in laboratory experiments. Therefore, knowledge about the larval growth dynamics, development histories, age structure, retention time and colonization patterns of the benthic community in highly glaciated stream reaches is still scarce (Danks, 2007; Elliot, 2013). Only by following the benthic development in the natural, kryal stream habitats, the complex interactions of benthic key species with the entity of occurring environmental factors can be investigated and the main abiotic driving forces, influencing benthic larval life will be displayed.

Rivers, from their origin to the mouth, are a continuum with changes in the uppermost reaches affecting the whole ecosystem downstream (e.g., Vannote et al., 1980; Füreder, 2007). High alpine benthic larvae are an important link in stream food webs, as they initially take up and store allochthonous and autochthonous organic material in the stream (Beracko et al., 2016; Niedrist & Füreder, 2017). Knowing the species` reactions on specific abiotic conditions and key factors positively affecting larval size, knowledge about the benthic larval growth and development will be gained. Moreover, increased larval size walks along with an extended assimilation of biomass in the stream food chain, fertilizing the whole freshwater ecosystem (e.g., Brittain, 1983; Sweeney et al., 1986; Corkum & Hanes, 1991).

The aim of the present study was to investigate the larval growth of alpine aquatic invertebrate species subjected to small-scale abiotic alterations in kryal stream habitats, in close vicinity to the glacier. By regularly sampling the benthic community and key environmental factors at three recently constituted stream stretches, towards the end of the snow free season, representing the most important time of the year for high alpine benthic invertebrate growth due to reduced discharge, higher water temperatures, and enhanced nutrient availability (Uehlinger et al., 2010), larval size patterns of high alpine chironomid species were followed for the first time. Former studies have shown that water temperature is the essential factor, influencing benthic larval growth with a threshold of 2.3°C for chironomid larvae (Huryn & Wallace, 1986). Glacier-fed streams are often characterized by even lower temperatures, raising the question if and how big larvae can grow under such harsh conditions and how long they need to complete their aquatic life stages. Along a temperature gradient bellow the hitherto valid limit, we follow the benthic larval growth of highly adapted chironomid key species in a kryal headwater. Furthermore, we test whether the insects are able to effectively use an increased availability of nutrition and if food availability plays a more important role for larval growth than previously thought. Morphometric measurement tools allowed us to visualize the benthic larval growth and development over time and, in a second step, to elucidate the interdependency with environmental conditions.

Materials and methods

Study area and site selection

The kryal Schlatenbach (i.e., section close to the glacial snout), draining the Schlatenkees glacier in the Innergschlöß valley, East Tyrol, Austria, was chosen for fieldwork, as a rapid glacier retreat has been observed over the recent years. The stream is located in the Hohe Tauern National Park and therefore free of direct human impacts like damming, pollution and nutrient enrichment. Sampling took place six times in the alpine summer and autumn (August–October) 2015 covering most of the snow free season. At each expedition, three stream stretches were sampled. Site 1 was still covered by the glacier in September 2014. According to the official annual glacial report of the Austrian Alpine Club, the Schlatenkees glacier snout retreated for 60.3 metres in 2015 (https://www.alpenverein.at/portal/news/aktuelle_news/2016/2016_04_08_gletscherbericht.php; downloaded on 22 December 2017), whereby site 1 got ice-free during spring/summer 2015, only some months before the initial sampling. Site 2 was ice-free since late 2012 and site 3 since late 2009 (Fig. 1). Positions of glacier snouts in 2009, 2012 and 2015 were taken from the Tyrolean geographical information system (https://portal.tirol.gv.at).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of sampling sites, glacial retreat and catchment shape. Altitudes and positions of the glacier snout in 2009, 2012 and 2015 (written in italics) taken from the Tyrolean geographical information system (https://portal.tirol.gv.at). L. Füreder photographed the glacial position in September 2014

Benthic invertebrates

Overall 54 semi-quantitative benthic samples, three replicates at each sampling site per expedition, were taken using a 0.09 m2 Surber Sampler with 100-µm-sized net. Sampling was restricted to permanently overflown stream stretches reflecting the predominant habitat characteristic and grain size. Each benthic sample was immediately fixed in 75% Ethanol. In the laboratory, larvae were handpicked and identified to species level using available keys (Schmid, 1993; Janecek, 1998; Rossaro & Lencioni, 2015a, b) under a microscope. Due to their frequent and continuous abundance, larvae of Diamesa cinerella (Meigen 1835) and Diamesa steinboecki (Goetghebuer 1933) were used for growth analysis. Chironomid pupae were determined to species level following Langton (1991).

Morphometric measurements and growth rate

A set of 19 landmarks was defined to morphometrically analyse each individual organism. Larval length was measured from the anal setae to the beginning of the head capsule (landmarks 1–13) plus the length of the head capsule, from the beginning of the capsule to the front end of the antennal-base (landmarks 16–17, Fig. 2). Landmarks 18–19 were set to the widest point of the head capsule, determining the head capsule width (Fig. 2). As the fourth body segment reflects the shape of chironomid larvae (Nolte, 1990), the length (Landmarks 4–5) and width/height (landmarks 14–15) of the fourth segment were measured. Biovolume of each individual was calculated by multiplying the larval length with the volume of the fourth segment. For the measurements, each single larva was first photographed laterally, then the head capsule was cut off and photographed dorsally using a reflected light microscope with trinocular port, digital mirrorless camera (Pentax Q, attached to microscope with C-mount to Q-mount adapter) and known scale. For morphometric measurements, the program “Jens Rüdigs Makroaufmaßprogramm” (version 0.9.2; http://ruedig.de/tmp/messprogramm.htm) was used.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Lateral view of Diamesa cinerella larva, dorsal view of Diamesa cinerella head and the position of the 19 landmarks used for morphometric measurements

Linear regression proved to be the best model of curve fitting regression analysis, relating the mean larval length and mean larval volume to development days (see Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, growth rate was assumed to be linear and calculated as instantaneous, daily growth rate (G) for length and volume, both species and all three sampling sites separately, following the equation G = (Mt−M0)/t (Romanovsky & Polishchuck, 1982), where Mt is the mean of the length/volume at the last sampling date, M0 is the mean of the length/volume at the first sampling date, and t is the period of growth in days (development days; following Huryn & Wallace, 1986).

Habitat characterization

Water temperature was measured in the late morning of each expedition using WTW multi-parameter portable meter at all three sites, within a few minutes in order to guarantee comparability. After removing all larvae from the semi-quantitative samples the remaining material was placed in aluminium dishes, dried at 60°C (24 h), weighed, burned at 450°C (2 h) and weighed again to estimate the content (dry weight) of organic matter. The amount of benthic organic material in the samples represents the availability of food for the inhabiting benthic larvae.

Data analyses

Mann–Whitney-U-tests compared the water temperatures and benthic organic materials at the three sampling sites across all sampling dates. A nonparametric test was required, as both measures were not normally distributed (even after log10 transformation). We related benthic organic material and individual numbers of benthic invertebrates with ANOVA. Log10 transformation of the dependent variable was necessary to meet the model assumptions of normality and homogeneity. To follow larval development, the four larval instars of all Diamesa species found in the samples were visualized in frequency histograms of the head capsule width, with each peak representing an instar (following Daly, 1985). We compared the L4 larval head capsule width of Diamesa cinerella and Diamesa steinboecki at the three sampling sites with Mann–Whitney-U-tests. A nonparametric approach was used as D. cinerella data were not normally distributed (even after log 10 transformation), and head capsule widths of D. steinboecki showed normality but were heteroscedastic (even after log10 transformation).

Four MANCOVAs were computed to check for the sampling site effects on the larval length and volume of each possible growth pattern and species, individually. Larval length and volume were treated as separate, dependent variables, sampling site as fixed factor and development days (period of growth in days) as covariate.

Statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics 23 and considered significant at P < 0.05. Data showed normality with non-significant Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and homogeneity with non-significant Levene`s test. Graphics were created in Microsoft Excel 2016 and SigmaPlot 13.0 (Systat).

Results

Abiotic conditions and chironomid densities

Water temperature increased with increasing distance from the glacier snout (Fig. 3; for mean values of each sampling see Supplementary Table 2), with site 1 being significantly colder than site 3 (P = 0.005). Organic matter decreased with increasing distance from the glacier (Fig. 3, for mean values of each sampling see Supplementary Table 2). Samples from site 1 had a significantly higher amount of organic material compared to site 2 (P = 0.003) and site 3 (P < 0.000). Site 2 was also characterized by a significantly higher amount of organic material compared to site 3 (P = 0.003). The organic matter at the three sampled sites generally increased during the sampling period. Algal mats of Hydrurus foetidus (Villars 1848), a Chrysophyceae, were covering the stones at site 1 throughout the sampling period. Samples from site 2 contained the algae from the fourth sampling occasion onwards and was present at site 3 on the last expedition (Fig. 3).Nutrient availability had no significant influence on the dispersal of chironomid larvae in the sampled stream (P = 0.293). The larvae did not preferably inhabit stream sections with high nutrition quantity, nor did they avoid low nutrient concentrations.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Water temperature [°C], dots with lines drawn for a better visualization of the temperature trends, and benthic organic material dry weights [g] of the three sites for all six sampling dates; “H” indicates the presence of Hydrurus foetidus in the samples

Larval stages

For the evaluation of the benthic larval growth and development, it is crucial to distinguish the four different larval stages (L1–L4) of each species. Size–frequency histograms (Fig. 4) display the head width of the four larval stages of all Diamesa species in the samples (for means see Table 1). According to these classifications, the larval development during the sampling period can be followed for the two frequently present species Diamesa cinerella (Fig. 5) and Diamesa steinboecki (Fig. 6). The size–frequency diagrams (Figs. 5, 6) show that larval instar composition of both species hardly differed between the three sites throughout the sampling period. Towards October, the majority of larvae were in the final L4 larval stage. We want to highlight the presence of pupae of D. cinerella on the last two samplings at all three sites and of D. steinboecki at site 2, fifth sampling. These samples also partially contained L1 and L2 larvae of both species.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Frequency histograms of head capsule width [µm] for the four present Diamesa species joined for the three sites and all sampling dates, individual numbers in parentheses

Table 1 Means and standard deviations of head capsule width [µm] for the four larval stages of all Diamesa species found in the samples
Fig. 5
figure 5

Larval-stage frequency distribution of Diamesa cinerella at the three sites during the sampling period; asterisk indicates the presence of pupae

Fig. 6
figure 6

Larval-stage frequency distribution of Diamesa steinboecki at the three sites during the sampling period; asterisk indicates the presence of pupae

Head capsule width and larval size

To check for differences in larval size of D. cinerella and D. steinboecki, at first, the head capsule widths of the L4 larvae at the three sampling sites were compared. Head capsule width of D. cinerella L4 larvae decreased significantly with the increasing distance from the glacier (site 1–site 2 (P < 0.000) and site 1 –ite 3 (P < 0.000)). Head capsules at site 2 were also significantly bigger compared with site 3 (P = 0.001) (site 1: mean = 444.2 µm; std = 42.5 µm, n = 259; site 2: mean = 417.7 µm, std = 40.8 µm, n = 330; site 3: mean = 401.3 µm, std = 36.7 µm, n = 85; see Fig. 7). Comparison of head capsule width for D. steinboecki revealed the same trend of decreasing head capsule width with the increasing distance from the glacier (site1: mean = 358.9, std = 37.1, n = 31; site 2: mean = 353.2, std = 25.2, n = 123; site3: mean = 347.1, std = 24.0, n = 122; see Fig. 7). We found statistically significant differences only between site 2 and site 3 (P = 0.049).

Fig. 7
figure 7

L4 head capsule width [µm] of Diamesa cinerella (left) and Diamesa steinboecki (right) at the three sites throughout the sampling period

Based on the spatio-temporal distribution of larval stages during the sampling period (Figs. 5, 6), two patterns of larval growth are possible. The first is a slow larval growth, where the larvae need the complete sampling period to finish their development as L4 larvae. A significant sampling site effect on the larval length (P < 0.000) and larval volume (P < 0.000) of D. cinerella was evident. L4 larvae of this species proved to be longest and bulkiest at site 1, close to the glacier, followed by site 2 and site 3 (Fig. 8a, b; for mean values see Supplementary Table 3, individual numbers are given in Supplementary Table 7). On the first sampling trip, no L4 D. steinboecki were present at site 3. At the third sampling, no L4 larvae were in the samples from site 1 and site 3. There was no significant sampling site effect on the slow larval growth of D. steinboecki. However, L4 larvae of D. steinboecki from site 1 and site 2 had the trend to be longer and bulkier than larvae from site 3 (Fig. 9a, b; for mean values see Supplementary Table 4, individual numbers are given in Supplementary Table 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Slow development of Diamesa cinerella on the left: means of larval length (a) and larval volume (b) with growth rates (site 1: solid black line, site 2: solid grey line, site 3: dashed black line). Fast development of Diamesa cinerella on the right: means of L2 (sampling 1), L3 (sampling 2) and L4 (sampling 3–6) of larval length (c) and larval volume (d) with growth rates (site 1: solid black line, site 2: solid grey line, site 3: dashed black line)

Fig. 9
figure 9

Slow development of Diamesa steinboecki on the left: means of larval length (a) and larval volume (b) with growth rates (site 1: solid black line, site 2: solid grey line, site 3: dashed black line). Fast development of Diamesa steinboecki on the right: means of L2 (sampling 1), L3 (sampling 2) and L4 (sampling 3–6) of larval length (c) and larval volume (d) with growth rates (site 1: solid black line, site 2: solid grey line, site 3: dashed black line)

Another potential growth pattern is a quick development of the larvae from L2 on the first field trip, to L3 on the second expedition, and L4 larvae from the third sampling onwards. There was a significant sampling site effect on the fast development of D. cinerella larvae regarding larval volume (P = 0.013). There was, however, no significant sampling site effect on the larval length. L2 larvae hardly differ in length and volume, whereas L3 and L4 larval length and volume decreased with increasing distance from the glacier (Fig. 8c, d; for means see Supplementary Table 5, individual numbers are given in Supplementary Table 7). At site 1, no L2 D. steinboecki were present on the first sampling date. L4 larvae were missing at site 1 during the third and fourth sampling. At site 3, no L3 larvae were in the samples of August 19 and no L4 larvae were present at August 26. There was no significant sampling site effect on larval length and volume of D. steinboecki for the fast larval development. L2 larval lengths and volumes are quite similar at all three sites (Fig. 9c, d; for means, see Supplementary Table 6; individual numbers are given in Supplementary Table 8). L3 and L4 larvae from sites 1 and 2 are longer and bulkier than larvae from site 3 (Fig. 9c, d; for means, see Supplementary Table 6; individual numbers are given in Supplementary Table 8).

Growth rates

Growth rates of the two observed species varied considerably between the sites (Table 2 and Figs. 8, 9). Concerning the slow development, differences in larval size became more distinct throughout the growing season. Growth rates of Diamesa cinerella were lowest at site 3. Larvae from site 1 had lower growth rates compared to site 2, as L4 larvae from the uppermost sampling site were longer and bulkier at the first sampling date compared to larvae from site 2. For the fast development scenario, growth rates were again lowest at site 3. For larval volume, rates at site 1 were the highest. Larvae from site 2 showed the highest gain in length. Growth rates of Diamesa steinboecki from site 2 were highest, followed by site 1 and 3. This trend was found for larval length and volume at both development scenarios. For the fast development, growth rates for D. cinerella at site 3 and D. steinboecki at site 1 need to be discussed with care, as L2 larvae at the first sampling date are missing, leading to an underestimation of the growth rates.

Table 2 Growth rates of Diamesa cinerella and Diamesa steinboecki for slow and fast developments, displaying the gains of larval length (Glength) and larval volume (Gvolume) per day

Discussion

Our study supports that although glacial headwaters are harsh environments, they can be highly productive for some invertebrate species. Water temperature and benthic organic matter (representing the nutrition for benthic invertebrates), obviously two of the most important drivers on larval growth and development, were assumed to increase with increasing distance from the glacier. This was found for water temperature with a significant increase within roughly 100 metres of flow, equivalent to Uehlinger et al. (2003), who calculated a temperature rise of 0.005°C per metre flow length in a Swiss alpine glacial stream. Along with higher water temperatures, an enhanced content of benthic organic matter would have been obvious. Our results, however, showed the opposite. Accountable for the high amount of benthic organic matter at site 1 and partially at site 2 is Hydrurus foetidus, a Chrysophyceae, mainly colonizing glacially influenced headwaters (e.g., Robinson et al., 2015). The increase of periphyton biomass at site 2 and site 3 in September and October matches the findings of Uehlinger et al. (2010) where the authors predict an increase in algal biomass in autumn/winter due to the lowered air temperatures accompanied with less glacier melting. The high amounts of periphyton biomass at site 1 throughout the sampling period do not follow the known patterns. Total quantity of benthic organic matter at the three sites is, compared to the findings of Robinson et al. (2001), relatively low.

Hydrurus foetidus is both an important nutrient source (e.g., Niedrist & Füreder, 2017) and habitat for chironomid species (Knownacka & Knownacki, 1972). In the present study, periphyton biomass had no significant effect on the distribution of Diamesa larvae. This is in agreement with Robinson et al. (2001) and Uehlinger et al. (2010) who did not detect a correlation of food availability with the occurrence of high alpine benthic species, which is in contrast with Brennan et al. (1977). Our findings suggest that the distribution of chironomid larvae in highly glaciated alpine streams seems to be random and not primarily depending on the small-scale living conditions in the stream.

Food availability and not temperature limits larval growth

Larval development did not differ significantly between sampling sites, although site 1 was still covered by the glacier in autumn 2014 and got ice-free during spring/summer 2015, only some months before initial sampling. Due to the high proportion of L4 larvae as well as the presence of pupae towards October, Diamesa cinerella and Diamesa steinboecki are obviously able to finish their aquatic life stages within 1 year and are at least univoltine. Presence of L1 and L2 larvae at the last two sampling dates indicate a summer generation of adult insects who mated and were capable of laying eggs during August/early September, implicating the possibility of a bivoltine life cycle.

Despite the very low water temperatures, both development scenarios are reasonable. Nolte & Hoffmann (1992) published a fast life cycle of Diamesa incallida (39–43 days) at relatively low water temperatures (about 8°C). Hannesdottir et al. (2012) report on bivoltine life cycles of two Eukiefferiella (Diptera, Chironomidae) species at the same temperature range. In temperate regions, chironomids show rapid development patterns (about 15 days) at their environmental optima (Danks, 2006). Highly adapted species from extreme habitats (e.g., temporary waterbodies) especially can follow fast development strategies (Danks, 2006). Among others, Niedrist & Füreder (2016) show the cold hardiness of Diamesa species allowing for a successful colonization of the uppermost stream reaches of highly glaciated rivers (see also Milner & Petts, 1994; Marziali & Rossaro, 2013). The harsh abiotic conditions of kryal headwaters hit the environmental optima of highly cold adapted Diamesinae and favour their existences. Therefore, univoltinism or even bivoltinism is feasible, although previously undocumented at such low water temperatures. As our samples are snapshots of the life cycles, further investigations following the larval development in these high alpine headwaters, especially during the winter season, are crucial.

Our larvae reached comparable or bigger sizes as previously published. Rossaro & Lencioni (2015a) state a mean body length of L4 Diamesa cinerella of about 11.2 mm which is reached by our larvae at site 1 (mean of 11.06 mm) and site 2 (mean of 11.03 mm). Larvae from site 3 were noticeably smaller (mean of 8.38 mm). Diamesa steinboecki larvae from our samples were, however, considerably longer than published by Rossaro & Lencioni (2015a). D. steinboecki reached mean lengths of 10.54 mm (site 1), 10.17 mm (site 2) and 8.64 mm (site 3), compared to mean body lengths of about 5.1 mm measured by Rossaro & Lencioni (2015a).

The decrease of L4 head capsule size, larval length and volume (statistically significant for D. cinerella) within about 100 metres of flow, despite increasing distance from the glacier and increasing temperature was unexpected and is contrary to previously published studies. Huryn & Wallace (1986) studied the development of chironomid larvae at 2.3°C and did not register any growth of the chironomid species, but recorded weight loss as the observed larvae stopped feeding. In many laboratory experiments, increased water temperature, compared with the control conditions, positively influenced the larval growth of mayflies, stoneflies or caddisflies leading to the increased larval sizes and/or faster larval development due to an accelerated metabolism (e.g., Brittain, 1983; Corkum & Hanes, 1991; Frouz et al., 2002; Wagner, 2005). This relation was also observed for chironomids (Konstantinov, 1958; Nebecker, 1973; Nolte & Hofmann, 1992; Reynolds & Benke, 2005; Walther et al., 2006; Bouchard & Ferrington, 2009). Some authors studied the influence of food availability or food quality on the growth and size of chironomid larvae but found the water temperature to be the limiting factor (Bouchard & Ferrington, 2009; Hannesdottir et al., 2012). However, there are studies underlining the importance of nutrient availability or food quality on the benthic larval size and growth (Oliver, 1971; Mackey, 1977; Menzie, 1981; Davis et al., 2010). Tronstad et al. (2010) report on growth rates of chironomid larvae in natural streams and their dependency on the available nutrients. Stanko-Mishic et al. (1999) show the significance of habitat quality accompanying with nutrient availability and particle size for chironomid larval growth. Thereby the usability of the benthic organic matter was even more important than the total amount of organic material for the benthic invertebrates. As food availability is the only reasonable explanation for the found size patterns in the highly glaciated stream sites, our results attribute nutrients a great importance for benthic larval size in alpine headwaters.

Hydrurus foetidus proved to be a suitable habitat and food source for (high alpine) benthic insects (Knownacka & Knownacki, 1971). We showed that the Crysophyceae acts like a fertilizer in the desert like environment of highly glaciated headwaters on chironomid larval size. Especially Diamesa cinerella larvae seem to benefit from the presence of the algal mats. This is particularly apparent at the slow development pattern; the initially bigger larvae at site 1 can only be explained by the high availability of benthic organic matter throughout the sampling. As the food availability at site 2 increased throughout the observed period, larval length and volume is increasing, too, resulting in very high growth rates. At the end of our sampling period, L4 larvae from site 2 caught up in length and volume compared to larvae of site 1. Larvae from site 3, on the other hand, did not experience such a growth spurt, as nutrient availability was on a significantly lower level throughout the sampling, compared to the other two sites. D. steinboecki seems to be more robust towards low nutrient concentrations. However, with ongoing time, larvae at the two uppermost sites grew bigger also resulting in higher larval sizes closer to the glacier. Our results go along with Niedrist (2017) who show that Diamesa larval size is generally increasing with increasing environmental harshness. Bigger larvae are obviously fitter and better able to resist the harsh living conditions of highly glaciated, alpine streams.

Conclusion

This is the first study investigating narrow spatial and temporal patterns on species composition, growth and development in a kryal headwater. The considerable differences in size and volume of the chironomid larvae within only 100 m of flow were unexpected. However, the observed larval size patterns show the efficiency of alpine chironomid species. Despite the very low water temperatures coinciding with a presumed slow metabolism, the Diamesa larvae can benefit from enhanced food availability, expressed by significantly increased growth. Furthermore, this is the first report of a univoltine life cycle in a highly glaciated aquatic ecosystem. Our findings are supported by Niedrist & Füreder (2017) who also found Hydrurus foetidus to be an important nutrient source for Diamesa larvae in several glaciated streams. Therefore, the unexpected increases of larval length and volume towards the glacier in our study, despite the significantly colder water temperatures, can reasonably be explained by the presence of Hydrurus foetidus. Food availability and not water temperature seems to be the limiting factor for larval size in this harsh freshwater ecosystem. As the observed algal blooms were the highest at site 1, stream stretches directly located at the glacier snouts can be more productive than previously assumed.

Due to the relatively short sampling period, the results depict an important snapshot of larval development and growth from one stream. Unfortunately, an alternative laboratory experiment, additionally testing the influence of various abiotic drivers on the larval growth of the two investigated Diamesa species is, due to the extreme conditions, not feasible. A simulation of the harsh environmental conditions with water temperatures close to 0°C, high turbidity and low channel stability due to strongly fluctuating discharges, for several weeks, is impossible. Therefore, larval growth and development in these aquatic ecosystems can only be followed by regular sampling. With our sampling effort, we were able to conclude on a remarkable larval growth and development in an extreme environment. Niedrist (2017) report a similar, general trend of larger chironomid larvae with the increasing environmental harshness, confirming our findings.

Consequently, the harsh environmental conditions of high alpine, kryal streams may exclude many taxa but favour the occurrence of highly adapted chironomid species. When their essential needs are guaranteed (nutrient availability and quality), these species can reach unexpectedly large larval sizes, resulting in an amplified storage of mainly autochthonous organic matter in the ecosystem, enriching the stream food chain at the initial links.