Abstract
An experimental factorial approach, in terms of habitat use and movements by Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar), was studied in response to induced peaking flow in a bypass river section in southern Norway. Sixteen radio-tagged salmon parr (mean TL 12.9 ± 0.8 cm) were tracked during a 7-day spring period with manipulations of flow. Total habitat availability was modeled and integrated with fish locations. Parr movements exhibited a wide individual variation in movement behavior with a subsequent large home range which indicated nonrandom patterns involving three types of behavioral response groups: I parr that did not move during experiments; II parr that used a defined area in the stream moving in all directions; and III parr that moved, i.e., traveled longer distances. Movement distances were strongly skewed towards many short (i.e., I and II) and few but long movements mainly on downstream direction (i.e., III). However, flow alterations clearly affected salmon parr movements, which were also significantly related with alterations of discharge and diel variations. As may be expected, parr movements were also positively related to habitat shifts. In conclusion, flow alterations and reduced light may increase Atlantic salmon parr movements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, J. D., V. A. Braithwaite & M. Fox, 1998. The response of wild atlantic Salmon Parr to reductions in water flow. Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 292–297.
Armstrong, J. D., P. S. Kemp, G. J. A. Kennedy, M. Ladle & N. J. Milner, 2003. Habitat requirements of Atlantic Salmon and Brown Trout in rivers and streams. Fisheries Research 62: 143–170.
Bachman, R. A., 1984. Foraging behavior of free-ranging wild and hatchery Brown Trout in a stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113: 1–32.
Bell, E., W. G. Duffy & T. D. Roeloft, 2001. Fidelity and survival of Juvenile Coho Salmon in response to a flood. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130: 450–458.
Berland, G., T. Nickelsen, J. Heggenes, F. Kland, E. B. Thorstad & J. H. Halleraker, 2004. Movements of wild Atlantic Salmon Parr in relation to peaking flows below a hydropower station. River Research and Applications 20: 957–966.
Boavida, I., J. M. Santos, T. Ferreira & A. Pinheiro, 2015. Barbel habitat alterations due to hydropeaking. Journal of Hydro-environment Research 9(2): 237–247.
Bruno, M. C. & A. Siviglia, 2012. Assessing impacts of Dam operations – interdisciplinary approaches for sustainable regulated river management. River Research and Applications 28: 675–677.
Bruno, M. C., B. Maiolini, M. Carolli & L. Silveri, 2010. Short time-scale impacts of hydropeaking on benthic invertebrates in an Alpine Stream (Trentino, Italy). Limnologica 40: 281–290.
Carolli, M., M. C. Bruno, A. Siviglia & B. Maiolini, 2012. Responses of Benthic invertebrates to abrupt changes of temperature in flume simulations. River Research and Applications 28: 678–691.
Chun, S. N., S. A. Cocherell, D. E. Cocherell, J. B. Miranda, G. J. Jones, J. Graham, A. P. Klimley, L. C. Thompson & J. J. Cech, 2010. Displacement, velocity preference, and substrate use of three native California Stream fishes in simulated pulsed flows. Environmental Biology of Fishes 90: 43–52.
Crowder, D. W. & P. Diplas, 2000. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance. Journal of Hydrology 230: 172–191.
Dunbar, M. J., K. Alfredsen & A. Harby, 2012. Hydraulic-habitat modelling for setting environmental river flow needs for salmonids. Fisheries Management and Ecology 19: 500–517.
Fausch, K. D., 1984. Profitable stream positions for salmonids: relating specific growth rate to net energy gain. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 441–451.
Flodmark, L. E. W., T. Forseth, J. H. L’Abée-Lund & L. A. Vollestad, 2006. Behaviour and growth of Juvenile Brown Trout exposed to fluctuating flow. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 15: 57–65.
Fraser, N. H. C., N. B. Metcalfe & J. E. Thorpe, 1993. Temperature-dependent switch between Diurnal and nocturnal foraging in Salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 252: 135–139.
Fulton, T.W., 1904. The rate of growth of fishes. 22nd Annual Report of the Fishery Board of Scotland 3: 141–241.
Ghanem, A., P. Steffler & F. Hicks, 1996. Two dimensional hydraulic simulation of physical habitat conditions in flowing streams. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12: 185–200.
Gorman, O. T. & J. R. Karr, 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507–515.
Harby, A. & K. Alfredson, 1999. Fish habitat simulation models and integrated assessment tools. In International Workshop on Sustainable Riverine Fish Habitat, April 21–24. Victoria, B.C., Canada
Heggenes, J., 1988. Effects of short-term flow fluctuations on displacement of, and habitat use by, Brown Trout in a small stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 117: 336–344.
Heggenes, J., 1990. Habitat Utilization and Preferences in Juvenile Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) in Streams. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 5: 341–354.
Heggenes, J., G. Bremset & Å. Brabrand, 2013. Visiting the hyporheic zone: young Atlantic salmon move through the substratum. Freshwater Biology 58: 1720–1728.
Herbinger, C. M. & G. W. Friars, 2008. Correlation between condition factor and total lipid content in Atlantic Salmon, Salmo salar L., Parr. Aquaculture Research 22: 527–529.
Hesthagen, T., 1990. Home range of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon, Salmo salar, and Brown Trout, Salmo trutta, in a Norwegian stream. Freshwater Biology 24: 63–67.
Irvine, R. L., J. L. Thorley, R. Westcott, D. Schmidt & D. DeRosa, 2014. Why do fish strand? An analysis of ten years of flow reduction monitoring data from the Columbia and Kootenay Rivers, Canada. River Research and Applications 31: 1242–1250.
Irvine, J. R., 1986. Effects of varying discharge on the downstream movement of Salmon Fry, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Walbaum. Journal of Fish Biology 28: 17–28.
Jones, N. E., 2014. The Dual nature of hydropeaking rivers: is ecopeaking possible? River Research and Applications 30: 521–526.
Korman, J. & S. E. Campana, 2009. Effects of hydropeaking on nearshore habitat use and growth of age-0 rainbow trout in a large regulated river. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138(1): 76–87.
Lagarrigue, T., R. Céréghino, P. Lim & P. Reyes-Marchant, 2002. Diel and seasonal variations in Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) feeding patterns and relationship with invertebrate drift under natural and hydropeaking conditions in a Mountain stream. Aquatic Living Resources 15: 129–137.
Liebig, H., R. Cereghino, P. Lim, A. Belaud & S. Lek, 1999. Impact of hydropeaking on the abundance of Juvenile Brown Trout in a Pyrenean Stream. Archiv Für Hydrobiologie 144: 439–454.
Nagrodski, A., G. D. Raby, C. T. Hasler, M. K. Taylor & S. J. Cooke, 2012. Fish stranding in freshwater systems: sources, consequences, and mitigation. Journal of Environmental Management 103: 133–141.
Nislow, K. H., C. L. Folt & D. L. Parrish, 1999. Favorable foraging locations for Young Atlantic Salmon: application to habitat and population restoration. Ecological Applications 9: 1085–1099.
Poff, N. L., 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47: 769–784.
Power, M. E., W. E. Dietrich & J. C. Finlay, 1996. Dams and downstream aquatic biodiversity: potential food web consequences of hydrologic and geomorphic change. Environmental Management 20(6): 887–895.
Puffer, M., O. Berg, A. Huusko, T. Vehanen, T. Forseth & S. Einum, 2015. Seasonal effects of hydropeaking on growth, energetics and movement of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). River Research and Applications 31: 1101–1108.
Ribi, J. M., J. L. Boillat, A. Peter & A. J. Schleiss, 2014. Attractiveness of a lateral shelter in a channel as a refuge for juvenile brown trout during hydropeaking. Aquatic Science 76: 527–541.
Robertson, M. J., C. J. Pennell, D. A. Scruton, G. J. Robertson & J. A. Brown, 2004. Effect of increased flow on the behaviour of Atlantic Salmon Parr in Winter. Journal of Fish Biology 65: 1070–1079.
Saltveit, S. J., J. H. Halleraker, J. V. Arnekleiv & A. Harby, 2001. Field experiments on stranding in Juvenile Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) and Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) during rapid flow decreases caused by hydropeaking. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 17: 609–622.
Scruton, D. A., L. M. N. Ollerhead, K. D. Clarke, C. J. Pennell, K. Alfredsen, A. Harby & D. Kelley, 2003. The behavioural response of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) and Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) to experimental hydropeaking on a Newfoundland (Canada) River. River Research and Applications 19: 577–587.
Scruton, D. A., C. J. Pennell, L. M. N. Ollerhead, K. Alfredsen, M. Stickler, A. Harby, M. J. Robertson, K. D. Clarke & L. J. LeDrew, 2008. A synopsis of ‘hydropeaking’ studies on the response of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon to experimental flow alteration. Hydrobiologia 609: 263–275.
Scruton, D. A., C. J. Pennell, M. J. Robertson, L. M. N. Ollerhead, K. D. Clarke, K. Alfredsen, A. Harby & R. S. McKinley, 2005. Seasonal response of Juvenile Atlantic Salmon to experimental hydropeaking power generation in Newfoundland, Canada. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25: 964–974.
Steffler, P., 2000. Software River2D. Two Dimensional Depth Averaged Finite Element Hydrodynamic Model. University of Alberta, Alberta.
Stickler, M., K. Alfredsen, D. A. Scruton, C. Pennell, A. Harby & F. Økland, 2007. Mid-winter activity and movement of Atlantic Salmon Parr during ice formation events in a Norwegian regulated river. Hydrobiologia 582: 81–89.
Thompson, L. C., S. A. Cocherell, S. N. Chun, J. J. Cech & A. P. Klimley, 2011. Longitudinal movement of fish in response to a single-day flow pulse. Environmental Biology of Fishes 90: 253–261.
Vehanen, T., A. Huusko & T. Yrja, 2003. Habitat preference by Grayling (Thymallus thymallus) in an artificially modified, hydropeaking riverbed: a contribution to understand the effectiveness of habitat enhancement measures. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 19: 15–20.
Venables, W. N. & D. M. Smith, 2012. An Introduction to R: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics, Vol. 3. Network Theory Ltd.
Vokoun, J. C., 2003. Kernel Density estimates of linear home ranges for stream fishes: advantages and data requirements. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23: 1020–1029.
Young, P. S., J. J. Cech & L. C. Thompson, 2011. Hydropower-related pulsed-flow impacts on stream fishes: a brief review, conceptual model, knowledge gaps, and research needs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 21(4): 713–731.
Zeiringer, B., B. Zeiringer, N. Fohler, S. Auer, F. Greimel & S. Schmutz, 2014. Experiments on drifting and stranding of juvenile grayling during fluctuating flow in nature-like channels with different morphological structures. 10th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics 2014, Trondheim, Norway.
Acknowledgments
A sincere thanks to MSc students Torben Ott and Eduard Stephenson from University of Stuttgart, Germany, and Curtis Pennell from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, St. John’s, Canada for extensive field work conducted around the clock. Ana Adeva Bustos, PhD student at NTNU, Trondheim, helped in establishing the GIS analysis. This study would not have been possible without the support and practical assistance by Svein Haugland at Agder Energi, Norway. The data collection and initial analysis were performed under the “EFFEKT-project”, The Research Council of Norway Grant no. 117776. Further analysis and writing of this paper were performed with funding from the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (SFRH/BPD/90832/2012) and The Research Council of Norway Grant No. 193818. Thanks are also due to an anonymous reviewer and Ole Kristian Berg for valuable suggestions regarding the manuscript revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: M. Power
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boavida, I., Harby, A., Clarke, K.D. et al. Move or stay: habitat use and movements by Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar) during induced rapid flow variations. Hydrobiologia 785, 261–275 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2931-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2931-3