Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dispersal limitations on fish community recovery following long-term water quality remediation

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In-stream barriers may impose constraints on the ecological effectiveness of restoration strategies by limiting colonization. We assessed the importance of dispersal limitations to fish community recovery following long-term pollution abatement, water quality remediation, and species introductions within the White Oak Creek watershed near Oak Ridge, Tennessee (USA). Long-term (26 years) responses in fish species richness, biomass, and community composition to water quality remediation were evaluated in light of physical barriers (culverts and weirs). We found that barriers to dispersal were potentially limiting fish community recovery by preventing colonization by introduced species and seasonal migrants. Changes in richness were negatively related to barrier index, a measure of the degree of isolation by barriers. Following introductions, upstream passage for six fish species above non-passable barriers was not observed. Highly isolated sites were dominated by a few equilibrium species, whereas less isolated sites showed more variation in life history strategies with increasing periodic and opportunistic strategists. The importance of barriers on community dynamics decreased over time—an indication of increasing community stability, homogenization of fauna, and improved water quality. However, isolating the role of dispersal limitation was complicated by multiple interacting stressors, such as the compounding effects of barriers and pervasive water quality conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese, B., P. L. Angermeier & J. T. Peterson, 2009. Does mobility explain variation in colonisation and population recovery among stream fishes? Freshwater Biology 54: 1444–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, S. Walker, R. H. B. Christensen, H. Singmann & B. Dai, 2015. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. CRAN R package. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html. Accessed 17 March 2015.

  • Bednarek, A. T. & D. D. Hart, 2005. Modifying dam operations to restore rivers: ecological responses to Tennessee River dam mitigation. Ecological Applications 15: 997–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisner, B. E., D. T. Haydon & K. Cuddington, 2003. Alternate stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 376–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcard, D. & P. Legendre, 2002. All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecological Modelling 153: 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brederveld, R. J., S. C. Jähnig, A. W. Lorenz, S. Brunzel & M. B. Soons, 2011. Dispersal as a limiting factor in the colonization of restored mountain streams by plants and macroinvertebrates. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 1241–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brudvig, L. A., C. M. Mabry & L. M. Mott, 2010. Dispersal, not understory light competition, limits restoration of Iowa woodland understory herbs. Restoration Ecology 19: 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carle, F. L. & M. R. Strub, 1978. A new method for estimating population size from removal data. Biometrics 34: 621–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, D., D. G. Kehler, C. Bourne & Y. F. Wiersma, 2009. A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks. Landscape Ecology 24: 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. D., M. K. Oli, M. C. Wooten, T. H. Eason, J. W. McCown & D. Paetkau, 2006. Effectiveness of a regional corridor in connecting two Florida black bear populations. Conservation Biology 20: 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etnier, D. A. & W. C. Starnes, 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erős, T., P. Takács, I. Czeglédi, P. Sály & A. Specziár, 2015. Taxonomic and trait based recolonization dynamics of a riverine fish assemblage following a large scale human induced disturbance: the red mud disaster in Hungary. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-015-2262-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, C., J. W. Moore, J. D. Reynolds & M. P. Beakes, 2014. Potential loss and rehabilitation of stream longitudinal connectivity: fish populations in urban streams with culverts. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 71: 1805–1816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficke, A. D., C. A. Myrick & N. Jud, 2011. The swimming and jumping ability of three small great plains fishes: implications for fishway design. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140: 1521–1531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. J., P. V. Debes, L. Bernatchez & J. A. Hutchings, 2014. Population size, habitat fragmentation, and the nature of adaptive variation in a stream fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281: 20140370. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0370.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goslee, S. & D. Urban, 2015. ecodist: Dissimilarity-based functions for ecological analysis. CRAN R package. http://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/ecodist/index.html. Accessed 17 March 2015.

  • Han, M., M. Fukushima, S. Kameyama, T. Fukushima & B. Matsushita, 2008. How do dams affect freshwater fish distributions in Japan? Statistical analysis of native and nonnative species with various life histories. Ecological Research 23: 735–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. R., 1994. The effects of habitat fragmentation on Midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecological Applications 4: 461–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, N. P. & P. L. Angermeier, 2011. Fish community and bioassessment responses to stream network position. Journal of the North American Benthological Soceity 30: 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, N. P., S. Eyler & J. E. B. Wofford, 2012. Dam removal increases American eel abundance in distant headwater streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141: 1171–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. A., 1993. Stopping rules in principal components-analysis–a comparison of heuristic and statistical approaches. Ecology 74: 2204–2214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, D., M. J. Van Strien & R. Holderegger, 2012. Do landscape barriers affect functional connectivity of populations of an endangered damselfly? Freshwater Biology 57: 1373–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiffney, P. M., G. R. Pess, J. H. Anderson, P. Faulds, K. Burton & S. C. Riley, 2009. Changes in fish communities following recolonization of the Cedar River, WA, by Pacific salmon after 103 years of local extirpation. River Research and Applications 25: 438–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocovsky, P. M., R. M. Ross, D. S. Dropkin & J. M. Campbell, 2008. Linking landscapes and habitat suitability scores for diadromous fish restoration in the Susquehanna River Basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 906–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz, L. A. 1954. An ecological survey of White Oak Creek, 1950–1953. ORO‐587. Vol 1. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, Division of Technical Information, Oak Ridge.

  • Kubach, K. M., M. C. Scott & J. S. Bulak, 2011. Recovery of a temperate riverine fish assemblage from a major diesel oil spill. Freshwater Biology 56: 503–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, M. J., W. F. Fagan, C. S. ReVelle & W. L. Graf, 2005. A multiobjective optimization model for dam removal: an example trading off salmon passage with hydropower and water storage in the Willamette basin. Advances in Water Resources 28: 845–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori, F., D. Palm, E. Brannas & B. Malmqvist, 2005. Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecological Applications 15: 2060–2071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlum, S., D. Cote, Y. F. Wiersma, D. Kehler & K. D. Clarke, 2014a. Evaluating the barrier assessment technique derived from FishXing software and the upstream movement of brook trout through road culverts. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 143: 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlum, S., D. Kehler, D. Cote, Y. F. Wiersma & L. Stanfield, 2014b. Assessing the biological relevance of aquatic connectivity to stream fish communities. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 71: 1852–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J. M. & K. Ewing, 2001. Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restoration Ecology 9: 280–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManamay, R. A. & E. A. Frimpong, 2015. Hydrologic filtering of fish life history strategies across the United States: implications for stream flow alteration. Ecological Applications 25: 243–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McManamay, R. A., D. J. Orth, C. A. Dolloff & D. M. Matthews, 2013. Case study: application of the ELOHA framework to regulated rivers in the Upper Tennessee River basin. Environ Management 51: 1210–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meixler, M. S., M. B. Bain & M. T. Walter, 2009. Predicting barrier passage and habitat suitability for migratory fish species. Ecological Modeling 220: 2782–2791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R. & R. J. Hobbs, 2007. Habitat restoration: do we know what we’re doing? Restoration Ecology 15: 382–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mims, M. C., J. D. Olden, Z. R. Shattuck & N. L. Poff, 2010. Life history trait diversity of native freshwater fishes in North America. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 19: 390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, T. J., D. A. Woolnough, D. L. Strayer Teresa J. Newton, Daelyn A. Woolnough & David L. Strayer, 2008. Using landscape ecology to understand and manage freshwater mussel populations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 424–439.

  • Oksanen, J., F. G.Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens & H. Wagner, 2011, vegan: Community Ecology Package. CRAN R package. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html. Accessed 17 March 2015.

  • Pépino, M., M. A. Rodríguez & P. Magnan, 2012. Fish dispersal in fragmented landscapes: a modeling framework for quantifying the permeability of structural barriers. Ecological Applications 22: 1435–1445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkin, J. S. & K. B. Gido, 2012. Fragmentation alters stream fish community structure in dendritic ecological networks. Ecological Applications 22: 2176–2187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkin, J. S., K. B. Gido, A. R. Cooper, T. F. Turner, M. J. Osborne, E. R. Johnson & K. B. Mayes, 2015. Fragmentation and dewatering transform great plains stream fish communities. Ecological Monographs 85: 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. J., 2011. Introduction to the biological monitoring and abatement program. Environmental Management 47: 1005–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Railsback, S.F., B. D. Holcomb & M. G. Ryon, 1989. A computer program for estimating fish population sizes and annual production rates. ORNL/TM-11061. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge: p 62.

  • Roni, P., K. Hanson & T. Beechie, 2008. Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 856–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryon, M. G., 2011. Recovery of fish communities in a warm water stream following pollution abatement. Environmental Management 47: 1096–1111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryon, M. G. & J. M. Loar, 1988. Checklist of fishes on the department of energy Oak Ridge reservation. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Sciences 63: 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrott, G. R., K. A. With & A. W. King, 2005. Demographic limitations of the ability of habitat restoration to rescue declining populations. Conservation Biology 19: 1181–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, C. B. & J. M. Loar, 1987 Environmental data for the WHITE Oak Creek/White Oak Lake Watershed. ORNL/TM-10062. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge, TN.

  • Skalski, G. T., J. B. Landis, M. J. Grose & S. P. Hudman, 2008. Genetic structure of Creek Chub, a headwater minnow, in an impounded river system. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137: 962–975.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. G., C. C. Brandt & S. W. Christensen, 2011. Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness. Environmental Management 47: 1077–1095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, G. R., M. J. Peterson, W. K. Roy & T. J. Mathews, 2011. Monitoring fish contaminant responses to abatement actions: factors that affect recovery. Environmental Management 47: 1064–1076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sudduth, E. B., J. L. Meyer & E. S. Bernhardt, 2007. Stream restoration practices in the Southeastern United States. Restoration Ecology 15: 573–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templ, M., K. Hron & P. Filzmoser. 2015. Cran R Package ‘robCompositions’. Robust Estimation for Compositional Data. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/robCompositions/index.html. Accessed 26 September 2015.

  • UCOR (URS | CH2 M Oak Ridge LLC). 2011. 2011 Cleanup Progress: Annual report to the Oak Ridge Community. Department of Energy Report DOE/ORO/2399: p 56. http://www.ucor.com/_docs/CleanProg2011.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2015.

  • Warren, M. L. & M. G. Pardew, 1998. Road crossings as barriers to small-stream fish movement. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127: 637–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winemiller, K. O., 2005. Life history strategies, population regulation, and implications for fisheries management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 872–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winemiller, K. O. & K. A. Rose, 1992. Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: implication for population regulation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 2196–2218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, T. A., S. K. Brewer, T. B. Grabowski & J. Mueller, 2014. Backcasting the decline of a vulnerable Great Plains reproductive ecotype: identifying threats and conservation priorities. Global Change Biology 20: 89–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the ORNL Environmental Protection Services Division’s Water Quality Programs. This paper has been authored by employees of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. Accordingly, the United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for the United States Government’s purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan). Special thanks to John Smith and two anonymous reviewers for providing comments and editorial suggestions that improved this manuscript. We are also grateful to Diedre Tharpe for providing access to surface water monitoring data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan A. McManamay.

Additional information

Handling editor: Alison King

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 249 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 220 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (PDF 129 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (PDF 285 kb)

10750_2015_2612_MOESM5_ESM.tif

Appendix 1. Species occurrence per site. Open circles represent non-detection, half-filled circles represent sites where species were detected <50% of the time, and filled circles represent sites where species were detected >50% of the time. Goldfish (Carassius auratus auratus) and three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) were detected rarely in low numbers; thus, were excluded. (TIFF 1351 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McManamay, R.A., Jett, R.T., Ryon, M.G. et al. Dispersal limitations on fish community recovery following long-term water quality remediation. Hydrobiologia 771, 45–65 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2612-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2612-7

Keywords

Navigation