Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the Estimates of the Monitoring Stations Coordinates of the Zagorsk PSPP-2, Obtained as a Result of Processing GNSS Measurements by the Double Differences Method and the PPP Method

  • Published:
Power Technology and Engineering Aims and scope

The article compares the coordinates of the satellite monitoring stations of the Zagorsk PSPP-2 obtained by the double differences method and the PPP method when processing the same measurements with a duration of at least 5 h. It has been established that the discrepancies in the coordinates in the northern and eastern directions are characterized by an RMS of 2 mm, and in the vertical direction—by an RMS of 7 mm. Proposals for the development of a new standard that allows using the PPP method in monitoring networks for hydraulic structures have been made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. A. Behr, K.W. Hudnut, and N. E. King, “Monitoring structural deformation at Pacoima dam, California using continuous GPS,” Proc. ION GPS, 59 – 68 (1998).

  2. V. V. Kalinnikov, A. V. Ustinov, and R. V. Zagretdinov, “Results of experimental studies on the use of PPP technology for global navigation satellite systems of monitoring of Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP,” Power Technol. Eng., 54(2), 167 – 171 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. STO 17330282.27.140.004–2008. Monitoring and Measuring Systems and Equipment of GTS. Creation Conditions. Regulations and Requirements [in Russian], RAO ES Rossii, Moscow (2008).

  4. STO 70238424.27.140.035–2009. Hydroelectric Power Plants. Monitoring and Assessment of the Technical Condition of Hydraulic Structures [in Russian], NP INVEL, Moscow (2009).

  5. G. Xu, GPS. Theory, Algorithms and Applications, Springer (2007).

  6. J. F. Zumberge, M. B. Heflin, D. C. Jefferson, M. M. Watkins, and F. H. Webb, “Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data for large networks,” J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 102(B3), 5005 – 5017 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Dawidowicz and G. Krzan, “Coordinate estimation accuracy of static precise point positioning using on-line PPP service, a case study,” Acta Geod. Geophys., 49(1), 37 – 55 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. I. El-Mewafi, A. A. Awad, A. E. A. Yassien, “Comparative study between Precise Point Positioning (PPP) versus relative positioning,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 6(2) (2018).

  9. V. V. Kalinnikov and O. G. Khutorova, “Diurnal variations in integrated water vapor derived from a GPS ground network in the Volga-Ural region of Russia,” Ann. Geophys., 35(3), 453 – 464 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Angrisano, G. Dardanelli, et al., “Performance assessment of PPP surveys with open source software using the GNSS GPS – GLONASS – Galileo constellations,” Appl. Sci., 10(16), 5420 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P 83–2001. Recommendations for Data Analysis and Field Observations of Settlements and Horizontal Displacements of Concrete Dams [in Russian], OAO VNIIG im. B. E. Vedeneeva, St. Petersburg (2001).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia

    V. V. Kalinnikov

  2. Institute Hydroproject JSC, Moscow, Russia

    V. V. Kalinnikov & A. V. Ustinov

Authors
  1. V. V. Kalinnikov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. V. Ustinov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Kalinnikov.

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel’svo, No. 10, October 2021, pp. 22 – 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34831/EP.2021.36.32.004

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalinnikov, V.V., Ustinov, A.V. Comparison of the Estimates of the Monitoring Stations Coordinates of the Zagorsk PSPP-2, Obtained as a Result of Processing GNSS Measurements by the Double Differences Method and the PPP Method. Power Technol Eng 55, 855–858 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-022-01443-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-022-01443-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation