The main objective of constructing artificial reefs is to improve the environment, increase the bio-productivity of marine ecosystems and their biodiversity. For this reason, any underwater object designated as an artificial reef gets a positive ecological image. This effect is often used to solve problems by methods that do not improve the ecological situation. For example, some sunken ships and unused underwater structures are often declared artificial reefs. As a result, the costs of lifting and dismantling them are not considered necessary. It has also been proposed to include the legs of offshore oil platforms in the category of artificial reefs and to consider them the objects that contribute to the improvement of the aquatic environment quality. In some cases, artificial reefs are constructed from waste, such as old car tires. When they are destroyed, the sea is polluted. Another important problem is the absence of control over the state of most artificial reefs. They are not maintained or repaired. Therefore, many artificial reefs are degrading. In time, they are losing their biomeliorative and recreational potential. To solve these problems, it is necessary to give all artificial reefs the official status of a separate class of hydraulic structures. It will define an exact purpose of subsea structures and will allow analysing the environmental impact of artificial reefs during all stages of their life cycle, including decommissioning. In addition, the construction of all types of artificial reefs should be considered as creation of natural-technical systems that should be managed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Baine, “Artificial reefs: a review of their design, application, management and performance,” Ocean Coast. Manag., 44(3–4), 241 – 259 (2001).
P. Cresson, L. le Direach, E. Rouanet, et al., “Functional traits unravel temporal changes in fish biomass production on artificial reefs,” Mar. Environ. Res., 145, 137 – 146 (2019).
S. Rouse, J. S. Porter, and T. A. Wilding, “Artificial reef design affects benthic secondary productivity and provision of functional habitat,” Ecol. Evol., 10(4), 2122 – 2130 (2020).
K. A. Dafforn, T. M. Glasby, L. Airoldi, et al., “Marine urbanization: an ecological framework for designing multifunctional artificial structures,” Front. Ecol. Environ., 13(2), 82 – 90 (2015).
M. Mayer-Pinto, E. L. Johnston, A. B. Bugnot, et al., “Building ‘blue’: an eco-engineering framework for foreshore developments,” J. Environ. Manag., 189, 109 – 114 (2017).
J. A. Bohnsack and D. L. Sutherland, “Artificial reef research: a review with recommendations for future priorities,” Bull. Mar. Sci., 37(1), 11 – 39 (1985).
J. T. Claisse, D. J. Pondella, M. Love, et al., “Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111(43), 15462 – 15467 (2014).
T. Fujii, “Potential influence of offshore oil and gas platforms on the feeding ecology of fish assemblages in the North Sea,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 542, 167 – 186 (2016).
M. Glarou, M. Zrust, and J. C. Svendsen, “Using artificial-reef knowledge to enhance the ecological function of offshore wind turbine foundations: Implications for fish abundance and diversity,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 8(5), 332 (2020).
V. N. Beznosov, B. V. Rodionov, and A. L. Suzdaleva, “Formation of the ecological image of industrial objects,” Ékol. Proizv., No. 1(30), 22 – 26 (2007).
N. H. M. Salleh, A. A. Aman, and S. A. Hamid, “Selection of artificial reef deployment sites by using evidential reasoning,” Am. Fish. Soc. Symp., 86, 251 – 264 (2018).
L. B. Firth, A. M. Knights, D. Bridger, et al., “Ocean sprawl: challenges and opportunities for biodiversity management in a changing world,” Oceanogr. Mar. Biol., 54, 189 – 262 (2016).
V. N. Beznosov and A. L. Suzdaleva, “Methodology for assessing contamination of water bodies,” Dokl. Mosk. Obshch. Ispyt. Prir., 36, 15 – 18 (2005).
Yu. A. Bukina, “Analysis of the effectiveness of arranging artificial reefs in the seas of the Russian Federation,” in: Science and Modernity–2017: Coll. of Mater. of the LI Int. Sci. and Pract. Conf. [in Russian], Tsentr Razv. Nauch. Sotr., Novosibirsk (2017), pp. 221 – 225.
E. C. Heery,M. J. Bishop, L. P. Critchley, et al., “Identifying the consequences of ocean sprawl for sedimentary habitats,” J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 492, 31 – 48 (2017).
V. K. Machkevsky and A. V. Gaevskaya, “Formation of parasite systems in the artificial reef’s succession,” Ékol. Morya, 50, 66 – 70 (2000).
A. L. Suzdaleva, “System technoecology and managed naturetechnical systems,” Bezopasn. Tekhnosf., 5(3), 6 – 14 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel’svo, No. 6, June 2021, pp. 45 – 49. DOI: 10.34831/EP.2021.67.51.006
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suzdaleva, A.L., Beznosov, V.N. Artificial Reef: Status, Life Cycle, and Environmental Impact Assessment. Power Technol Eng 55, 558–561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-021-01397-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-021-01397-x