Abstract
J. Dewey and H. Plessner both and independently of one another treated the central question of what new task philosophy must set itself if the assumption is correct that the life-form of mind, i.e., the mental life-form of humans, arose in nature and must also sustain itself in the future within nature. If nature has to reconceived so as to make the irreducible qualities of life and mind truly possible, then it can no longer be restricted to the role of physical material. Conversely humans cannot no longer take on the role of God outside and independent of nature. Instead these philosophers distinguish between three “plateaus” (Dewey) or “stages” (Plessner), between physical (inorganic) nature, psycho-physical (living) nature and the nature that is mental life. This distinction is drawn such that a connection between the plateaus is truly possible. The third level, that of the mental form of life, answers mentally within conduct to the break with the first two levels. Hence it depends in the future as well on the continuously renewed difference (between the precarious and the stable for Dewey, between immediacy and mediation for Plessner) in our experience of nature. Within this difference nature as a whole remains an open unknown, which is why we can credit Dewey with a philosophy of diversified and negative holism, Plessner with a differential philosophy of the negativity of the absolute.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernstein, R. J. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey. Nature and cooperative intelligence. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Dewey, J. (1909). The influence of Darwinism on philosophy. In J. Dewey & J. A. Boydston (Eds.), The middle works (Vol. 4, p. 3). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1917). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In J. Dewey & J. A. Boydston (Eds.), The middle works (Vol. 10, pp. 3–48). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988a). Experience and nature (1925/1929). In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works (Vol. 1, 1925). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988b). The public and its problems. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works (Vol. 2, pp. 235–372). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988c). Conduct and experience. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works (Vol. 5, pp. 218–235). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988d). Peirce’s theory of linguistic signs, thought and meaning. In Boydston JA (Ed.), The later works (Vol. 15, pp. 141ff.). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
James, W. (1977). A pluralistic Universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Krüger, H.-P. (1999). Zwischen Lachen und Weinen. Vol. I: Das Spektrum menschlicher Phänomene. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Krüger, H.-P. (2001). Zwischen Lachen und Weinen. Vol. II: Der dritte Weg Philosophischer Anthropologie und die Geschlechterfrage. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Krüger, H.-P. (2004). The specification of human beings: A comparison of John Dewey’s and Helmuth Plessner’s Approaches. In J. Ryder & K. Wilkoszewaska (Eds.), Deconstruction and Reconstruction (pp. 129–136). Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.
Krüger, H.-P. (2009). The Public nature of human beings. parallels between classical pragmatism and helmuth plessner’s philosophical anthropology, In IRIS. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate, I, 1 (April 2009) (pp. 195–204).
Plessner, H. (1970). Laughing and crying: A study of the limits of human behavior (M. Grene & JSP. Churchill, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
Plessner, H. (1975). Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Verlag.
Plessner, H. (1980a). Anthropologie der Sinne. In G. Dux, O. Marquard & E. Ströker (Eds.), Gesammelte Schriften III (pp. 317–393). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Plessner, H. (1980b). Die Einheit der Sinne. Grundlinien einer Ästhesiologie des Geistes. In G. Dux, O. Marquard & E. Ströker (Eds.), Gesammelte Schriften III (pp. 7–315). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Plessner, H. (1981a). Grenzen der Gemeinschaft. Eine Kritik des sozialen Radikalismus (1924). In G. Dux (Ed.), Gesammelte Schriften V (pp. 7–133). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Plessner, H. (1981b). Macht und menschliche Natur. Ein Versuch zur Anthropologie der geschichtlichen Weltansicht. In G. Dux (Ed.), Gesammelte Schriften V (pp. 135–234). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Plessner, H. (1983a). Die physiologische Erklärung des Verhaltens. Eine Kritik an der Theorie Pawlows. In G. Dux, O. Marquard & E. Ströker (Eds.), Gesammelte Schriften VIII (pp. 7–32). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Plessner, H. (1983b). Die Aufgabe der Philosophischen Anthropologie, In G. Dux, O. Marquard & E. Ströker (Eds.), Gesammelte Schriften VIII (pp. 33–51). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Plessner, H. (1985a). Die Frage nach dem Wesen der Philosophie (1934). In G. Dux, O. Marquard & E. Ströker (Eds.), Gesammelte Schriften IX (pp. 96–123). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Plessner, H. (1985b). Das Problem der Öffentlichkeit und die Idee der Entfremdung. In G. Dux, O. Marquard & E. Ströker (Eds.), Gesammelte Schriften X (pp. 212–226). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Putnam, H. (1995). Pragmatism. An open question. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1998). Dewey between Hegel and Darwin. In R. Rorty (Ed.), Truth and progress. Philosophical papers (Vol. 3, pp. 290–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scheler, M. (2003). The human place in the cosmos (1928). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Scheler, M. (2008). The Nature of Sympathy. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
Shusterman, R. (2008). Body consciousness. A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics: Cambridge University Press.
Shusterman, R. (2010). Soma and Psyche. Journal of Speculative Philosophy. New Series, 24(3), 205–213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krüger, HP. How is the Human Life-Form of Mind Really Possible in Nature? Parallels Between John Dewey and Helmuth Plessner. Hum Stud 42, 47–64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9429-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9429-5