Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Social Networks to Improve Adaptive Co-Governance with the ≠Khomani Bushmen of the Kalahari, South Africa

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adaptive co-management has been suggested as one way to enable sustainable management of common pool resources. A knowledge gap exists, however, in how different kinds of co-management structures relate to sustainable resource management and adaptability. Using a network approach we examine the issues of social capital, leadership and traditional knowledge and how these contribute to collective action at the community level. The current social structure of the ≠Khomani Bushmen community, South Africa, was assessed. Overall network cohesion was found to be low, which potentially impedes effective governance, while high fragmentation hampers the possibility of joint action. Individual characteristics, such as gender and ethnicity affect knowledge exchange, while a correlation was found between number of ties to central actors and perceived knowledge of how to use plants sustainably. The study offers insight into how traditional ecological knowledge, social capital and leadership affect possibilities for collective action and co-management of natural resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The survey was approved by the Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (ref. no. 211/2009). The ≠Khomani and the JMB were informed of the results of the study during a community feedback meeting held in July 2011, where the findings were presented using network maps.

References

  • Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., Diduck, A. P., Doubleday, N. C., Johnson, D. S., Marschke, M., McConney, P., Pinkerton, E. W., and Wollenberg, E. K. (2009). Adaptive Co-Management for Social-Ecological Complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., Medin, D., Ross, N., Lynch, E., and Coley, J. (1999). Folkecology and Commons Management in the Maya Lowlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United State of America 96: 7598–7603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, A. (1979). Nharo Bushman Medicine and Medicine Men. Africa 49: 68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, A. (2007). Anthropology and the Bushman. Berg Publishers, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2003). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Change. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Ö., and Crona, B. I. (2009). The Role of Social Networks in Natural Resource Governance: What Relational Patterns Matter? Global Environmental Change 19: 366–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Ö., and Norberg, J. (2005). Information Network Topologies for Enhanced Local Adaptive Management. Environmental Management 35: 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P. (2006). Identifying Sets of Key Players in a Social Network. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 12: 21–34 doi:10.1007/s10588-006-7084-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., and Dreyfus, D. (2012). Keyplayer: Finding Sets of Key Players in a Network. Analytic Technologies, Lexington, Kentucky. http://www.analytictech.com/products.htm

  • Borgatti, S. P., and Foster, P. C. (2003). The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology. Journal of Management 29: 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies. Lexington, Kentucky, USA. [online] URL: http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet6/ucinet_5_description.htm.

  • Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Farvar, M. T., Nguinguiri, J. C., and Ndangang, V. (2000). Co-management of Natural Resources: Organizing Negotiation and Learning by Doing. Kasparek, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (2003). Integrating Conservation and Development: A Case of Institutional Misfit. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 479–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, L., and Berkes, F. (2005). Co-Management: Concepts and Methodological Implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chennells, R. (2002). The ≠Khomani San Land Claim. South African San Institute (SASI). Working Group of Indigenous Minorities in Southern Africa (WIMSA).

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crona, B. I. (2006). Supporting and Enhancing Development of Heterogeneous Ecological Knowledge Among Resource Users in a Kenyan Seascape. Ecology and Society 11: 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crona, B. I., and Bodin, Ö. (2006). WHAT You Know is WHO You Know? Communication Patterns among Resource Extractors as a Prerequisite for Co-Management. Ecology and Society 11: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art7.

  • Crona, B. I., and Parker, J. N. (2012). Learning in Support of Governance: Theories, Methods, and a Framework to Assess How Bridging Organizations Contribute to Adaptive Resource Governance. Ecology and Society 17: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04534-170132.

  • Degenne, A., and Forsé, M. (1999). Introducing Social Networks. Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., and Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. Ambio 31: 437–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., and Berkes, F. (1991). Traditional Resources Management Systems. Resource Management and Optimization 8: 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, S. (2001). The Bushmen of southern Africa: Slaughter of the Innocent. Chatto and Windus, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 76: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. (1994). What is Ecosystem Management? Conservation Biology 8: 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, C. (2010). Strengthening Regional Cohesion: Collaborative Networks and Sustainable Development in Swiss Rural Areas. Ecology and Society 15: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art16/.

  • Holden, P. (2007). Conservation and Human Rights - The Case of the ≠Khomani San Bushmen and the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, South Africa. Policy Matters 15: 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E. (2006). Adoption of a new regulation for the governance of common-pool resources by a heterogeneous population. In Baland, J. M., Bardhan, P., and Bowles, S. (eds.), Inequality, Cooperation and Environmental Sustainability. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D., and Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal Networks and Organizational Crisis: An Experimental Simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 51: 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. (2002). Active Social Capital: Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (1993). Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (1999). Appraising Adaptive Management. Conservation Ecology 3: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabhan, G. P. (1997). Cultures of Habitat: On Nature, Culture, and Story. Counterpoint, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L., and Dale, A. (2005). Network Structure, Diversity and Proactive Resilience Building: A Response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecology and Society 10: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/resp2/.

  • Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., and Labianca, G. (2004). Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties. Academy of Management Journal 47: 860–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive Co-Management for Building Resilience in Social and Ecological Systems. Environmental Management 34: 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 325: doi:10.1126/science.1172133.

  • Pretty, J., and Smith, D. (2004). Social Capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management. Conservation Biology 18: 631–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J., and Ward, H. (2001). Social Capital and the Environment. World Development 29: 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagans, R., and McEvily, B. (2003). Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 240–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, S. (2001). NGOs, ‘Bushmen’ and Double Vision: The Khomani San Land Claim and the Cultural Politics of ‘Community’ and Development’ in the Kalahari. Journal of Southern African Studies 27: 833–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, A. (2008). Policy Networks: The Relation between Structure and Performance. Doctoral Thesis, Lulea University of Technology.

  • Sandström, A., and Rova, C. (2010). Adaptive Co-Management Networks: a Comparative Analysis of Two Fishery Conservation Areas in Sweden. Ecology and Society 15: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/artZZ/.

  • Scott, J. P. (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thondhlana, G., Shackleton, S., and Muchapondwa, E. (2011). Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and its Land Claimants: A Pre- and Post-Land Claim Conservation and Development History. Environmental Research Letters 6: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, K. M. (1999). Comprehensive Knowledge Management. Working Paper. Knowledge Research Institute, Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the ≠Khomani Bushmen community, Kelly Scheepers and South African National Parks, the Southern Africa San Institute, Phillipa Holden and David Grossman, Peter Mokomele and the Commission on Restitution of Land Rights, and the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park Joint Management Board for their support during fieldwork. Sincere gratitude goes to Eve Annecke and Candace Kelly of the Sustainability Institute, Stellenbosch, the Harry Crossley Foundation, Stellenbosch University and South Africa National Parks for institutional and financial support. ATK acknowledges the support of the Centre of Excellence in Environmental Decision (CEED) at the University of Queensland. The insights and contributions of the reviewers are also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. M. Mannetti.

Electronic supplementary material

Survey protocol (Appendix 1), tables depicting E-I Index results, cross boundary exchange rates and key player data (Appendix 2, 3 and 5, respectively) and a map illustrating the position of key players (Appendix 4) are included. The authors are solely responsible for the content and functionality of these materials. Queries (other than absence of the material) should be directed to the corresponding author.

Appendix 1

(DOC 29 kb)

Appendix 2

(DOC 54 kb)

Appendix 3

(DOC 34 kb)

Appendix 4

(DOC 219 kb)

Appendix 5

(DOC 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mannetti, L.M., Esler, K.J., Knight, A.T. et al. Understanding Social Networks to Improve Adaptive Co-Governance with the ≠Khomani Bushmen of the Kalahari, South Africa. Hum Ecol 43, 481–492 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9760-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9760-2

Keywords

Navigation