Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for suspected cardiac amyloidosis: where are we now?

  • Published:
Heart Failure Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an underdiagnosed form of restrictive cardiomyopathy leading to a rapid progression into heart failure. Evaluation of CA requires a multimodality approach making use of echocardiography, cardiac magnetic imaging (CMR), and nuclear imaging. With superior tissue characterization, high-resolution imaging, and precise cardiac assessment, CMR has emerged as a versatile tool in the workup of cardiac amyloidosis with a wide array of parameters both visual and quantitative. This includes late gadolinium enhancement patterns, T1/T2 mapping, and extracellular volume (ECV) measurement providing robust diagnostic accuracies, patient stratification, and prognostication. Recent advancements have introduced new measures able to identify early disease, track disease progression, and response to therapy positioning CMR as an instrumental imaging modality in the era of rising interest in CA screening and emerging effective therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Dorbala S, Ando Y, Bokhari S et al (2020) ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: part 2 of 2-diagnostic criteria and appropriate utilization. J Nucl Cardiol 27(2):659–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01761-5. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  2. Dorbala S, Ando Y, Bokhari S et al (2019) ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: part 1 of 2-evidence base and standardized methods of imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 26(6):2065–2123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01760-6. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  3. Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK et al (2005) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation 111(2):186–193. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000152819.97857.9D. Accessed 19 Oct 2021

  4. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, Aletras AH (2002) Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med. 47(2):372–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10051. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  5. Fontana M, Pica S, Reant P et al (2015) Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2015;132(16):1570–1579. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016567. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  6. Vogelsberg H, Mahrholdt H, Deluigi CC et al (2008) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in clinically suspected cardiac amyloidosis: noninvasive imaging compared to endomyocardial biopsy. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(10):1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.049. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  7. Syed IS, Glockner JF, Feng D et al (2010) Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(2):155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.09.023. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  8. Ruberg FL, Appelbaum E, Davidoff R et al (2009) Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in light-chain cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol 103(4):544–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.105. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  9. Karamitsos TD, Piechnik SK, Banypersad SM et al (2013) Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(4):488–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.013. Accessed 19 Oct 2021

  10. Austin BA, Tang WHW, Rodriguez ER et al (2009) Delayed hyper-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging provides incremental diagnostic and prognostic utility in suspected cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(12):1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.08.008. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  11. Takeda M, Amano Y, Tachi M, Tani H, Mizuno K, Kumita S (2013) MRI differentiation of cardiomyopathy showing left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure: differentiation between cardiac amyloidosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and hypertensive heart disease. Jpn J Radiol 31(10):693–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0238-0. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  12. Deux J, Damy T, Rahmouni A, Mayer J, Planté-Bordeneuve V (2014) Noninvasive detection of cardiac involvement in patients with hereditary transthyretin associated amyloidosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study. Amyloid 21(4):246–255. https://doi.org/10.3109/13506129.2014.956924. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  13. Zhao L, Tian Z, Fang Q (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance for patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 16:129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0311-6. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  14. Martinez-Naharro A, Treibel TA, Abdel-Gadir A et al (2017) Magnetic resonance in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(4):466–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.053. Accessed 19 Oct 2021

  15. Dungu JN, Valencia O, Pinney JH et al (2014) CMR-based differentiation of AL and ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(2):133–142.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.08.015. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  16. Martinez-Naharro A, Treibel TA, Abdel-Gadir A et al (2017) Magnetic resonance in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(4):466–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.053. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  17. Martinez-Naharro A, Abdel-Gadir A, Treibel TA et al (2017) CMR-verified regression of cardiac AL amyloid after chemotherapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11(1):152–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.012. Accessed 19 Oct 2021

  18. White JA, Kim HW, Shah D et al (2014) CMR imaging with rapid visual T1 assessment predicts mortality in patients suspected of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(2):143–156. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951756/. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.09.019. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  19. Fontana M, Banypersad SM, Treibel TA et al (2014) Native T1 mapping in transthyretin amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(2):157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.008. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  20. Moon JC, Messroghli DR, Kellman P et al (2013) Myocardial T1 mapping and extracellular volume quantification: a society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SCMR) and CMR working group of the european society of cardiology consensus statement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Banypersad SM, Sado DM, Flett AS et al (2013) Quantification of myocardial extracellular volume fraction in systemic AL amyloidosis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 6(1):34–39. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.978627. Accessed 19 Oct 2021

  22. Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM et al (2017) Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the european association for cardiovascular imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  23. Mekinian A, Lions C, Leleu X et al (2010) Prognosis assessment of cardiac involvement in systemic AL amyloidosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Med 123(9):864–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.03.022. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  24. Fontana M, Treibel TA, Martinez-Naharro A et al (2017) A case report in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the contrast agent matters in amyloid. BMC Med Imaging 17(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0173-5. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  25. Banypersad SM, Fontana M, Maestrini V et al (2015) T1 mapping and survival in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. Eur Heart J 36(4):244–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu444. Accessed 19 Oct 2021

  26. Martinez-Naharro A, Kotecha T, Norrington K et al (2019) Native T1 and extracellular volume in Transthyretin amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12(5):810–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.006. Accessed 19 Oct 2021

  27. Raina S, Lensing SY, Nairooz RS et al (2016) Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement CMR in systemic amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9(11):1267–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.036. Accessed 25 Oct 2021

  28. Bulluck H, White SK, Rosmini S et al (2015) T1 mapping and T2 mapping at 3T for quantifying the area-at-risk in reperfused STEMI patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0173-6

  29. Lurz P, Luecke C, Eitel I et al (2016) Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected myocarditis: the MyoRacer-trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(15):1800–1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.013. Accessed 5 Nov 2021

  30. Bohnen S, Radunski UK, Lund GK et al (2015) Performance of T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance to detect active myocarditis in patients with recent-onset heart failure. Circulation: Cardiovas Imaging 8(6):e003073. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.114.003073. Accessed 5 Nov 2021

  31. Legou F, Tacher V, Damy T et al (2017) Usefulness of T2 ratio in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac MR imaging. Diagn Interv Imaging 98(2):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.007. Accessed 5 Nov 2021

  32. Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H, Bohl S, Schulz-Menger J (2011) Prognostic impact of T2-weighted CMR imaging for cardiac amyloidosis. Eur Radiol 21(8):1643–1650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2109-3. Accessed 5 Nov 2021

  33. Kotecha T, Martinez-Naharro A, Treibel TA et al (2018) Myocardial edema and prognosis in Amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 71(25):2919–2931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.536. Accessed 5 Nov 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mouaz H. Al-Mallah.

Ethics declarations

Research studies involving humans and/or animals

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saad, J.M., Ahmed, A.I., Han, Y. et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for suspected cardiac amyloidosis: where are we now?. Heart Fail Rev 27, 1543–1548 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-022-10226-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-022-10226-w

Keywords

Navigation