Abstract
Garland E. Allen’s 1978 biography of the Nobel Prize winning biologist Thomas Hunt Morgan provides an excellent study of the man and his science. Allen presents Morgan as an opportunistic scientist who follows where his observations take him, leading him to his foundational work in Drosophila genetics. The book was rightfully hailed as an important achievement and it introduced generations of readers to Morgan. Yet, in hindsight, Allen’s book largely misses an equally important part of Morgan’s work – his study of development and regeneration. It is worth returning to this part of Morgan, exploring what Morgan contributed and also why he has been seen by contemporaries and historians such as Allen as having set aside some of the most important developmental problems. A closer look shows how Morgan’s view of cells and development that was different from that of his most noted contemporaries led to interpretation of his important contributions in favor of genetics. This essay is part of a special issue, revisiting Garland Allen's views on the history of life sciences in the twentieth century.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, Garland E. 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan. The Man and His Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Allen, Garland E. 1983. “T. H. Morgan and the Influence of Mechanistic Materialism on the Development of the Gene Concept 1910–1940.” American Zoologist 23: 829–843.
Baltzer, Fritz. 1967. Theodor Boveri, Life and Work of a Great Biologist, 1862–1915. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cowdry, Edmund (ed.). 1924. General Cytology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hertwig, Oscar. 1898. Die Zelle und die Gewebe. Grundzüge der Allgemeinen Anatomie und Physiologie. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Kohler, Robert. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maienschein, Jane. 1991. Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1897. Development of the Frog’s Egg. New York: Macmillan.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1901. Regeneration. New York: Macmillan.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1924. “Mendelian Heredity and Cytology.” Edmund V. Cowdry (ed.), General Cytology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 693–728.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1927. Experimental Embryology. New York: Columbia University Press
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. 1934. Embryology and Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Nobel Prize Website. 1933. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/ laureates/1933/.
Oppenheimer, Jane. 1983. “Thomas Hunt Morgan as an Embryologist: The View from Bryn Mawr.” American Zoologist 23(4) (special issue on “The Place of Thomas Hunt Morgan in American Biology”): 845–854.
Sánchez Alvarado, Alejandro. 2010. “T.H. Morgan’s Regeneration Paying It Forward,” Lecture at the Marine Biological Laboratory in Thomas Hunt Morgan Commemorative Symposium, July 21, 2010.
Sánchez Alvarado, Alejandro. http://www.stowers.org/faculty/s%C3%A1nchez-lab.
Sunderland, Mary Evelyn. 2010. “Regeneration: Thomas Hunt Morgan’s Window into Development.” Journal of the History of Biology 43: 325–361.
Wilson, Edmund Beecher. 1895. Atlas of Fertilization and Karyokinesis of the Ovum. New York: Macmillan.
Wilson, Edmund Beecher. 1896. The Cell in Development and Inheritance. New York: Macmillan.
Wilson, Edmund Beecher. 1924. “Introduction.” Edmund V. Cowdry (ed.), General Cytology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maienschein, J. Garland Allen, Thomas Hunt Morgan, and Development. J Hist Biol 49, 587–601 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9426-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9426-3