Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Polarized agents of internationalization: an autoethnography of migrant faculty at a Japanese University

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, government policies that target the rapid internationalization of Japanese higher education have provided new career opportunities especially for scholars with experience of studying and teaching abroad. This autoethnographic paper draws on such “migrant” faculty’s engagement in formal curriculum development to illustrate their active negotiations within the micro-level processes of internationalization of a Japanese University. More specifically, the analysis focuses first on the enactment of agencies to negotiate diverse understandings of “culture” and “discipline” in the process of building a “Japanese Studies” curriculum. The paper then draws on those negotiations to show how those agencies were transformative; namely how they impacted on and challenged the framing and the practice of the official framework of “Japanese Studies” at University X. This study aims, therefore, to shed light on the ways individual migrant faculty members of diverse backgrounds, may constructively contribute to internationalization processes of higher education when such faculty’s active interactions are carefully looked at and sought for, beyond established and often imagined cultural, disciplinary, and institutional boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/highered/title02/detail02/sdetail02/1373895.htm [accessed 2 April 2020]

  2. In order to draw attention to the essence of our argument and not to the eventual specificities of our institution, we do not provide the details of sources and original texts related to University X’s policies and to our internal conversations.

  3. To ensure the anonymity of our colleagues, we do not provide the dates of electronic communications.

References

  • Aizawa, I., & Rose, H. (2019). An analysis of Japan’ English as medium of instruction initiatives within higher education: the gap between meso-level policy and micro-level practice. Higher Education, 77, 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0323-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bager-Elsborg, A. (2018). How lecturers’ understanding of change is embedded in disciplinary practices: a multiple case study. Higher Education, 76, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0195-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2003). Participant objectivation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, A., & Brown, H. (2007) English-medium instruction in Japanese higher education policy: challenges and outcomes. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

  • Breaden, J., & Goodman, R. (2014). The dog that didn’t bark: 3/11 and international students in Japan. In J. Breaden, S. Steele, & C. S. Stevens (Eds.), Internationalising Japan: discourse and practice (pp. 13–31). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brotherhood, T., Hammond, C. D., & Kim, Y. (2020). Towards an actor-centered typology of internationalization: a study of junior international faculty in Japanese universities. Higher Education, 79, 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. (2006). A case study in the acceptance of a new discipline. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C. N. (2006 [1993]). 36 views of Mount Fuji: On finding myself in Japan. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, P., & Duff, S. (2009). Reason before passion: faculty views on internationalization in higher education. Higher Education, 58, 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9207-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eades, J. S. (2016). Dimensions of internationalisation: some Japanese case studies. In J. Mock, H. Kawamura, & N. Naganuma (Eds.), The impact of internationalization on Japanese higher education: is Japanese education really changing? (pp. 71–90). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. P., & Frey, O. (Eds.). (2003). Autobiographical writing across the disciplines: a reader. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaitanidis, I. (2017). Critique of/in Japanese studies: an introduction to the special edition. In I. Gaitanidis (Ed.), Critique of/in Japanese Studies. New Ideas in East Asian Studies Special Edition, 1-7.

  • Gaitanidis, I. (2020). Jobbing as methodology: Victor T. King’s involvement with area studies and some implications for Japanese studies and beyond. In K.G. Ooi (Ed.), Borneo and Sulawesi: indigenous peoples, empires and area studies (pp.176–193). London: Routledge.

  • Galloway, N., & Numajiri, T. & Rees, N. (2020) The ‘internationalisation’, or ‘Englishisation’, of higher education in East Asia. Higher Education, published online first 26 March. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00486-1.

  • Giroux, H. A., & Searls Giroux, S. (2004). Take back higher education: race, youth, and the crisis of democracy in the post-civil rights era. Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., Franquiz, M., & Dixon, C. (1997). The myth of the objective transcript: transcribing as a situated act. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 172–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, K. (2014). ‘English-only’, but not a medium-of-instruction policy: the Japanese way of internationalising education for both domestic and overseas students. In M. O. Hamid, H. T. M. Nguyen, & R. B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.), Language planning for medium instruction in Asia (pp. 16–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horiguchi, S. & Imoto, Y. (2015). Fostering learning through unlearning institutional boundaries: a “team ethnography” of a liminal intercultural space at a Japanese university. Ethnography and Education, 10(1), 92–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2014.956134.

  • Horiguchi, S., Imoto, Y., & Poole, G. S. (2015). Foreign language education in Japan: exploring qualitative approaches. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, F. (2017) Who are they and why did they move to Japan? An analysis of international faculty at universities. Centre for Global Higher Education working paper series, 27, 1–24.

  • Huang, F. (2018) International faculty at Japanese universities: their demographic characteristics and work roles. Asia Pacific Education Review 19(2), 263–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9536-7.

  • Huang, F. (2019). International Faculty in Japan. International Higher Education, 96, 18–19. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2019.96.10777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, V. T. (2014). Southeast Asian studies: the conundrum of area and method. In M. Huotari, & J. Rüland, & J. Schlehe, (Eds). Methodology and research practice in southeast Asian studies (pp.44–63). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • McVeigh, B. J. (1998). Life in a Japanese women’s college: learning to be ladylike. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVeigh, B. J. (2002). Japanese higher education as myth. New York: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMorran, C. (2016). Unthinking the nation state as area: Interrogating Japan and Japanese studies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, published online before print June, 30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816656525.

  • MEXT [Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technol] (2011). Gurobarujinzaiikusei Suishinkaigi Chukanmatome [Meeting for Promotion of Global Human Resource Development Mid-Term Report]. Retrieved from https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/npu/policy04/pdf/20110624/sankou2.pdf.

  • Miyoshi, M., & Harootunian, H.D. (Eds.) (2002) Learning places: the afterlives of area studies. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Mock. J., Kawamura, H. & Naganuma, N., (Eds) (2016) The impact of internationalization on Japanese higher education: is Japanese education really changing? Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Morley, L., Alexiadou, N., Garaz, S., Gonzàlez-Monteagudo, J., & Taba, M. (2018). Internationalisation and migrant academics: the hidden narratives of mobility. Higher Education, 76(3), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L., Leyton, D., & Hada, Y. (2019). The affective economy of internationalisation: migrant academics in and out of Japanese higher education. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 3(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2018.1564353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okano, K., & Sugimoto, Y. (2017). Rethinking Japanese studies: eurocentrism and the Asia-Pacific region. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Omatsu, G. (2010). The “four prisons” and the movement of liberation: Asian American activism from the 1960s to the 1990s. In J. Y. S. Wu & T. Chen (Eds). Asian American studies now: a critical reader (pp.298–330). USA: Rutgers University Press.

  • Ota, H. (2018). Internationalization of higher education: global trends and Japan’s challenges. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 12, 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, G. S. (2010). The Japanese professor: an ethnography of a university faculty. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reed-Danahay, D. (2009). Anthropologists, education, and autoethnography. Reviews in Anthropology, 38(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00938150802672931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2018). Japan’s English-medium instruction initiatives and the globalization of higher education. Higher Education, 75(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0125-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryang, S. (2000). Ethnography or self-cultural anthropology? Reflections on writing about ourselves. Dialectical Anthropology, 25, 297–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011626917988.

  • Sakamoto, R. (2016). The true meaning of integrity; reflections on a professional life in Japan. In C. B. Hutchison (Ed.), Experiences of immigrant professors: cross-cultural differences, challenges, and lessons for success (pp.100–109). London: Routledge.

  • Satoko Shao-Kobayashi, (2013) “My dad is samurai”: Positioning of race and ethnicity surrounding a transnational Colombian Japanese high school student. Linguistics and Education, 24(3), 361–372.

  • Sugimoto, Y. (2014). Japanese society: inside out and outside in. International Sociology, 29, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580914530416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, A. (2016). Internationalization at universities – true or false: the emptiness of “global HR development”. Discuss Japan—Japan Foreign Policy Forum, 30 Available at https://www.japanpolicyforum.jp/society/pt20160331064546.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan

    Ioannis Gaitanidis & Satoko Shao-Kobayashi

Authors
  1. Ioannis Gaitanidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Satoko Shao-Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoko Shao-Kobayashi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaitanidis, I., Shao-Kobayashi, S. Polarized agents of internationalization: an autoethnography of migrant faculty at a Japanese University. High Educ 83, 19–33 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00582-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00582-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation