Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implications of performance-based funding on equity-based missions in US higher education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Upholding an equity-focused mission can be challenging for administrators, particularly in light of recently implemented policies that center funding based on student performance. Based on interviews with administrators across four universities in the same state, this work examines the ways in which performance-based funding (PBF) requirements are interacting with the public-serving mission of urban-serving research universities (USRUs) in the USA. Key findings highlight perceived tensions between PBF and USRUs, implications of these tensions of the understanding and enactment of the USRU mission, redefining of concepts of improvement, and implications of PBF on deepening stratification across a differentiated system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. (2009). Italy introduces performance-related funding: agency to evaluate research is launched. Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science, 460. https://doi.org/10.1038/460559a Retrieved July 16, 2015 from http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090728/full/460559a.html.

  • Ardis, J. (2013). Performance based funding becoming the new norm in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.statebudgetsolutions.org/publications/detail/performance-based-funding-becoming-thenew-norm-in-higher-education.

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education, Inc: new policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2002). In pursuit of prestige: strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E., & Hagedorn, L. S. (1999). Campus racial climate and the adjustment of students to college: a comparison between White students and African-American students. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 134–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, A. P., & Strohl, J. (2013). Separate and unequal: how higher education reinforces the intergenerational reproduction of White racial privilege. Washington, DC: Georgetown Public Policy Institute and the Center on Education and the Workforce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cielinski, A., & Pham, D. (2017). Equity measures in state outcomes-based funding: incentives for public colleges to support low-income and underprepared students. Washington, DC: Center for Postsecondary and Economic Success.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalition of Urban-Serving Universities. (2010). Urban universities: anchors generating prosperity for America’s cities. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, L. M., & Cavanaugh, T. W. (2016). Grading the metrics: performance-based funding in the Florida state university system. Journal of Education Finance, 42(2), 153–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2005). Karl Weick: Concepts, style and reflection. In C. Jones & R. Munro (Eds.), Contemporary organization theory (pp. 267–278). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAMVAD Socioeconomic and Policy Consultancy. (2011). The taximeter system. Copenhagen: DAMVAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, E. (2015). Negotiating access and tier one aspirations: the historical evolution of a striving Hispanic-serving institutions. Journal of Hispanic Higher Educaiton, 14(4), 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S. (2010). Continuity and change in long-lasting state performance funding systems for higher education: the cases of Tennessee and Florida. CCRC Working Paper No. 18. New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.

  • Dougherty, K. J., Natow, R. S., & Vega, B. E. (2012). Popular but unstable: Explaining why state performance funding systems in the United States often do not persist. Teachers College Record, 114(3).

  • Dougherty, K. J., & Reddy, V. T. (2011). The impacts of state performance funding systems on higher education institutions: research literature review and policy recommendations. CCRC Working Paper No. 37. New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.

  • Dougherty, K. J., & Reddy, V. T. (2013). Performance funding for higher education: what are the mechanisms? What are the impacts? Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Natow, R. S., Pheatt, L., & Reddy, V. (2014). Performance funding for higher education: forms, origins, impacts, and futures. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214541042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Lahr, H., Pheatt, L., Natow, R. S., & Reddy, V. (2016). Performance funding for higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberle-Sudré, K., Welch, M., & Howard Nichols, A. (2015). Rising tide: do college grad rate gains benefit all students? Washington, DC: The Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, P. G. (1994). The urban campus. Phoenix: Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. (1996). Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organisations. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gándara, D., & Rutherford, A. (2017). Mitigating unintended impacts? The effects of premiums for underserved populations in performance-funding policies for higher education. Research in Higher Education, 59(6), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9483-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerald, D., & Haycock, K. (2006). Engines of inequality: diminishing equity in the nation’s premier public universities. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A. (2001). The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences? Journal of Economic Issues, 3, 607–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A., & Martin, B. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: an international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A., Piolatto, M., & Labini, M. S. (2015). University funding and research assessment: an analysis of Italian and British cases. In A. Geuna & F. Rossi (Eds.), The university and the economy: pathways to growth and economic development (pp. 102–138). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, L. D. (2012). Responding to mission creep: faculty members as cosmopolitan agents. Higher Education, 64(3), 337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, L. D. (2013). Faculty sensemaking and mission creep: interrogating institutionalized ways of knowing and doing legitimacy. The Review of Higher Education, 36(2), 179–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobman, A. B. (1988). Urban state universities: An unfinished national agenda. Little Rock: River Market Books and Gifts.

  • Hagood, L. P. (2019). The financial benefits and burdens of performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(2), 189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnisch, T. L. (2011). Performance-based funding: a re-emerging strategy in public higher education financing. Washington, DC: AASCU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, C. E., Mulhollan, P. E., & White, K. E. (1990). Metropolitan universities: models for the twenty-first century. In D. M. Johnson & D. A. Bell (Eds.), Metropolitan universities: an emerging model in American higher education (pp. 5–16). Denton: University of North Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haycock, K., Lynch, M., & Engle, J. (2010). Opportunity adrift: our flagship universities are straying from their public mission. Washington, DC: The Education Trust Retrieved from http://www.edtrust.org/sites/edtrust.org/files/publications/files/Opportunity%20Adrift%28%29.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, N.W. (2016). Why performance-based college funding doesn’t work. The Century Foundation. Retrieved from https://tcf.org/content/report/why-performance-based-college-funding-doesnt-work/.

  • Hillman, N., & Corral, D. (2017). The equity implications of paying for performance in higher education. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(14), 1757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, N. W., Tandberg, D. A., & Fryar, A. H. (2015). Evaluating the impacts of “new” performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 0162373714560224.

  • Hillman, N. W., Hicklin Fryar, A., & Crespín-Trujillo, V. (2018). Evaluating the impact of performance funding in Ohio and Tennessee. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 144–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, A., & Humphreys, M. (2013). Putting power in its place: the centrality of edgelands. Organization Studies, 34, 1505–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard Nichols, A., Eberle-Sudré, K., & Welch, M. (2016). Rising tide II: do Black students benefit as grad rates increase? Washington, DC: The Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, D., & Shulock, N. (2013). Metrics, dollars, and systems change: learning from Washington state’s student achievement initiative to design effective postsecondary performance funding policies. A state policy brief. Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/student-achievement-initiative-policy-brief.pdf.

  • Jennings, P. D., & Greenwood, R. (2003). Constructing the iron cage: institutional theory and enactment. In R. Westwood & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organization: point-counterpoint in organization studies (pp. 195–207). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. M., & Bell, D. A. (1995). Metropolitan universities: an emerging model in American higher education. Denton: University of North Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R., Wasserman, T. H., Yildirim, M., & Yonai, B. A. (2014). Examining the effects of stress and campus climate on the persistence of students of color and White students: an application of Bean and Eaton’s psychological model of retention. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. A. (2011). “Outcome funding”: Tennessee experiments with a performance-based approach to college appropriations. National Crosstalk. Retrieved from https://www.luminafoundation.org/files/resources/early-results-tn-0314-1.pdfhttp://www.highereducation.org/crosstalk/ct0511/news0511-tenn.shtml.

  • Jones, T. (2014). Performance funding at MSIs: Considerations and possible measures for public minority-serving institutions. Atlanta: Southern Education Foundation.

  • Jones, T. (2016). A historical mission in the accountability era: a public HBCU and state performance funding. Educational Policy, 30(7), 999–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., Jones, S., Elliott, K. C., Owens, L., Assalone, A., & Gándara, D. (2017). Outcomes based funding and race in higher education: can equity be bought? Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlenberg, R. D. (2015). How higher education funding shortchanges community colleges. New York: The Century Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2001). Making newsmakers: conversational identity at work. Organization Studies, 22, 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelchen, R. (2018). Do performance-based funding policies affect underrepresented student enrollment? The Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 702–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelchen, R., & Stedrak, L. J. (2016). Does performance-based funding affect colleges’ financial priorities? Journal of Education Finance, 41(3), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1353/jef.2016.0006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King Alexander, F. (2000). The changing face of accountability. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 411–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, M. (2018). Many state flagship universities leave [B]lack and Latino students behind. The Hechinger Report. Retrieved from https://hechingerreport.org/many-state-flagship-universities-leave-black-latino-students-behind/.

  • Lahr, H., Pheatt, L., Dougherty, K. J., Jones, S. M., Natow, R. S., & Reddy, V. (2014). Unintended impacts of performance funding on community colleges and universities in three states (no. 78). Community College Research Center Working Paper. New York: Columbia University Teachers College.

  • Lederman, D. (2008). Performance funding 2.0. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/12/17/perform.

  • Letizia, A. J. (2015). Performance-based funding in higher education: the state of truth in the information age. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, A., Gándara, D., & Assalone, A. (2018). Equity or disparity: do performance funding policies disadvantage two-year minority-serving institutions? Community College Review, 46(3), 288–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Brawley, E. (2003). The metropolitan mission of a research university: a study of the context and opportunities for faculty. Phoenix: Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateos-González, J. L., & Boliver, V. (2019). Performance-based university funding and the drive towards ‘institutional meritocracy’ in Italy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(2), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurrasse, D. J. (2001). Beyond the campus: how colleges and universities form partnerships with their communities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown-Moak, M. P. (2013). The “New” Performance Funding in Higher Education. Educational Considerations, 40(2).

  • McKinney, L., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2015). Performance-based funding for community colleges in Texas: are colleges disadvantaged by serving the most disadvantaged students? Greater Texas Foundation.

  • Miller, G. N. S., & Morphew, C. C. (2017). Merchants of optimism: agenda-setting organizations and the framing of performance-based funding for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 754–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, C. M. (2010). Doing more with less: The inequitable funding of community colleges (AACC Policy Brief 2010-03PBL). Washington, DC: American Association for Community Colleges Retrieved from http://www.aacc.nche.edu/Publications/Briefs/Pages/rb09082010.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). (2017). Performance-based funding for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performance-funding.aspx.

  • Ness, E. C., Deupree, M. M., & Gándara, D. (2015). Campus responses to outcomes-based funding in Tennessee: robust, aligned, and contested. Nashville: Tennessee Higher Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisar, M. A. (2015). Higher education governance and performance based funding as an ecology of games. Higher Education, 69(2), 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orphan, C. (2018). Public purpose under pressure: examining the effects of neoliberal public policy on the missions of regional comprehensive universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(2), 59–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakravan, P. (2006). The future is not what it used to be: Re-examining provincial postsecondary funding mechanisms in Canada. In C. D. Howe Institute Commentary (Vol. 227). Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute.

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., Hardesty, J., & Burroughs, N. (2013). Talent on the sidelines: excellence gaps and America’s persistent talent underclass. Storrs: Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut Retrieved from http://webdev.education.uconn.edu/static/sites/cepa/AG/excellence2013/Excellence-Gap-10-18-13_JP_LK.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, A. (2005). Leadership and organizing: sensemaking in action. Leadership, 1(1), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabovsky, T. M. (2012). Accountability in higher education: exploring impacts on state budgets and institutional spending patterns. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 675–700. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick, M., Coca, V., & Nagoaka, J. (2011). Potholes on the road to college: high school effects in shaping urban students’ participation in college application, four-year college enrollment, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Bell, A., & Perna, L. W. (2008). Contextual influences on parental involvement in college going: variations by socioeconomic class. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 564–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, F. (1990). The American college and university: a history (2nd ed.). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A., & Rabovsky, T. (2014). Evaluating impacts of performance funding policies on student outcomes in higher education. The Annals of the American Academy, 655, 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, T., & Hunter, J. M. (2011). Impact of performance-funding on retention and graduation rates. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(33), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. D. (2006). The university in the 21st century: toward a democratic and emancipatory university reform. In R. Rhoads & C. A. Torres (Eds.), The university, state, and market: the political economy of globalization in the Americas (pp. 60–100). Stanford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severino, C. (1996). The idea of an urban university: a historic and rhetoric of ambivalence and ambiguity. Urban Education, 22(3), 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D., Dundar, A., Huie, F., Wakhungu, P. K., Yuan, X., Nathan, A., & Bhimdiwali, A. (2017). Completing College: A National View of Student Completion Rates – Fall 2011 Cohort (Signature Report No. 14). Herndon: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.

  • Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2012). Transatlantic moves to the market: the United States and the European Union. Higher Education, 63(5), 583–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sólorzano, D. G., Villalpando, O., & Oseguera, L. (2005). Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: a critical race analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(3), 272–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soo, D. (2010). An added dimension of mission: metropolitan colleges and universities. Perspective on Urban Education, 35–40.

  • Strayhorn, T. L. (2017). Factors that influence the persistence and success of Black men in urban public universities. Urban Education, 52(9), 1106–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandberg, D. A., & Hillman, N. W. (2014). State higher education performance funding: data, outcomes, and policy implications. Journal of Higher Education Finance, 39(3), 222–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelin, J. (1990). Rudolph rediscovered: an introductory essay by John R. Thelin. In F. Rudolph (Ed.), The American college and university: a history (2nd ed., pp. ix–xxiii). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelin, J. (2004). A history of American higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. (2010). Wannabe U: inside the corporate university. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbricht, M. R., Fernandez, F., & Ortagus, J. C. (2017). An examination of the (un)intended consequences of performance funding in higher education. Educational Policy, 31(5), 643–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarkesh, M., & Beas, A. M. (2004). UCLA community college review: Performance indicators and performance-based funding in community colleges. Community College Review, 31(4), 62–76.

  • Zerquera, D. (2016). Urban-serving research universities: institutions for the public good. Higher Learning Research Communications, 6(2).

  • Zerquera, D., Ballysingh, T. A., & Templeton, E. (2017). A critical look at perspectives of access and mission at diverse urban universities. Association of Mexican American Educators, 11(3), 199–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziskin, M. B., Hossler, D., Rabourn, K. E., Cekic, O., & Hwang, Y. (2014). Outcomes-based funding: current status, promising practices and emerging trends. Toronto: Higher education Quality Control of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziskin, M. B., Rabourn, K. E., & Hossler, D. (2018). Performance-based funding of higher education: analyses of policy discourse across four case studies. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 16(2), 164–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desiree Zerquera.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zerquera, D., Ziskin, M. Implications of performance-based funding on equity-based missions in US higher education. High Educ 80, 1153–1174 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00535-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00535-0

Keywords

Navigation