Abstract
From the 1990s onwards, economics departments in Europe have changed toward a culture of “excellence.” Strong academic hierarchies and new forms of academic organization replace “institutes” and “colleges” by fully equipped “economics departments.” This article seeks to demonstrate how and why hierarchization, discourses of excellence and organizational change takes place in European economics departments. The concept of “elitism dispositif” will be developed in order to understand these changes as a discursive as well as power-related phenomenon based on rankings, on the formation of new academic classes as well as on the construction of an elite myth. An elitism dispositif is defined as a discursive power apparatus that transforms symbolic differences among researchers, constructed by rankings, into material inequalities, based on an unequal distribution of academic capital between departments and researchers. Based on an empirical study, the article will focus on a selection of economics departments in Germany and in the UK, in order to study the emergence of an “elite class” as well as the functioning of an “excellence culture” that is based on discourses of power and inequality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This FED project was funded by the Volkswagen Foundation.
These categories are labels used by actors in economics. They are not the author’s invention and therefore I make no claim for sociological validity.
All the results are here: http://www.rae.ac.uk/submissions/submissions.aspx?id=34&type=uoa.
Independent schools, which are called private schools in the United States.
For Marx, the apostrophe in “C’” refers to two things: on the one hand to surplus value as a quantitative increase compared to “C”, and on the other hand to the fact of capital reproduction. Since “capital” is not a thing but a social relation of power, the apostrophe indicates the fact that a capitalist social relation is established through accumulation processes, i.e. through the continuous transformation of academic resources into traditional academic capital and new academic capital. My representation of Marx’s formula does not need the quantitative aspect of “surplus value” as it refers to the fact that a capitalist academic social relation is now constructed in the step from “C” to “C′”.
References
Angermuller, J. (2013). How to become a philosopher. Academic discourse as a multi-levelled positioning practice. Sociología histórica, 3, 263–289.
Angermuller, J., & Maesse, J. (2015). Regieren durch Leistung. Die Verschulung des Sozialen in der Numerokratie. [Governing by numbers. The schoollike reorganization of the social in the numerocracy]. In A. Schäfer & C. Thompson (Eds.), Leistung [Merit] (pp. 61–108). Paderborn: Schöningh.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P., Boltanski, L., de Saint-Martin, M., & Maldidier, P. (1981). Titel und Stelle. Über die Reproduktion sozialer Macht. [Degree and position. On the reproduction of social power]. Frankfurt a.M.: Europa-Verlag.
Collins, R. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York: Academic Press.
Combes, P.-P., & Linnemer, L. (2010). Inferring missing citations. A quantitative multi-criteria ranking of all journals in economics. Working paper. https://server1.tepper.cmu.edu/barnett/journal_ranking_2010.pdf, Accessed 25 Oct 2014.
Desrosières, A. (2003). Managing the economy. In T. Porter & D. Ross (Eds.), The Cambridge history of science (pp. 553–564). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dezaley, Y., & Garth, D. (2009). National usages for a “global” science. The dissemination of new economic paradigms as a strategy for the reproduction of governing elites. In G. Mallard, C. Paradeise, & A. Peerbaye (Eds.), Global science and national sovereignty. Studies in historical sociology of science (pp. 143–167). Routledge: New York.
Epstein, G. A. (Ed.). (2005). Financialization and the world economy. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity. How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.
Fitzgerald, J., & O’Rourke, B. (2015). Performing economics: How economics discourse gets enacted in radio news interviews. In paper presented at the 10th international conference in interpretive policy analysis, July 8, 2015 to July 10, 2015.
Flottum, K. (2005). The self and the others: Polyphonic visibility in research articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 29–44.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). An introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Fourcade, M. (2006). The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 145–194.
Fourcade, M., Ollion, E., Algan, Y. (2014). The superiority of economists. MaxPo discussion paper 14/3.
Goedegebuure, L. C., Maassen, P. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1990). Peer review and performance indicators: Quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education. Utrecht: Lemma.
Habermas, J. (1985). Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit. Kleine politische Schriften V. [The new complexity. Short political letters V]. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.
Hall, P. A. (Ed.). (1989). The political power of economic ideas. Keynesianism across nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hamann, J. (2015). Posthumous (e)valuation. Research biographies in US sociology, as reflected in academic obituaries. Timelines–Newsletter of the ASA Section History of Sociology, 24, 10–13.
Han, S.-K. (2003). Tribal regimes in academia: A comparative analysis of market structure across disciplines. Social Networks, 25, 251–280.
Hartmann, M. (2006). The sociology of elites. London: Routledge.
Hirschman, D., & Bopp Berman, E. (2014). Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics. Socio-Economic Review, 12, 779–811.
Hood, W. W., & Conceptión, S. W. (2001). The literature of bilbliometrics, scientometrics and infometrcis. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314.
Hornbostel, S. (2008). Neue evaluationsregime? Von der Inquisition zur Evaluation. [New evaluation regimes? From inquisition to evaluation]. In H. Matthies & D. Simon (Eds.), Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung [Science under observation] (pp. 59–82). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Huisman, J., & van der Wende, M. (Eds.). (2004). On cooperation and competition. National and European policies for the internationalisation of higher education. Bonn: Lemmens.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Jessop, B. (2004). Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 159–174.
Johnston, J., & Reeves, A. (2016). Economics is becoming an elite subject for elite UK universities, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/11/14/economics-elite-subject-uk-universities/.
Kessler, O., & Wilhelm, B. (2013). Financialization and the three utopias of shadow banking. Competition & Change, 17(3), 248–264.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Krücken, G., & Meier, F. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. Drori, J. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), World society and the expansion of formal organization (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think. Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(21), 201–221.
Langenohl, A. (2010). Analyzing expectations sociologically: Elements of a formal sociology of the financial markets. Economic Sociology: The European Economic Newsletter, 12(1), 18–27.
Lebaron, F. (2006). “Nobel” economists as public intellectuals: The circulation of symbolic capital. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 43(1), 87–101.
Lebaron, F. (2014). The world of economics: A “strong field”–pegged to the field of power. Presentation at the workshop “Die Soziologie ökonomischen Wissens”, Jena.
Lee, F. S., Pham, X., & Gu, G. (2013). The UK research assessment exercise and the narrowing of UK economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 693–717.
Leins, S. (2013). Playing the market? The role of risk, uncertainty and authority in the construction of stock market forecasts. In R. Cassidy, A. Pisac, & C. Loussouarn (Eds.), Qualitative research in gambling: exploring the production and consumption of risk (pp. 218–232). New York and London: Routledge.
Leyshon, A., & Thrift, N. (2007). The capitalization of almost everything: The future of finance and capitalism. Theory Culture & Society, 24(7–8), 97–115.
MacKenzie, D. (2006). An engine, not a camera. How financial models shape markets. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Maesse, J. (2010). Die vielen Stimmen des Bologna-Prozesses. Zur diskursiven Logik eines bildungspolitischen Programms. [Die many voices of the Bologna process. The discursive logic of an educational policy program] Bielefeld, transcript.
Maesse, J. (2015a). Economic experts. A discursive political economy of economics. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(3), 279–305.
Maesse, J. (2015b). Eliteökonomen. Wissenschaft im Wandel der Gesellschaft. [Elite economists. Science in transformation of society]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Maesse, J. (2016a). The power of myth. The dialectics between “elitism” and “academism” in economic expert discourse. European Journal of Cross Cultural Communication, Special Issue: Culture, Integration and Communication: Issues and Approaches in Higher Education Contexts, forthcoming.
Maesse, J. (2016b). Graduate schools in economics: Opening the black box of the elitism dispositif. In R. Bloch, A. Mitterle, C. Paradeise & T. Peter (Eds.), The making of elite universities and the production of elites (in review).
Maesse, J., & Hamann, J. (2016). Die Universität als Dispositiv. Die gesellschaftstheoretische Einbettung von Bildung und Wissenschaft aus diskurstheoretischer Perspektive [The university as a dispositif. The social embeddedness of education and science in discourse analytical perspective]. Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung, 1, 29–50.
Matthies, H., & Simon, D. (Eds.). (2007). Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung [Science under oberservation]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337.
Morgan, M. S. (2003). Economics. In T. Porter & D. Ross (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Science (pp. 275–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Münch, R. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. New York: Routledge.
Musselin, C., & Teixeira, P.N. (eds) (2014). Reforming higher education. Public policy design and implementation. Higher Education Dynamics Series 41.
O’Rourke, B. K., & Hogan, J. (2013). Reflections in the eyes of a dying tiger: Looking back on Ireland’s 1987 economic crisis. In A. De Rycker & Z. Mohd Don (Eds.), Discourse and crisis: Critical perspectives (pp. 215–238). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., Ferlie, E. (eds) (2009). University governance: Western European comparative perspectives. Higher Education Dynamics 25.
Paradeise, C., & Thoenig, J.-C. (2013). Academic institutions in search of quality: Local orders and global standards. Organization Studies, 34(2), 189–218.
Power, M. (1997). The audit society. Rituals of verification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Readings, B. (1996). The University in Ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reitz, T., & Draheim, S. (2006). Die Rationalität der Hochschulreform. Grundzüge eines postautonomen Wissensregimes [The rationality of higher education reform. Main features of a post-autonomous regime of knowledge]. Soziale Welt, 57(4), 373–396.
Rossi, Peter H., Lipsey, Mark W., & Freeman, Howard E. (2004). Evaluation. A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74, 63–82.
Schmidt-Wellenburg, C. (2013). Die Regierung des Unternehmens. Managementberatung im neoliberalen Kapitalismus. [Governing the firm. Managerial advice in neoliberal capitalism] Konstanz, UVK.
Schulze-Cleven, T. (2015). Liberalizing the academy: The transformation of higher education in the Unites States and Germany. CSHE Research & Occasional Paper 1.15 (Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, 2015).
Wansleben, L. (2013). Cultures of expertise in global currency markets. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Guest Editor Name: Guest Editors of Political Economy of Higher Education (Prof. Dr. Johannes Angermuller, Dr. Jens Maesse, Dr. Tilman Reitz, and Prof. Dr. Tobias Schulze-Cleven).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maesse, J. The elitism dispositif: hierarchization, discourses of excellence and organizational change in European economics. High Educ 73, 909–927 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0019-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0019-7