Abstract
As negotiation is critical to all forms of organizational decision-making, researchers have shown an interest in understanding how the flow of information (valid and otherwise) influences this process. Often, competitive, questionable, and unethical tactics have been treated as interchangeable in these studies, despite presumed differences in appropriateness. The purpose of this study was to examine the similarities and differences in negotiators’ use and efficacy of appropriate competitive tactics (e.g., exaggerated offers) versus inappropriate competitive tactics (e.g., factual misrepresentations), primarily through a negotiation simulation. The study found that although these two categories of tactics were correlated in terms of overall use, appropriate competitive behaviors were used more frequently, especially early in negotiations, and these behaviors often resulted in comparable responses from counterparts. While ultimately increasing the likelihood of a negotiation impasse, the use of appropriate competitive tactics improved an individual’s substantive outcome where agreements could be reached. Inappropriate competitive tactics were likely to increase in number the sooner they were first employed in negotiations, with a response of inappropriate competitive tactics to the first use of competitive tactics increasing the likelihood of subsequent use of inappropriate tactics. The implications of these and other findings for both practitioners and future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair WL, Brett JM (2005) The negotiation dance: time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organ Sci 16(1):33–51
Amanatullah E, Morris M, Curhan J (2008) Negotiators who give too much: unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining. J Pers Soc Psychol 95(3):723–738
Anton RJ (1990) Drawing the line: an exploratory test of ethical behavior in negotiations. Int J Confl Manag 1(3):265–280
Aquino K, Becker T (2005) Lying in negotiations: how individual and situational factors influence the use of neutralization strategies. J Organ Behav 26:661–679
Arbuckle JL (1996) Amos users’ guide (version 3.6). Small Waters Corporation, Chicago
Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York
Bakeman R, Gottman JM (1997) Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Barry B (1999) The tactical use of emotion in negotiation. In: Bies RJ, Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BJ (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations. JAI Press, Stamford, pp 93–121
Ben-Yoav O, Pruitt D (1984) Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. J Exp Soc Psychol 34:323–335
Bok S (1978) Lying: moral choice in public and private life. Random House, New York
Brett JM, Shapiro DL, Lytle AL (1998) Breaking the bonds of reciprocity in negotiations. Acad Manag J 41(4):410–424
Butler JK (1999) Trust expectations, information sharing, climate of trust and negotiation effectiveness and efficiency. Group Organ Manag 24:217–238
Carlson JR, George JF, Burgoon JK, Adkins M, White CH (2004) Deception in computer-mediated communication. Group Decis Negot 13(1):5–28
Carr AZ (1968) Is business bluffing ethical? Harv Bus Rev 46(1):143–153
Carson TL (1993) Second thoughts about bluffing. Bus Ethics Q 3(4):317–341
Chartrand TL, Maddux W, Lakin J (2005) Beyond the perception-behavior link: the ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In: Hassin R, Uleman J, Bargh JA (eds) The new unconscious. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 334–361
Christie R, Geis FL (1970) Studies in machiavellianism. Academic Press, New York
Cialdini RB (2009) Influence: science and practice, 5th edn. Pearson Education, Boston
Curhan JR, Pentland A (2007) Thin slices of negotiation: predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. J Appl Psychol 92(3):802–811
De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR, Kwon S (2000) Influence of social motives on integrative negotiations: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:889–905
Dees JG, Cramton PC (1991) Shrewd bargaining on the moral frontier: toward a theory of morality in practice. Bus Ethics Q 1(2):135–167
Delerue-Vidot H (2006) Opportunism and unilateral commitment: the moderating effect of relational capital. Manag Decis 44(6):737–751
Deutsch M (1973) The resolution of conflict: constructive and destructive processes. Yale University Press, New Haven
Druckman D, Olekalns M (2008) Emotions in negotiation. Group Decis Negot 17(1):1–11
Druckman D, Olekalns M, Smith P (2009) Interpretive filters: social cognition and the impact of turning points in negotiation. Negot J 25:13–40
Elangovan AR, Auer-Rizzi W, Szabo E (2007) Why don’t I trust you now? An attributional approach to erosion of trust. J Manag Psychol 22(1):4–24
Fassina NE, Whyte GR (2014) “I am disgusted by your proposal”: the effects of a strategic flinch in negotiations. Group Decis Negot 23(4):901–920
Ferrin DL, Bligh MC, Kohles JC (2008) It takes two to tango: an interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 107:161–178
Festinger LA (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Peterson, Evanston
Filzmoser M, Vetschera R (2008) A classification of bargaining steps and their impact on negotiation outcomes. Group Decis Negot 17(5):421–443
Fisher R, Ury W, Patton B (2011) Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in, 3rd edn. Penguin Books, New York
Fleck D, Volkema R, Levy B, Pereira S, Vaccari L (2013) Truth or consequences: the effects of competitive-unethical tactics on negotiation process and outcomes. Int J Confl Manag 24(4):328–351
Fulmer IS, Barry B, Long A (2009) Lying and smiling: informational and emotional deception in negotiation. J Bus Ethics 88:691–709
Galinsky AD, Mussweiler T (2001) First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. J Pers Soc Psychol 81:657–669
Glasl F (1982) The process of conflict escalation and roles of third parties. In: Bomers GBJ, Peterson RB (eds) Conflict management and industrial relations. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, The Hague, pp 119–140
Glick S, Croson R (2001) Reputations in negotiation. In: Hoch S, Kunreuther H (eds) Wharton on decision making. Wiley, New York, pp 117–186
Graebner M (2009) Caveat venditor: trust asymmetries in acquisitions of entrepreneurial firms. Acad Manag J 52(3):435–472
Guidice RM, Alder GS, Phelan SE (2009) Competitive bluffing: an examination of a common practice and its relationship with performance. J Bus Ethics 87(4):535–553
Han I, Kwon S, Bae J, Park K (2012) When are integrative tactics more effective? The moderating effects of moral identity and the use of distributive tactics. Int J Confl Manag 23(2):133–150
Joreskog KG, Sorbom D (1989) LISREL 7: a Guide to the program and applications. SPSSX Inc, Chicago
Kulik BW, O’Fallon MJ, Salimath MS (2008) Do competitive environments lead to the rise and spread of unethical behavior? Parallels from Enron. J Bus Ethics 83(4):703–723
Labianca G, Brass DJ, Gray B (1998) Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: the role of negative relationships and third parties. Acad Manag J 41(1):55–67
Lax DA, Sebenius JK (1986) The manager as negotiator. The Free Press, New York
Lewicki RJ (1983) Lying and deception: a behavioral model with applications to negotiations. In: Bazerman MH, Lewicki RJ (eds) Negotiating in organizations. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 68–90
Lewicki RJ, Barry B, Saunders DM (2010) Negotiation, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston
Lewicki RJ, Robinson RJ (1998) Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: an empirical study. J Bus Ethics 17:665–682
Lytle AL, Brett JM, Shapiro DL (1999) The strategic use of interests, rights, and power to resolve disputes. Negot J 15:31–51
Ma L, Mclean Parks J (2012) Your good name: the relationship between perceived reputational risk and acceptability of negotiation tactics. J Bus Ethics 106(2):161–175
Ma Z (2008) Personality and negotiation revisited: toward a cognitive model of dyadic negotiation. Manag Res News 31(10):774–790
Ma ZZ (2010) The SINS in business negotiations: explore the cross-cultural differences in business ethics between Canada and China. J Bus Ethics 91(Supplement 1):123–135
McAllister DJ (1995) Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manag J 38:24–59
Meyer CJ, McCormick B, Clement A, Woods R, Fifield C (2012) Scissors cut paper: purposive and contingent strategies in a conflict situation. Int J Confl Manag 23(4):344–361
Meyerson D, Weick KE, Kramer RM (1996) Swift trust and temporary groups. In: Kramer RM, Tyler TR (eds) Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 166–195
Mintzberg H (1973) The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row, New York
Murphy PR, Dacin MT (2011) Psychological pathways to fraud: understanding and preventing fraud in organizations. J Bus Ethics 101(4):601–618
Murnighan JK, Babcock L, Thompson L, Pillutla M (1999) The information dilemma in negotiations: effects of experience, incentives, and integrative potential. Int J Confl Manag 10(4):313–339
Mussweiler T, Strack F (1999) Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: a selective accessibility model. J Exp Soc Psychol 35:136–164
Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York
O’Connor KM, Carnevale PJ (1997) A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 23:504–515
O’Fallon MJ, Butterfield KD (2005) A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. J Bus Ethics 59(4):375–413
Olekalns M, Brett JM, Weingart LR (2003) Phases, transitions and interruptions: modeling processes in multi-party negotiations. Int J Confl Manag 14(3/4):191–211
Olekalns M, Kulik CT, Chew L (2014) Sweet little lies: social context and the use of deception in negotiation. J Bus Ethics 120(1):13–26
Olekalns M, Smith PL (2003) Social motives in negotiation: the relationships between dyad composition, negotiation processes and outcomes. Int J Confl Manag 14(3):233–254
Olekalns M, Smith PL (2007) Loose with the truth: predicting deception in negotiation. J Bus Ethics 76:225–238
Olekalns M, Smith PL, Walsh T (1996) The process of negotiating: tactics, phases and outcomes. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 67:68–77
Olekalns M, Weingart L (2008) Emergent negotiations: stability and shifts in process dynamics. Negot Confl Manag Res 1:135–160
Perry GM, Nixon CJ (2005) The influence of role models on negotiation ethics of college students. J Bus Ethics 62(1):25–40
Pesendorfer E, Koeszegi ST (2006) Hot versus cool behavioural styles in electronic negotiations: the impact of communication mode. Group Decis Negot 15(2):141–155
Pierce JR, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Sivanathan N (2013) From glue to gasoline: how competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychol Sci 24(10):1986–1994
Pruitt DG (1981) Negotiation behavior. Academic Press, New York
Pruitt DG, Rubin JZ (1986) Social conflict: escalation, stalemate and settlement. Random House, New York
Reb J (2010) The influence of past negotiations on negotiation counterpart preferences. Group Decis Negot 19(5):457–477
Requeho WH, Graham JL (2008) Global negotiation: the new rules. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Rivers C (2009) Negotiating with the Chinese: EANTs and all. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 51(5):473–489
Rivers C, Volkema RJ (2013) East–West differences in “tricky” tactics: a comparison of the tactical preferences of Chinese and Australian negotiators. J Bus Ethics 115(1):17–31
Robinson RJ, Lewicki RJ, Donahue EM (2000) Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: introducing the SINS scale. J Organ Behav 21(6):649–664
Rosette AS, Kopelman S, Abbott JL (2014) Good grief! Anxiety sours the economic benefits of first offers. Group Decis Negot 23(3):629–647
Ryckman RM, Hammer M, Kaczor LM, Gold JA (1996) Construction of a personal development competitive attitude scale. J Pers Assess 66:374–385
Schroth HA, Bain-Chekal J, Caldwell DF (2005) Sticks and stones may break bones and words can hurt me: words and phrases that trigger emotions in negotiations and their effects. Int J Confl Manag 16(2):102–127
Schweitzer ME, Croson R (1999) Curtailing deception: the impact of direct questions on lies and omissions. Int J Confl Manag 10:225–248
Smyth LF (2012) Escalation and mindfulness. Negot J 28(1):45–72
Sobral F, Islam G (2013) Ethically questionable negotiating: the interactive effects of trust, competitiveness, and situation favorability on ethical decision making. J Bus Ethics 117(2):281–296
Tenbrunsel A, Smith-Crowe K (2008) Chapter 13: ethical decision making: where we’ve been and where we’re going. Acad Manag Ann 2:545–607
The American Heritage Dictionary (2011) 5th ed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston
Thomas K, Kilmann RH (1974) Thomas–Kilmann conflict MODE instrument. Xicom, Tuxedo
Thomas K, Thomas G (2008) Conflict styles of men and women at six organization levels. Int J Confl Manag 19(2):148–166
Thompson L (1993) The impact of negotiation on intergroup relations. J Exp Soc Psychol 29:304–325
Thompson L (2012) The mind and heart of the negotiator, 5th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River
Tinsley CH, O’Connor KM, Sullivan BA (2002) Tough guys finish last: the perils of a distributive reputation. Organ Behav Human Decis Process 88(2):621–642
Tinsley CH, Pillutla MM (1998) Negotiating in the United States and Hong Kong. J Int Bus Stud 29(4):711–727
Tsay C-J, Bazerman MH (2009) A decision-making perspective to negotiation: a review of the past and a look to the future. Negot J 25(4):467–480
Turel O (2010) Interdependence issues in analyzing negotiation data. Group Decis Negot 19:111–125
Volkema RJ (2004) Demographic, cultural, and economic predictors of perceived ethicality of negotiation behavior: a nine-country analysis. J Bus Res 57:69–78
Volkema RJ, Fleck D, Hofmeister A (2010) Predicting competitive-unethical negotiating behavior and its consequences. Negot J 25(3):263–286
Volkema RJ, Fleck D, Hofmeister A (2011) Getting off on the right foot: the effects of initial email messages on negotiation process and outcome. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 54(3):299–313
Volkema RJ, Fleck D, Hofmeister-Toth A (2004) Ethicality in negotiation: an analysis of attitudes, intentions, and outcomes. Int Negot 9(2):315–339
Volkema RJ, Fleury MTL (2002) Alternative negotiating conditions and the choice of negotiation tactics: a cross-cultural comparison. J Bus Ethics 36:381–398
von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Weingart LR, Olekalns M, Smith PL (2004) Quantitative coding of negotiation behavior. Int Negot 9(3):441–455
Westbrook KW, Arendall CS, Padelford WM (2011) Gender, competitiveness, and unethical negotiation strategies. Gend Manag 26(4):289–310
Whyte G, Sebenius JK (1997) The effect of multiple anchors on anchoring in individual and group judgment. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 69(1):75–85
Zyglidopoulos SC, Fleming PJ, Rothenberg S (2009) Rationalization, overcompensation and the escalation of corruption in organizations. J Bus Ethics 84:65–73
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Barbara Levy and Lara Vaccari for their assistance with data analysis. This study was partially funded by CNPq, Brazil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fleck, D., Volkema, R.J. & Pereira, S. Dancing on the Slippery Slope: The Effects of Appropriate Versus Inappropriate Competitive Tactics on Negotiation Process and Outcome. Group Decis Negot 25, 873–899 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9469-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9469-7