Skip to main content
Log in

Microsatellites and agronomic approaches reveal the diversity of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivated in Espírito Santo—Brazil, by family farms

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae) is the most important legume of the genus Phaseolus, and the most cultivated in family farming. This study aimed to characterize landrace beans by SSR markers and morphoagronomic variables, comparing them to commercial cultivars. A total of 185 accessions (158 landrace and 27 commercial) were evaluated using SSR, and later 50 accessions (37 landrace and 13 commercial cultivars) were evaluated by 12 morphoagronomic variables. The estimators of genetic diversity, expected heterozygosity, allelic number, private, and rare alleles showed greater magnitude in landrace accessions, indicating the potential of these accessions as a reservoir of rare and private alleles compared to commercial stocks. Ten groups were observed in the cluster analysis, of which one group had 89% of accessions (138 landrace and all commercial ones). For morphoagronomic characterization, three field experiments were carried out in randomized blocks with three replications, one in Alegre, ES and two in Mimoso do Sul, ES. The accessions Verde-111, Branco-110, Pérola-102, Preto-13-69, Feijão Rainha-18, and Branco-05 showed high productivity levels (above 3000 kg ha−1) and six groups were formed. Most landrace accessions and commercial cultivars were allocated into the same group, suggesting that landrace beans have characteristics of interest compared to the commercial ones. The variability detected in landrace beans is of strategic importance, given the selection carried out by farmers for materials adapted to their local conditions. Thus, the development of policies to support the conservation of bean trees on rural properties is indicated as a measure to preserve diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdurakhmonov IY, Abdukarimov A (2008) Application of association mapping to understanding the genetic diversity of plant germplasm resources. Int J Plant Genomics 2008:574927. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/574927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Afférri FS, Martins EP, Peluzio JM, Fidelis RR, Rodrigues VM (2008) Espaçamento e densidade de semeadura para a cultura do milho, em plantio tardio, no Estado do Tocantins. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 128–133

  • Akibode CS, Maredia M (2011) Global and regional trends in production, trade and consumption of food legume crops. Report submitted to the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA) of the CGIAR Science Council, FAO, Rome

  • Ambade RL, Verma SK, Nanda HC, Nair SK, Verulkar SB (2015) Genetic diversity based on molecular markers in Grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Legume Res 38:43–46. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00007.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assady B, Dorri HR, Vaezi S (2005) Study of genetic diversity of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes by multivariate analysis methods. In: The First Iranian Pulse Symposium, Research Center for Plant Sciences, Ferdowi University of Mashhad, Iran, p 650

  • Beebe SE (2012) Common bean breeding in the tropics. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol 36. Wiley, New York, pp 357–426

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benchimol LL, Campos T, De Carbonell SAM, Colombo CA, Chioratto AF, Formighieri EFL, Gouve RM, Souza APD (2007) Structure of genetic diversity among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties of Mesoamerican and Andean origins using new developed microsatellite markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1747–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9184-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoldo JG, Nodari RO, Coimbra JLM, Guidolin AF, Toaldo D, Pinho de Morais PP, Elias HT (2014) Genetic progress of black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) over seven years. Interciencia 39:24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Giardini A, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti E, Santilocchi R, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Gioia T, Logozzo G, Attene G, Nanni L, Papa R (2013) Molecular analysis of the parallel domestication of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Mesoamerica and the Andes. New Phytol 197:300–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04377.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bitocchi E, Nanni L, Bellucci E, Rossi M, Giardini A, Zeuli P, Logozzo G, Stougaard J, McClean P, Attene G, Papa R (2012) Mesoamerican origin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is revealed by sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:788–796. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108973109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair MW, Brondani RVP, Díaz LM, Del Peloso MJ (2013) Diversity and population structure of common bean from Brazil. Crop Sci 53:1983–1993. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.09.0516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair MW, Díaz LM, Buendía HF, Duque MC. (2009) Genetic diversity, seed size associations and population structure of a core collection of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 119:955–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1064-8

  • Botstein D, White R, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BRASIL. Presidência da República. Decreto no 2.366, de 05 de novembro de (1997) Regulamenta a Lei no 9.456, de 25 de abril de 1997, que institui a Proteção de Cultivares, dispões sobre o Serviço Nacional de Proteção de Cultivares - SNPC, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, no 216, 7 de nov. 1997. Seção 1, pp 25333–25354.

  • Burle ML, Fonseca JR, Kami JA, Gepts P (2010) Microsatellite diversity and genetic structure among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces in Brazil, a secondary center of diversity. Theor Appl Genet 121:801–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1350-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral PDS, Soares TCB, Lima ABP, de Miranda FD, Souza FB, Gonçalves LSA (2011) Genetic diversity in local and commercial dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) accessions based on microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Res 10(1):140–149. https://doi.org/10.4238/vol10-1gmr993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral PDS, Taís CBS, Leandro SAG, Antonio TAJ, Andreia BPL, Rosana R, de Frederico PM (2010) Quantification of the diversity among common bean accessions using Ward-MLM strategy. Pesq Agropecu Brasília 45(10):1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2010001000011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso PCB, Brondani C, Menezes IPP, Valdisser PAMR, Borba TCO, Del Peloso MJ, Vianello RP (2014) Discrimination of common bean cultivars using multiplexed microsatellite markers. Genet Mol Res 13(1):1964–1978. https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.March.24.1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carias CMDOM, Guilhen JHS, de Souza MT, Ferreira A, Ferreira MFDS (2018) Genetic divergence toward the selection of promising bean progenitors via mixed multivariate models. Cien Inv Agr 45:251–262. https://doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v45i3.1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro JE de S, de Paula Júnior TJ, Borém A (2015) Feijão: do plantio à colheita. UFV, Viçosa, p 384

  • Castro-Rosas J, Aguirre-Santos EA, Gómez-Aldapa CA, Valle-Cervantes S, Ochoa-Martínez LA, Hernández-Santos B, Rodríguez-Miranda J (2016) Effect of harvest year on the physical properties, chemical composition and cooking time of three common bean varieties that are grown in Mexico. Qual Assur Saf Crop 8:339–348. https://doi.org/10.3920/QAS2015.0693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary N, Gupta M, Shafi S, Jan S, Mir AH, Singh B, Varshney R (2022) Molecular diversity and nutriment studies of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from the two hot-spots of Western Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir. Crop and Pasture Science

  • Coelho GMM, Coimbra JLM, Souza CA, Bogo A, Guidolim AF (2007) Diversidade genética em acessos de feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Cienc Rural 37:1241–1247. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000500004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho CMM, Zilio M, Souza CA, Guidolin AF, Miquelluti DJ (2010) Características morfo-agronômicas de cultivares crioulas de feijão comum em dois anos de cultivo. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 31(1):1177–1186

  • Collicchio E, Ramalho MAP, Abreu ÂFB (1997) Associação entre o porte da planta do feijoeiro e o tamanho dos grãos. Pesq Agropec Bras 32:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2018) Perspectivas para a agropecuária. Conab, Brasília

  • Cruz CD (2013) GENES—a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Sci 35:271–276. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v35i3.21251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz CD (2001) Programa Genes: aplicativo computacional em genética e estatística. UFV, Viçosa, 648p

  • Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ (2001) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. UFV. 390p

  • Del Peloso MJ, Melo LC (2005) Potencial de rendimento da cultura do feijoeiro comum. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, p 131

  • Delfini J, Moda-Cirino V, de Fátima RC, dos Santos NJ, Ruas PM, Buratto JS, Ruas EA, Gonçalves LSA (2017) Distinctness of Brazilian common bean cultivars with carioca and black grain by means of morphoagronomic and molecular descriptors. PLoS ONE 12:e0188798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188798

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl DA, VonHoldt BM (2012) Structure harvester: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4(2):359–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

  • Ellegren H (2004) Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet 5:435–445. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans AM (1980) Structure, variation, evolution, and classification in Phaseolus. In: Summerfield RJ, Bunting AH (eds) Advances in legume science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 337–347

  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14(8):2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x

  • Falconer DS (1987) Introdução à genética quantitativa. UFV, Viçosa

  • FAO (2019) New standards to curb the global spread of plant pests and diseases. http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/1187738/icode/. Accessed May 2020

  • Gaitán-Solís E, Duque MC, Edwards KJ, Tohme J (2002) Microsatellite repeats in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): isolation, characterization, and cross-species amplification in Phaseolus ssp. Crop Sci 42:2128–2136. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvan MZ, Menendez-Sevillano MC, De Ron AM, Santalla M, Balatti PA (2006) Genetic diversity among wild common beans from north-western Argentina based on morpho-agronomic and RAPD data. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:891–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-004-0981-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gana AS, Shaba SZ, Tsado EK (2013) Principal component analysis of morphological traits in thirty-nine accessions of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in a rainfed lowland ecology of Nigeria. J Plant Breed Crop Sci 5:120–126. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS12.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia RAV, Rangel PN, Brondani C, Martins WS, Melo LC, Carneiro MS, Borba TCO, Brondani RPV (2011) The characterization of a new set of EST-derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers as a resource for the genetic analysis of Phaseolus vulgaris. BMC Genet 12:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-12-41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gepts P, Osborn TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA (1986) Phaseolin-protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Econ Bot 40:451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia T, Logozzo G, Marzario S, Spagnoletti Zeuli P, Gepts P (2019) Evolution of SSR diversity from wild types to U.S. advanced cultivars in the Andean and Mesoamerican domestications of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). PLoS One 14:e0211342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Graham PH, Ranalli P (1997) Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Res 53:131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00112-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanai LR, de Campos T, Camargo LEA, Benchimol LL, de Souza AP, Melotto M, Carbonell SAM, Chioratto AF, Consoli L, Formighieri EF, Siqueira M, Tsai SM, Vieira MLC (2007) Development, characterization, and comparative analysis of polymorphism at common bean SSR loci isolated from genic and genomic sources. Genome 50:266–277. https://doi.org/10.1139/G07-007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson PM, Sitathani K, Sadashiva AT, Yang RY, Graham E, Ledesma D (2007) Performance of Solanum habrochaites LA 1777 introgression line hybrids for marketable tomato fruit yield in Asia. Euphytica 158:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9440-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann Júnior L, Ribeiro ND, Rosa SSD, Jost E, Poersch NL, Medeiros SLP (2007) Resposta de cultivares de feijão à alta temperatura do ar no período reprodutivo. Cienc Rural 37:1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000600006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INCAPER (2018) Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa e Assistência Têcnica Rural. Boletim Climatológico Trimestral do Espírito Santo Jan–Mar 2018. Vitória

  • INCAPER a (2017) Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa e Assistência Têcnica Rural. Boletim Climatológico Trimestral do Espírito Santo Out–Dez 2017. Vitória

  • INCAPER b (2017) Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa e Assistência Têcnica Rural. Boletim Climatológico Trimestral do Espírito Santo Abr – Jun 2017. Vitória

  • Jannat S, Shah AH, UlHassan M, Sher A, Fiaz S, Elesawy BH, Ismailf KA, Askaryf A, Qayyum A (2022) Genetic diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) ecotypes from Pakistan using simple sequence repeats. Saudi J Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103300

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor R, Choudhary K (2017) Genetic diversity analysis of fodder oats (Avena sativa L.) germplasm by microsatellite markers. J Agr Sci Tech 19: 1369–1379. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3577

  • Kumar P, Gupta VK, Misra AK, Modi DR, Pandey BK (2009) Potential of molecular markers in plant biotechnology. Plant Omics J 2(4):141–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak M, Gepts P (2009) Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Theor Appl Genet 118:979–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0955-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima MS, Carneiro JES, Carneiro PCS, Pereira CS, Vieira RF, Cecon PR (2012) Characterization of genetic variability among common bean genotypes by morphological descriptors. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 12:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-70332012000100010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maciel F, Echeverrigaray S, Gerald L, Grazziotin F (2003) Genetic relationship and diversity among Brazilian cultivar and of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) revealed by AFLP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:887–893. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025994513043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen J (1967) Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, University of California Press, City, pp 281–297

  • Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1981) Introduction to linear regression analysis. John Wiley, New York. 504p

  • Murekezi A, Oparinde A, Birol E (2017) Consumer market segments for biofortified iron beans in Rwanda: evidence from a hedonic testing study. Food Policy 66:35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghavi MR, Malaki M, Alizadeh H, Pirseiedi M, Mardi M (2009) An assessment of genetic diversity in wild diploid wheat Triticum boeoticum from west of Iran using RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers. J Agric Sci Tech 11:585–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri V, Tosti N (2002) Phaseolus genetic diversity maintained on farm in Central Italy. Gen Res Crop Evol 49:511–520. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020902508166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okii D, Tukamuhabwa P, Tusiime G, Talwana H, Odong T, Mukankusi C, Male A, Amongi W, Sebuliba S, Paparu P, Nkalubo S, Ugen M, Buah S, Gepts P (2017) Agronomic qualities of genetic pyramids of common bean developed for multiple-disease-resistance. Afr Crop Sci J 25:457–472. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v25i4.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira HS, Melo LC, Del Peloso MJ, Diaz JLC, Magaldi MCS, Faria LC, Abreu AFB, Pereira Filho IA, Moreira JAA, Martins M, Wendland A, Costa JGC (2010) Evaluation of export common bean genotypes in Brazil. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 53:276–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet J (2006) DARwin software: dissimilarity analysis and representation for windows. http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin. Accessed 1 Feb 2018

  • Perseguini JMKC, Oblessuc PR, Rosa JRBF, Gomes KA, Chiorato AF, Carbonell SA, Garcia AA, Vianello RP, Benchimol-Reis LL (2016) Genome-wide association studies of anthracnose and angular leaf spot resistance in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). PLoS ONE 11(3):e0150506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perseguini JMKC, Silva GMB, Rosa JRBF, Gazaffi R, Marçal JF, Carbonell SAM, Chiorato AF, Zucchi MI, Garcia AAF, Benchimol-Reis LL (2015) Developing a common bean core collection suitable for association mapping studies. Genet Mol Biol 38:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-475738120140126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.6.3. https://www.R-project.org

  • Ramalho MAP, Santos JB, Zimmermann MJO (1993) Genética quantitativa em plantas autógamas; aplicações ao melhoramento do feijoeiro. UFG, Goiânia

  • Ramos Junior EU, Lemos LB, Silva TRB (2005) Componentes da produção, produtividade de grãos e características tecnológicas de cultivares de feijão. Bragantia 64:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052005000100008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana JC, Sharma TR, Tyagi RK, Chahota RK, Gautam NK, Singh M, Sharma PN, Ojha SN (2015) Characterisation of 4274 accessions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm conserved in the Indian gene bank for phenological, morphological and agricultural traits. Euphytica 205:441–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1406-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salehi M, Tajick M, Ebadi AG (2008) The study of relationship between different traits in common bean with multivariate statistical methods. Am-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 3:806–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado FHM, Fidelis RR, Carvalho GL, dos Santos RS, Canceillier EL, Silva GF (2011) Comportamento de genótipos de feijão, no período da entressafra, no sul do estado de Tocantins. Biosci J 27:52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado FHM, SilvaJ OliveiraTC, Tonello LP, Passos NG, Fidelis RR (2012) Efeito do nitrogênio em feijão cultivado em terras altas no sul do estado de Tocantins. Ambiência 8:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago-Ramos D, Juan de Dios Figueroa-Cárdenas JD, José Juan Véles-Medina JJ, Salazar (2018) Physicochemical properties of nixtamalized black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) flours. Food Chem 240:456–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.156

  • Scarano D, Rubio F, José Ruiz J, Raoa R, Corradoa G (2014) Morphological and genetic diversity among and within common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the Campania region (Southern Italy). Sci Hortic 180:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmutz J, McClean P, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu S, Song Q, Chavarro C et al (2014) A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet 46:707–713. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma PN, Diaz LM, Blair MW (2013) Genetic diversity of two Indian common bean germplasm collections based on morphological and microsatellite markers. Plant Genet Resour 11:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262112000469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savić A, Pipan B, Vasić M, Meglič V (2021) Genetic diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) germplasm from Serbia, as revealed by single sequence repeats (SSR). Sci Hortic 288:110405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sifres A, Blanca J, Nuez F (2010) Pattern of genetic variability of Solanum habrochaites in its natural area of distribution. Genet Resour Crop Evol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9578-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva JG, Aidar H, Kluthcouski J (2009) Colheita direta de feijão com colhedora automotriz axial. Pesq Agropec Trop 39:371–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva JG, Fonseca JR da (1996) Colheita. In: Araujo RS, Rava CA, Stone LF, Zimmermann MJ de O. Cultura do feijoeiro comum no Brasil. POTAFOS, Piracicaba pp 523–541.

  • Silva OF, Wander AE (2013) O feijão-comum no Brasil: Passado, Presente e Futuro. Embrapa-CNPAF, Santo Antônio de Goiás

  • Simone M de, Failde V, Garcia S, Panadero PC (1992) Adaptación de variedades y líneas de judías secas (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) a la recolección mecanica directa. INTA, Salta

  • Singh D (1981) The relative importance of characters affecting genetic divergence. Indian J Gene Plant Breed 41:237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Makkar HPS, Negi SS (1989) Rate and extent of digestion and potentially digestible dry matter and cell wall of various tree leaves. J Dairy Sci 72(12):3233–3239. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79482-0

  • Singh SP, Molina A, Gepts P (1995) Potential of wild common bean for seed yield improvement of cultivars in the tropics. Can J Plant Sci 75:807–812. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps95-136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovič L, Pipan B, Sinkovič E, Meglič V (2019) Morphological seed characterization of common (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and runner (Phaseolus coccineus L.) bean germplasm: a Slovenian gene bank example. BioMed Res 2019:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6376948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira ML, Santini L, Diniz AL et al (2016) Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful. Genet Mol Biol 39:312–328. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zilio M, Coelho CMM, Souza CA, Santos JCP, Miquelluti DJ (2011) Contribuição dos componentes de rendimento na produtividade de genótipos crioulos de feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Rev Ciênc Agron 42:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902011000200024

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasília, DF, Brazil), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (FAPES, Vitória, ES, Brazil), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Brasília, DF, Brazil) for financial support.

Funding

The research leading to these results received funding from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasília, DF, Brasil), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo (FAPES, Vitória, ES, Brasil) e Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brasília, DF, Brasil) provided financial support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcia Flores da Silva Ferreira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 140 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carvalho, M.S., de Oliveira Moulin Carias, C.M., Silva, M.A. et al. Microsatellites and agronomic approaches reveal the diversity of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivated in Espírito Santo—Brazil, by family farms. Genet Resour Crop Evol 70, 731–747 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01457-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01457-9

Keywords

Navigation