Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Helianthus tuberosus L. agg. in the Carpathian Basin: a blessing or a curse?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Helianthus tuberosus agg., an herbaceous perennial plant from the Asteraceae family, is native to North America and was introduced as a crop to Europe in the seventeenth century. The status of this plant has been rather controversial in the Carpathian Basin. This paper reviews its taxonomy, chorology, and ethnobotany in this region, using data obtained from herbarium specimens, ethnobotanical surveys performed in Transylvania, and data published earlier, documenting the invasive features of the plant since the beginning of the nineteenth century. Our results suggest that (1) Helianthus tuberosus agg. has been present in the Carpathian Basin from the nineteenth century, (2) its taxonomy is problematic since the first part of the nineteenth century; (3) ethnobotanical surveys confirmed that the plant’s tuber has been locally used mostly as a food in Transylvania, collected from cultivation. Overall, Helianthus tuberosus agg. is both a ‘blessing and a curse’ at the same time, it is a valuable crop with beneficial nutritional value, and also an environmentally dangerous invasive element for the diversity of the flora of the Carpathian Basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anastasiu P, Negrean G (2009) Neophytes in Romania. In: Rákosy L (ed) Neobiota din România. Presa Universitarặ Clujeanặ, Cluj-Napoca, pp 66–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeli I, Barta J, Molnár L (2000) A gyógyító csicsóka. Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniuk VO (2014) Kompleksnie vikoristania bulb topinambura (Helianthus tuberosus L.): ochishchennia inulinub fruktozi ta manozospepifichnovo lektinu. Farmakognostichni, Fitochimichni Doslidjennia pp 50–60

  • Bajňanský V, Fargašová A (2007) Atlas of seeds and fruits of Central and East-European flora. The Carpathian Mountains Region. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajpai PK, Bajpai P (1991) Cultivation and utilization of Jerusalem artichoke for ethanol, single cell protein, and high fructose syrup production. Enzyme Microb Tech 13:359–362. doi:10.1016/0141-0229(91)90158-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balogh L (2001) Invasive alien plants threatening the natural vegetation of Őrség landscape protection area (Hungary). In: Brundu G (ed) Plant invasions: species ecology and ecosystem management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogh L (2006) Napraforgófajok (Helianthus spp.). In: Botta-Dukát Z, Mihály B (eds) Biológiai inváziók Magyarországon. Özönnövények II. A KvVM Természetvédelmi Hivatalának tanulmánykötetei 10, Budapest, pp 247–305

  • Balogh L (2008) Sunflower species (Helianthus spp.). In: Botta-Dukát Z, Balogh L (eds) The most important invasive plants in Hungary. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, pp 227–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogh L (2012) Napraforgó fajok (Helianthus spp.). In: Csiszár Á (ed) Inváziós növényfajok Magyarországon. Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem Kiadó, Sopron, pp 265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartha SG, Quave CL, Balogh L, Papp N (2015) Ethnoveterinary practices of Covasna County, Transylvania, Romania. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 11(35):1–22. doi:10.1186/s13002-015-0020-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bärwald G (2008) Gesund abnehmen mit Topinambur. Trias, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkő L (1967) A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára I. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittera M (1922) Növénytermesztéstan. Pátria, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock DG, Kane NC, Ebert DP, Rieseberg LH (2013) Genome skimming reveals the origin of the Jerusalem Artichoke tuber crop species: neither from Jerusalem nor an artichoke. New Phytol 201(3):1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borbás V (1884) Temes megye vegetációja. Magy Orv Term XXIII: 1–83

  • Boršic I, Milović M, Dujmović I et al (2008) Preliminary check-list of invasive alien plant species (IAS) in Croatia. Nat Croat 17:55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Borza A (ed) (1968) Dicționar etnobotanic cuprinzînd denumirile polulare româneşti şi în alte limbi ale plantelor din România. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Butură V (1979) Enciclopedie de etnobotanică românească. Editura Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică, Bucureşti

    Google Scholar 

  • Červenka M (1986) Slovenské botanické názvoslovie. Príroda, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Zhou W, Gao C et al (2009) Biodiesel production from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tuber by heterotrophic microalgae Chlorella protothecoides. J Chem Technol Biot 84:777–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cimbalista UA (2009) Porivnialnii rentgeno-fluorescentnii analiz mineralniih rechovin v korinnii soniasnika adnarichnovo (Helianthus annuum), v bulbah soniasniku bulbistovo (Helianthus tuberosus). Farmakologia ta farmacija (Pharmacol Pharm) 1:22–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimbalista UA (2015) Paivniainie farmakognostichnie daslidjernia predstavnikiv rodu Helianthus L.: sniasnika adnarichnava ta soniasnika duibistovo. Zaproizhskii Derzhavnii Medichnii Universitet, Zaporizzia

    Google Scholar 

  • Csontos P, Vitalos M, Barina Z et al (2010) Early distribution and spread of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Central and Eastern Europe. Bot Helv 120:75–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-010-0072-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dénes A, Papp N, Babai D et al (2012) Wild plants used for food by Hungarian ethnic groups living in the Carpathian Basin. Act Soc Bot Pol 81(4):381–396. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2012.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Densmore F (1928) Uses of the plants by Chippewa Indians. United States, Government Printing Office, US

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolina K, Łuczaj Ł (2014) Wild food plants used on the Dubrovnik coast (south-eastern Croatia). Acta Soc Bot Pol 83(3):175–181. doi:10.5586/asbp.2014.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dövényi Z (2012) A Kárpát-medence földrajza. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdei A (2011) Elődeink öröksége: békési és székelyföldi települések etnobotanikai értékelése. BSc Thesis, University of Szeged, Szeged

  • Fehér A (2007) Historical reconstruction of expansion of non-native plants in the Nitra river basin (SW Slovakia). Kanitzia 15:47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehér A, Končeková L (2009) Evaluation of mechanical regulation of invasive Helianthus tuberosus populations in agricultural landscape. J Cent Eur Agrc 10:245–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete G, Kováts D (1974) 100 éves Növénytár herbáriumainak története II. Herbarium Carpato-Pannonicum. Bot Közlem 61:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Filep R, Balogh L, Csergő AM (2010) Perennial Helianthus taxa in Târgu-Mureş city and its surroundings. J Plant Develop 17:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Filep R, Pal RW, Balázs VL et al (2016) Can seasonal dynamics of allelochemicals play a role in plant invasions? A case study with Helianthus tuberosus L. Plant Ecol 217:1489–1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0662-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes N, Ugarte E, Kühn I et al (2008) Alien plants in Chile: inferring invasion periods from herbarium records. Biol Invasions 10:649–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s.0530-007-9159-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes N, Pauchard A, Sánchez P et al (2013) A new comprehensive database of alien plant species in Chile based on herbarium records. Biol Invasions 15:847–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s.10530-012-0334-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galgóci M, Štrba P (2008) Preliminary overview of detected invasive, alien and expanding taxons in the central part of the Pezinské Malé Karpaty Mts. Mladí vedci, pp 54–61

  • Gilmore MR (1913) A study in the ethnobotany of the Omaha Indians. Nebraska State Historical Society Collections 17:314–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Grábner E (1948) Szántóföldi növénytermesztés. Pátria Irodalmi Vállalat és Nyomdai Részvénytársaság, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Grynaeus T, Szabó LGy (2002) A bukovinai hadikfalvi székelyek növényei. Gyógyszerészet 46:251–259, 327–336, 394–399, 588–600

  • Gub J (1993) Adatok a Nagy-Homoród és a Nagy-Küküllő közötti terület népi növényismeretéhez. Néprajzi Látóhatár 1–2:95–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyárfás J (1925) Sikeres gazdálkodás szárazságban. Országos Magyar Gazdasági Egyesület Könyvkiadóvállalata, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand WD (ed) (1976) American folk medicine: a symposium. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart JA (1981) The ethnobotany of the Northen Cheyenne Indians in Montana. J Ethnopharmacol 4(1):1–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazslinszky F (1872) Magyarhon edényes növényeinek füvészeti kézikönyve. Athenaeum nyomda, Pest

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins KA, Bock DG, Hahn MA et al (2015) Comparative genomics in the Asteraceae reveals little evidence for parallel evolutionary change in invasive taxa. Mol Ecol 24:2226–2240. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hulina N (1998) Rare, endangered or vulnerable plants and neophytes in a drainage system in Croatia. Nat Croat 7:279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • I’só (1943) A csicsóka a mezőgazdaságfejlesztő ágazatban. Köztelek 8

  • I’só (1955) A csicsóka termesztése és nemesítése. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarić S, Popović Z, Mačukanović-Jocić M et al (2007) An ethnobotanical study on the usage of wild medicinal herbs from Kopaonik Mountain (Central Serbia). J Ethnopharmacol 111:160–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kays SJ, Nottingham SF (2008) Biology and chemistry of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). CRC Press, Boca Ranton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyeres Á (ed) (1967) Magyar életrajzi lexikon I. kötet. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest

  • Kleessen B, Schwarz S, Boehm A et al (2007) Jerusalem artichoke and chicory inulin in bakery products affect faecal microbiota of healthy volunteers. Br J Nutr 98:540–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114507730751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis L, Kaul HP, Praznik W, Liebhard P (2007) Einfluss des Erntetermins auf den Kraut- und Knollenertrag unterschiedlicher Sorten von Topinambur (Helianthus tuberosus L.) im semiariden Produktionsgebiet Österreichs. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 11(2):67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosaric N, Cosentino GP, Wieczorek A (1984) The Jerusalem artichoke as an agricultural crop. Biomass 5:1–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács JA (2006) Distribution of invasive alien species stands in Eastern Transylvania. Kanitzia 14:109–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss F (1943) Nösnerländische Pflanzennamen. Erdélyi Tudományos Intézet. Carl Csallner, Beszterce-Bistriz

  • Lacaita CC (1919) The “Jerusalem artichoke” (Helianthus tuberosus). Bull Misc Inform Kew 9:321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C et al (2008) Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80:101–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippay J (1664) Posoni kert. Cosmerovius Máthe Nyomdája, Nagyszombat

  • Loiselle BA, Jørgensen PM, Consiglio T et al (2008) Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? J Biogeogr 35:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01779x

    Google Scholar 

  • Łuczaj L, Stawarczyk K, Kosiek T et al (2015) Wild food plants and fungi used by Ukrainians in the western part of the Maramureş region in Romania. Acta Soc Bot Pol 84(3):339–346. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2015.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukač G, Vujčić-Karlo S (2000) Habitat characteristics and the importance of some plant species as singing places for marsh warblers (Acrocephalus palustris Aves) in Croatian neophyte structures. Nat Croat 9:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukácsy A (2011) Lex Gerenday. Egy polgárcsalád 15 éve. Corvina Kiadó, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Marhold K, Hindék F (1998) Zoznam nižších a vyšších rastlín Slovenska. Veda, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Micle F (2005) A review on the activity of „Alexandru Borza” Botanical Garden since its foundation. Contribuţii Botanice 40:341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerman ED (1998) Native american ethnobotany. Timber Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Murádin L (1975) A ‘burgonya, és a ‘csicsóka’ erdélyi elnevezéseinek szóföldrajzi és jelentésbeli összefüggéseikez. Nyelv- és Irodalomtudományi Közlemények XIX:7–16

  • Negrean G, Anastasiu P (2004) Plante invazive şi potenţial invazive în România (Lista neagră). In: Mihailescu S (ed) Bioplatform—Romanian National platform for biodiversity. Biodiversity Research Strategy, Bucharest, pp 87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Németh G, Izsáki Z (2006) Macro- and micro-element content and uptake of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). In: V Alps-Adria Scientific Workshop, Opatija

  • Omelchuk O, Prots B (2014) Effects of river regulation on plant dispersal and vegetation. Transylv Rev Syst Ecol Res 16:149–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp E (2007) Haszonnövények színes atlasza. Mezőgazda Kiadó Kft, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp N, Birkás-Frendl K, Bencsik T, Czégényi D (2013a) Ethnobotanical surveys in Transylvania: past, present and future. Bull Transilv Univ Braşov Ser II For Wood Ind Agric Food Eng 4(53):2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp N, Birkás-Frendl K, Farkas Á, Pieroni A (2013b) An ethnobotanical study on home gardens in an Transylvanian Hungarian Csángó village (Romania). Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:1423–1432. doi:10.1007/s10722-012-9930-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papp N, Kirkás-Frendl K, Bencsik T et al (2014) Survey of traditional beliefs in the Hungarian Csángó and Székely ethnomedicinal in Transylvania, Romania. Rev Bras Farmacogn 24:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2014.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patzner RA (1999) Alien species. Case study. Republic of Austria, Federal Ministry for Environment, Youth and Family Affairs, International Department, Vienna

  • Pauková Ž (2013) Invasive plant species in the three microregions of Nitra region, south-west Slovakia. Ekol 32(2):262–266. doi:10.2478/eko-2013-0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Péntek J, Szabó TA (1985) Ember és növényvilág. Kalotaszeg növényzete és népi növényismerete. Kriterion, Bukarest

    Google Scholar 

  • Perczel Gy (1996) A társadalmi-gazdasági fejlődés természeti alapjai. In: Gy Perczel (ed) Magyarország társadalmi-gazdasági földrajza. ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, Budapest, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry MJ (1974) Food use of “wild” plants by Cherokee Indians. A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree, The University of Tennessee

  • Pethe F (1805) Takarmányozástan. Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest

  • Pethő MA (2014) Kalotaszeg népi táplálkozása és szokásai. Püski, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinckert FA (1861) Die Topinambur: Anleitung zur Kultur und Benutzung als Futterkraut und Knollengewächs für Haus- und Viehwirthschaft. E. Schotte & Company, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Protopopova V, Shevera M (1998) Expansion of alien plants in settlements of the Tisa river basin (Transcarpathia, Ukraine). Thaiszia J Bot 8:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Protopopova VV, Shevera MV, Mosyakin SL (2006) Deliberate and unintentional introduction of invasive weeds: a case study of the alien flora of Ukraine. Euphytica 148:17–33. doi:10.1007/s10681-006-5938-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M et al (2004) Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Lambden PW, Arianoutsou M et al (2009) Alien vascular plants of Europe. In: Drake JA (ed) Daisie handbook of alien species in Europe. Springer, Knoxville, pp 43–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Rácz J (2010) Növénynevek enciklopédiája. Az elnevezések eredete, a növények kultúrtörténete és életteani hatása. Tinta Könyvkiadó, Budapest

  • Roberfroid MB (2007) Inulin-type fructans: functional food. J Nutr 137:2493–2502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully S (1970) A treasury of American Indian herb. Crown Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonkai L (1886) Erdély edényes flórája- Helyesbitett foglalata. Kir. Magyar Természettudományi társulat, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Sîrbu C, Oprea A (2008) Alien plant species from Stânişoara Mountains (Eastern Carpathians - Romania). J Plant Develop 15:33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Speck FG, Dexter RW (1952) Utilization of animals and plants by the Malecite Indians of New Brunswick. J Wash Acad Sci 42:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoian L (2008) A csicsóka biotermesztése. A biogazdálkodók lapja 10:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanton CJ, Cavers PB, Clements DR et al (1992) The biology of Canadian weeds. 101. Helianthus tuberosus L. Can J Plant Sci 72:1367–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabó TA (1978) Erdélyi Magyar Szótörténeti Tár II (Cs – Elsz). Kriterion Könyvkiadó, Bukarest

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó LGy (2010a) A csicsóka rendszertana és elterjedése. In: Szabó LGy (ed) Magyarország kultúrflórája. A csicsóka (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Szent István Egyetem Kiadó, Gödöllő, pp 12–16

  • Szabó LGy (2010b) Magyarország kultúrflórája. A csicsóka (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Szent István Egyetem Kiadó, Gödöllő

  • Szabó TA, Péntek J (1976/1996) Ezerjófű. Etnobotanikai útmutató. Kriterion (Bukarest), Tankönyvkiadó (Budapest)

  • Thiers B. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/

  • Thurzová L, Kresánek K, Mareček Š, Mika K (1983) Malý atlas liečivých rastlín. Vydavatel’stvo Osveta, Martin

  • Thurzová L, Kresánek K, Mareček Š, Mika K (2010) Malý atlas liečivých rastlín. Vydavatel’stvo Osveta, Martin

  • Tickner DP, Angold PG, Gurnell AM et al (2001) Riparian plant invasions: hydrogeomorphological control and ecological impacts. Prog Phys Geogr 25:22–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Török K, Botta-Dukát Z, Dancza I et al (2003) Invasion gateways and corridors in the Carpathian Basin: biological invasions in Hungary. Biol Invasions 5:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BINV.0000005570.19429.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA et al (2010) Flora Europaea, vol 4. Plantaginaceae to Compositae (and Rubiaceae). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Varga Gy (1993) A népi táplálkozás Hajdú-Bihar megyében a XX. század első felében. A hajdú-Bihar Megyei Múzeumok Közleményei 52, Debrecen

  • Villax Ö (1940) Növénytermesztés. Győregyházmegyei Alap Nyomda, Magyaróvár

  • Vishnyakova M, Burlyaeva M, Akopian J et al (2016) Reviewing and updating the detected locations of beautiful vavilovia (Vavilovia formosa) on the Caucasus sensu stricto. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63:1085–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0440x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrbničanin S, Malidža G, Stefanović L et al (2009) Distribution of some harmful, invasive and quarantine weeds on the territory of Serbia. Part III: spatial distribution and frequency of eight weeds species. Biljni Lekar (Plant Doctor) 37(1):21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter J, Essl F, Englisch T et al (2005) Neophytes in Austria: habitat preferences and ecological effects. Neobiota 6:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EF (1997) The alien flora of Europe: a taxonomic and biogeographic review. J Veg Sci 8:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber E (1998) The dynamics of plant invasions: a case study of three exotic goldenrod species (Solidago L.) in Europe. J Biogeogr 25:147–154. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.251119.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelnik I (2012) The presence of invasive alien plant species in different habitats: case study from Slovenia. Acta Biol Slov 5:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Žgančíková I, Vereš T, Čurná V (2012) Monitoring of the Helianthus tuberosus L. as an invasive weed of natural ecosystems. Res J Agric Sci 44(2):127–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Zoltán Barina and Dániel Pifkó for their helpful advice (Hungarian Natural History Museum, Hungary), and to colleagues in herbaria for data collection. Special thanks to all people who shared their archaic knowledge in our field work. This research was realized in the frames of TÁMOP 4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001 “National Excellence Program—Elaborating and operating an inland student and researcher personal support system convergence program”. The project was subsidized by the OTKA (Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, PD 108534), the APVV-15-0308 and the VEGA 2/0044/15 grants. The present scientific contribution is dedicated to the 650th anniversary of the foundation of the University of Pécs, Hungary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Filep.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filep, R., Balogh, L., Balázs, V.L. et al. Helianthus tuberosus L. agg. in the Carpathian Basin: a blessing or a curse?. Genet Resour Crop Evol 65, 865–879 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0577-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0577-2

Keywords

Navigation