Skip to main content
Log in

The maximum injectivity radius of hyperbolic orbifolds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geometriae Dedicata Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For two-dimensional orientable hyperbolic orbifolds, we show that the radius of a maximal embedded disk is greater or equal to an explicit constant \(\rho _T\), with equality if and only if the orbifold is a sphere with three cone points of order 2, 3 and 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bavard, C.: Disques extrémaux et surfaces modulaires. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 5(2), 191–202 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Beardon, A.F.: The Geometry of Discrete Groups, volume 91 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buser, P.: Geometry and Spectra of Compact Riemann Surfaces, volume 106 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeBlois, J.: The centered dual and the maximal injectivity radius of hyperbolic surfaces. ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1308.5919 (2013)

  5. Dianu, R.: Sur le spectre des tores pointés. PhD thesis. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (2000)

  6. Dryden, E.B., Parlier, H.: Collars and partitions of hyperbolic cone-surfaces. Geom. Dedicata 127, 139–149 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Farb, B., Margalit, D.: A Primer on Mapping Class Groups, volume 49 of Princeton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gendulphe, M.: Trois applications du lemme de Schwarz aux surfaces hyperboliques. ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1404.4487 (2014)

  9. Hatcher, A., Thurston, W.: A presentation for the mapping class group of a closed orientable surface. Topology 19(3), 221–237 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Parlier, H.: Hyperbolic polygons and simple closed geodesics. Enseign. Math. (2) 52(3–4), 295–317 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan, S.P., Wong, Y.L., Zhang, Y.: Generalizations of McShane’s identity to hyperbolic cone-surfaces. J. Differ. Geom. 72(1), 73–112 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada, A.: On Marden’s universal constant of Fuchsian groups. II. J. Analyse Math. 41, 234–248 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank her advisor Hugo Parlier for introducing her to the subject, for many helpful discussions and advice and for carefully reading the drafts of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Fanoni.

Additional information

Research supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant Number PP00P2_128557.

Appendix

Appendix

In this Appendix we use the same techniques of the rest of the article to give a new proof of the following theorem by Yamada:

Theorem 5.3

(Yamada [12]) For every hyperbolic surface \(S\)

$$\begin{aligned} r(S)\ge \rho _S={{\mathrm{arcsinh}}}(2/\sqrt{3}) \end{aligned}$$

with equality if and only if \(S\) is the thrice-punctured sphere.

Note that another proof of this theorem has been given by Gendulphe in [8].

To simplify the notation, given a simple closed geodesic \(\alpha \), we will denote its length simply by \(\alpha \) (instead of \(l(\alpha )\)).

Remark 5.4

We will use the collar lemma (cf. [3]) and in particular the fact that if two simple closed geodesics \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) intersect \(n\) times, then

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha \ge 2 n w(\beta ) \end{aligned}$$

where \(w(\beta )={{\mathrm{arcsinh}}}\left( \frac{1}{\sinh (\beta /2)}\right) \) is half the width of the collar of \(\beta \).

Proof

Fix \(p\in S\) with \(r_p=r(S)\); the disk \(B_{r_p}(p)\) determines at least two loops based at \(p\) of length \(2r_p\). If there are exactly two loops of length \(2r_p\) such that either at least one is homotopic to a cusp, or their geodesic representatives do not intersect, we are in the situation of Fig. 18, where \(\alpha \), \(\beta \) or \(\gamma \) can be cusps:

Fig. 18
figure 18

The point \(p\) with the two loops

By choosing a point \(q\) in a small enough neighborhood of \(p\) on the orthogonal to the third curve, if \(\gamma \) is not a cusps, or on the geodesic from \(p\) to \(\gamma \), if \(\gamma \) is a cusp, we increase the lengths of the two loops around \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) and by continuity all other loops are still longer. So \(r_q>r_p\), a contradiction. \(\square \)

We have then two possibilities:

  1. (a)

    there are two loops of length \(2r_p\) whose geodesic representatives intersect each other once, or

  2. (b)

    there are at least three loops such that, if two are not homotopic to cusps, their geodesic representatives do not intersect.

Case (a) consider three loops of length \(2r_p\); they determine a 3- or a 4-holed sphere.

If there exists three loops determining a 3-holed sphere, we can write equations for \(p\). Denote by \(\alpha \), \(\beta \) and \(\gamma \) the three boundary curves or cusps, by \(\tilde{\alpha }\), \(\tilde{\beta }\) and \(\tilde{\gamma }\) the angles of the three loops at \(p\) and by \(\theta \) the angle of the (equilateral) triangle whose sides are the three loops (see Fig. 19).

Fig. 19
figure 19

Three loops determining a Y-piece

We have:

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \cosh \left( \frac{\alpha }{2}\right) =\cosh (r_p)\sin \left( \frac{\tilde{\alpha }}{2}\right) \\ \cosh \left( \frac{\beta }{2}\right) =\cosh (r_p)\sin \left( \frac{\tilde{\beta }}{2}\right) \\ \cosh \left( \frac{\gamma }{2}\right) =\cosh (r_p)\sin \left( \frac{\tilde{\gamma }}{2}\right) \\ \cos (\theta )=1-\frac{1}{2\cosh ^2(r_p)}\\ \tilde{\alpha }+\tilde{\beta }+\tilde{\gamma }+3\theta =2\pi \end{array}\right. \end{aligned}$$
(4)

Using \(r_p<\rho _S\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\alpha },\tilde{b},\tilde{\gamma }>2\arcsin \left( \sqrt{\frac{3}{7}}\right) \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} \theta >\arccos \left( \frac{11}{14}\right) , \end{aligned}$$

so

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\alpha }+\tilde{\beta }+\tilde{\gamma }+3\theta >2\pi \end{aligned}$$

which is a contradiction. Moreover, \(r_p=\rho _S\) is a solution if and only if \(\alpha =\beta =\gamma =0\), i.e. if we are on a thrice-punctured sphere. So in this case, \(r(S)\ge \rho _S\), with equality if and only if \(S\) is a thrice-punctured sphere.

If no three loops determine a 3-holed sphere, fix three loops (with corresponding geodesic representatives or cusps \(\alpha \), \(\beta \) and \(\gamma \)) and the associated four-holed sphere. Denote by \(\delta \) the fourth boundary curve or cusp (Fig. 20). The loop based at \(p\) and homotopic to \(\delta \) has length at least \(2r_p\). We can again write down equations satisfied by the pieces we obtain by cutting the four-holed sphere along the loops.

Fig. 20
figure 20

Four loops in a four-holed sphere

If we assume that \(r_p\le \rho _S\), we get (similarly to before)

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\alpha },\tilde{\beta },\tilde{\gamma }\ge 2\arcsin \left( \sqrt{\frac{3}{7}}\right) . \end{aligned}$$

Consider the quadrilateral with the four loops as sides; three sides have the same length \(2r_p\) and the fourth has length at least \(2r_p\). The two diagonals of the quadrilateral are longer than \(2r_p\), otherwise we have three loops of length \(2r_p\) determining a 3-holed sphere. Let’s denote the angles as in Fig. 21.

Fig. 21
figure 21

The quadrilateral with the four loops as sides

By hyperbolic trigonometry we get

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi _1,\varphi _2 >2\arcsin \left( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\sqrt{7}}\right) \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi _3,\varphi _4 >\arcsin \left( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\sqrt{7}}\right) . \end{aligned}$$

So

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\alpha }+\tilde{b}+\tilde{\gamma }+\tilde{\delta }+2\theta +2\varphi >2\pi , \end{aligned}$$

a contradiction. Thus \(r(S)>\rho _S\).

Case (b) assume \(r_p\le \rho _S\). Consider the one-holed torus determined by the geodesic representatives \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) of the two loops of length \(2r_p\). Denote its boundary curve or cusp by \(\gamma \). Since \(\alpha ,\beta \le 2\rho _S\), by the collar lemma we have \(\alpha ,\beta \ge 2{{\mathrm{arcsinh}}}\left( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right) \).

Cut along \(\alpha \) and denote by \(d\) the shortest path between the two copies of \(\alpha \). We have (again, by the collar lemma) \(2{{\mathrm{arcsinh}}}\left( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\right) \le d\le \beta \le 2\rho _S\). If \(\gamma \) is not a cusp, then

$$\begin{aligned} \cosh (\gamma /2)&= \sinh ^2(\alpha /2)\cosh (d)-\cosh ^2(\alpha /2)\\&= \sinh ^2(\alpha /2)(\cosh (d)-1)+1. \end{aligned}$$

So \(\frac{17}{8}\le \cosh (\gamma )\le \frac{41}{9}\) and the width \(w(\gamma )\) of the collar around \(\gamma \) satisfies

$$\begin{aligned} w(\gamma )>\log (5/4)>\log (2\sqrt{3}). \end{aligned}$$

Remark 5.5

By hyperbolic trigonometry, if a point \(p\) has distance at least \(\log (2/\sqrt{3})\) from the collar around a curve \(\alpha <2\rho _S\), then the loop based at \(p\) and homotopic to \(\alpha \) is at least \(2\rho _S\).

If \(\gamma >2\rho _S\), fix \(q\in \gamma \). Consider a loop based at \(q\) of length \(2r_q\) and its geodesic representative \(\delta \). There are three possibilities:

  • if \(\delta \cap \gamma =\emptyset \), by Remark 5.5 we get \(2r_q=\delta >2\rho _S\);

  • if \(\delta \cap \gamma \ne \emptyset \) and \(\delta \ne \gamma \), then \(\delta \) crosses the one-holed torus, so it crosses \(\alpha \) or \(\beta \) at least once and \(\gamma \) at least twice. Thus

    $$\begin{aligned} 2r_q=\delta \ge 2{{\mathrm{arcsinh}}}(\sqrt{3}/2)+4\log (5/4)>2\rho _S; \end{aligned}$$
  • if \(\delta =\gamma \), then \(r_q>\rho _S\).

In all cases, \(r_q>\rho _S>r_q\), a contradiction.

Suppose then that \(\gamma \) is a curve with \(\gamma \le 2\rho _S\). One can show that in these conditions there exists a solution to the system (4), determining a point \(q\) with loops of length \(\ell >2{{\mathrm{arccosh}}}(\frac{\sqrt{37}}{3})>2\rho _S\). Moreover \(\cosh (d(q,\alpha ))=\frac{\sinh (\ell /2)}{\sinh (\alpha /2)}>\rho _S\). So there exists \(r>\rho _S\) such that all loops based at \(q\) have length at least \(2r\), thus again \(r(S)>r_p\), a contradiction.

If \(\gamma \) is a cusp, cut along \(\alpha \) and consider a point \(q\) which is equidistant from the two copies of \(\alpha \) and at distance \(\log (2/\sqrt{3})+\varepsilon \) (for \(\varepsilon >0\) small) from the horoball of area 2. By explicit computations, \(r_q>\rho _S>r_p\), contradiction again.

So in case (b), \(r(S)>\rho _S\).\(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fanoni, F. The maximum injectivity radius of hyperbolic orbifolds. Geom Dedicata 175, 281–307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10711-014-0041-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10711-014-0041-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation