Skip to main content
Log in

Higgs bundles for the non-compact dual of the special orthogonal group

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geometriae Dedicata Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Higgs bundles over a closed orientable surface can be defined for any real reductive Lie group \(G\). In this paper we examine the case \(G=\mathrm {SO}^*(2n)\). We describe a rigidity phenomenon encountered in the case of maximal Toledo invariant. Using this and Morse theory in the moduli space of Higgs bundles, we show that the moduli space is connected in this maximal Toledo case. The Morse theory also allows us to show connectedness when the Toledo invariant is zero. The correspondence between Higgs bundles and surface group representations thus allows us to count the connected components with zero and maximal Toledo invariant in the moduli space of representations of the fundamental group of the surface in \(\mathrm {SO}^*(2n)\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This corresponds to the fact that both \(\mathrm {SO}^*(2n)\) and \(G=\mathrm {Sp}(2n,\mathbb {R})\) embed as subgroups in \(\mathrm {SU}(n,n)\)

  2. Our definition follows Knapp [27, p. 384], except that we do not impose the condition that for every \(g\in G\) the automorphism \({{\mathrm{Ad}}}(g)\) of \(\mathfrak {g}^{\mathbb {C}}\) is inner, i.e. \({{\mathrm{Ad}}}(g)={{\mathrm{Ad}}}(x)\) for some \(x\) in the identity component of the adjoint form of \(G\). In fact this condition, which plays a role only if non-connected groups must be considered, is automatically satisfied by the groups which appear in this paper.

  3. It is interesting to note that this invariant has recently been interpreted in terms of fixed point data on the spectral curve associated to the Higgs bundles—see [26]. This also sheds new light on the bounds described in Proposition 3.27.

  4. See “Appendix” for a summary of results for the relevant groups.

  5. Announced without proof as Theorem 4.8 in [6].

  6. Non-emptiness, also for non-maximal components, follows from the results of [26] which appeared after the present paper.

  7. Note that \(\mathbb {C}^*=\mathrm {GL}(1,\mathbb {C})\) so a \(K^2\)-twisted \(\mathbb {C}^*\)-Higgs bundle is a pair \((L,\beta )\) consisting of a line bundle \(L\) and a section \(\beta \in H^0(X,K^2)\)

References

  1. Aparicio, M.: The Geometry of SO\((p, q)\)-Higgs Bundles. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Salamanca (2009)

  2. Aparicio, M., Garcia-Prada, O.: Higgs bundles for the Lorentz group. Ill. J. Math. 55, 1299–1326 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben Simon, G., Burger, M., Hartnick, T., Iozzi, A., Wienhard, A.: On weakly maximal representations of surface groups. arXiv:1305.2620 [math.DG] (2013)

  4. Biswas, I., Ramanan, S.: An infinitesimal study of the moduli of Hitchin pairs. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 49, 219–231 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradlow, S.B., García-Prada, O., Gothen, P.B.: Surface group representations and \({\rm U}(p, q)\)-Higgs bundles. J. Differ. Geom. 64, 111–170 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradlow, S.B., García-Prada, O., Gothen, P.B.: Maximal surface group representations in isometry groups of classical Hermitian symmetric spaces. Geom. Dedic. 122, 185–213 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradlow, S.B., García-Prada, O., Gothen, P.B.: Deformations of maximal representations in Sp(4,\(\mathbb{R}\)). Q. J. Math. 63, 795–843 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradlow, S.B., García-Prada, O., Mundet i Riera, I.: Relative Hitchin–Kobayashi correspondences for principal pairs. Q. J. Math. 54, 171–208 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Burger, M., Iozzi, A., Wienhard, A.: Surface group representations with maximal Toledo invariant. Ann. Math. 172, 517–566 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Clerc, J.-L., Ørsted, B.: The Gromov norm of the Kaehler class and the Maslov index. Asian J. Math. 7(2), 269–295 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Domic, A., Toledo, D.: The Gromov norm of the Kaehler class of symmetric domains. Math. Ann. 276, 425–432 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Dupont, J.L.: Bounds for characteristic numbers of flat bundles. LNM 763, 109–119 (1978)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedman, R., Morgan, J.W.: Smooth Four-Manifolds and Complex Surfaces, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], vol. 27. Springer, Berlin (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. García-Prada, O., Gothen, P.B., Mundet i Riera, I.: Higgs bundles and surface group representations in the real symplectic group. J. Topol. 6, 64–118 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. García-Prada, O., Gothen, P.B., Mundet i Riera, I.: The Hitchin–Kobayashi correspondence, Higgs pairs and surface group representations, version 3 (2012). arXiv:0909.4487

  16. García-Prada, O., Gama Oliveira, A.: Higgs bundles for the non-compact dual of the unitary group. Ill. J. Math. 55, 1155–1181 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. García-Prada, O., Mundet i Riera, I.: Representations of the fundamental group of a closed oriented surface in \({\rm Sp}(4,\mathbb{R})\). Topology 43(4), 831–855 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Gothen, P.B.: Components of spaces of representations and stable triples. Topology 40, 823–850 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Gothen, P.B.: The topology of Higgs bundle moduli spaces. Ph.D. thesis, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick (1995)

  20. Gothen, P.B., Oliveira, A.: Rank two quadratic pairs and surface group representations. Geom. Dedic. 161, 335–375 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Guichard, O., Wienhard, A.: Topological invariants of Anosov representations. J. Topol. 3(3), 578–642 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Helgason, S.: Differential Geometry, Lie Groups and Symmetric Spaces. Academic Press, New York-London (1978)

  23. Hitchin, N.J.: The self-duality equations on a Riemann surface. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 55, 59–126 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Hitchin, N.J.: Lie groups and Teichmüller space. Topology 31, 449–473 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Hitchin, N.J.: Higgs bundles and characteristic classes. arXiv:1308.4603

  26. Hitchin, N.J., Schaposnik, L.P.: Nonabelianization of Higgs bundles. J. Differ. Geom. 97, 79–89 (2014)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Knapp, A.W.: Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 1st edn. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 140. Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston (1996)

  28. Kobayashi, S.: Differential geometry of complex vector bundles, Publications of the Mathematical Society of Japan, vol. 15. Kanô Memorial Lectures, 5. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1987)

  29. Milnor, J.W.: On the existence of a connection with curvature zero. Commm. Math. Helv. 32, 215–223 (1958)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Peón Nieto, A.: Higgs bundles, real forms and the Hitchin fibration. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (2013)

  31. Ramanathan, A.: Stable principal bundles on a compact Riemann surface. Math. Ann. 213, 129–152 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Rubio Nuñez, R.: Higgs bundles and Hermitian symmetric spaces. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (2012)

  33. Schaposnik, L.P.: Spectral data for \({\rm U}(m, m)\)-Higgs bundles. In: International Mathematics Research Notices, first published online March 24 (2014). doi:10.1093/imrn/rnu029

  34. Schmitt, A.H.W.: Moduli for decorated tuples for sheaves and representation spaces for quivers. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 115, 15–49 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmitt, A.H.W.: Geometric Invariant Theory and Decorated Principal Bundles, Zürich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2008)

  36. Simpson, C.T.: Higgs bundles and local systems. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 75, 5–95 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Wentworth, R.A., Wilkin, G.: Cohomology of U(2,1) representation varieties of surface groups. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 106(2), 445–476 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Olivier Biquard, Ignasi Mundet and Roberto Rubio for useful discussions. The authors also thank the following institutions for their hospitality during various stages of this research: Centre for Quantum Geometry of Moduli Spaces (Aarhus University), The Institute for Mathematical Sciences (National University of Singapore), Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (Guanajuato) and the Centre de Recerca Matemàtica (Barcelona), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Centro de Matemática da Universidade do Porto, and the Instituto de Ciencias Matemáticas, Madrid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter B. Gothen.

Additional information

Members of the Research Group VBAC (Vector Bundles on Algebraic Curves) and the ESF Network ITGP (Interactions of Low-Dimensional Topology and Geometry with Mathematical Physics). Second author is partially supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) under Grants MTM2007-67623 and MTM2010-17717. Third author partially supported by FCT (Portugal) with EU (FEDER/COMPETE) and Portuguese funds under projects PTDC/MAT/099275/2008, PTDC/MAT/098770/2008, PTDC/MAT-GEO/0675/2012 and PEst-C/MAT/UI0144/2013. The authors also acknowledge support from U.S. National Science Foundation Grants DMS 1107452, 1107263, 1107367 “RNMS: GEometric structures And Representation varieties” (the GEAR Network).

Appendix: \(G\)-Higgs bundles for other groups

Appendix: \(G\)-Higgs bundles for other groups

We collect here some basic results about \(G\)-Higgs bundles for groups other than \(\mathrm {SO}^*(2n)\) which play a role in our analysis of \(\mathrm {SO}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundles. The groups include three complex reductive groups (\(\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\), \(\mathrm {SL}(n,\mathbb {C})\) and \(\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\)) and two non-compact real forms (\(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\) and \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)).

In all cases the basic definitions of stability properties follow from the general definition formulated for \(G\)-Higgs bundles in [15].

1.1 The groups \(\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C}), \mathrm {SL}(n,\mathbb {C})\) and \(\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\)

We begin by recalling how the notion of \(G\)-Higgs bundle specializes when \(G\) is a complex group. In this case, the complexified isotropy representation is just the adjoint representation of \(G\) on \(\mathfrak {g}\). Thus, a \(G\)-Higgs bundle for a complex group \(G\) is a pair \((E,\varphi )\), where \(E \rightarrow X\) is a holomorphic principal \(G\)-bundle and \(\varphi \in H^0(X,{{\mathrm{Ad}}}E\otimes K)\); here \({{\mathrm{Ad}}}E = E\times _{{{\mathrm{Ad}}}}\mathfrak {g}\) is the adjoint bundle of \(E\). We shall use this observation for all three groups considered in this section.

Consider first the case of \(G=\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\). A \(\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundle may be viewed as a pair consisting of a rank \(n\) holomorphic vector bundle \(E\) over \(X\) and a holomorphic section

$$\begin{aligned} \Phi \in H^0(X,K \otimes {{\mathrm{End}}}E). \end{aligned}$$

We refer the reader to [15] for the general statement of the stability conditions for \(\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundles. The notions of (semi-,poly-)stability in this case are equivalent to the original notions given by Hitchin in [23] (see [15]). Denote by \(\mu (E) = \deg (E) / {{\mathrm{rk}}}(E)\) the slope of \(E\).

Proposition 8.1

A \(\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundle \((E,\Phi )\) is semistable if and only if for any subbundle \(E'\subset E\) such that \(\Phi (E')\subset E' \otimes K\) we have \(\mu (E')\le \mu (E)\). Furthermore, \((E,\Phi )\) is stable if for any nonzero and strict subbundle \(E'\subset E\) such that \(\Phi (E')\subset E' \otimes K\) we have \(\mu (E')<\mu (E)\). Finally, \((E,\Phi )\) is polystable if it is semistable and for each subbundle \(E'\subset E\) such that \(\Phi (E')\subset E' \otimes K\) and \(\mu (E')=\mu (E)\) there is another subbundle \(E''\subset E\) satisfying \(\Phi (E'')\subset E'' \otimes K\) and \(E=E'\oplus E''\). As a consequence \((E,\Phi )=\oplus (E_i,\Phi _i)\) where \((E_i,\Phi _i)\) is a stable \(\mathrm {GL}(n_i,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundle with \(\mu (E_i)=\mu (E)\).

The group \(\mathrm {SL}(n,\mathbb {C})\) is the subgroup of \(\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\) defined by the usual condition on the determinant. A \(\mathrm {SL}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundle may thus be viewed as a \(\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundle \((E,\Phi )\) with the extra conditions that \(E\) is endowed with a trivialization \(\det E\simeq \mathcal {O}\) and \(\Phi \in H^0(X,K\otimes {{\mathrm{End}}}_0 E)\) where \({{\mathrm{End}}}_0 E\) denotes the bundle of traceless endomorphisms of \(E\). The (semi-,poly-)stability condition is the same as the one for \(\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundles given in Proposition 8.1.

Finally we consider the case \(G=\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\). A principal \(\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-bundle on \(X\) corresponds to a rank \(n\) holomorphic orthogonal vector bundle \((E,Q)\), where \(E\) is a rank \(n\) vector bundle and \(Q\) is a holomorphic section of \(S^2E^*\) whose restriction to each fibre of \(E\) is non degenerate. The adjoint bundle can be identified with \(\Lambda ^2_QE \subset {{\mathrm{End}}}(E)\), the subbundle of \({{\mathrm{End}}}(E)\) consisting of endomorphisms which are skew-symmetric with respect to \(Q\). A \(\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundle is thus a pair consisting of a rank \(n\) holomorphic orthogonal vector bundle \((E,Q)\) over \(X\) and a section

$$\begin{aligned} \Phi \in H^0(X,\Lambda ^2_Q E\otimes K). \end{aligned}$$

The general notions of (semi-,poly-)stability specialize in the case of \(\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundles to the following (see [1, 2]).

Proposition 8.2

A \(\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundle \(((E,Q),\Phi )\) is semistable if and only if for any isotropic subbundle \(E'\subset E\) such that \(\Phi (E')\subset K\otimes E'\) we have \(\deg E'\le 0\). Furthermore, \(((E,Q),\Phi )\) is stable if for any nonzero and strict isotropic subbundle \(0\ne E'\subset E\) such that \(\Phi (E')\subset K\otimes E'\) we have \(\deg E'<0\). Finally, \(((E,Q),\Phi )\) is polystable if it is semistable and for any nonzero and strict isotropic subbundle \(E'\subset E\) such that \(\Phi (E')\subset K\otimes E'\) and \(\deg E'=0\) there is a coisotropic subbundle \(E''\subset E\) such that \(\Phi (E'')\subset K\otimes E''\) and \(E=E'\oplus E''\).

Remark 8.3

Recall that if \((E,Q)\) is an orthogonal vector bundle, a subbundle \(E'\subset E\) is said to be isotropic if the restriction of \(Q\) to \(E'\) is identically zero, and coisotropic if \(E'^{\perp _Q}\) is isotropic.

Remark 8.4

For complex groups \(G\), Definition 2.7 implies that a \(G\)-Higgs bundle \((E,\varphi )\) is simple if \(\mathrm{Aut }(E,\varphi )=Z(H^{\mathbb {C}})\). For \(G=\mathrm {GL}(n,\mathbb {C})\) or \(\mathrm {SL}(n,\mathbb {C})\) it is well known that stability implies simplicity. This is not so for \(\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundles. For instance it is possible for a stable \(\mathrm {SO}(n,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundle to decompose as sum of stable \(\mathrm {SO}(n_i,\mathbb {C})\)-Higgs bundles (with \(\Sigma n_i=n\)). In all cases though, the Higgs bundles which are stable and simple represent smooth points in their moduli spaces (see Proposition 2.14).

1.2 The groups \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\) and \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)

1.2.1 \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\)-Higgs bundles

The maximal compact subgroups of \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\) are isomorphic to \(H=\mathrm {U}(p)\times \mathrm {U}(q)\) and hence \(H^{\mathbb {C}}=\mathrm {GL}(p,\mathbb {C})\times \mathrm {GL}(q,\mathbb {C})\). The complexified isotropy representation space is \(\mathfrak {m}^{\mathbb {C}}={{\mathrm{Hom}}}(\mathbb {C}^q,\mathbb {C}^p)\oplus {{\mathrm{Hom}}}(\mathbb {C}^p,\mathbb {C}^q)\). A \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\)-Higgs bundle may thus be described by the data \((V, W,\varphi =\beta +\gamma )\), where \(V\) and \(W\) are vector bundles of rank \(p\) and \(q\), respectively, \(\beta \in H^0(X,{{\mathrm{Hom}}}(W,V)\otimes K)\) and \(\gamma \in H^0(X,{{\mathrm{Hom}}}(V,W)\otimes K)\).

The following proposition gives the simplified stability conditions for \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\)-Higgs bundles. It can be proved using arguments similar to the ones for other real groups (cf. Sect. 3.2 and [15, Section 4]).

Proposition 8.5

A \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\)-Higgs bundle \((V,W,\varphi =\beta +\gamma )\) is semistable if

$$\begin{aligned} \mu (V'\oplus W') \le \mu (V\oplus W), \end{aligned}$$

is satisfied for all \(\varphi \)-invariant pairs of subbundles \(V'\subset V\) and \(W'\subset W\), i.e. for pairs such that

$$\begin{aligned} \beta&:W'\longrightarrow V'\otimes K\nonumber \\ \gamma&:V'\longrightarrow W'\otimes K. \end{aligned}$$

A \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\)-Higgs bundle \((V,W,\varphi )\) is stable if the slope inequality is strict whenever \(V'\oplus W'\) is a proper non-zero \(\varphi \)-invariant subbundle of \(V\oplus W\).

A \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\)-Higgs bundle \((V,W,\varphi )\) is polystable if it is semistable and for any \(\varphi \)-invariant pair of subbundles \(V'\subset V\) and \(W'\subset W\) satisfying \(\mu (V'\oplus W')=\mu (V\oplus W)\) there is another \(\varphi \)-invariant pair of subbundles \(V''\subset V\) and \(W''\subset W\) such that \( V=V'\oplus V''\ \mathrm {and}\ W=W'\oplus W''\). As a consequence there is a decomposition

$$\begin{aligned} (V,W,\beta ,\gamma )=\bigoplus (V_i,W_i,\beta _i,\gamma _i), \end{aligned}$$

where \(V=\bigoplus V_i\), \(W=\bigoplus W_i, \beta =\Sigma \beta _i ,\gamma =\Sigma \gamma _i\) and \((V_i,W_i,\beta _i,\gamma _i)\) is a stable \(\mathrm {U}(p_i,q_i)\)-Higgs bundle with \(\mu (V_i\oplus W_i)=\mu (V\oplus W)\).

Remark 8.6

In the case \(q=0\), the group is \(\mathrm {U}(p)\) and hence \(\varphi = 0\). Thus a \(\mathrm {U}(p)\)-Higgs bundle is an ordinary vector bundle. Proposition 8.5 shows that in this case the \(\mathrm {U}(p,q)\)-Higgs bundles stability condition coincides with the usual one for vector bundles.

1.2.2 \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundles

The group \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\) is a non-compact real form of \(\mathrm {GL}(2n,\mathbb {C})\) consisting of matrices \(M\) verifying that \(\bar{M}J_n=J_nM\) where \(J_n=\left( \begin{matrix} 0 &{} I_n \\ -I_n &{} 0 \end{matrix}\right) .\) A maximal compact subgroup of \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\) is the compact symplectic group \(\mathrm {Sp}(2n)\) (or, equivalently, the group of \(n\times n\) quaternionic unitary matrices), whose complexification is \(\mathrm {Sp}(2n,\mathbb {C})\), the complex symplectic group. The group \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\) is the non-compact dual of \(\mathrm {U}(2n)\), in the sense that the non-compact symmetric space \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)/\mathrm {Sp}(2n)\) is the dual of the compact symmetric space \(\mathrm {U}(2n)/\mathrm {Sp}(2n)\) in Cartan’s classification of symmetric spaces (cf. [22]).

The corresponding Cartan decomposition of the complex Lie algebra is

$$\begin{aligned} \mathfrak {gl}(2n,\mathbb {C})=\mathfrak {sp}(2n,\mathbb {C})\oplus \mathfrak {m}^{\mathbb {C}}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(\mathfrak {m}^{\mathbb {C}}=\{A\in \mathfrak {gl}(2n,\mathbb {C})\;|\;A^tJ_n=J_nA\}\). Hence a \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundle over \(X\) is a pair \((E,\varphi )\), where \(E\) is a holomorphic \(\mathrm {Sp}(2n,\mathbb {C})\)-principal bundle and the Higgs field \(\varphi \) is a global holomorphic section of \(E\times _{\mathrm {Sp}(2n,\mathbb {C})}\mathfrak {m}^{\mathbb {C}}\otimes K\).

Given a symplectic vector bundle \((W,\Omega )\), denote by \(S^{2}_{\Omega }W\) the bundle of endomorphisms \(\xi \) of \(W\) which are symmetric with respect to \(\Omega \) i.e. such that \(\Omega (\xi \,\cdot ,\cdot )=\Omega (\cdot ,\xi \,\cdot )\). In terms of vector bundles, we have that a \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundle over \(X\) is a triple \((W,\Omega ,\varphi )\), where \(W\) is a holomorphic vector bundle of rank \(2n\), \(\Omega \in H^0(X,\Lambda ^2W^*)\) is a symplectic form on \(W\), and the Higgs field \(\varphi \in H^0(X,S_{\Omega }^2 W\otimes K)\) is a \(K\)-twisted endomorphism \(W\rightarrow W \otimes K\), symmetric with respect to \(\Omega \).

Given the symplectic form \(\Omega \), we have the usual skew-symmetric isomorphism

$$\begin{aligned} \omega :W\mathop {\longrightarrow }\limits ^{\simeq }W^* \end{aligned}$$

given by

$$\begin{aligned} \omega (v)=\Omega (v,-). \end{aligned}$$

The map \(f\mapsto f\omega ^{-1}\) defines an isomorphism between \(S^2_\Omega W\) and \(\Lambda ^2W\). Hence we can think of a \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundle as a triple \((W,\Omega ,\varphi )\) with \(\varphi \in H^0(X,S_{\Omega }^2W\otimes K)\) or as a triple \((W,\Omega ,\tilde{\varphi })\) with \(\tilde{\varphi }\in H^0(X,\Lambda ^2W\otimes K)\) given by

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{\varphi }=\varphi \omega ^{-1}. \end{aligned}$$
(8.1)

The general (semi-,poly-)stability conditions for \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundles are studied in [16], where simplified conditions (similarly to the case of other groups) are given. We have the following ([16, Proposition 3.6]).

Proposition 8.7

A \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundle \((W,\Omega ,\varphi )\) semistable if and only if \( \deg W'\le 0\) for any isotropic and \(\varphi \)-invariant subbundle \(W'\subset W\).

A \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundle \((W,\Omega ,\varphi )\) is stable if and only if it is semistable and \(\deg W'<0\) for any isotropic and \(\varphi \)-invariant strict subbundle \(0\ne W' \subset W\).

The \(\mathrm {U}^*(2n)\)-Higgs bundle \((W,\Omega ,\varphi )\) is polystable if and only if it is semistable and, for any isotropic (respectively coisotropic) and \(\varphi \)-invariant strict subbundle \(0\ne W'\subset W\) such that \(\deg W'=0\), there is another coisotropic (respectively isotropic) and \(\varphi \)-invariant subbundle \(0\ne W''\subset W\) such that \(W\simeq W'\oplus W''\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bradlow, S.B., García-Prada, O. & Gothen, P.B. Higgs bundles for the non-compact dual of the special orthogonal group. Geom Dedicata 175, 1–48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10711-014-0026-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10711-014-0026-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation