Skip to main content
Log in

Geography and geographers: re-revisited—again

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In responding to the commentaries Ron Johnston reflects on both the origins of “Geography and Geographers” and its relevance to the changing practices within human geography over the last forty years.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Another feature of that conference session was that Peter and I believe it is the first to be held at an RGS (IBG) meeting at which both of the main presenters were great-grandfathers!

  2. John later told me he was angry at missing the opportunity to publish Urban Residential Patterns (Johnston 1971). I sent him the outline but as an unknown from New Zealand he asked for sample chapters: another publisher offered an immediate contract (on the advice of their editor, R. O. Buchanan, who knew of me through his New Zealand contacts, and his colleague, Michael Wise, who had visited us in New Zealand as I was writing the book).

  3. I even penned my own, unsuccessful (despite the work of the series editor, Bill Morgan), version (Johnston, 1973).

  4. As a minor footnote, one of my Sheffield colleagues sent a rejoinder to my review of Harvey’s book to the New Zealand Geographer, which I only learned of after it was accepted (Rowley 1975, Johnston 1975).

  5. That was based on a final-year option course Freeman gave when I was at Manchester: my wife took it in 1960–1961 but I didn’t in the following year.

  6. As background reading for the Sheffield course I recommended Chorley (1973).

  7. My Sheffield colleague Stan Gregory was a co-founder of what became the Quantitative Methods Study Group but he counselled against its early affiliation with the IBG because of known resistance from ‘senior geographers’ (Johnston 2018).

  8. I recall a colleague at another department telling me a publisher had asked him to write a competitor volume but he responded there was no point, since he couldn’t better mine!

  9. This went unrecognised by some critics (e.g. Mair 1986).

  10. I was once asked why Peter Hall appeared relatively little in the book; my reply was because he did geography, not debate about what geography was/is/should be!

  11. Compare the size of the five editions of The Dictionary of Human Geography, for which I was lead editor on the first four – the first (1981) had 404 pages, the fifth (2009) had 1052: another potential subject for a conference session? Again, apart from some earlier dictionaries that were not aimed at university students, The Dictionary of Human Geography was a pioneer and attracted a large market. It now has a number of competitors.

  12. Katharine Hall also refers favourably to the first chapter’s treatment of the academic career structure. When I submitted the text of the first edition, John Davey’s assistant expressed incredulity that it worked as I described it – and, of course, there is much more casualisation now than then (and worse pensions!).

  13. They still don’t: there is a lot of work based on French philosophers but not much on French geographers (indeed almost all of it is by Hugh Clout!)!

References

  • Barnes, T. J., & Sheppard, E. S. (Eds.). (2019). Spatial histories of radical geography: North America and beyond. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley, R. J. (Ed.). (1973). Directions in geography. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley, R. J., & Haggett, P. (Eds.). (1965). Frontiers in geographical teaching. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley, R. J., & Haggett, P. (Eds.). (1967). Models in geography. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craggs, R., & Neate, H. (2019). What happens if we start from Nigeria? Diversifying histories of geography. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1631748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, T. W. (1963). A hundred years of geography. London: George Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggett, P. (1965). Locational analysis in human geography. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P. E. (1972). All possible worlds: A history of geographical ideas. Indianapolis: Odyssey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1971). Urban residential patterns: An introductory review. London: G. Bell and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1973). Spatial structures: Introducing the study of spatial systems in human geography. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1974). Continually changing human geography revisited: David Harvey: Social justice and the city. New Zealand Geographer, 30, 180–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1975). Regarding bourgeois geography and original sin. New Zealand Geographer, 31, 192–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1978). Paradigms and revolution: observations on human geography since the Second World War. Progress in Human Geography, 2, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (2006). The politics of changing human geography’s agenda: textbooks and the representation of increasing diversity. In Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS31, pp. 286–303.

  • Johnston, R. J. (2018). Stanley Gregory 1926–2016. In E. Baigent & A. Reyes Novaes (Eds.), Geographers: Biobibliographical studies, vol. 37 (pp. 69–104). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (2019). Percy Crowe: A forgotten pioneer quantitative geographer and climatologist. Progress in Physical Geography, 43, 586–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (2020). Encountering Alan Wilson, filling the gaps in data sets (from the knows to the unknowns) … and disciplinary history/progress. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, in press.

  • Johnston, R. J., Harris, R., Jones, K., Manley, D., Sabel, C. E., & Wang, W. W. (2014a). Mutual misunderstanding, and avoidance, mis-representations and disciplinary politics: spatial science and quantitative analysis in (UK) geographical curricula. Dialogues in Human Geography, 4, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J., Harris, R., Jones, K., Manley, D., Sabel, C. E., & Wang, W. W. (2014b). One step forward but two steps back to the proper appreciation of spatial science. Dialogues in Human Geography, 4, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. L. (1969). Dimensions of urban social structure: The social areas of Melbourne, Australia. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. N. (1992). The geographical tradition: Episodes in the history of a contested enterprise. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. N., Monk, J., Johnston, R. J. (2007). Classics in human geography revisited. Johnston, R. J. 1979: Geography and geographers: Anglo-American human geography since 1945. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 43–52.

  • Mair, A. (1986). Thomas Kuhn and understanding geography. Progress in Human Geography, 10, 345–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, G. (1975). Continually changing human geography: A rejoinder. New Zealand Geographer, 31, 189–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J., & Johnston, R. J. (1979). Geography of elections. London: Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms, D. W. G. (1965). Quantitative techniques in urban social geography. In R. J. Chorley & P. Haggett (Eds.), Frontiers in geographical teaching (pp. 239–265). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms, D. W. G. (1971). The urban mosaic: Towards a theory of residential differentiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Johnston.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnston, R. Geography and geographers: re-revisited—again. GeoJournal 87 (Suppl 3), 385–388 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10206-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10206-3

Navigation