Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The spatiotemporal forming of a state of exception: repurposing hot-spot analysis to map bare-life in Southern Arizona’s borderlands

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through the use of Hot-Spot analysis, typically reserved for local analysis of crime and law enforcement, I document the dispersal and clustering of migrant mortalities on a temporal scale in the Ajo valley of Southern Arizona in the U.S.–Mexico borderlands. The study maps the influence of border enforcement by time and documents the forming of a state of exception, by finding whether and where migrants had taken other more-remote routes in relation to the constructing of and policing by a Border Patrol checkpoint, The spatiotemporal nature of ‘Hot’ and ‘Cold-Spots’ plus an analysis of migrant mortality locations before and after the establishment of a checkpoint serves as a novel approach to spatial analysis in border studies. It creates a type of remote forensics for verifying the ‘funnel effect’ and the condition of Bare Life it produces where law has taken migrant’s political power and left them with their biological existence (Agamben in Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1998). I show a widening of the state and a receding of the migrant into a rugged and remote isolation. Until now, the defining of the borderlands as a State of Exception (Doty in Int Political Sociol 1(2):113–137, 2007) has been theoretical and qualitative. This paper doesn’t retract from that but rather adds quantitative data and interpretation to theory, making it a needed clarification of biopolitics in a time of growing use of militarization at the U.S.–Mexico border and worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta, A. (2012). Hinging on exclusion and exception: Bare life, the US/Mexico border, and Los que nunca llegarán. Social Text, 30(4 (113)), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Nova srpska politička misao, 12(1+4), 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoore, L. (2006). Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography, 25(3), 336–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arizona OpenGIS for Deceased Migrants. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from http://humaneborders.info/.

  • Atabakhsh, H., Larson, C., Petersen, T., Violette, C., & Chen, H. (2004). Information sharing and collaboration policies within government agencies. In International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (pp. 467–475). Springer, Berlin.

  • Badiou, A. (2008). The meaning of Sarkozy (p. 100). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, G. A. (2016). The rugged border: Surveillance, policing and the dynamic materiality of the US/Mexico frontier. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(2), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, G. A., Chambers, S. N., & Launius, S. (2019). Bodily inertia and the weaponization of the Sonoran desert in US boundary enforcement: A GIS modeling of migration routes through Arizona’s altar valley. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 7(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burridge, A. (2009). Differential criminalization under operation streamline: Challenges to freedom of movement and humanitarian aid provision in the Mexico-US borderlands. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 26(2), 78–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacho, L. M. (2012). Social death: Racialized rightlessness and the criminalization of the unprotected. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, L., Stow, D., Kaiser, J., & Coulter, L. (2007). Monitoring cross-border trails using airborne digital multispectral imagery and interactive image analysis techniques. Geocarto International, 22(2), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. N., Jacobs, W. J., & Lindberg, C. (2018). Maze or Labyrinth: Identifying PTSD stressors in the built space of Zaatari and Calais Refugee Camps. The Professional Geographer, 70(4), 552–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. N., Boyce, G. A., Launius, S., & Dinsmore, A. (2019). Mortality, surveillance and the tertiary “funnel effect” on the US–Mexico border: A geospatial modeling of the geography of deterrence. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 1–26.

  • Chamblee, J. F., Christopherson, G. L., Townley, M., DeBorde, D., & Hoover, R. (2006). Mapping migrant deaths in southern Arizona: The Humane Borders GIS. Unpublished report.

  • Chávez, S. (2011). Navigating the US–Mexico border: The crossing strategies of undocumented workers in Tijuana, Mexico. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(8), 1320–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. (2005). US statecraft and the US–Mexico border as security/economy nexus. Political Geography, 24(2), 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (2016). Freedom is a constant struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the foundations of a movement. Haymarket Books.

  • De Genova, N. (2005). Working the boundaries: Race, space, and “illegality” in Mexican Chicago. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, N. (2009). Conflicts of mobility, and the mobility of conflict: Rightlessness, presence, subjectivity, freedom. Subjectivity, 29(1), 445–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejanovic, S. (2004). Invisible bodies, illusionary securing: The performance of illegality at the US–Mexico border. Violent Interventions, 2, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dines, N., Montagna, N., & Ruggiero, V. (2015). Thinking Lampedusa: Border construction, the spectacle of bare life and the productivity of migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(3), 430–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R. L. (2007). States of exception on the Mexico–US border: Security, “decisions”, and civilian border patrols. International Political Sociology, 1(2), 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R. L. (2011). Bare life: Border-crossing deaths and spaces of moral alibi. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29(4), 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. J. (1996). Militarization of the United States-Mexico border, 1978–1992. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., Chainey, S., Cameron, J. G., Leitner, M., & Wilson., R. E. (2005). Mapping crime: Understanding hotspots. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

  • Erdogan, S., Yilmaz, I., Baybura, T., & Gullu, M. (2008). Geographical information systems aided traffic accident analysis system case study: City of Afyonkarahisar. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(1), 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschbach, K., Hagan, J., Rodriguez, N., Hernandez-Leon, R., & Bailey, S. (1999). Death at the border. International Migration Review, 33(2), 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcon, S. (2001). Rape as a weapon of war: Advancing human rights for women at the US–Mexico border. Social Justice, 28(2 (84)), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2009). Securitate, teritoriu, populatie. Cluj: Editura Idea Design & Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A., Birkby, W. H., Jones, A. M., Henry, T. E., & Parks, B. O. (1989). Decay rates of human remains in an arid environment. Journal of Forensic Science, 34(3), 607–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, T. M. (2010). The border fence, immigration policy, and the Obama administration: a cautionary note. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(1), 129–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaccaria, P., & Minca, C. (2011). Topographies/topologies of the camp: Auschwitz as a spatial threshold. Political Geography, 30(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, A., & Spradley, M. K. (2017). Migrant deaths at the Arizona–Mexico border: Spatial trends of a mass disaster. Forensic Science International, 280, 200–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Governmental Accountability Office. (2005). GAO-05-435, Available data on interior checkpoints suggest differences in sector performance.

  • Governmental Accountability Office. (2009). GAO-09-824, Checkpoints contribute to border patrol’s mission, but more consistent data collection and performance measurement could improve effectiveness.

  • Gregory, D. (2006). The black flag: Guantánamo Bay and the space of exception. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88(4), 405–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, R. (2012). Illegal refugees: Competing policy ideas and the rise of the regime of deterrence in American asylum politics. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 31(2), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, S. (2008). Contemporary geographies of exclusion I: traversing Skid Road. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 659–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hing, B. O. (2018). American presidents, deportations, and human rights violations: From carter to trump. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, K. B. (2009). Broken lives from broken windows: The hidden costs of aggressive order-maintenance policing. NYU Review of Law & Social Change, 33, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. (2016). Violent borders: Refugees and the right to move. Brooklyn: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusionyte, I. (2018). Threshold: Emergency responders on the US–Mexico border (Vol. 41). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (2003). Homeland insecurities: Some reflections on language and space. Radical History Review, 85(1), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe, R., & Sullivan, T. (2011). Resource-constrained spatial hot-spot identification. Arlington, VA: RAND Corp., National Security Research Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindynis, T. (2014). Ripping up the map: Criminology and cartography reconsidered. British Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 222–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S., & Wildgen, J. (2012). Manifold destiny: Migrant deaths and destinations in the Arizona desert. Growth and Change, 43(3), 482–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, N. (2004). CrimeStat III: A spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations (version 3.0). Houston, TX: Ned Levine & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Li, X., Wang, W., Li, Z., Hou, M., He, Y., et al. (2012). Investigation of space-time clusters and geospatial Hot-Spots for the occurrence of tuberculosis in Beijing. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 16(4), 486–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, D. E., Reineke, R. C., Rubio-Goldsmith, R., & Parks, B. O. (2014). Structural violence and migrant deaths in Southern Arizona: Data from the Pima County office of the medical examiner, 1990–2013. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 2(4), 257–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, D., Reineke, R., Rubio-Goldsmith, R., Anderson, B., Hess, G., & Parks, B. (2013). A continued humanitarian crisis at the border: Undocumented border crosser deaths recorded by the Pima County office of the medical examiner, 1990–2012. Available at SSRN 2633209.

  • Marx, K., (1867). Capital: A critique of political economy; Volume III. Lawrence & Wishart, London.

  • Massey, D. S., Durand, J., & Malone, N. J. (2002). Beyond smoke and mirrors: Mexican immigration in an era of economic integration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembé, J. A., & Meintjes, L. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2014). Border patrol nation: Dispatches from the front lines of homeland security. San Francisco: City Lights Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., & Nevins, J. (2017). Beyond Trump’s Big, Beautiful Wall: Trump’s plan to wall off the entire US–Mexico border is just one of a growing list of actions that extend US border patrol efforts far past the international boundary itself. NACLA Report on the Americas, 49(2), 145–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miroff, N. (2013). South Texas county faces wave of migrant deaths. The Washington Post. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-05-08/world/39114984_1_illegal-migrants-u-s-border-patrol-checkpoint. Accessed 15 November 2018.

  • Mountz, A., Coddington, K., Catania, R. T., & Loyd, J. M. (2013). Conceptualizing detention: Mobility, containment, bordering, and exclusion. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 522–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevins, J. (2001). Operation Gatekeeper: The rise of the “illegal alien” and the remaking of the US–Mexico boundary. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • No More Deaths. (2017). Preventing deaths, and helping recover remains, in the Ajo migration corridor. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Medical%20Examiner/Resources/Annual-Report-2016.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2019.

  • Ortega, C. (2018). Border patrol failed to count hundreds of migrant deaths on US soil. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/14/us/border-patrol-migrant-death-count-invs/index.html. Accessed November 15, 2018.

  • Pima County Office of the Medical Examiner. (2017). Annual report 2017. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Medical%20Examiner/Resources/Annual-Report-2016.pdf. Accessed February 6, 2019.

  • Pope, P. J., & Garrett, T. M. (2013). America’s homo sacer: Examining US deportation hearings and the criminalization of illegal immigration. Administration & Society, 45(2), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasannakumar, V., Vijith, H., Charutha, R., & Geetha, N. (2011). Spatio-temporal clustering of road accidents: GIS based analysis and assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, P. K., & Grundy-Warr, C. (2004). The irregular migrant as homo sacer: Migration and detention in Australia, Malaysia, and Thailand. International Migration, 42(1), 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, P. (2012). Barrier effects of borders: Implications for border-crossing infrastructures. European Journal of Transport & Infrastructure Research, 12(2), 150–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Clare, A. (1996). Multinationals, linkages, and economic development. The American Economic Review, 852–873.

  • Romero, M. (2008). Crossing the immigration and race border: A critical race theory approach to immigration studies. Contemporary Justice Review, 11(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo, D. K., Thurman, Q. C., Jamieson, J. D., & Egan, K. (2008). Geographic patterns and profiling of illegal crossings of the southern US border. Security Journal, 21(1–2), 29–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Goldsmith, R., McCormick, M., Martinez, D., & Duarte, I. (2006). The ‘Funnel Effect’ and recovered bodies of unauthorized migrants processed by the Pima County office of the medical examiner, 1990-2005. Available at SSRN 3040107.

  • Slack, J., Martinez, D. E., Lee, A. E., & Whiteford, S. (2016). The geography of border militarization: Violence, death and health in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Latin American Geography, 15(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofsky, W. (2013). The order of terror: The concentration camp. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soto, G., & Martínez, D. E. (2018). The geography of migrant death: implications for policy and forensic science. In K. E. Latham & A. J. O’Daniel (Eds.), Sociopolitics of migrant death and repatriation (pp. 67–82). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M. (1993). Congress warned: NAFTA no fix for migrant influx. San Diego Union-Tribune.

  • Sundberg, J. (2015). The state of exception and the imperial way of life in the United States—Mexico Borderlands. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(2), 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanh Toan, D. T., Hu, W., Quang Thai, P., Ngoc Hoat, L., Wright, P., & Martens, P. (2013). Hot-spot detection and spatio-temporal dispersion of dengue fever in Hanoi, Vietnam. Global health action, 6(1), 18632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Customs & Border Protection. (2018). Large group apprehensions continue near Ajo. (2018, December 10). Retrieved May 14, 2019, from https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/large-group-apprehensions-continue-near-ajo.

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection. (2019). SBInet Tucson west tower project. (2019, February 15). Retrieved May 14, 2019, from https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/along-us-borders/technology-innovation-acquisition/sbinet-tucson-west-tower-project.

  • Walsh, J. (2013). Remapping the border: Geospatial technologies and border activism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(6), 969–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wortley, R., & Mazerolle, L. (2008). Environmental criminology and crime analysis: Situating the theory, analytic approach and application. Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, 6, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortley, R., & Townsley, M. (Eds.). (2016). Environmental criminology and crime analysis (Vol. 16). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Development, The University of Arizona, 1064 E Lowell St, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Samuel Norton Chambers

Authors
  1. Samuel Norton Chambers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Norton Chambers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

As this study was not funded and data was openly available, I do not have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

No human (or animal) participants were involved and the mortality records used in analysis were collected by a third party prior to this research.

Informed consent

No consent was or is required for this study and the paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chambers, S.N. The spatiotemporal forming of a state of exception: repurposing hot-spot analysis to map bare-life in Southern Arizona’s borderlands. GeoJournal 85, 1373–1384 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10027-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10027-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation