Abstract
Using geographic information system techniques, this article explores the formation of STEM jobs from a regional perspective. It uses data on European regions, specifically from the Nomenclature of Territorial Units, to first show (by means of Getis-Ord general G statistic and the global Moran’s I statistic) the existence of regional clusters of STEM jobs, which then it explores by means of Getis-Ord Gi*, a local indicator of spatial association. Finally, it estimates, both globally (fitting an ordinary least squares, regression model) and locally (fitting a geographically weighted regression), the extent to which different institutional and firm-based factors contribute to their formation. Findings reveal North–South and West–East differences in how factors contribute to the formation of STEM clusters in Europe. In particular, whereas STEM employment in the North seems to depend more on tertiary education, secondary education is more important in the South. On the other hand, whereas in Western Europe, a favorable learning environment seems to trigger the concentration of STEM jobs, extrinsic factors such as pay seem to be more important in Eastern Europe.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Canberra Manual provides guidelines for the measurement of human resources devoted to science and technology and was prepared in close cooperation between the OECD, the European Commission, Eurostat, UNESCO and the International Labour Office (ILO), and with the support of national experts. The text was discussed at specialist workshops at the OECD in 1992 and 1993 and then submitted to the Group of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators (NESTI) at its meeting in Canberra in April 1994. The manual was approved by the Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy and made available to the public under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD.
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovania, Spain, Sweden, and UK.
ISC0-08 major group 2 (Professionals) includes Science and Engineering Professionals, Health Professionals, Teaching Professionals, Business and Administration Professionals, Information and Communications Technology Professionals and Legal, Social and Cultural Professionals.
ISCO-08 major group 3 (Technicians and Associate Professionals) include Science and Engineering Associate Professionals, Health Associate Professionals, Business and Administration Associate Professionals, Legal, Social, Cultural and Related Associate Professionals and Information and Communications Technicians.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review,108(6), 1488–1542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696.
Alabdulkareem, A., Frank, Sun, L., AlShebli, B., Hidalgo, C., & Rahwan, I. (2018). Unpacking the polarization of workplace skills. Science Advances,4(7), eaao6030. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6030.
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis,27(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.
Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US Labor Market. American Economic Review,103(5), 1553–1597. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.5.1553.
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003a). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration*. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/118/4/1279/1925105.
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003b). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,118(4), 1279–1333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801.
Ben-Ner, A., & Urtasun, A. (2013). Computerization and skill bifurcation: The role of task complexity in creating skill gains and losses. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,66(1), 225–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391306600109.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017) What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530–1534.
Caprile, M. (2015). Directorate general for internal policies policy department a: Economic and scientific policy Encouraging STEM studies Labour Market Situation and comparison of practices targeted at young people in different member states. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542199/IPOL_STU(2015)542199_EN.pdf.
Donaldson, D., & Hornbeck, R. (2016). Railroads and American economic growth: A “market access” approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics,131(2), 799–858. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw002.
Felkner, J. S., & Townsend, R. M. (2011). The geographic concentration of enterprise in developing countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 2005–2061.
Florida, R. (2014). The creative class and economic development. Economic Development Quarterly,28(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242414541693.
Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Stolarick, K. (2008). Inside the black box of regional development–human capital, the creative class and tolerance. Journal of Economic Geography,8(5), 615–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn023.
Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Geographically+Weighted+Regression%3A+The+Analysis+of+Spatially+Varying+Relationships+-p-9780471496168.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change,114(1), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
Goos, M., Konings, J., & Vandeweyer, M. (2018). Local high-tech job multipliers in Europe. Industrial and Corporate Change,27(4), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty013.
Goos, M., & Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain. Retrieved from https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/rest.89.1.118?casa_token=beyN9dYbwTUAAAAA:TcKzGRJ9fcITCien_kBDF1h5XTqbj7tHOVqoP57Hdu-hpt8vRTgRH47uFb17HcnkVjIQI-xH-x4.
Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review,104(8), 2509–2526. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2509.
Krzywdzinski, M. (2017). Automation, skill requirements and labour-use strategies: High-wage and low-wage approaches to high-tech manufacturing in the automotive industry. New Technology, Work and Employment,32(3), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12100.
OCDE. (1995). Manual on the measurement of human resources Devotde to S&T “Canberra Manual.” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, (95), 1–111. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264065581-en.pdf?expires=1538454325&id=id&accname=ocid195679&checksum=1C92DAE6E85D0E2A4C9C923AC02D2E82.
Pollard, S. (1981). Peaceful conquest: The industrialization of Europe, 1760–1970. Oxford University Press.
Scott, A. J. (2000). Economic geography: The great half-century. Cambridge Journal of Economics,24(4), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/24.4.483.
Scott, A. J. (2001). Globalization and the rise of city-regions. European Planning Studies, 9(7), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431012007978.
Scott, A. J., & Scott, A. (2002). Regional push: Towards a geography of development and growth in low- and middle-income countries. Third World Quarterly,23(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/3993580.
Vilorio, D. (2014). STEM 101: Intro to tomorrow’s jobs. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 1(1), 2–12. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2014/spring/art01.pdf.
World Economic Forum. (2016). The future of jobs employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. Growth Strategies, 2016(january), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756712473437.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
The general G statistic of overall spatial association is given as
where \(x_{i}\) and \(x_{j}\) are attribute values for NUTS regions \(i\) and \(j\), and \(w_{ij}\) is the spatial weight between both regions. \(n\) is the number of regions in the dataset. Then for inferential purposes, a z-score of \(G\) is calculated.
The global Moran’s I statistic for spatial autocorrelation is given as
where \(z_{i}\) is the deviation of an attribute for region \(i\) from its mean, is the spatial weight between regions regions \(i\) and \(j\). \(n\) is the number of regions in the dataset. \(S_{0}\) is the aggregate of all the spatial weights. Then a z-score of \(I\) is calculated.
The Getis-Ord Gi* local statistic is calculated as follows
where \(x_{j}\) is the attribute value for region j, \(w_{ij}\) is the spatial weight between region i and j, n is equal to the total number of regions and
For statistically significant positive z-scores of \(G_{i}^{*}\), the larger the z-score is, the more intense the cluster of high values (hot spot). For statistically significant z-scores, the smaller the z-score is, the more intense the cluster of low values (cold spot). A z-score near zero indicates no apparent spatial clustering.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Urtasun, A. Clusters of stem jobs across Europe. GeoJournal 85, 285–301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-09962-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-09962-0