Skip to main content
Log in

Rock Mass Structural Characterization Through DFN–LiDAR–DOS Methodology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underground projects require a realistic understanding of geological, structural and mechanical characteristics of the rock mass. This includes a comprehensive rock mass characterization, assessment to all existing site information and an accurate geological model. However, due to the lack of truly three-dimensional subsurface fracture geometry data, this reality is rendered difficult. Thus, the use of Discrete Fracture Networks (DFNs) arises as an interesting tool. DFN models are statistically generated from discontinuity features mapped in situ. These deterministic data can be obtained by employing various techniques, and more specifically with the use of laser scanning (i.e. Light Detection and Ranging—LiDAR). Complimentary discontinuity data can be obtained through fiber optic sensors coupled to tendon rock support elements, adding structural information from within the rock mass to the DFN model. This paper presents the methodology associated with the implementation of LiDAR data into DFN models for the purpose of application in underground projects and the use of optical sensors to capture three-dimensional loading of tendon support and, in turn, identify intersecting discontinuity planes. The Distributed Optical Strain Sensing technology is demonstrated through double shear laboratory tests, as well as through an in situ application to monitor rock mass movement during a tunnel excavation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

(Modified after Vazaios et al. 2017a)

Fig. 4

(Modified after Vazaios et al. 2017a)

Fig. 5

(Modified after Vazaios et al. 2017b)

Fig. 6

(Modified after Vazaios et al. 2017b)

Fig. 7

(Modified after Vazaios et al. 2017b)

Fig. 8

(Modified after Vazaios et al. 2017a)

Fig. 9

(Modified after Forbes et al. 2017)

Fig. 10

(Modified after Forbes et al. 2018b)

Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertuzzi R (2014) Sydney sandstone and shale parameters for tunnel design. Aust Geomech 49

  • Björnfot F, Stephansson O (1983) Interaction of grouted rock bolts and hard rock masses at variable loading in a test drift of the Kiirunavaara Mine. In: Proceedings of international symposium on rock bolting, pp 337–395, Abisko, Sweden

  • Cruz D (2017) The geomechanical response of axially loaded fully grouted rock bolts utilizing fibre optics technology. MASc Dissertation. Royal Military College of Canada

  • Diederichs MS, Carter MA, Lato MJ, Bennett JB, Hutchinson DJ (2013) LiDAR surveying for liner condition, rock stability and reconditioning assessment of Canada’s oldest railway tunnel in Brockville. In: Proceedings of GeoMontreal 2013, Montreal

  • Esmaieli K, Hadjigeorgiou J, Grenon M (2010) Estimating geometrical and mechanical REV based on synthetic rock mass models at Brunswick Mine. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:915–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahmand K, Vazaios I, Diederichs M S, Vlachopoulos N (2015) Generation of a synthetic rock mass (SRM) model for simulation of strength crystalline rock using a hybrid DFN–DEM approach. In: ISRM regional symposium eurock 2015 & 64th geomechanics colloquium, Salzburg, Austria

  • Fekete S, Diederichs MS (2012) Integration of 3-dimensional laser scanning with discontinuum modelling for stability analysis of tunnels in blocky rockmasses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 57:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes B, Vlachopoulos N, Hyett AJ, Diederichs MS (2017) A new optical sensing technique for monitoring shear of rock bolts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 66:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes B, Vlachopoulos N, Hyett AJ (2018a) The application of distributed optical strain sensing to measure the strain distribution of ground support members. FACETS 3(1):195–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes B, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2018b) Spile support performance monitored in a shallow urban tunnel using distributed optical strain sensing. In: 52nd US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, Seattle, USA

  • Forbes B, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2019a) An in situ monitoring campaign of a hard rock pillar at great depth within a Canadian mine. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes B, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS, Roper TP (2019b) Measuring the in situ response of tunnel support using high spatial resolution optical fiber strain sensing. Manuscript submitted to tunnelling and underground space technology

  • Google Maps (2019) https://googlemaps.com. Accessed Sept 2019

  • Grechishnikova A (2016) Discrete fracture network model developed from a high resolution LIDAR outcrop survey of a naturally fractured unconventional Niobrara reservoir, Denver Basin. In: Unconventional resources technology conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 1–3 August 2016

  • Hyett A, Forbes B, Spearing S (2013) Enlightening bolts: using distributed optical sensing to measure the strain profile along fully grouted rock bolts. In: 32nd international conference on ground control in mining, Morgantown, WV, pp 107–112

  • InnovMetrics (2009) PolyWorks, V11.0.4, Quebec City, Canada

  • Kulatilake P, Park J, Um JG (2004) Estimation of rock mass strength and deformability in 3-D for a 30 m cube at a depth of 485 m at Aspo hard rock laboratory. Geotech Geol Eng 22:313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford JC, Diederichs MS (2015) Quantifying uncertainty in intact Hoek-Brown strength envelopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 74:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lato MJ, Diederichs MS, Hutchinson DJ (2010) Bias correction for view-limited Lidar scanning of rock outcrops for structural characterization. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(5):615–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirarco (2016) Mofrac. V2, Sudbury, Canada

  • Monsalve J, Baggett J, Bishop R, Ripepi N (2019) Application of laser scanning for rock mass characterization and discrete fracture network generation in an underground limestone mine. Int J Min Sci Technol 29(2019):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palleske C, Lato MJ, Hutchinson DJ, Elmo D, Diederichs MS (2013) Impacts of limited spacing and persistence data on DFN modelling of rockmasses. In: Proceedings of the Canadian geotechnical society GeoMontreal conference 2013

  • Pells PJ (2002) Developments in the design of tunnels and caverns in the Triassic rocks of the Sydney region. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:569–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00058-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience (2013) Dips V6.010, Toronto, Canada

  • Srivastava RM (2006) Field verification of a geostatistical method for simulating fracture network models. In: Proceedings of the 47th US rock mechanics symposium, Golden, Colorado, USA

  • Sturzenegger M, Stead D (2009) Close-range terrestrial digital photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for discontinuity characterization on rock cuts. Eng Geol 106:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazaios I (2018) Modelling of hard rockmasses with non-persistent joints to assess the stress induced damage of deep excavations. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

  • Vazaios I, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2015) DFN generation for mechanical stability analysis of underground works. In: Proceedings of ITA WTC 2015 congress and 41st general assembly, Dubrovnik, Croatia

  • Vazaios I, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2016) Sampling technique biases and their effect on discrete fracture network generation for underground works using LiDAR scanning. In: Proceedings of the GeoVancouver 2016 conference, Vancouver, Canada

  • Vazaios I, Vlachopoulos N, Forbes B, Diederichs MS (2017a) A DFN–LiDAR-optical sensor method for the estimation of rockmass conditions in underground projects. In: Proceedings of the world tunnel congress 2017—surface challenges—underground solutions, Bergen, Norway

  • Vazaios I, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS (2017b) Integration of lidar-based structural input and discrete fracture network generation for underground applications. Geotech Geol Eng 35(5):2227–2251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazaios I, Vlachopoulos N, Forbes B (2017c) A DFN–LiDAR-optical sensor method for the estimation of rockmass conditions in underground projects. In: World Tunnelling Congress 2017, Bergen, Norway, June 2017

  • Vlachopoulos N, Forbes B (2015) Temporary tunnel support strategies: optimization and testing. In: Proceedings of ITA WTC 2015 congress and 41st general assembly, Dubrovnik, Croatia, p 10

  • Vlachopoulos N, Vazaios I (2018) The numerical simulation of hard rocks for tunnelling purposes at great depths: a comparison between the hybrid FDEM method and continuous techniques. Adv Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3868716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs MS, Marinos V, Marinos P (2013) Tunnel behaviour associated with the weak Alpine rock masses of the Driskos Twin Tunnel system, Egnatia Odos Highway. Can Geotech J 50(1):91–120. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuestefeld P, Medeiros M, Koehrer B, Sibbing D, Kobbelt L, Hilgers C (2016) Automated workflow to derive LIDAR fracture statistics for the DFN modelling of a tight gas sandstone reservoir analog. In: 78th EAGE conference and exhibition 2016, Vienna, Austria, 30 May–2 June 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC), the Canadian Department of National Defence, Yield Point Inc., Geomechanica Inc. and The Royal Military College (RMC) Green Team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Vlachopoulos.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vlachopoulos, N., Vazaios, I., Forbes, B. et al. Rock Mass Structural Characterization Through DFN–LiDAR–DOS Methodology. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 6231–6244 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01431-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01431-1

Keywords

Navigation