Abstract
This paper reviews and compares different mathematical forms for representing the effective stress failure envelope in the context of slope stability analysis. Although commonly assumed to be linear, the effective stress failure envelope for many soils is non-linear, at least when considered over a wide range of normal stresses. Multiple studies have considered the effects of including non-linearity in slope stability calculations, but little guidance is available for selecting an appropriate envelope form. Differences between six mathematical forms are examined by analyzing four real data sets, each with different characteristics. Statistical descriptors are used to evaluate the goodness of fit for each form. Two simple slopes are analyzed with each data set to ascertain the impact that the envelope form has on the calculated factor of safety. The envelope form is shown to have a relatively small impact on the predicted shear strength and calculated factor of safety for slope stability, provided that (1) the failure envelopes are fit to the test data using a robust regression procedure and (2) the effective normal stresses acting on the critical failure surface are mostly within the range tested by the laboratory shear strength program. The largest differences in predicted shear strength occurred when the failure envelopes were extrapolated to stresses below the laboratory test stress range. In this low stress range, a practical engineering solution is obtained by drawing a linear failure envelope from the origin to the “best-fit” failure envelope at the lowest effective normal stress indicated by the test data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723
Allen DM (1971) Mean square error of prediction as a criterion for selecting variables. Technometrics 13:469–475
Anyaegbunam AJ (2015) Nonlinear power-type failure laws for geomaterials: synthesis from triaxial data, properties, and applications. Int J Geomech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000348
Arlot S (2010) A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv 4:40–79
Bishop AW, Webb DL, Lewin PI (1965) Undisturbed samples of London Clay from the Ashford common shaft: strength–effective stress relationships. Géotechnique 15:1–31
Castellanos BA, Brandon TL, VandenBerge DR (2016a) Correlations for fully softened shear strength parameters. Geotech Test J 39:568–581
Castellanos BA, Brandon TL, VandenBerge DR (2016b) Use of fully softened shear strength in slope stability analysis. Landslides 13:697–709
Charles JA, Soares MM (1984) The stability of slopes in soils with nonlinear failure envelopes. Can Geotech J 21:397–406
Duncan JM, Brandon TL, VandenBerge DR (2011) Report of the workshop on shear strength for stability of slopes in highly plastic clays, CGPR #67. Center for Geotechnical Practice and Research, Blacksburg
Duncan JM, Wright SG, Brandon TL (2014) Soil strength and slope stability, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, London
Gamez JA, Stark TD (2014) Fully softened shear strength at low stresses for levee and embankment design. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140:1–6
Griffith AA (1924) Theory of rupture. In: Biezeno CB, Burgers JM (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international congress for applied mechanics. Technische Boekhandel en Drukkerij J. Waltman Jr, Delft, Netherlands, pp 55–63
Hammah RE, Yacoub TE, Corkum BC, Curran JH (2005) The shear strength reduction method for the generalized Hoek-Brown criterion. In: Alaska Rocks 2005, The 40th US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association
Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-brown failure criterion—2002 edition. In: Proceedings of 5th North American rock mechanics 17th tunnelling association of Canada conference NARMS-TAC, pp 267–273
Jiang JC, Barker R, Yamagami T (2003) The effect of strength envelope nonlinearity on slope stability computations. Can Geotech J 40:308–325
Lade PV (2010) The mechanics of surficial failure in soil slopes. J Eng Geol 114:57–64
Lee KL, Seed HB (1967) Drained strength characteristics of sands. J Soil Mech Found Div 93:117–141
Li X (2007) Finite element analysis of slope stability using a nonlinear failure criterion. Comput Geotech 34:127–136
Lumb P (1970) Safety factors and the probability distribution of soil strength. Can Geotech J 7:225–242
Maksimovic M (1989) Nonlinear failure envelope for soils. J Geotech Eng 115:581–586
Mallows CL (1973) Some comments on Cp. Technometrics 15:661–675
Marachi ND, Chan CK, Seed HB (1972) Evaluation of properties of rockfill materials. J Soil Mech Found Div 98:95–114
McGuire MP, VandenBerge DR (2017) Interpretation of shear strength uncertainty and reliability analyses of slopes. Landslides 14(6):2059–2072
Mesri G, Shahien M (2003) Residual shear strength mobilized in first-time slope failures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129:12–31
Miller SM, Whyatt JK, McHugh EL (2004) Applications of the point estimation method for stochastic rock slope engineering. In: Proceedings of 6th North America rock mechanics symposium
Mitchell JK (1993) Chapter 14—Strength and Deformation behavior, fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, New York
Noor MJM, Hadi BA (2010) The role of curved-surface envelope Mohr–Coulomb model in governing shallow infiltration induced slope failure. Electron J Geotech Eng 15:1–21
Perry J (1994) A technique for defining non-linear shear strength envelopes, and their incorporation in a slope stability method of analysis. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 27:231–241
Rocscience (2016a) RS2-Finite element analysis for excavations and slopes, Toronto
Rocscience (2016b) Slide v7.0-2D limit equilibrium slope stability analysis, Toronto
Schnabel Engineering Inc (2013) CU test results, proposed embankment shell material, Cobbs Creek Dam
Sokolovsky VV (1960) Statics of soil media. Butterworths Scientific Publications, London
Spencer E (1967) A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel interslice forces. Géotechnique 17:11–26
Stark TD, Eid HT (1997) Slope stability analyses in stiff fissured clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123:335–343
Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Soc 36:111–147
Taylor DW (1947) Fundamentals of soil mechanics. Wiley, New York
Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
VandenBerge DR, Duncan JM, Brandon TL (2013) Fully softened strength of natural and compacted clays for slope stability. In: Proceedings of geo-congress 2013 stab perform slopes embankments, vol 3, pp 221–233
VandenBerge, DR, Duncan, JM, and Brandon, TL (2015). Consolidated-undrained strength of compacted clay. CGPR #83, Center for Geotechnical Practice and Research, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
VandenBerge DR, McGuire MP, Castellanos BA (2018) Linear and nonlinear effective stress shear strength envelopes from triaxial test data. Center for Geotechnical Practice and Research, Blacksburg, VA, pp 57
Wong KS, Duncan JM (1974) Hyperbolic stress–strain parameters for nonlinear finite element analyses of stresses and movements in soil masses. University of California, Berkeley
Wright SG (2005) Evaluation of soil shear strengths for slope and retaining wall stability analyses with emphasis on high plasticity clays. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of their respective academic departments at Tennessee Tech, Virginia Tech, and Lafayette College during preparation of this work. They are also grateful for numerous enlightening and insightful discussions regarding nonlinear failure envelopes with colleagues Tom Brandon, Mike Duncan, Garry Gregory, and Steve Wright.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
VandenBerge, D.R., Castellanos, B.A. & McGuire, M.P. Comparison and Use of Failure Envelope Forms for Slope Stability Analyses. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 2029–2046 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0742-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0742-1