Skip to main content
Log in

Recommendations for a Quantitative Description of Joint Orientation Data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive joint orientation data collection program is necessary to ensure a sufficient degree of confidence in constructing a structural model. This paper investigates the influence of the number of joints sampled on the characterisation of the joint dip and dip direction. In a series of numerical experiments, Discrete Fracture Networks (DFNs) were used to model joint set populations. The average joint properties and the variation of the orientation cluster are obtained by simulating vertical and inclined boreholes in three different DFN models. The confidence level in the joint orientation data is calculated with the confidence limit method for different drilling densities. For comparable joint orientation data variability, a similar trend is observed regarding the confidence level and the number of joint sampled. Based on that trend, a series of recommendations were developed to estimate the number of joint to sample for a single joint set in order to reach a targeted level of confidence in the dip and dip direction data. Depending on the project requirements, the use of a range of levels of confidence and degrees of precision in the recommendations, can provide greater flexibility in design decisions. The proposed recommendations can be used to optimize the planning of geotechnical drilling campaigns for new mining projects or to review an existing structural database for an undergoing project identifying gaps in the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dershowitz WS, Einstein HH (1988) Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint system models. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21:21–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dershowitz WS, Herda HH (1992) Interpretation of fracture spacing and intensity. In: Proceedings of the 33rd U.S. rock mechanics symposium, Santa Fe, New Mexico

  • Elmo D, Stead D (2010) An integrated numerical modelling-discrete fracture network approach applied to the characterisation of rock mass strength of naturally fractured pillars. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(3):3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0027-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili K, Hadjigeorgiou J, Grenon M (2010) Estimating geometrical and mechanical REV based on synthetic rock mass models at Brunswick Mine. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(6):915–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili K, Hadjigeorgiou J, Grenon M (2013) Stability analysis of the 19A ore pass at Brunswick mine using a two-stage numerical modelling approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(6):1323–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0371-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillion M-H, Hadjigeorgiou J (2017) Quantifying the influence of geotechnical borehole inclination on collecting joint orientation data. Min Technol Trans Inst Min Metall Sect A 127(1):26–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14749009.2017.1308690

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenon M, Hadjigeorgiou J (2008a) A design methodology for rock slopes susceptible to wedge failure using fracture system modelling. Eng Geol 96(1–2):78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenon M, Hadjigeorgiou J (2008b) Fracture-SG, version 2.17: a fracture system generator software package. Université Laval, Québec

  • Grenon M, Landry A, Hadjigeorgiou J, Lajoie PL (2017) Discrete fracture network based drift stability at the Éléonore mine. Min Technol Trans Inst Min Metall Sect A 126(1):22–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14749009.2016.1199296

    Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Rock Mechanics (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 15(6):319–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC, Runger GC (2003) Applied statistics and probability for engineers, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD (1985) Hemispherical projection methods in rock mechanics. George Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Read J (2009) Chapter 4: structural model. In: Read J, Stacey P (eds) Guidelines for open pit slope design. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Read J, Stacey P (eds) (2009) Guidelines for open pit slope design. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience Inc. (2012) DIPS version 6.0, interactive analysis of orientation based geological data. Rocscience Inc., Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers S, Elmo D, Beddoes R (2009) Mine scale DFN modelling and rapid upscaling in geomechanical simulations of large open pits. In: Proceedings of the slope stability conference, 9–11 Nov, Santiago, Chile

  • Staub I, Fredriksson A, Outters N (2002) Strategy for a rock mechanics site descriptive model. R-02-02. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Stockholm

  • Wyllie DC, Mah CW (2005) Rock slope engineering, civil and mining, 4th edn. Taylor and Francis Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Anglo American and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada for their financial support. The authors are also thankful to Roger Johnson and Phil de Graaf for their useful comments and to Edmar Mandawe for his participation in the analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Hadjigeorgiou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fillion, MH., Hadjigeorgiou, J. Recommendations for a Quantitative Description of Joint Orientation Data. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 1503–1514 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0703-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0703-8

Keywords

Navigation