Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigations on Geotechnical Aspects for TBM Specification on the Tabriz Metro Line 3, Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to perform a successful mechanized tunnelling, detailed surface and subsurface investigations on ground are key factors for proper TBM selection and design of machine technical specification. Adverse geological conditions encountered by boring machine during tunnelling, provides a great challenges and may trigger serious hazards especially in urban areas. This paper focused on investigation of geotechnical properties and relevant issues for mechanized tunnelling in the Tabriz metro line 3. Geological units of the tunnel alignment consist of alluvium deposits (fine to coarse grained with some cobble and boulder) in south and north parts and alternation of layers of soft rocks (marlstone, sandstone and mudstone) in the middle portion. Principal objects including detailed assessment of physical and mechanical parameters, soil grain size distribution, percentage of fine-grain content, equivalent quartz content, permeability and consistency have been investigated. Main geotechnical problems are occurrence of oversized rock particles, mixed face condition, soil abrasivity and clogging in the tunnel alignment and basically clear subsurface geological models to study these problems are constructed. Finally based on obtained data the proper TBM type and additional conditioning material for each section of the tunnel are suggested.

Graphical Abstract

In order to perform a successful mechanized tunneling, detailed surface and subsurface investigations on ground are key factors for proper TBM selection and design of machine technical specification. Adverse geological conditions encountered by boring machine during tunneling, provides a great challenges and may trigger serious hazards especially in urban areas. This paper focused on investigation of geotechnical properties and relevant issues for mechanized tunneling in the Tabriz metro line 3. Geological units of the tunnel alignment consist of alluvium deposits (fine to coarse grained with some cobble and boulder) in south and north parts and alternation of layers of soft rocks (marlstone, sandstone and mudstone) in the middle portion. Principal objects including detailed assessment of physical and mechanical parameters, soil grain size distribution, percentage of fine-grain content, equivalent quartz content, permeability and consistency have been investigated. Main geotechnical problems are occurrence of oversized rock particles, mixed face condition, soil abrasivity and clogging in the tunnel alignment and basically clear subsurface geological models to study these problems are constructed. Finally based on obtained data the proper TBM type and additional conditioning material for each section of the tunnel are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi Garabagh E, Rostami J, Palomino AM (2011) New soil abrasion testing method for soft ground tunnelling applications. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26(5):604–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1979) Classification of rocks and soils for engineering geological mapping. Part I: rock and soil materials. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 19:364–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D1586-67 (1967) Standard test method for standard penetration test (SPT)

  • ASTM D4719 (2000) Standard test method for prebored pressuremeter testing in soils

  • ASTM D422 (2002) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils

  • ASTM D3080 (2003) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions

  • ASTM D4318 (2010) Standard test method for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils

  • ASTM D7625-10 (2010) Standard test method for laboratory determination of abrasiveness of rock using the CERCHAR method. DAUB (Deutscher Ausschuss für unterirdisches Bauen), Empfehlungen zur Auswahl von

  • ASTM P18-579 (2013) Standard test method for laboratory determination of abrasiveness of soil using the LCPC method

  • ASTM D2166 (2006) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil

  • ASTM D2850 (2007) Standard test method for unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils

  • ASTM D2938 (2002) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of intact rock core specimens

  • Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2013) EPB tunneling challenges in bouldery ground: a new experience on the Tabriz metro line 1, Iran. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0490-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J (2015) Parametric study of soil abrasivity for predicting wear issue in TBM tunneling projects. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 48:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayati M, Khademi Hamidi J (2017) A case study on TBM tunnelling in fault zones and lessons learned from ground improvement. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 63:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell FG (2000) Engineering properties of soils and rocks. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, p 482

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Trans S Afr Inst Civ Eng 15(12):335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin N (2016) An appraisal of TBM performances in Turkey in difficult ground conditions and some recommendations. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BTS (2005) Closed-face tunneling machines and ground stability. British tunneling society (closed-face working group) in association with the Institution of Civil Engineers. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  • Budach C (2012) Untersuchungen zum erweiterten Einsatz von Erddruckschilden in grobkörnigem Lockergestein (Transl.: Investigations for extended use of EPBShields in coarse-grained soils). Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum

  • Carrieri G, Fornari E, Guglielmetti V, Crova R (2006) Torino metro line 1: use of three TBM-EPBs in very coarse grained soil. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21:274–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAUB (Deutscher Ausschuss für unterirdisches Bauen) (2010) Empfehlungen zur Auswahl von Tunnelvortriebsmaschinen. http://www.daub-ita.de/fileadmin/documents/daub/gtcrec1/gtcrec11.pdf

  • Deer DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. University of Illinois, Technical Report No AFWL-TR-65-116 Air force weapons lanbs, Kirthland Air Force Base Mexico, p 308

  • Dowden PB, Robinson RA (2001) Coping with boulders in soft ground tunneling. In: Hansmire WH, Gowring IM (ed) Proceedings rapid excavation and tunneling conference (RETC), San Diego, USA, pp 961–977

  • Filba M, Salvany JM, Jubany J, Carrasco L (2016) Tunnel boring machine collision with an ancient boulder beach during the excavation of the Barcelona city subway L10 line: a case of adverse geology and resulting engineering solutions. Eng Geol 200:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Font-Capó J, Vázquez-Suñé E, Carrera J, Martí D, Carbonell R, Pérez-Estaun A (2011) Groundwater inflow prediction in urban tunneling with a tunnel boring machine (TBM). Eng Geol 121(1–2):46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Q, Yin L, Ma H, Zhao J (2016) TBM tunnelling under adverse geological conditions: an overview. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour T, Rostami J, Tarigh Azali S (2013) Engineering geological characterizing of alluvial sediments along the line A of Qom metro project, Iran. In: Anagnostou G, Ehrbar H (eds) ITA-AITES world tunnel congress (WTC), Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1047–1054

  • Hassanpour R, Rostami J, Thewes M, Schmitt J (2018) Parametric study of the impacts of various geological and machine parameters on thrust force requirements for operating a single shield TBM in squeezing ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 73:252–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrenknecht M, Thewes M, Budach C (2011) The development of earth pressure balance shields: from the beginning to the present. Geomech Tunn 1:11–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollmann F, Thewes M (2013) Assessment method for clay clogging and disintegration of fines in mechanised tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 37:96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt SW, Del Nero DE (2010) Two decades of advances investigating baselining and tunneling in bouldery ground. ITA-AITES world tunneling congress (WTC), Vancouver, Canada

  • ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics) (1981) Basic geotechnical description of rock masses, international society of rock mechanics commission on the classification of rock and rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 18:85–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen PD, Langmaack L, Dahl F, Breivik T (2013) Development of the Soft Ground Abrasion Tester (SGAT) to predict TBM tool wear, torque and thrust. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38:398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalilian Khave G (2013) TBM tunnelling in hydrogen sulfide gas bearing ground and its solutions. Geotech Geol Eng 31(5):1621–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khademi Hamidi J, Shahriar K, Rezai B, Rostami J, Bejari H (2010) Risk assessment based selection of rock TBM for adverse geological conditions using Fuzzy-AHP. Bull Eng Geol Env 69:523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer DS, Leelasukseree C, Mustoe GGW (2008) Disc cutter performance in boulderladen ground. In: Roach MF, Ofiara D, Townsend BF, Kritzer MR (eds) North American tunneling conference (NAT), pp 129–136

  • Langmaack L (2002) Soil conditioning for TBM—chances and limits. Journe’es d’E’ tudes Internationales de Toulouse—underground Works, living structures. Association Franc¸aise des Tunnels et de l’Espace Souterrain (AFTES)

  • Ma H, Yin L, Gong Q, Wang J (2015) TBM tunneling in mixed-face ground: problems and solutions. Int J Min Sci Technol 25(4):641–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrid Vergara I, Saroglou C (2018) Prediction of TBM performance in mixed-face ground conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 69:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos PG, Novack M, Benissi M, Panteliadou M, Papouli D, Stoumpos G, Marinos V, Korkaris K (2008) Ground information and selection of TBM for the Thessaloniki Metro, Greece. Environ Eng Geosci XIV 1:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos PG, Novack M, Benissi M, Stoumpos G, Papouli D, Panteliadou M, Marinos V, Boronkay K, Korkaris K (2009) Assessment of ground conditions with respect to mechanized tunneling for the construction of extension of the Athens Metro to the city of Piraeus. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck RB, Hanson WE, Thornburn TH (1974) Foundation engineering, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostami J, Gharahbagh EA, Palomino AM, Mosleh M (2012) Development of soil abrasivity testing for soft ground tunneling using shield machines. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steingrimsson JH, Grøv E, Nilsen B (2002) The significance of mixed-face conditions for TBM performance. World Tunn 15(9):435–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarigh Azali S, Ghafoori M, Lashkaripour GR, Hassanpour J (2013) Engineering geological investigations of mechanized tunneling in soft ground: a case study, East–West lot of line 7, Tehran Metro, Iran. Eng Geol 166(8):170–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thewes M (2007) TBM tunneling challenges—redefining the state of the art. In: Barták J, Hrdina I, Romancov G, Zlámal J (eds) ITA-AITES world tunnel congress (WTC), Prague, Czech Republic, keynote lectures

  • Thewes M, Burger W (2004) Clogging risks for TBM drives in clay. Tunn Tunn Int 36:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuro K, Käsling H (2009) Classification of the abrasiveness of soil and rock. Geomech Tunn 2(2):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TURO (Tabriz Urban Railway Organization) (2014) Geotechnical and mechanics of material reports of Tabriz Metro L3

  • Zhao J, Gong QM, Eisensten Z (2006) Tunneling through a frequently changing and mixed ground: a case history in Singapore. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22:388–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu WB, Ju SJ (2005) Mix ground and shield tunneling technology in Guangzhou. In: Proceedings of 2005 Shanghai international forum on tunnelling, Shanghai, pp 165–73

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thanks the Tabriz Urban Railway Organization, especially Mr Aftabi whose kindly helps and data support was invaluable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Ghodrat Barzegari & Fateme Shayan

  2. Mining Engineering Faculty, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

    Hamid Chakeri

Authors
  1. Ghodrat Barzegari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fateme Shayan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hamid Chakeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghodrat Barzegari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barzegari, G., Shayan, F. & Chakeri, H. Investigations on Geotechnical Aspects for TBM Specification on the Tabriz Metro Line 3, Iran. Geotech Geol Eng 36, 3639–3663 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0563-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0563-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation