Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Shear Strain on the Poisson’s Ratio of Clean Sands

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, a series of resonant column tests was performed to determine the influence of confining pressure, shear strain and relative density on the dynamic properties and Poisson's ratio of poorly graded clean sand. The tests were performed on the sand specimens of size 50 × 100 mm compacted at relative densities 30, 50 and 75 %. To achieve the corresponding relative density, sand was compacted in 5 equal layers with a specific number of blows. A fixed-free type resonant column apparatus was used to determine the dynamic soil properties at various confining pressures. It has been inferred from the data that the shear modulus (\(G\)) increases with an increase in confining pressure and relative density; and decreases with an increase in shear strain. In addition, damping ratio (\(D\)) decreases with an increase in confining pressure and relative density; and increases with an increase in shear strain. In addition, Poisson’s ratio (\(\nu\)) decreases with an increase in confining pressure and relative density and increases with an increase in the shear strain. The variation of shear modulus with Poisson’s ratio is also discussed. It has been found that there has been a decrease in shear modulus with an increase in Poisson’s ratio of the soil. It is noticed that the small strain shear modulus determined from the present study closely matches with the value determined using the correlations from the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM D4015-07 (2007) Standard test methods for modulus and damping of soils by resonant column method, annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  • Bates CR (1989) Dynamic soil property measurements during triaxial testing. Géotechnique 39(4):721–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascante G, Santamarina C, Yassir N (1998) Flexural excitation in a standard torsional-resonant column device. Can Geotech J 35:478–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drnevich VP, Hardin BO (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equation and curves. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(7):667–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Drnevich VP, Hardin BO, Shippy DJ (1978) Modulus and damping of soils by the resonant column method. Dyn Geotech Test 654:91–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin BO, Richart FR (1963) Elastic wave velocities in granular soils. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 89(1):33–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi I, Zhang XJ (1993) Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping sand and clay. Soils Found 33(1):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki T, Tatsuoka F, Takagi Y (1978) Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading. Soils Found 18(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain rate. Soils Found 20(2):45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T, Yoshida Y, Esashi Y (1982) Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range. Soils Found 22(4):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar J, Madhusudhan BN (2010) Effect of relative density and confining pressure on poisson’s ratio from bender and extender elements tests. Géotechnique 60(7):561–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1979) Soil mechanics. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa K, Soga K, Mitchell JK (1997) Observation of biot compressional wave of the second kind in granular soils. Géotechnique 47(1):133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richart FE Jr, Hall JR Jr, Woods RD (1970) Vibrations of soils and foundations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins KM, Evans MD, Diehl NB, Daily WD III (1998) Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(5):396–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena SK, Reddy KR (1989) Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for Monterey no. 0 sand by resonant column tests. Soils Found 29(2):38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Rep. no. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California

  • Seed HB, Wong RT, Idris IM, Tokimatsu K (1986) Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analysis of cohesionless soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE 112(11):1016–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe KH II, Hwang SK, Lee NJ, Andrus RD (1994) Effects of various parameters on the stiffness and damping of soils at small to medium strains. In: Proceedings of international symposium prefailure deformation characteristics of geomaterials, vol 2, Sapporo, Japan, pp 785–816

  • Stokoe KH II, Darendeli MB, Andrus RD, Brown LT (1999) Dynamic soil properties: laboratory, field and correlation studies. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, vol 3. Lisbon, Portugal, pp 811–845

  • Stokoe KH II, Darendeli MB, Gilbert RB, Menq FY, Choi WK (2004) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. In: Proceedings of the NSF/PEER international workshop on uncertainties in nonlinear soil properties and their impact on modeling dynamic soil response, University of California at Berkeley

  • Vucetic M (1994) Cyclic threshold shear strain in soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120(12):2208–2228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng ASCE 117(1):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M, Lanzo G, Doroudian M (1998) Damping at small strains in cyclic simple shear test. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124(7):585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichtmann T, Triantafyllidis T (2013) Effect of uniformity coefficient on G/Gmax and damping ratio of uniform to well-graded quartz sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 139:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Andrus RD, Juang CH (2005) Normalized shear modulus and material damping ratio relationships. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(4):453–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sireesh Saride.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutta, T.T., Saride, S. Influence of Shear Strain on the Poisson’s Ratio of Clean Sands. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 1359–1373 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0047-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0047-1

Keywords

Navigation