Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Analytical Models to Estimate Pile Setup in Cohesive Soils Based on FE Numerical Analyses

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the numerical simulation of pile installation and the subsequent increase in the pile capacity over time (or setup) after installation that was performed using the finite element software Abaqus. In the first part, pile installation and the following load tests were simulated numerically using the volumetric cavity expansion concept. The anisotropic modified Cam-Clay and Dracker–Prager models were adopted in the FE model to describe the behavior of the clayey and sandy soils, respectively. The proposed FE model proposed was successfully validated through simulating two full-scale instrumented driven pile case studies. In the second part, over 100 different actual properties of individual soil layers distracted from literature were used in the finite element analysis to conduct parametric study and to evaluate the effect of different soil properties on the pile setup behavior. The setup factor A was targeted here to describe the pile setup as a function of time after the end of driving. The selected soil properties in this study to evaluate the setup factor A include: soil plasticity index (PI), undrained shear strength (S u ), vertical coefficient of consolidation (C v ), sensitivity ratio (S r ), and over-consolidation ratio (OCR). The predicted setup factor showed direct proportion with the PI and S r and inverse relation with S u , C v and OCR. These soil properties were selected as independent variables, and nonlinear multivariable regression analysis was performed using Gauss–Newton algorithm to develop appropriate regression models for A. Best models were selected among all based on level of errors of prediction, which were validated with additional nineteen different site information available in the literature. The results indicated that the developed model is able to predict the setup behavior for individual cohesive soil layers, especially for values of setup factor greater than 0.10, which is the most expectable case in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Farsakh M, Tumay M, Voyiadjis G (2003) Numerical parametric study of piezocone penetration test in clays. Int J Geomech 3(4):170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Farsakh M, Rosti F, Souri A (2015) Evaluating pile installation and subsequent thixotropic and consolidation effects on setup by numerical simulation for full-scale pile load tests. Can Geotech J 52:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustesen AH (2006) The effect of time on soil behavior and pile capacity. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark

  • Barnes HA (1997) Thixotropy—a review. Int J Non-Newton Fluid Mech 70:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock PJ, Schmertmann JH, McVay MC, Townsend FC (2005) Side shear setup. II: results from Florida test piles. J Geotech Geoenv Eng 131(3):301–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty T, Salgado R, Loukidis D (2013) A two-surface plasticity model for clay. Comput Geotech 49:170–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Haque MN, Abu-Farsakh M, Fernandez BA (2014) Field investigation of pile setup in mixed soil. Geotech Test J 37(2):268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafalias YF (1987) An anisotropic critical state clay plasticity model. Constitutive laws for engineering materials: theory and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 513–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias MB (2008) Numerical simulation of pile installation and setup. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Wisconsin, Milwauke, WI

  • Fakharian K, Attar IH, Haddad H (2013) Contributing factors on setup and the effects on pile design parameter. In: Proceeding of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris

  • Haque MN, Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q, Zhang Z (2014) A case study on instrumentation and testing full-scale test piles for evaluating set-up phenomenon. Transportation research record. J Transp Res Rec, 2462 Soil Mechanics, pp 37–47

  • Haque MN, Abu-Farsakh M, Zhang Z, Okeil A (2016) Evaluate pile set-up for individual soil layers and develop a model to estimate the increase in unit side resistance with time based on PCPT data. Transportation research record: J Transp Res Rec (in press)

  • Karlsrud K, Clausen CJF, Aas PM (2005) Bearing capacity of driven piles in clay, the NGI approach. In: Proceeding of international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics, Perth Sept. 2005, A.A. Balkema Publishers, pp 775–782

  • Khan L, Decapite K (2011) Prediction of pile set-up for Ohio soils. Federal Highway Administration Report FHWA/OH-2011/3, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio, USA, p 34

  • Konard JM, Roy M (1987) Bearing capacity of friction pile in marine clay. Geotechnique 37(2):163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK (1960) Fundamentals aspects of thixotropy in soils. J Soil Mech Found Des 86:19–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng KW (2011) Pile setup, dynamic construction control, and load and resistance factor design of vertically-loaded steel HPiles. Graduate theses and dissertations. Paper 11924

  • Ng KW, Roling M, AbdelSalam SS, Suleiman MT, Sritharan S (2013) Pile setup in cohesive soil. I: experimental investigation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(2):199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph MF, Wroth CP (1979) Driven piles in clay: effects of installation and subsequence consolidation. Int J Geotech 29(4):361–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosti F, Abu-Farsakh M (2015) Numerical simulation of pile installation and setup for Bayou Laccasine Site. Geotechnical Special publication No. 256. IFCEE2015, pp 1152–1161

  • Salgado R (2008) Engineering of foundations. Mc Graw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao C (1998) Implementation of DSC model for dynamic analysis of soil structure interaction problems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

  • Skov R, Denver H (1988) Time-dependence of bearing capacity of piles. In: Fellenius BH (ed) Proceedings of 3rd international conference on the application of stress-wave theory to piles, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 879–888

  • Teh CI, Houlsby GT (1991) An analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay. Geotechnique 41(1):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titi HH, Wathugala GW (1999) Numerical procedure for predicting pile capacity setup/freeze. J Transp Res Rec 1663:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker J, Yu HS (2006) Adaptive finite element analysis of cone penetration in clay. Acta Geotech 1:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathugala GW (1990) Finite element dynamic analysis of nonlinear porous media with application to the piles in saturated clay. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC Project No. 11-2GT) and Louisiana Department of Transportation and development (LADOTD) [State Project No. 736-99-1732]. The authors appreciate Gavin Gautreau for providing the field test data for the projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murad Abu-Farsakh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosti, F., Abu-Farsakh, M. & Jung, J. Development of Analytical Models to Estimate Pile Setup in Cohesive Soils Based on FE Numerical Analyses. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 1119–1134 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0032-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0032-8

Keywords

Navigation