Abstract
Earthen barriers or clay liners are a major concern in geo-environmental engineering. They are designed to preclude or reduce leachate migration. Hence, a low hydraulic conductivity (k) is an important parameter in the design of clay liners. Materials such as bentonite and lateritic clays, which have a low hydraulic conductivity at high dry densities, are used in the construction of clay liners. Compacted expansive clays which are high in montmorillonite content also have a very low hydraulic conductivity. When expansive clays are blended with fly ash, an industrial waste, the hydraulic conductivity further reduces as the ash-clay blends result in increased dry densities at increased fly ash contents. Hence, fly ash-stabilised expansive clay can also be proposed as an innovative clay liner material. It is, therefore, required to study various physical and engineering properties of this new clay liner material. Liquid limit (LL) and free swell index (FSI) are important index properties to be studied in the case of this clay liner material. The hydraulic conductivity of this new clay liner material depends on the fly ash content in the blend. Further, parameters such as solute concentration and kinematic viscosity also influence hydraulic conductivity of clay liners. This paper presents experimental results obtained on hydraulic conductivity (k) of fly ash-stabilised expansive clay liner at varying fly ash content and solute concentration. The tests were performed with deionised water (DIW), CaCl2, NaCl and KCl as permeating fluids. Fly ash content in the blend was varied as 0, 10, 20 and 30 % by weight of the expansive clay, and the solute concentration was varied as 5 mM (milli molar), 10, 20, 50, 100 and 500. It was found that hydraulic conductivity (k) decreased with increasing fly ash content, solute concentration and kinematic viscosity. Further, hydraulic conductivity (k) was correlated with LL and FSI of the clay liner material for different fly ash contents and solute concentrations. Useful correlations were obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benson C, Oren AH, Gates WP (2010) Hydraulic conductivity of two geosynthetic clay liners permeated with a hyperalkaline solutions. Geotext Geomembr 28(2):206–218
Bonaparate R, Daniel D, Koerner R (2002) Assessment and recommendations for improving the performance of waste containment systems. Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
Bouazza A (2002) Geosynthetic clay liners. Geotext Geomebr 20(1):13–17
Bowders JJ Jr, Daniel DE (1987) Hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay to dilute organic chemicals. J Geotech Eng 113(12):1432–1448
Bowders JJ Jr, Daniel DE, Broderick GP, Liljestrand HM (1986) Methods for testing the compatibility of clay liners with land fill leachate. In: Petros JK Jr, Lacy WJ, Conways RA (eds) Hazardous and industrial solid waste testing, ASTM STP 886, West Conshohocken, pp 233–250
Daniel DE (1993) Geotechnical practice for waste disposal. Chapman and Hall, London
Daniel D, Boardman T (1993) Report on workshop on geosynthetic clay liners. Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
Elsbury BR, Daniel DE, Sraders GA (1990) Lessons learned from compacted clay liner. J Geotech Eng 116(11):1641–1659
Fernandez F, Quigley RM (1989) Organic liquids and hydraulic conductivity of barrier clays. In: Proceedings of the international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 3. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1867–1870
Foreman DE, Daniel DE (1986) Permeation of compacted clay with organic chemicals. J Geotech Eng 112:669–681
Gleason MH, Daniel DE, Eykholt GR (1997) Calcium and sodium bentonite for hydraulic containment applications. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123:438–445
Gray DH, Mitchell JK (1967) Fundamental aspects of electro-osmosis in soils. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div 93(SM6):209–236
Hewitt R, Daniel D (1997) Hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners after freeze—thaw. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(4):305–313
Holtz WG, Gibbs HJ (1956) Engineering properties of expansive clays. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng 121:641–677
Jo H, Katsumi T, Benson C, Edil T (2001) Hydraulic conductivity and cation exchange in non-prehydarted GCLs permeated with single species salt solutions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(7):557–667
Jo H, Benson C, Edil T (2004) Hydraulic conductivity and cation exchange in non-prehydrated and prehydrated bentonite permeated with weak inorganic salt solutions. Clay Clay Miner 52(6):661–679
Kolstad D, Benson C, Edil T (2004) Hydraulic conductivity and swell of nonprehydrated GCLs permeated with multi species inorganic solutions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(12):1236–1249
Kraus J, Benson C, Erickson A, Chamberlain E (1997) Freeze-thaw and hydraulic conductivity of bentonitic barriers. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(3):229–238
Lee J, Shackelford CD, Benson CH, Jo H, Edil TB (2005) Correlating index properties and hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(4):405–417
Martin RT (1960) Adsorbed water on clay: a review. Clays Clay Miner 9:28–70
Mazzieri F, Pasqualini E (2000) Permeability of damaged geosynthetic clay liners. Geosynth Int 7(2):101–118
Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behaviour, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Olsen HW (1965) Deviations from Darcy’s law in saturated clay. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 29:135–140
Olsen HW (1969) Simultaneous fluxes of liquid and charge in saturated kaolinite. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 33(3):338–344
Petrov RJ, Rowe RK (1997) Geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) chemical compatibility by hydraulic conductivity testing and factors impacting its performance. Can Geotech J 34(6):863–885
Petrov RJ, Rowe RK, Quigley RM (1997a) Comparison of laboratory measured GCL hydraulic conductivity based on three permeameter types. Geotech Test J 20(1):49–62
Petrov RJ, Rowe RK, Quigley RM (1997b) Selected factors influencing GCL hydraulic conductivity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(8):683–695
Phanikumar BR, Sharma RS (2004) Effect of fly ash on engineering properties of expansive soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(7):764–767
Rad NS, Jacobson BD, Bachus RC (1994) Compatibility of geosynthetic clay liners with organic and inorganic permeants. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on geotextiles, geomembranes and related products, Singapore (CD ROM)
Rowe RK (1998) Geosynthetics and the minimization of contaminant migration through barrier systems beneath solid waste. In: Keynote lecture, proceedings, 6th international conference on geosynthetics, Atlanta, vol 1, pp 27–102
Rowe KR, Quigley RM, Booker RB (1995) Clayey barrier system for waste disposal facilities. E & FN Span, London
Ruhl JL, Daniel DE (1997) Geosynthetic clay liners permeated with chemical solutions and leachates. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(4):369–381
Shackelford CD (1994) Waste-soil interactions that alter hydraulic conductivity. In: Daniel DE, Trautwein SJ (eds) Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, pp 111–168 ASTM STP 1142
Shackelford C, Benson C, Katsumi T, Edil T, Lin L (2000) Evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of GCLs permeated with non-standard liquids. Geotext Geomembr 18:133–161
Shackelford C, Sevick G, Eykholt G (2010) Hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners to tailings impoundment solutions. Geotext Geomembr 28(2):149–162
Shan HY, Daniel DE (1991) Results of laboratory tests on a geotextile/bentonite liner material. In: Proceedings, geosynthetics 1991, vol 2. Industrial Fabrics Association International, St. Paul, Minn., pp 517–535
Umashankar M, Phanikumar BR (2012) Correlation studies on index properties of fly ash-stabilised expansive clay liners. Geomech Geoeng 7(4):283–291
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phanikumar, B.R., Uma Shankar, M. Studies on Hydraulic Conductivity of Fly Ash-Stabilised Expansive Clay Liners. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 449–462 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9956-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9956-7