Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on Hydraulic Conductivity of Fly Ash-Stabilised Expansive Clay Liners

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earthen barriers or clay liners are a major concern in geo-environmental engineering. They are designed to preclude or reduce leachate migration. Hence, a low hydraulic conductivity (k) is an important parameter in the design of clay liners. Materials such as bentonite and lateritic clays, which have a low hydraulic conductivity at high dry densities, are used in the construction of clay liners. Compacted expansive clays which are high in montmorillonite content also have a very low hydraulic conductivity. When expansive clays are blended with fly ash, an industrial waste, the hydraulic conductivity further reduces as the ash-clay blends result in increased dry densities at increased fly ash contents. Hence, fly ash-stabilised expansive clay can also be proposed as an innovative clay liner material. It is, therefore, required to study various physical and engineering properties of this new clay liner material. Liquid limit (LL) and free swell index (FSI) are important index properties to be studied in the case of this clay liner material. The hydraulic conductivity of this new clay liner material depends on the fly ash content in the blend. Further, parameters such as solute concentration and kinematic viscosity also influence hydraulic conductivity of clay liners. This paper presents experimental results obtained on hydraulic conductivity (k) of fly ash-stabilised expansive clay liner at varying fly ash content and solute concentration. The tests were performed with deionised water (DIW), CaCl2, NaCl and KCl as permeating fluids. Fly ash content in the blend was varied as 0, 10, 20 and 30 % by weight of the expansive clay, and the solute concentration was varied as 5 mM (milli molar), 10, 20, 50, 100 and 500. It was found that hydraulic conductivity (k) decreased with increasing fly ash content, solute concentration and kinematic viscosity. Further, hydraulic conductivity (k) was correlated with LL and FSI of the clay liner material for different fly ash contents and solute concentrations. Useful correlations were obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson C, Oren AH, Gates WP (2010) Hydraulic conductivity of two geosynthetic clay liners permeated with a hyperalkaline solutions. Geotext Geomembr 28(2):206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaparate R, Daniel D, Koerner R (2002) Assessment and recommendations for improving the performance of waste containment systems. Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouazza A (2002) Geosynthetic clay liners. Geotext Geomebr 20(1):13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowders JJ Jr, Daniel DE (1987) Hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay to dilute organic chemicals. J Geotech Eng 113(12):1432–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowders JJ Jr, Daniel DE, Broderick GP, Liljestrand HM (1986) Methods for testing the compatibility of clay liners with land fill leachate. In: Petros JK Jr, Lacy WJ, Conways RA (eds) Hazardous and industrial solid waste testing, ASTM STP 886, West Conshohocken, pp 233–250

  • Daniel DE (1993) Geotechnical practice for waste disposal. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel D, Boardman T (1993) Report on workshop on geosynthetic clay liners. Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbury BR, Daniel DE, Sraders GA (1990) Lessons learned from compacted clay liner. J Geotech Eng 116(11):1641–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez F, Quigley RM (1989) Organic liquids and hydraulic conductivity of barrier clays. In: Proceedings of the international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol 3. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1867–1870

  • Foreman DE, Daniel DE (1986) Permeation of compacted clay with organic chemicals. J Geotech Eng 112:669–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason MH, Daniel DE, Eykholt GR (1997) Calcium and sodium bentonite for hydraulic containment applications. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123:438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray DH, Mitchell JK (1967) Fundamental aspects of electro-osmosis in soils. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div 93(SM6):209–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt R, Daniel D (1997) Hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners after freeze—thaw. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(4):305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz WG, Gibbs HJ (1956) Engineering properties of expansive clays. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng 121:641–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo H, Katsumi T, Benson C, Edil T (2001) Hydraulic conductivity and cation exchange in non-prehydarted GCLs permeated with single species salt solutions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(7):557–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo H, Benson C, Edil T (2004) Hydraulic conductivity and cation exchange in non-prehydrated and prehydrated bentonite permeated with weak inorganic salt solutions. Clay Clay Miner 52(6):661–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad D, Benson C, Edil T (2004) Hydraulic conductivity and swell of nonprehydrated GCLs permeated with multi species inorganic solutions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(12):1236–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus J, Benson C, Erickson A, Chamberlain E (1997) Freeze-thaw and hydraulic conductivity of bentonitic barriers. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(3):229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Shackelford CD, Benson CH, Jo H, Edil TB (2005) Correlating index properties and hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(4):405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RT (1960) Adsorbed water on clay: a review. Clays Clay Miner 9:28–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzieri F, Pasqualini E (2000) Permeability of damaged geosynthetic clay liners. Geosynth Int 7(2):101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behaviour, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen HW (1965) Deviations from Darcy’s law in saturated clay. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 29:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen HW (1969) Simultaneous fluxes of liquid and charge in saturated kaolinite. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 33(3):338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrov RJ, Rowe RK (1997) Geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) chemical compatibility by hydraulic conductivity testing and factors impacting its performance. Can Geotech J 34(6):863–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrov RJ, Rowe RK, Quigley RM (1997a) Comparison of laboratory measured GCL hydraulic conductivity based on three permeameter types. Geotech Test J 20(1):49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrov RJ, Rowe RK, Quigley RM (1997b) Selected factors influencing GCL hydraulic conductivity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(8):683–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phanikumar BR, Sharma RS (2004) Effect of fly ash on engineering properties of expansive soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(7):764–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rad NS, Jacobson BD, Bachus RC (1994) Compatibility of geosynthetic clay liners with organic and inorganic permeants. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on geotextiles, geomembranes and related products, Singapore (CD ROM)

  • Rowe RK (1998) Geosynthetics and the minimization of contaminant migration through barrier systems beneath solid waste. In: Keynote lecture, proceedings, 6th international conference on geosynthetics, Atlanta, vol 1, pp 27–102

  • Rowe KR, Quigley RM, Booker RB (1995) Clayey barrier system for waste disposal facilities. E & FN Span, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl JL, Daniel DE (1997) Geosynthetic clay liners permeated with chemical solutions and leachates. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(4):369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford CD (1994) Waste-soil interactions that alter hydraulic conductivity. In: Daniel DE, Trautwein SJ (eds) Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA, pp 111–168 ASTM STP 1142

  • Shackelford C, Benson C, Katsumi T, Edil T, Lin L (2000) Evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of GCLs permeated with non-standard liquids. Geotext Geomembr 18:133–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford C, Sevick G, Eykholt G (2010) Hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners to tailings impoundment solutions. Geotext Geomembr 28(2):149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan HY, Daniel DE (1991) Results of laboratory tests on a geotextile/bentonite liner material. In: Proceedings, geosynthetics 1991, vol 2. Industrial Fabrics Association International, St. Paul, Minn., pp 517–535

  • Umashankar M, Phanikumar BR (2012) Correlation studies on index properties of fly ash-stabilised expansive clay liners. Geomech Geoeng 7(4):283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. R. Phanikumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phanikumar, B.R., Uma Shankar, M. Studies on Hydraulic Conductivity of Fly Ash-Stabilised Expansive Clay Liners. Geotech Geol Eng 34, 449–462 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9956-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9956-7

Keywords

Navigation