Abstract
Many funding institutions and development agencies are facing the same challenge when considering the sustainability of their investment portfolio in agriculture: the livestock sector has a large environmental footprint, the most pressing one being its contribution to climate change, but it is essential for food security, nutrition and livelihoods for billions of poor people in the world. While other challenges such as biodiversity losses or land degradation are growing and should also be addressed, climate change is the number one concern these organizations are facing now, and even more so since the Global Methane Pledge launched in 2021. The choice should not be whether or not to invest in livestock but rather how to invest, and we argue that a share of the emission budget should be allocated to livestock given its multiple positive contributions. Improving livestock production will not only be beneficial for nutrition and incomes but it is also key if we are to achieve our current climate targets. To be able to account for these benefits while accurately measuring greenhouse gas emissions, and to reflect this in national climate commitments, we need specific data, tools and capacity which are currently not available in all countries. It is the role of science to continue providing references in a diversity of local contexts to better estimate emissions and advise how to reduce them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data presented in this paper are available upon request to the authors.
References
Arndt C, Hristov AN, Price W et al (2022) Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5 °C target by 2030 but not 2050. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111294119. PNAS
Assouma MH, Lecomte P, Hiernaux P, Ickowicz A, Corniaux C, Decruyenaere V, Diarra AR, Vayssières J (2018) How to better account for livestock diversity and fodder seasonality in assessing the fodder intake of livestock grazing semi-arid sub-saharan Africa rangelands. Livest Sci 216:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.07.002
Beal T, Gardner CD, Herrero M, Iannotti LL, Merbold L, Nordhagen S, Mottet A (2023) Friend or foe? The role of animal-source foods in healthy and environmentally sustainable diets. J Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.10.016. (Jf Nutr, in press)
Butterbach-Bahl K, Gettel G, Kiese R et al (2020) Livestock enclosures in drylands of Sub-Saharan Africa are overlooked hotspots of N2O emissions. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18359-y
Carton W, Lund JF, Dooley K (2021) Undoing equivalence: rethinking carbon accounting for just carbon removal. Front Clim. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.664130
Chang J, Peng S, Yin Y et al (2021) The key role of production efficiency changes in livestock methane emission mitigation. Adv Earth Space Sci. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000391
FAO (2017) Livestock solutions for climate change. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/i8098e/i8098e.pdf
FAO (2020) Estimation des bilans fourragers dans la région du Sahel d’Afrique de l’Ouest et Centrale. Sous la direction de Assouma, M.H. et Mottet, A. FAO: Production et santé animales – Directives no 22. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9111fr
FAO (2022) Global livestock environmental assessment model (GLEAM) dashboard. https://www.fao.org/gleam/dashboard/en/ Accessed 23 January 2023
Garcia-Dory F, Houzer E, Scoones I (2021) Livestock and climate justice: challenging mainstream policy narratives. Inst Dev Stud Bull. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2022.138
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food Agric Org United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/i3437e/i3437e.pdf
Global Methane Pledge (2021) https://www.globalmethanepledge.org/. Accessed 23 Jan 2023
Honan M, Feng X, Tricarico JM, Kebreab E (2021) Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in cattle: modes of action, effectiveness and safety. An Prod Sci 62:1303–1317. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20295
IFAD (2023) Five ways IFAD is making livestock more climate friendly. https://www.ifad.org/en/web/latest/-/five-ways-ifad-is-making-livestock-more-climate-friendly
IFAD FAO, Mottet A, Mundy O (2021) International fund for agricultural development and food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome https://www.fao.org/3/cb7221en/cb7221en.pdf
McAuliffe GA, Takahashi T, Beal T et al (2022) Protein quality as a complementary functional unit in life cycle assessment (LCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02123-z
McLaren S, Berardy A, Henderson A et al (2021) Integration of environment and nutrition in life cycle assessment of food items: opportunities and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/cb8054en/cb8054en.pdf
Merbold L, Scholes RJ, Acosta M et al (2021) Opportunities for an African greenhouse gas observation system. Reg Environ Change 21:104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01823-w
Mottet A, Henderson B, Opio C, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Silvestri S, Chesterman S, Gerber PJ (2017) Climate change mitigation and productivity gains in livestock supply chains: insights from regional case studies. Reg Environ Change 17(1):129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0986-3
Mottet A, Bicksler A, Lucantoni D et al (2020) Assessing transitions to sustainable agricultural and food systems: a tool for agroecology performance evaluation (TAPE). Front Sustain Food Syst. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.579154
Ndung’u PW, du Toit CJL, Takahashi T et al (2022) A simplified approach for producing Tier 2 enteric-methane emission factors based on East African smallholder farm data. An Prod Sci. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN22082
Nouala (2022) Livestock is a form of climate justice in the Global South. Aljazeera Opinion. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/11/10/livestock-is-a-form-of-climate-justice-in-the-global-south. Accessed 17 Jan 2023
Opio C, Gerber P, Mottet A et al (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains—a global life cycle assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Özkan Ş, Teillard F, Lindsay B et al (2022) The role of animal health in national climate commitments. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0431en
Özkan Ş, Nana A, Ziebe R et al (2022b) Cameroon moves towards low-carbon livestock systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc1443en
Özkan Ş, Doro E, Mottet A (2023) Estimating the environmental impact of the regeneration of landscapes and livelihoods (ROLL) project in Lesotho. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3396en
Rose S, Khatri-Chhetri A, Stier M et al (2021) Agricultural sub-sectors in new and updated NDCs: 2020–2021 dataset. CCAFS dataset version 2.1., updated October 2022. Wageningen, Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/115962
Soltan YA, Patra AK (2021) Ruminal microbiome manipulation to improve fermentation efficiency in ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Nutr Prod Health Environ
Stevens GA, Beal T, Mbuya MNN et al (2022) Micronutrient deficiencies among preschool-aged children and women of reproductive age worldwide: a pooled analysis of individual-level data from population-representative surveys. Lancet Glob Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00367-9
The Guardian (2020) Revealed: development banks funding industrial livestock farms around the world. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/02/revealed-development-banks-funding-industrial-livestock-farms-around-the-world Accessed 23 Jan 2023
Weiler V, Udo HMJ, Viets T et al (2014) Handling multi-functionality of livestock in a life cycle assessment: the case of smallholder dairying in Kenya. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.009
Wilkes A, van Dijk S (2018) Tier 2 inventory approaches in the livestock sector: a collection of agricultural greenhouse gas inventory practices. UNIQUE forestry and land use GmbH https://globalresearchalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Livestock-Tier-2-collection_Final_181130.pdf
World Bank (2021) Regional sahel pastoralism support project II (PRAPS-II). Project Appraisal Document
Acknowledgements
This paper was presented by the first author at the ISCRAES 2022 conference in Dublin on 28–31 August 2022, which was sponsored by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme: Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems. The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers, Thouraya Triki and Pierre Gerber for useful comments, as well as Phyllis Ndung’u, Bienvenu Somda, Ahmadou Nana, Narindra Rakotovao and Jean-Sebastien Lesaffre for their contributions to FAO’s work on low emission and resilient livestock investments. This work has received funding from the World Bank Group under the Program for Climate Smart Livestock Systems (PCSL), the International Financing Corporation and the International Fund for Agricultural Development through a grant under the second phase of the Adaptation for Smallholder Agriculture Programme (ASAP2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to writing and review the manuscript. AM designed the research.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare having no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This special issue, titled ‘Towards Net Zero Emissions Without Compromising Agricultural Sustainability: What Is Achievable?’, is guest-edited by M.I. Khalil, B. Osborne, and A. Wingler. It originates from the ISCRAES 2022 (www.iscraes.org) Panel Discussion, which was sponsored by the OECD Co-operative Research Programme: Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems.
The OECD disclaimer is: The opinions expressed and arguments employed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD or of the governments of its Member countries. The IFAD disclaimer is: The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not be attributed to IFAD, its Member States, or their representatives to its Executive Board.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mottet, A., Teillard, F. & Özkan, Ş. Investing in low-emission and resilient livestock production: the why and how. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10319-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10319-4