Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying crack tip position and stress intensity factors from displacement data

  • Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fracture prognosis and characterization efforts require knowledge of crack tip position and the Stress Intensity Factors (SIFs) acting in the vicinity of the crack. Here, we present an efficient numerical approach to infer both of these characteristics under a consistent theoretical framework from noisy, unstructured displacement data. The novel approach utilizes the separability of the asymptotic linear elastic fracture mechanics fields to expedite the search for crack tip position and is particularly useful for noisy displacement data. The manuscript begins with an assessment of the importance of accurately locating crack tip position when quantifying the SIFs from displacement data. Next, the proposed separability approach for quickly inferring crack tip position is introduced. Comparing to the widely used displacement correlation approach, the performance of the separability approach is assessed. Cases involving both noisy data and systematic deviation from the asymptotic linear elastic fracture mechanics model are considered, e.g. inelastic material behavior and finite geometries. An open source python implementation of the proposed approach is available for use by those doing field and laboratory work involving digital image correlation and simulations, e.g. finite element, discrete element, molecular dynamics and peridynamics, where the crack tip position is not explicitly defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayatollahi M, Nejati M (2011) An over-deterministic method for calculation of coefficients of crack tip asymptotic field from finite element analysis. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 34(3):159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker K, Warner D (2012) Extended timescale atomistic modeling of crack tip behavior in aluminum. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 20(6):065005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas D, Tsitsiklis JN (2008) Introduction to probability, vol 1. Athena Scientific, Nashua

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler MJ, Van Duin AC, Goddard WA III (2006) Multiparadigm modeling of dynamical crack propagation in silicon using a reactive force field. Phys Rev Lett 96(9):095505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J, Efstathiou C, Lambros J, Sehitoglu H, Hauber B, Spottswood S, Chona R (2009) Investigation of fatigue crack closure using multiscale image correlation experiments. Eng Fract Mech 76:2384–2398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Ehrhardt M, Ferreira D, Santos S (2019) Combining pattern search and implicit filtering for solving linearly constrained minimization problems with noisy objective functions. Optim Methods Softw 34(4):827–852

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Freund LB (1998) Dynamic fracture mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles GL, González JA, Castro JT, Freire JL (2017) A j-integral approach using digital image correlation for evaluating stress intensity factors in fatigue cracks with closure effects. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 90:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu W, Warner DH (2021) Dissolution at a ductile crack tip. Phys Rev Lett 127(14):146001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamam R, Hild F, Roux S (2007) Stress intensity factor gauging by digital image correlation: application in cyclic fatigue. Strain 43(3):181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen R, Waldram D, Thai T, Berke R (2021) Super resolution digital image correlation (SR-DIC): an alternative to image stitching at high magnifications. Exp Mech 61(9):1351–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooke R, Jeeves TA (1961) “Direct search’’ solution of numerical and statistical problems. J ACM 8(2):212–229

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TJ (2012) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Courier Corporation, Chelmsford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Xie H, Pan B (2015) Speeding up digital image correlation computation using the integral image technique. Opt Lasers Eng 65:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis RM, Torczon V, Trosset MW (2000) Direct search methods: then and now. J Comput Appl Math 124(1–2):191–207

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liang T, Ye W (2014) An efficient hybrid DSMC/MD algorithm for accurate modeling of micro gas flows. Commun Comput Phys 15(1):246–264

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lim I, Johnston I, Choi S (1992) Comparison between various displacement-based stress intensity factor computation techniques. Int J Fract 58(3):193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai NT, Choi ST (2018) Atomic-scale mutual integrals for mixed-mode fracture: abnormal fracture toughness of grain boundaries in graphene. Int J Solids Struct 138:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pataky GJ, Sangid MD, Sehitoglu H, Hamilton RF, Maier HJ, Sofronis P (2012) Full field measurements of anisotropic stress intensity factor ranges in fatigue. Eng Fract Mech 94:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117(1):1–19

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reed RP (1983) The Economic Effects of Fracture in the United States: a report to NBS by Batelle Columbus Laboratories. National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce

  • Réthoré J, Gravouil A, Morestin F, Combescure A (2005) Estimation of mixed-mode stress intensity factors using digital image correlation and an interaction integral. Int J Fract 132:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35(2):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JR (1974) Limitations to the small scale yielding approximation for crack tip plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 22(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford RJ, Dally JW (1979) A general method for determining mixed-mode stress intensity factors from isochromatic fringe patterns. Eng Fract Mech 11(4):621–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seitl S, Malíková L, Sobek J, Frantík P, Lopez-Crespo P (2017) Williams expansion-based approximation of the stress field in an al 2024 body with a crack from optical measurements. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 11(41):323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D, Ayatollahi M, Pavier M (2001) The role of t-stress in brittle fracture for linear elastic materials under mixed-mode loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 24(2):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenström C, Eriksson K (2019) The j-contour integral in peridynamics via displacements. Int J Fract 216(2):173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanova L, Roslyakov P (2016) Complete williams asymptotic expansion of the stress field near the crack tip: analytical solutions, interference-optic methods and numerical experiments. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, vol 1785, p 030029

  • Suresh S (1998) Fatigue of materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tada H, Paris PC, Irwin GR (1973) The stress analysis of cracks. Handbook, Del Research Corporation 34

  • Thompson AP, Aktulga HM, Berger R, Bolintineanu DS, Michael Brown W, Crozier PS, in’t Veld PJ, Kohlmeyer A, Moore SG, Nguyen TD, Shan R, Stevens M, Tranchida J, Trott C, Plimpton SJ (2021) LAMMPS—a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput Phys Commun 271:108171

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Oterkus S, Oterkus E (2020) Determination of horizon size in state-based peridynamics. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 1–24

  • Williams ML (1957) On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack. J Appl Mech 24:109–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MA, Grutzik SJ, Chandross M (2019) Continuum stress intensity factors from atomistic fracture simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 354:732–749

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Kong C, Li K, Zhang D (2016) Real-time digital image correlation for dynamic strain measurement. Exp Mech 56(5):833–843

  • Yoda M (1980) The j-integral fracture toughness for mode II. Int J Fract 16:R175–R178

  • Yoneyama S, Arikawa S, Kusayanagi S, Hazumi K (2014) Evaluating j-integral from displacement fields measured by digital image correlation. Strain 50(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanganeh M, Lopez-Crespo P, Tai Y, Yates J (2013) Locating the crack tip using displacement field data: a comparative study. Strain 49(2):102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehnder AT (2012) Fracture mechanics, vol 62. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Gu W, Warner DH (2022) Atomic mechanism of near threshold fatigue crack growth in vacuum. Nat Commun 13(1):812

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank J. Carroll for providing displacement and DIC analysis data. The authors thank E. David Reedy for reviewing a draft of the manuscript and providing valuable technical insight. This work was supported in part by the Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) program at Sandia National Laboratories for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. This paper describes objective technical results and analysis. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or the United States Government. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. DHW gratefully acknowledges support from the Office of Naval Research #N000142012484 and the National Science Foundation #1922081.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The study was conceptualized and designed by DHW, SJG and MAW The first draft of the manuscript was prepared by SG and GW. The final implementation of the methodology and the analysis was performed by SG. All authors contributed to the paper and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek H. Warner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, S., West, G., Wilson, M.A. et al. Identifying crack tip position and stress intensity factors from displacement data. Int J Fract 243, 47–63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-023-00729-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-023-00729-4

Keywords

Navigation