Skip to main content
Log in

The steady-state Archard adhesive wear problem revisited based on the phase field approach to fracture

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of adhesive wear is herein investigated in relation to periodic asperity junction models in the framework of the Archard interpretation suggesting that wear debris formation is the result of asperity fracture. To this aim, the phase field model for fracture is exploited to simulate the crack pattern leading to debris formation in the asperity junction model. Based on dimensional analysis considerations, the effect of the size of the junction length, the lateral size of the asperity, and the amplitude of the re-entrant corner angles \(\gamma \) and \(\beta \) defined by the junction geometry is examined in the parametric analysis. Results show that two failure modes are expected to occur, one with a crack nucleated at the re-entrant corner \(\gamma \), and another with a crack nucleated at the re-entrant corner \(\beta \), depending on the dominant power of the stress-singularity at the two re-entrant corner tips. Steady-state adhesive wear, where the initial asperity junction geometry is reproduced after debris formation, is observed for asperity junctions with \(\gamma = 45^\circ \), almost independently of the lateral size of the asperity and of the horizontal projection of the junction length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Images adopted from Stachowiak and Batchelor (2013)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghababaei R, Warner DH, Molinari JF (2016) Critical length scale controls adhesive wear mechanisms. Nat Commun 7:11816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldakheel F, Mauthe S, Miehe C (2014) Towards phase field modeling of ductile fracture in gradient-extended elastic–plastic solids. Proc Appl Math Mech 14:411–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessi R, Marigo JJ, Maurini C, Vidoli S (2017) Coupling damage and plasticity for a phase-field regularisation of brittle, cohesive and ductile fracture: one-dimensional examples. Int J Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.05.047

  • Archard J (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8):981–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell R, Davies P, Halling J, Whomes T (1991) Tribology. Principles and design applications. Macmillian Education Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan B (2000) Modern tribology handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borden M, Hughes T, Landis C, Anvari A, Lee I (2016) A phase-field formulation for fracture in ductile materials: finite deformation balance law derivation, plastic degradation, and stress triaxiality effects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:130–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2008) The variational approach to fracture. J Elast 91(1):5–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockley CA, Fleming GK (1965) A model junction study of severe metallic wear. Wear 8(5):374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley DH (1981) Surface effects in adhesion, friction, wear, and lubrication, vol 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpinteri A, Paggi M (2007) Analytical study of the singularities arising at multi-material interfaces in 2D linear elastic problems. Eng Fract Mech 74(1):59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung KH, Kim DE (2003) Fundamental investigation of micro wear rate using an atomic force microscope. Tribol Lett 15(2):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freddi F, Royer-Carfagni G (2011) Variational fracture mechanics to model compressive splitting of masonry-like materials. Ann Solid Struct Mech 2(2–4):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotsmann B, Lantz MA (2008) Atomistic wear in a single asperity sliding contact. Phys Rev Lett 101(12):125,501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood JA, Tabor D (1955) Deformation properties of friction junctions. Proc Phys Soc Sect B 68(9):609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesch C, Franke M, Dittmann M, Temizer I (2016) Hierarchical NURBS and a higher-order phase-field approach to fracture for finite-deformation contact problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 301:242–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills DA, Paynter RJH, Nowell D (2010) The effect of wear on nucleation of cracks at the edge of an almost complete contact. Wear 268(7–8):900–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm R (2013) Electric contacts: theory and application. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayaba T, Kato K (1979) The analysis of adhesive wear mechanism by successive observations of the wear process in SEM. Wear Mater 110:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim HK, Hills DA, Paynter RJH (2014) Asymptotic analysis of an adhered complete contact between elastically dissimilar materials. J Strain Anal Eng Des 49(8):607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubarda VA, Krajcinovic D, Mastilovic S (1994) Damage model for brittle elastic solids with unequal tensile and compressive strengths. Eng Fract Mech 49(5):681–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010a) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45):2765–2778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010b) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(10):1273–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Hofacker M, Schaenzel LM, Aldakheel F (2015) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part II. Brittle-to-ductile failure mode transition and crack propagation in thermo-elastic–plastic solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 294:486–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Aldakheel F, Teichtmeister S (2017) Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture at finite strains: a robust variational-based numerical implementation of a gradient-extended theory by micromorphic regularization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 111:816–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugadu A, Hills DA, Limmer L (2002a) An asymptotic approach to crack initiation in fretting fatigue of complete contacts. J Mech Phys Solids 50(3):531–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugadu A, Hills DA, Nowell D (2002b) Modifications to a fretting-fatigue testing apparatus based upon an analysis of contact stresses at complete and nearly complete contacts. Wear 252(5):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paggi M, Carpinteri A (2008) On the stress singularities at multimaterial interfaces and related analogies with fluid dynamics and diffusion. Appl Mech Rev 61(2):020801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paggi M, Reinoso J (2017) Revisiting the problem of a crack impinging on an interface: a modeling framework for the interaction between the phase field approach for brittle fracture and the interface cohesive zone model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 321:145–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter MI, Hills DA (2002) Note on the complete contact between a flat rigid punch and an elastic layer attached to a dissimilar substrate. Int J Mech Sci 44(3):509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowicz E, Tanner R (1966) Friction and wear of materials. J Appl Mech 33:479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seweryn A, Molski K (1996) Elastic stress singularities and corresponding generalized stress intensity factors for angular corners under various boundary conditions. Eng Fract Mech 55(4):529–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowiak G, Batchelor AW (2013) Engineering tribology. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahdat V, Grierson DS, Turner KT, Carpick RW (2013) Mechanics of interaction and atomic-scale wear of amplitude modulation atomic force microscopy probes. ACS Nano 7(4):3221–3235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams ML (1952) Stress singularities resulting from various boundary conditions in angular corners of plates in extension. J Appl Mech 19(4):526–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Shakiba R, Adams JB (2013) Molecular dynamics simulation of severe adhesive wear on a rough aluminum substrate. J Phys D Appl Phys 46(5):055,307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method: solid mechanics, vol 2. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman JM (1962) Electrons in metals: a short guide to the Fermi surface. Contemp Phys 4(2):81–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. D. A. Hills (University of Oxford) for useful discussion and suggestions on the problem of steady state wear. JR acknowledges the support of the projects funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness/FEDER (Projects MAT2015-71036-P and MAT2015-71309-P) and the Andalusian Government (Projects of Excellence Nos. TEP-7093 and P12-TEP-1050).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Paggi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carollo, V., Paggi, M. & Reinoso, J. The steady-state Archard adhesive wear problem revisited based on the phase field approach to fracture. Int J Fract 215, 39–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0329-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0329-0

Keywords

Navigation