Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertain random data envelopment analysis for technical efficiency

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a classical and prevailing tool for estimating relative efficiencies of multiple decision making units (DMUs). However, sometimes DMUs’ inputs and outputs cannot be observed accurately in practical cases, and hence this paper attempts to propose an uncertain random DEA model to evaluate the efficiencies of DMUs with uncertain random inputs and outputs. The sensitivity and stability of this new model are further analyzed with the aim to figure out the stability radius of each DMU. Finally, a numerical example is presented for illustrating the proposed uncertain random DEA model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in DEA. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. R., Hollingsworth, K., & Inman, L. (2002). The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17(3), 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D. (1993). Maximum likelihood, consistency and DEA: Statistical foundations. Management Science, 39(10), 1265–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1–2), 91–107.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Pastor, J. T. (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and the uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2014). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B., Lio, W., & Li, X. (2019). An uncertain DEA model for scale efficiency evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(8), 1616–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, B., Zou, Z., Lio, W., & Li, J. (2020). The uncertain DEA models for specific scale efficiency identification. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 38(3), 3403–3417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lio, W., & Liu, B. (2018). Uncertain data envelopment analysis with imprecisely observed inputs and outputs. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 17(3), 357–373.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2007). Uncertainty theory (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2009). Some research problems in uncertainty theory. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 3(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. (2010). Uncertainty theory: A branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. H. (2013a). Uncertain random programming with applications. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 12(2), 153–169.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. H. (2013b). Uncertain random variables: A mixture of uncertainty and randomness. Soft Computing, 17(4), 625–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. H., & Ha, M. H. (2010). Expected value of function of uncertain variables. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 4(3), 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, W., Zhang, D., Qi, L., & Liu, W. (2008). Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation. Omega, 36(6), 950–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, O. B., & Petersen, N. C. (1995). Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science, 41(3), 442–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J. K. (1982). Efficiency measurement in stochastic input–output systems. International Journal of Systems Science, 13(3), 273–287.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, 32, 73–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2014). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K. (2002). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 32–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, M. L. (2015). Uncertain Data Envelopment Analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No.61873329, Research Program of Social Sciences of Ocean University of China Grant No.201713011, and Social Science Foundation of Shandong Grant No.17CCXJ19.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Uncertainty theory

Liu (2007) set up uncertainty theory to analyze the belief degree in 2007 and then Liu (2009) perfected it in 2009. In this appendix, some helpful knowledge is provided which is beneficial to this article. The set function on a \(\sigma \)-algebra \({\mathcal {L}}\) over a nonempty set \(\varGamma \) is named uncertain measure provided that it meets three axioms below:

  1. 1.

    Normality Axiom: For the universal set \(\varGamma \), .

  2. 2.

    Duality Axiom: For any event \(\varLambda \), .

  3. 3.

    Subadditivity Axiom: For every countable sequence of events \(\varLambda _1, \varLambda _2, \cdots \), we obtain

    Then, Liu (2009) proposed product axiom in 2009.

  4. 4.

    Product Axiom: The product uncertain measure in uncertainty spaces is an uncertain measure meeting

    where \(\varLambda _k\) are arbitrarily chosen events from \({\mathcal {L}}_{k}\) for \(k=1, 2, \cdots \), respectively.

Definition 2

(Liu 2007) An uncertain variable is a function \(\xi \) from an uncertainty space (\(\varGamma \), \({\mathcal {L}}\), ) to the set of real numbers such that \(\{\xi \in B \}\) is an event for any Borel set B of real numbers.

Definition 3

(Liu 2007) For an uncertain variable \(\xi \), its uncertainty distribution \(\varPhi \) is

for any real number x.

Based on the definitions above, a frequently used uncertainty distribution can be expressed below:

$$\begin{aligned} \varPhi (x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle 0, &{} \quad \text{ if } x \le a \\ \displaystyle \frac{x - a}{b - a}, &{} \quad \text{ if } a < x \le b \\ \displaystyle 1, &{} \quad \text{ if } x > b \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$

which is named linear uncertainty distribution and labeled with \({\mathcal {L}}(a,b)\).

Definition 4

(Liu 2009) Uncertain variables \(\xi _1\), \(\xi _2\), \(\cdots \), \(\xi _n\) are said to be independent if

for any Borel sets \(B_{1}\), \(B_{2}\), \(\cdots \), \(B_{n}\) of real numbers.

If an uncertain variable \(\xi \) has a regular uncertainty distribution \(\varPhi (x)\), then the inverse function \(\varPhi ^{-1}(\alpha )\) is named the inverse uncertainty distribution of \(\xi \) (Liu 2010).

Theorem 6

(Liu 2010) Assume \(\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, \ldots , \xi _{n}\) are independent uncertain variables with regular uncertainty distributions \(\varPhi _{1}, \varPhi _{2},\ldots , \varPhi _{n},\) respectively. When \(f(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots , x_{n})\) is continuous, strictly increasing with respect to \(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots , x_{m}\) and strictly decreasing with respect to \(x_{m+1}, x_{m+2}, \ldots , x_{n}\), then \(\xi = f(\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, \ldots , \xi _{n})\) has an inverse uncertainty distribution

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&\displaystyle \varPsi ^{-1}(\alpha ) = f(\varPhi ^{-1}_{1}(\alpha ), \cdots , \varPhi ^{-1}_{m}(\alpha ), \varPhi ^{-1}_{m+1}(1-\alpha ), \cdots , \varPhi ^{-1}_{n}(1-\alpha )). \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

For the uncertain variable \(\xi \), its expected value can be figured out by following formula:

$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle E[\xi ] = \int _{0}^{1} \varPhi ^{-1}(\alpha ) \mathrm {d} \alpha \end{aligned}$$

if \(\xi \) has a regular uncertainty distribution \(\varPhi \) (Liu 2010).

Theorem 7

(Liu and Ha 2010) Suppose \(\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, \ldots , \xi _{n}\) are independent uncertain variables with regular uncertainty distributions \(\varPhi _{1}, \varPhi _{2}, \ldots , \varPhi _{n},\) respectively. When \(f(\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, \ldots , \xi _{n})\) is strictly increasing with respect to \(\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, \ldots , \xi _{m}\) and strictly decreasing with respect to \(\xi _{m+1}, \xi _{m+2}, \ldots , \xi _{n}\), then

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&\displaystyle E[\xi ] = \int _{0}^{1} f(\varPhi _{1}^{-1}(\alpha ), \cdots , \varPhi _{m}^{-1}(\alpha ), \varPhi _{m+1}^{-1}(1-\alpha ), \cdots , \varPhi _{n}^{-1}(1-\alpha )) \mathrm {d} \alpha \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

is the expected value of \(f(\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, \ldots , \xi _{n})\).

Chance theory

Liu (2013b) created chance theory for modeling the phenomenon that uncertainty and randomness simultaneously appear in a system. Some essential definitions and theorems are given in this appendix.

Definition 5

(Liu 2013b) The chance measure of event \(\varTheta \) is

where \(\varTheta \in {\mathcal {L}} \times {\mathcal {A}}\) is an event in a chance space .

Definition 6

(Liu 2013b) An uncertain random variable is a function \(\xi \) from a chance space to the set of real numbers such that \(\{\xi \in B \}\) is an event in \({\mathcal {L}} \times {\mathcal {A}}\) for any Borel set B of real numbers.

Definition 7

(Liu 2013b) Let \(\xi \) be an uncertain random variable. Then its chance distribution is defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \varPhi (x)=\mathrm {Ch}\{ \xi \le x\} \end{aligned}$$

for any \(x \in \mathfrak {R}.\)

Theorem 8

(Liu 2013a) Let \({\eta }_{1},{\eta }_{2},\ldots ,{\eta }_{m}\) be independent random variables with probability distributions \(\varPsi _{1},\varPsi _{2},\ldots ,\varPsi _{m}\), and let \({\tau }_{1},{\tau }_{2},\ldots ,{\tau }_{n}\) be independent uncertain variables with regular uncertainty distributions \(\varUpsilon _{1},\varUpsilon _{2},\ldots ,\varUpsilon _{n}\), respectively. Assume \(f({\eta }_{1},{\eta }_{2},\ldots ,{\eta }_{m},{\tau }_{1},{\tau }_{2},\ldots ,{\tau }_{n})\) is continuous, strictly increasing with respect to \({\tau }_{1},{\tau }_{2},\ldots ,{\tau }_{k}\) and strictly decreasing with respect to \({\tau }_{k+1},{\tau }_{k+2},\ldots ,{\tau }_{n}\). Then the uncertain random variable

$$\begin{aligned} \xi =f({\eta }_{1},{\eta }_{2},\ldots ,{\eta }_{m},{\tau }_{1},{\tau }_{2},\ldots ,{\tau }_{n}) \end{aligned}$$

has a chance distribution

$$\begin{aligned} \varPhi (x)=\int _{\mathfrak {R}^{m}}F(x;{y}_{1},{y}_{2},\ldots ,{y}_{m})\mathrm {d} \varPsi _{1}({y}_{1})\mathrm {d}\varPsi _{2}({y}_{2}) \ldots \mathrm {d}\varPsi _{m}({y}_{m}) \end{aligned}$$

where \(F(x;{y}_{1},{y}_{2},\ldots ,{y}_{m})\) is the root \(\alpha \) of the equation

$$\begin{aligned} f({y}_{1},{y}_{2},\ldots ,{y}_{m},\varUpsilon _{1}^{-1}(\alpha ),\ldots , \varUpsilon _{k}^{-1}(\alpha ),\varUpsilon _{k+1}^{-1}(1-\alpha ), \ldots ,\varUpsilon _{n}^{-1}(1-\alpha ))=x. \end{aligned}$$

For the uncertain random variable \(\xi \), its expected value can be figured out by the theorem below.

Theorem 9

(Liu 2013a) Assume \({\eta }_{1}, {\eta }_{2}, \ldots , {\eta }_{m}\) are independent random variables with probability distributions \(\varPsi _{1}, \varPsi _{2}, \ldots , \varPsi _{m}\), and assume \({\tau }_{1}, {\tau }_{2}, \ldots , {\tau }_{n}\) are independent uncertain variables with uncertainty distributions \(\varUpsilon _{1}, \varUpsilon _{2}, \ldots , \varUpsilon _{n}\), respectively. If f is a measurable function, then

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \xi =f({\eta }_{1},{\eta }_{2},\ldots ,{\eta }_{m},{\tau }_{1},{\tau }_{2},\ldots ,{\tau }_{n}) \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

has an expected value

$$\begin{aligned} E[\xi ]=\int _{\mathfrak {R}^{m}}{G({y}_{1},{y}_{2},\ldots ,{y}_{m})\mathrm {d} \varPsi _{1}({y}_{1})\mathrm {d}\varPsi _{2}({y}_{2}) \ldots \mathrm {d}\varPsi _{m}({y}_{m})} \end{aligned}$$

where

$$\begin{aligned} G({y}_{1},{y}_{2},\ldots ,{y}_{m})=E[f({y}_{1},{y}_{2},\ldots ,{y}_{m}, {\tau }_{1},{\tau }_{2},\ldots ,{\tau }_{n})] \end{aligned}$$

is the expected value of the function \(f({y}_{1},{y}_{2},\ldots ,{y}_{m},{\tau }_{1},{\tau }_{2},\ldots , {\tau }_{n})\) for any real numbers \({y}_{1},{y}_{2}\), \(\ldots ,{y}_{m}\), and is determined by \(\varUpsilon _{1}, \varUpsilon _{2},\ldots ,\varUpsilon _{n}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, B., Feng, W. & Li, J. Uncertain random data envelopment analysis for technical efficiency. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 21, 1–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09361-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09361-0

Keywords

Navigation