Skip to main content
Log in

General Complexity, Ethical Complexity and Normative Professionalization

  • Reply
  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the critical comments that focus on what is perceived as lack of clarity with regard to different uses of the system concept: on the one hand, in the usual general sense, on the other, in a specific ‘Habermassian’ sense. This final reply tries to remedy this in critical discussion with Morin, arguing that Morin’s paradigm of generalized complexity addresses the question of what subjects are, but remains silent with regard to the question of who they are. Answering this question confronts us with a specific ethical manifestation of complexity that cannot be adequately understood within the conceptual space of systems-oriented complexity theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Kunneman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunneman, H. General Complexity, Ethical Complexity and Normative Professionalization. Found Sci 21, 449–453 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9407-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9407-6

Keywords

Navigation