Skip to main content
Log in

Fire Dynamics of Mass Timber Compartments with Exposed Surfaces: Development of an Analytical Model

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposed timber in buildings has proven to have a positive effect on the building’s sustainability, occupant wellness, and increases the aesthetic appeal of the building but is currently limited by most building codes mainly due to fire safety concerns. While compartment fire testing can be carried out to prove a design performance, this approach is costly and time consuming. Models predicting the fire dynamics inside mass timber compartment with exposed surfaces were developed over the last years. The charring rate of the timber elements, in these models, is either the charring rate of timber when exposed to standard fire or the displacement of the 300°C isotherm using finite element analysis involving several parameters to be determined. Furthermore, using the 300°C isotherm does not account for the impact of the oxygen concentration on the charring rate. In this study, a two-zone model has been developed to estimate the heat release rate (HRR), the upper-layer temperature and oxygen concentration, and the char depth of the exposed timber elements during compartment fires. The charring rate is determined as a function of the incident heat flux impinging on the surface and the oxygen concentration. Comparing the model predictions to 20 experimental compartment fires with and without exposed timber surfaces shows that the model captures well the general fire dynamic, i.e., HRR and temperature. The char depth predictions are close to the experimental data, while being mostly conservative. Seven limitations and improvements have been discussed and will be considered in future versions of this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fell DR (2010) Wood in the human environment: restorative properties of wood in the built indoor environment. PhD Thesis University of British Columbia

  2. Watchman M, Potvin A, Demers CMH (2017) A post-occupancy evaluation of the influence of wood on environmental comfort. BioResources 12(4):8704–8724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McGregor CJ (2013) Contribution of cross laminated timber panels to room fires. Master’s Thesis Carleton University, p. 185

  4. Medina Hevia AR (2014) Fire resistance of partially protected cross laminated timber rooms. Master’s Thesis Carleton University, p. 199

  5. Su J, Leroux P, Lafrance P-S, et al (2018) Fire testing of rooms with exposed wood surfaces in encapsulated mass timber construction. National Research Council of Canada Report A1-0127101 74

  6. Su J, Lafrance P, Hoehler M, Bundy M (2018) Fire safety challenges of tall wood buildings—phase 2: task 2 & 3—cross laminated timber compartment fire tests. National Research Council of Canada, p. 396

  7. Brandon D, Sjöström J, Temple A et al (2021) Fire safe implementation of visible mass timber in tall buildings—compartment fire testing. Res Inst Sweden Rep 2021:40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li X, Zhang X, Hadjisophocleous G, McGregor C (2015) Experimental study of combustible and non-combustible construction in a natural fire. Fire Technol 51:1447–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-014-0407-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zelinka SL, Hasburgh LE, Bourne KJ et al (2018) Compartment fire testing of a two-story mass timber building. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotsovinos P, Rackauskaite E, Christensen E et al (2022) Fire dynamics inside a large and open-plan compartment with exposed timber ceiling and columns: CodeRed\#01. Fire Mater n/a:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.3049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brandon D (2018) Fire safety challenges of tall wood buildings—phase 2: task 4-engineering methods for performance based design. National Fire Protection Association Report FPRF-2018-04 46

  12. Brandon D (2016) Practical method to determine the contribution of structural timber to the rate of heat release and fire temperature of post-flashover compartment fires. Tech Res Inst Sweden SP Rep 2016(68):20

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brandon D, Anderson J (2018) Wind effect on internal and external compartment fire exposure. Res Inst Sweden Rep 2018:72

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brandon D, Temple A, Sjöström J (2021) Predictive method for fires in CLT and glulam structures—a priori modelling versus real scale compartment fire tests & an improved method. Res Inst Sweden Rep 2021:63

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wade C, Spearpoint M, Fleischmann C et al (2018) Predicting the fire dynamics of exposed timber surfaces in compartments using a two-zone model. Fire Technol 54:893–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0714-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wade C, Hopkin D, Su J, et al (2019) Enclosure fire model for mass timber construction—benchmarking with a kinetic wood pyrolysis submodel. In: Interflam: 15th international conference on fire safety engineering, pp. 1–3

  17. Schmid J, Frangi A (2021) Structural timber in compartment fires—the timber charring and heat storage model. Open Eng 11:435–452. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2021-0043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wickstrom U (1985) Application of the standard fire curve for expressing natural fires for design purposes. ASTM Special Technical Publication, pp. 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp35295s

  19. CEN (2004) EN 1991-1-2—Eurocode 1: actions on structures—Part 1–2: general actions—actions on structures exposed to fire. CEN standards

  20. Mikkola E (1990) Charring of wood. Tutkimuksia-Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus

    Google Scholar 

  21. Just A, Abu A, Barber D et al (2022) Load-bearing timber structures. Fire safe use of wood in buildings. CRC Press, pp 227–276

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartlett AI, Hadden RM, Bisby LA (2019) A review of factors affecting the burning behaviour of wood for application to tall timber construction. Fire Technol 55:1–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0787-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Friquin KL (2011) Material properties and external factors influencing the charring rate of solid wood and glue-laminated timber. Fire Mater 35:303–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Richter F, Rein G (2020) A multiscale model of wood pyrolysis in fire to study the roles of chemistry and heat transfer at the mesoscale. Combust Flame 216:316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.02.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. CEN (2004) EN 1995-1-2—Eurocode 5: design of timber structures—Part 1–2: general—actions on structures exposed to fire. CEN standards

  26. White RH, Tran HC (1996) Charring rate of wood exposed to a constant heat flux. Wood and fire safety. Technical University Zvolen, Faculty of Wood Technology, Zvolen, Slovak Republic, pp 175–183

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barber D (2016) Fire safety engineering of tall timber buildings in the USA. In: WCTE 2016—World conference on timber engineering. World Conference on Timber Engineering, Vienna

  28. Staffansson L (2010) Selecting design fires. Department of Fire Safety Engineering and Systems Safety, Lund University

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rockett JA (1976) Fire induced gas flow in an enclosure. Combust Sci Technol 12:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102207608946717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karlsson B, Quintiere JG (2022) Pressure profiles and vent flows for well-ventilated enclosures. Enclosure fire dynamics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, pp 81–114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Babrauskas V (2016) Heat release rates. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, pp 799–904

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Hadjisophocleous GV, Mehaffey JR (2016) Fire scenarios. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, pp 1262–1288

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. ISO (2006) ISO 16735 Fire safety engineering—requirements governing algebraic equations—Smoke layer. International Standard Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization

  34. Zukoski Ee (1994) Mass flux in fire plumes. In: Fire safety science—proceedings of the fourth international symposium, IAFSS, p. 13

  35. McCaffrey BJ (1983) Momentum implications for buoyant diffusion flames. Combust Flame 52:149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(83)90129-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hurley MJ (2016) Appendix 3: fuel properties and combustion data. In: SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, pp. 3437–3475

  37. Schmid J, Santomaso A, Brandon D et al (2018) Timber under real fire conditions—the influence of oxygen content and gas velocity on the charring behavior. J Struct Fire Eng 9:222–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Canadian Wood Council (2022) Mass timber research fire test performed as expected: fire performance similar to non-combustible. https://firetests.cwc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Announcemnt_4_Mass_Timber_Fire_Research_Test_Performed-1.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2023

  39. Brandon D, Dagenais C (2018) Fire safety challenges of tall wood buildings—phase 2: task 5—experimental study of delamination of cross laminated timber (CLT) in fire. National Fire Protection Association Report FPRF-2018-05 74

  40. APA (2018) ANSI/APA PRG 320-2018: standard for performance-rated cross-laminated timber. The Engineered Wood Association (APA), p. 40

  41. Dagenais C, Ranger L, Benichou N (2019) Fire performance of cross-laminated timber with adhesives conforming to 2018 edition of ANSI/APA PRG-320 (Project No. 301013085). FPInnovations

  42. ISO (2019) ISO 24679–1: fire safety engineering performance of structures in fire part 1: general. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Department of Wood and Forest Sciences of Université Laval and FPInnovations in the form of scholarships. The authors would also like to thank Daniel Brandon and Alastair Temple for sharing their fire test data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Dagenais.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Nomenclature

\({A}_{F}\):

Floor area, m2,

\({A}_{i}\):

Area of the surface “\(i\)”, m2,

\({A}_{v}\):

Opening area, m2,

\({C}_{D}\):

Flow coefficient,

\(g\):

Acceleration due to gravity, \(g=\) 9.81 m/s2,

\({H}_{c}\):

Heat of combustion, MJ/kg,

\({h}_{v}\):

Opening height, m,

\({\dot{m}}_{a}\):

Mass flow of air, kg/s,

\({\dot{m}}_{{O}_{2}\_a}\):

Mass flow of air entering the compartment, kg/s,

\({\dot{m}}_{{O}_{2}\_c}\):

Mass of oxygen required for the combustion inside the compartment, kg/s,

\({\dot{m}}_{p}\):

Mass flux in the fire plume entering the upper layer, kg/s,

\(\dot{Q}\):

Heat release rate, kW.

\({\dot{Q}}^{^{\prime\prime} }\):

Heat release rate per unit area, kW/m2,

\({\dot{q}}^{^{\prime\prime} }\):

External heat flux, kW/m2,

\({\dot{Q}}_{c}\):

Fuel-controlled heat release rate, kW,

\({\dot{Q}}_{dec}\):

Heat release rate at the beginning of the decay, kW,

\({\dot{Q}}_{v}\):

Heat release rate limited by the ventilation, kW,

\({\dot{Q}}_{R}\):

Energy lost by radiation, kW,

\({\dot{Q}}_{TOTAL}\):

Sum of the heat release rate of the movable fuel load and the exposed timber elements, kW,

\({\dot{Q}}_{W}\):

Energy lost by conduction, kW,

\(RR\):

Reduction rate factor, accounting for the combustion efficiency of timber in oxygen-poor environment,

\({RR}_{C}\):

Reduction rate factor for the ceiling surface,

\({T}_{0}\):

Ambient temperature,°C or K,

\({T}_{f}\):

Upper-layer temperature,°C or K,

\(t\):

Time, s,

\({t}_{dec}\):

Time when the decay begins, s,

W:

Opening width, m,

\({H}_{l}\):

Height of the lower end of the opening, m,

x:

Variable to be determined,

y:

Variable to be determined,

z:

Plume height, m,

\(\left[{O}_{2}\right]\):

Oxygen concentration, kg/kg of air

1.2 Greeks

\(\alpha\):

Fire growth rate, kW/s2,

\({\alpha }_{1}\):

Flow rate coefficient, kg/(s m5/2),

\({\alpha }_{fo}\):

Decreasing rate of the fully developed phase, kW/s2,

\(\beta\):

Charring rate, mm/min,

\({\beta }_{i}\):

One-dimensional charring rate of the surface “\(i\)”, mm/min,

\(\Delta P\):

Pressure difference across the opening

\(\varepsilon\):

Emissivity,

\({\rho }_{w,0}\):

Oven dry density of wood, kg/m3,

\({\rho }_{0}\):

Air density at ambient temperature, kg/m3,

\({\rho }_{s}\):

Smoke density, kg/m3,

\(\sigma\):

The Stefan-Boltzmann constant, \(\sigma =\) 5.67 × 10–11 kW/(m2K4),

\(\Phi\):

View factor

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Girompaire, L., Dagenais, C. Fire Dynamics of Mass Timber Compartments with Exposed Surfaces: Development of an Analytical Model. Fire Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01528-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01528-y

Keywords

Navigation