Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental Study of the Effect of Opening Factor on Self-Extinguishing and Blue Ghosting Flame in Under-Ventilated Compartment Fire

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blue ghosting flame and self-extinguishing are two typical flame behaviors in ventilation-controlled compartment fires. However, the study of the evolution of these two behaviors with opening factor and heat release rate (HRR) is incomplete. In this study, the experiments were performed in a 1/2-scale compartment model with openings of six different sizes. The temperature, oxygen concentration and carbon monoxide concentration in the compartment under different propane supply rates were recorded and analyzed. The results showed that the flame transformed from the stable stage to blue ghosting flame or extinguishment with the increase of the total HRR. When there is a blue ghosting flame and self-extinguishing, the combustion spontaneously regulates the oxygen concentration in the compartment and changes the trend of the oxygen concentration decreasing with the total HRR. The blue flame not only reflects that the real HRR is in an unstable state, but also changes the evolutionary trend of the ceiling temperature. The critical HRR for the appearance of blue ghosting flame and self-extinguishing behavior increases linearly with the opening factor. The value of the Global Equivalence Ratio stabilized around 0.73 only after the opening factor was greater than 0.0145. The blue ghosting flame cannot return to stability and is extinguished when the difference between the entrainment rate and the air consumption rate exceeds the limit of spontaneous regulation of combustion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(A\) :

Opening area [\({\mathrm{m}}^{2}\)]

\({A}_{T}\) :

Internal surface area of the compartment [m2]

g :

Gravity acceleration [m/s2]

\(H\) :

Opening height [\(\mathrm{m}\)]

\({h}_{k}\) :

Thermal conductivity [kW/(m2 K)]

\(m\) :

Total mass of gas in the compartment [\(\mathrm{kg}\)]

\({m}_{{o}_{2}}\) :

Mass of oxygen in the smoke layer [\(\mathrm{kg}\)]

\({m}_{g}\) :

Mass of gas in the smoke layer [\(\mathrm{kg}\)]

\({\dot{m}}_{a}\) :

Mass flow rate of air inflow through the opening [\(\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{s}\)]

\({\dot{m}}_{f}\) :

Fuel supply flow rate [\(\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{s}\)]

\({\dot{m}}_{p}\) :

Air flow rate entrained by the fire plume [\(\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{s}\)]

\({\dot{Q}}^{*}\) :

Dimensionless HRR [dimensionless]

\(S\) :

Air to fuel mass stoichiometric ratio [dimensionless]

\({T}_{\infty }\) :

Ambient temperature [K]

\({Y}_{g}\) :

Oxygen concentration in the smoke layer [dimensionless]

\({Y}_{\infty }\) :

Mass fraction of oxygen in air [dimensionless

\(\Delta H\) :

Heat of combustion [\(\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{kg}\)]

\(\chi\) :

Air–fuel local equivalence ratio [dimensionless]

\(\eta\) :

Combustion efficiency [dimensionless]

\({\rho }_{a}\) :

Air density [kg/m3

References

  1. Bøhm B, Hadvig S (1982) Nonconventional fully developed polyethylene and wood compartment fires. Combust Flame 44:201–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(82)90074-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ko G, Hamins A, Bundy M, Johnsson E, Kim S, Lenhert D (2009) Mixture fraction analysis of combustion products in the upper layer of reduced-scale compartment fires. Combust Flame 156:467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu K, Wang Z, Ding Y, Wang J, Zhang J, Delichatsios MA, Hu L (2021) Flame behavior from an opening at different elevations on the facade wall of a fire compartment. Proc Combust Inst 38:4551–4559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.07.094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee Y-P, Delichatsios M, Ohmiya Y (2012) The physics of the outflow from the opening of an enclosure fire and re-examination of Yokoi’s correlation. Fire Saf J 49:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuen A, Yeoh G, Timchenko V, Cheung S, Barber T (2016) Importance of detailed chemical kinetics on combustion and soot modelling of ventilated and under-ventilated fires in compartment. Int J Heat Mass Transf 96:171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emberley R, Inghelbrecht A, Yu Z, Torero JL (2017) Self-extinction of timber. Proc Combust Inst 36:3055–3062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loo AS-X, Coppalle A, Aîné P (2013) Flame extinction in a ventilation-controlled compartment. Procedia Eng 62:301–08. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ren N, Zeng D, Meredith KV, Wang Y, Dorofeev SB (2019) Modeling of flame extinction/re-ignition in oxygen-reduced environments. Proc Combust Inst 37:3951–3958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim KI, Ohtani H, Uehara Y (1993) Experimental study on oscillating behaviour in a small-scale compartment fire. Fire Saf J 20:377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(93)90056-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakatsuki K, Low ventilation small-scale compartment fire phenomena: ceiling vents, College Park, MD: University of Maryland, 2001. www.worldcat.org

  11. Hu L, Lu K, Delichatsios M, He L, Tang F (2012) An experimental investigation and statistical characterization of intermittent flame ejecting behavior of enclosure fires with an opening. Combust Flame 159:1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu L, Lu K, Tang F, Delichatsios M, He L (2014) A global non-dimensional factor characterizing side wall constraint effect on facade flame entrainment and flame height from opening of compartment fires. Int J Heat Mass Transf 75:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.03.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeda H, Akita K (1981) Critical phenomenon in compartment fires with liquid fuels. Critical phenomenon in compartment fires with liquid fuels. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 519–527

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foote K. 1986 LLNL enclosure fire tests data report. In. 1986 LLNL enclosure fire tests data report. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (USA), 1987. 1986 LLNL enclosure fire tests data report (Technical Report) | OSTI.GOV

  15. Sugawa O, Kawagoe K, Oka Y, Ogahara I (1989) Burning behavior in a poorly-ventilated compartment fire-ghosting fire. Fire Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.3210/fst.9.2_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Audouin L, Such J, Malet J, Casselman C (1997) A real scenario for a ghosting flame. Fire Safety Sci 5:1261–1272. https://doi.org/10.3801/iafss.fss.5-1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Utiskul Y, Quintiere JG, Rangwala AS, Ringwelski BA, Wakatsuki K, Naruse T (2005) Compartment fire phenomena under limited ventilation. Fire Saf J 40:367–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawagoe K, 1958 Fire behaviour in rooms-report no. 27, Tokyo: building research institute

  19. He Q, Ezekoye OA, Li C, Lu S (2015) Ventilation limited extinction of fires in ceiling vented compartments. Int J Heat Mass Transf 91:570–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hurley MJ, Gottuk DT, Hall JR Jr, Harada K, Kuligowski ED, Puchovsky M, Watts JM Jr (2015) handbook of fire protection engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ren F, Hu L, Zhang X, Sun X, Zhang J, Delichatsios M (2019) Experimental study of transitional behavior of fully developed under-ventilated compartment fire and associated facade flame height evolution. Combust Flame 208:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Delichatsios MA, Silcock GW (2002) Fully involved enclosure fires: effects of fuel type, fuel area and geometry: fully involved enclosure fires: effects of fuel type, fuel area and geometry. Fire Safety Sci. https://doi.org/10.3801/iafss.fss.7-59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun X, Hu L, Zhang X, Yang Y, Ren F, Fang X, Wang K (2021) Experimental study of flame extinction with fuel diffusion combustion inside a wall-opening compartment under reduced ventilation conditions. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quintiere JG (2006) Fundamentals of fire phenomena. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Brohez S, Delvosalle C, Marlair G (2004) A two-thermocouples probe for radiation corrections of measured temperatures in compartment fires. Fire Saf J 39:399–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2004.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh AV, Gollner MJ (2015) A methodology for estimation of local heat fluxes in steady laminar boundary layer diffusion flames. Combust Flame 162:2214–2230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tierney MJ, Kim HOL (1993) Electrochemical gas sensor with extremely fast response times. Anal Chem 65:3435–3440. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00071a017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dossi N, Toniolo R, Pizzariello A, Carrilho E, Piccin E, Battiston S, Bontempelli G (2012) An electrochemical gas sensor based on paper supported room temperature ionic liquids. Lab Chip 12:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1LC20663J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moffat RJ (1988) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 1:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(88)90043-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamada T, Takanashi K-i, Yanai E, Suzuki T, Sekizawa A, Satoh H, Kurioka H (2002) An experimental study of ejected flames and combustion efficiency. Fire Safety Sci. https://doi.org/10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.7-903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Floyd JE, Wieczorek C, Vandsburger U (2001) Simulations of the virginia tech fire research laboratory using large eddy simulation with mixture fraction chemistry and finite volume radiative heat transfer. In. simulations of the Virginia tech fire research laboratory using large eddy simulation with mixture fraction chemistry and finite volume radiative heat transfer. Ninth international fire science and engineering conference, London. Simulation of the Virginia tech fire research laboratory using large eddy-simulation with mixture fraction chemistry and finite volume radiative heat transfer | NIST

  32. Zukoski E, Morehart J, Kubota T, Toner S (1991) Species production and heat release rates in two-layered natural gas fires. Combust Flame 83:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(91)90079-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beyler CL (1986) Major species production by diffusion flames in a two-layer compartment fire environment. Fire Saf J 10:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(86)90031-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Steckler KD, Quintiere JG, Rinkinen WJ (1982) Flow induced by fire in a compartment. NASA STI/Recon Tech Rep N 83:19965. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(82)80267-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Prahl J, Emmons H (1975) Fire induced flow through an opening. Combust Flame 25:369–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(75)90109-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. White J, Link E, Trouvé A, Sunderland P, Marshall A, Sheffel J, Corn M, Colket M, Chaos M, Yu H-Z (2015) Radiative emissions measurements from a buoyant, turbulent line flame under oxidizer-dilution quenching conditions. Fire Saf J 76:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. White J, Vilfayeau S, Marshall A, Trouve A, McDermott RJ (2017) Modeling flame extinction and reignition in large eddy simulations with fast chemistry. Fire Saf J 90:72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Huggett C (1980) Estimation of rate of heat release by means of oxygen consumption measurements. Fire Mater 4:61–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.810040202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McCaffrey B, Quintiere J, Harkleroad M (1981) Estimating room temperatures and the likelihood of flashover using fire test data correlations. Fire Technol 17:98–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Karlsson B, Quintiere J (1999) Enclosure fire dynamics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou B, Yoshioka H, Noguchi T, Ando T (2020) Experimental study on vertical temperature profile of buoyant window spill plume from intermediate-scale compartments. Fire Mater 44:516–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2807

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51636008, 52076202) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2320000053).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, China

    Dong Wang, Xiaodong Zhou, Zhizuan Zhou, Hong Liu, Ping Zhang & Lizhong Yang

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, 1-1 Hibarigaoka, Tempaku, Toyohashi, 441-8580, Japan

    Xiaoyu Ju

  3. Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong, China

    Ping Zhang

Authors
  1. Dong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoyu Ju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaodong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhizuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ping Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lizhong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaoyu Ju or Lizhong Yang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Ju, X., Zhou, X. et al. Experimental Study of the Effect of Opening Factor on Self-Extinguishing and Blue Ghosting Flame in Under-Ventilated Compartment Fire. Fire Technol 59, 595–621 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01353-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01353-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation