Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness Test and Evaluation of Transformer Fire Extinguishing System

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With 110 kV oil-immersed transformer as the platform, in this paper, we build a full-scale test platform covering 6 fire extinguishing (fire control) methods and different extinguishing agents, which is available for transformer fire extinguishing tests consistent with actual fire conditions. Through a transformer fire extinguishing test consistent with the real situation, we can draw that the efficiencies of different fire extinguishing methods from high to low are: fire monitor, foam fire extinguishing system (column type), water spray fire extinguishing system, foam fire extinguishing system (pipe network type), water mist fire extinguishing system, oil discharge and nitrogen injection system; Based on simulation calculations and full-scale test results, we evaluate the effectiveness of the transformer fire extinguishing systems by using the combined weight method and taking into overall consideration of factors such as fire extinguishing effect, fire extinguishing cost, system reliability, environmental protection, etc.. It is concluded that the recommended fire extinguishing methods for oil-immersed transformers from superior to inferior are in the sequences of: fire monitor system with oil-emulsified extinguishing agent, foam system with oil-emulsified extinguishing agent (column type), water spray system with oil-emulsified extinguishing agent, foam system (pipe network type), water mist system with foam extinguishing agent, oil discharge and nitrogen injection system. The conclusion provides a reference for the selection of fire extinguishing methods for oil-immersed transformers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu C, Zhou T, Chen B et al (2021) Experimental study on burning characteristics of the large-scale transformer oil pool fire with different extinguishing methods. Fire Technol 57(1):461–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duarte D (2004) A performance overview about fire risk management in the Brazilian hydroelectric generating plants and transmission network. J Loss Prev Process Ind 17(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu Y, Chen B, Wu C et al (2020) Development of actual transformer fire-extinguishing test platform and coupling fire-extinguishing test. Fire Sci Technol 39(7):966–969

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ng AKL (2007) Risk assessment of transformer fire protection in a typical New Zealand high-rise building. Research Thesis, University of Canterbury

  5. Geoff Lesh PE (2010) Report on the step-up transformer failure and fire at palomar unit 1-December 2010 August 10, 2011 business meeting discussion item. Engineering Office Siting, Transmission and Environmental Protection Division, California

  6. Wang Y, Li C, Zhang J et al (2019) Fire accident characteristics and fire extinguishing countermeasures of oil-immersed transformer. Saf Environ Eng 11(6):166–171 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Li C, Zhang J et al (2019) Fire accident characteristics and fire extinguishing countermeasures of oil-immersed transformer. Saf Environ Eng 26(6):166–171 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lu J, Chen B, Liang P et al (2019) Experimental evaluation of protecting high-voltage electrical transformers using water mist with and without additives. Fire Technol 1(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han Y, Choi B, Kim M (2005) Application of a fixed water mist system in a power transformer room. Fire Saf Sci-Proceeding of the Eighth International Symposium 2005:765–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang P, Zhou T, Chen B et al (2021) Experimental study on the effectiveness of water mist containing surfactant on extinguishing transformer oil fire. In: The 5th IEEE conference on energy internet and energy system integration, pp 3698–3703

  11. GB 50219-2014 (2014) Technical code for water spray fire protection systems. China Planning Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  12. GB 50898-2013 (2013) Technical code for water mist fire extinguishing system. China Planning Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  13. GB 50151-2010 (2013) Code of design for foam extinguishing systems. China Planning Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  14. GB 50338-2003 (2003) Code of design for fixed fire monitor extinguishing systems. China Planning Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yilmaz F, Zengin M, Cure C (2020) Determination of ecologically sensitive areas in Denizli province using geographic information systems (GIS) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Environ Monit Assess 192(9):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozturk N, Karacan I, Tozan H et al (2017) Defining criteria weights by AHP in health technology assessment. Value Health 20(9):698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu R, Cheng W, Yu Y et al (2018) Human factors analysis of major coal mine accidents in China based on the HFACS-CM model and AHP method. Int J Ind Ergon 68:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalal J, Mohapatra P, Mitra G (2010) Prioritization of rural roads: AHP in group decision. Eng Constr Archit Manage 17(2):135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunag Z (2020) Research on the optimal selection of 110kV substation comprehensive automation reconstruction scheme based on analytic hierarchy process. Master Thesis, China, Jilin University. (In Chinese)

  20. Bhattacharya G, Ghosh K, Chowdhury A (2017) Granger causality driven AHP for feature weighted kNN. Pattern Recogn 66:425–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zou Q, Zhang T, Liu W (2021) A fire risk assessment method based on the combination of quantified safety checklist and structure entropy weight for shopping malls. Proc Inst Mech Eng O. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X20987378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen J (2019) Fault prediction of a transformer bushing based on entropy weight TOPSIS and gray theory. Comput Sci Eng 21(6):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li T, Wang Q (2012) Scheme evaluation of general layout design based on entropy weight and improved analytic hierarchy process method. J Lanzhou Univ Technol 38(2):120–123 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China (No. 5216A0220030).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Li, B., Wu, C. et al. Effectiveness Test and Evaluation of Transformer Fire Extinguishing System. Fire Technol 58, 3167–3190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01297-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01297-0

Keywords

Navigation