Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soft proton scattering efficiency measurements on x-ray mirror shells

  • Published:
Experimental Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In-orbit experience has shown that soft protons are funneled more efficiently through focusing Wolter-type optics of X-ray observatories than simulations predicted. These protons can degrade the performance of solid-state X-ray detectors and contribute to the instrumental background. Since laboratory measurements of the scattering process are rare, an experiment for grazing angles has been set up at the accelerator facility of the University of Tübingen. Systematic measurements at incidence angles ranging from 0.3° to 1.2° with proton energies around 250 keV, 500 keV, and 1 MeV have been carried out. Parts of spare mirror shells of the eROSITA (extended ROentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array) instrument have been used as scattering targets. This publication comprises a detailed description of the setup, the calibration and normalization methods, and the scattering efficiency and energy loss results. A comparison of the results with a theoretical scattering description and with simulations is included as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://geant4.cern.ch

  2. Part of the SRIM package; http://www.srim.org

  3. The scattering angle has been transformed to match the convention used in this study.

  4. Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica

  5. Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics

  6. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

References

  1. Weisskopf, M.C. et al.: An overview of the performance and scientific results from the chandra X-Ray Observatory. PASP 114(791), 1–24 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lo, D.H., Srour, J.R.: Modeling of proton-induced CCD degradation in the Chandra X-ray observatory. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50(6), 2018–2023 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jansen, F. et al.: XMM-newton observatory I. The spacecraft and operations. A&A 365, L1–L6 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kendziorra, E. et al.: The effect of low energy protons on the performance of the EPIC pn-CCD detector on XMM-newton. Proc. SPIE 4140, 32–41 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Firsov, O.B.: Reflection of fast ions from a dense medium at glancing angles. Sov. Phys.-Doklady 11(8), 732–733 (1967)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Agostinelli, S. et al.: Geant4 – a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250–303 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lei, F. et al.: Update on the use of Geant4 for the Simulation of low-energy protons scattering off X-ray mirrors at grazing incidence angles. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51(6), 3408–3412 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasmussen, A. et al.: Proton scattering off of XMM optics: XMM mirror and RGS grating samples, XMM Document RGS-COL-CAL-99009, Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory (1999)

  9. Nartallo, R. et al.: Radiation environment induced degradation on chandra and implications for XMM, ESA Report (2000)

  10. Diebold, S. et al.: A setup for soft proton irradiation of X-ray detectors for future astronomical space missions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 721, 65–72 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feroci, M. et al.: The large observatory for x-ray timing. Proc. SPIE 9144, 9144–100 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ziegler, J.F. et al.: SRIM – The stopping and range of ions in matter. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 268, 1818–1823 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Perinati, E. et al.: Analysis of proton propagation through the eROSITA telescope. Proc. SPIE 9144, 9144–190 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Predehl, P. et al.: eROSITA on SRG. Proc. SPIE 9144, 9144–64 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nandra, K. et al.: Athena: exploring the hot and energetic universe. Proc. SPIE 9144, 9144–84 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown, R.B. et al.: Precision ion beam energy measurement of a Van de Graaff accelerator using a generating voltmeter. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 151, 377–380 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kump, P. et al.: An absolute calibration of electrostatic accelerators in the energy region from 0.7 MeV to 2.1 MeV. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 112, 489–494 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Diebold, S. et al.: A facility for soft proton irradiation and instrument testing for future space missions. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 61(4), 1937–1942 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Winter, H. et al.: Energy loss of fast protons in grazing scattering from an Al(111)-surface. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 125, 124–127 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pfandzelter, R. et al.: Probing the stopping power near the surface by specular reflection of protons from graphite. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 72, 163–175 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie through the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (Grant FKZ 50 OO 1110).

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Diebold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diebold, S., Tenzer, C., Perinati, E. et al. Soft proton scattering efficiency measurements on x-ray mirror shells. Exp Astron 39, 343–365 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-015-9451-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-015-9451-4

Keywords

Navigation