Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Introgression of morphological, phenological and productivity traits along with disease resistance from Cicer pinnatifidum into cultivated chickpea: a success story

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wild Cicer species are known as potential genetic resources for resistance to a/biotic stresses as cultivated chickpea (C. arietinum L.) has a particularly narrow genetic base and suffers from a range of diseases. The present study was aimed to introgress valuable morphological, phenological, productivity traits and resistance against Ascochyta blight (AB) and Botrytis grey mould (BGM) diseases from wild Cicer pinnatifidum to cultivated chickpea (C. arietinum L.). A set of 158 inter-specific derivatives, derived from inter-specific cross between bushy mutant GL 23137 (C. arietinum) × IG 136820 (C. pinnatifidum), was evaluated along with the parents. Several derivatives were identified with superior traits. GLWP 38 recorded higher pods per plant, biomass per plant, seed yield per plant and 100-seed weight. Some derivatives with early flowering/maturity, erect/semi-erect growth habit and medium main branch length were also found. One AB resistant derivative (GLWP 55) and two BGM resistant derivatives (GLWP 61 and GLWP 63) were identified. Furthermore, genotyping-by-sequencing identified 1409 polymorphic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers in derivatives and parents. These SNPs were used to perform graphical genotyping for confirming the degree of introgressions in different derivatives and also at chromosomal level from wild parent. The promising derivatives are being utilized currently in chickpea breeding programme to breed cultivars with improved yield levels and resistance against AB and BGM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary files.

References

  • Adak A, Sari D, Sari H, Toker C (2017) Gene effects of Cicer reticulatum on qualitative and quantitative traits in the cultivated chickpea. Plant Breed 136:933–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akinlade OJ, Voss-Fels K, Costilla R, Kholova J, Choudhary S, Varshney RK, Hickey LT, Smith MR (2022) Designing chickpea for a hotter drier world. Euphytica 218:100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-022-03048-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amante-Bordeos A, Sitch LA, Nelson R, Dalmacio RD, Oliva NP, Aswidinnoor H, Leung H (1992) Transfer of bacterial blight and blast resistance from the tetraploid wild rice Oryza minuta to cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Theor Appl Genet 84:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00229493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Badami PS, Mallikarjuna N, Moss JP (1997) Interspecific hybridization between Cicer arietinum and C. pinnatifidum. Plant Breed 116:393–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1997.tb01019.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejiga G, Van der Maesen LJG (2006) Cicer arietinum L. record from protabase. In: Brink M, Belay G (eds) PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa)

  • Bhavyasree RK, Singh S, Singh I (2018) Comparison of backcross and F2 populations for yield attributes in a cross between Cicer arietinum with Cicer reticulatum. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7(12):2695–2701. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HM, Ku HM, Schafleitner R, Bains TS, Kuo CG, Liu CA, Nair RM (2012) The major quantitative trait locus for Mungbean yellow mosaic Indian virus resistance is tightly linked in repulsion phase to the major bruchid resistance locus in a cross between mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and its wild relative Vigna radiata ssp. Euphytica 192:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0831-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plants DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine W, Nassib AM, Telaye A (1988) Breeding for morphological traits. In: Summerfield RJ (ed) World crops: cool season food legumes. Current plant science and biotechnology in agriculture, 5th edn. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2764-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2021) Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare

  • Frey KJ, Cox TS, Rodgers DM, Bramel-Cox P (1983) Increasing cereal yields with genes from wild and weedy species. In: Proceedings of the 15th international genetics congress, M. S. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp 51–68

  • Gupta M, Kaur M, Singh I, Singh S, Gaur PM (2015) Developing chickpea cultivars suitable for mechanical harvesting. Brainstorming meeting on promotion of pulses in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India, August 31, 2015, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282977135

  • Hadzhiivanova B, Bozhanova V, Dechev D (2012) Intersipecific hybridization between durum wheat and Aegilops umbellulata (zhuk.) B. Bulg J Agric Sci 18:713–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes HK, Parker JH, Kurtzweil C (1920) Genetics of rust resistance in crosses of varieties of Triticum vulgare with varieties of T. durum and T. dicoccum. J Agric Res 19:523–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha UC, Singh DP, Paul PJ, Lavanya GR (2011) Metroglyph analysis for morphological variation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Madras Agric J 98:121–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Johal GS, Briggs SP (1992) Reductase-activity encoded by the Hm1 disease resistance gene in maize. Science 258:985–987. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1359642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jukanti A, Gaur P, Gowda C, Chibbar R (2012) Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. Br J Nutr 108(1):11–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512000797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur L, Sirari A, Kumar D, Sandhu JS, Singh S, Kapoor K, Singh I, Gowda CLL, Pande S, Gaur P, Sharma M, Imtiaz M, Siddique KHM (2013) Combining ascochyta blight and botrytis grey mold resistance in chickpea through interspecific hybridization. Phytopathol Mediterr 52:157–165. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-11651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ladizinsky G, Adler A (1976a) Genetic relationships among the annual species of Cicer. Theor Appl Genet 48:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00527371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ladizinsky G, Adler A (1976b) The origin of chickpea Cicer arietinum L. Euphytica 25:211–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754–1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mallikarjuna N (1999) Ovule and embryo culture to obtain hybrids from interspecific incompatible pollinations in chickpea. Euphytica 110:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003621908663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallikarjuna N, Jadhav DR (2008) Techniques to produce hybrid between Cicer arietinum L. × Cicer pinnatifidum Jaub. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 68:398–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallikarjuna N, Jadhav D, Nagamani V, Amudhavalli C, Hoisington DA (2007) Progress in interspecific hybridization between Cicer arietinum and wild species C. bijugum. J SAT Agric Res 5:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Moukoumbi YD, Sie M, Vodouhe R, Ndri B, Toulou B, Ogunbayo SA, Ahanchede A (2011) Assessing phenotypic diversity of interspecific rice varieties using agro-morphological characterization. J Plant Breed Crop Sci 3(5):74–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Nene YL (1982) A review of ascochyta blight of chickpea. Trop Pest Manag 28:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670878209370675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor S, Crociara C, Valetti L, Malavera AP, Fekete A, Allende MJ, Carreras J (2022) Screening of chickpea germplasm for Ascochyta blight resistance under controlled environment. Euphytica 218:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02963-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana DS, Dass A, Rajanna GA, Kaur R (2016) Biotic and abiotic stress management in pulses. Indian J Agron 61:238–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao NK, Pundir RPS, van der Maesen LJG (1980) Inheritance of some qualitative characters in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Proc Indian Acad Sci 89:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03046180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid MH, Khalequzzaman KM, Kashem MA, Alam MJ, Islam MS, Rafii MY, Latif MA (2013) Yield loss assessment of chickpea caused by botrytis gray mold through fungicide (bavistin) spray. Life Sci 10:3001–3004

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathore PS, Sharma SK (2003) Scientific pulse production. Yash Publishing House, Bikaner, pp 92–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy SC, Shil P (2020) Assessment of genetic heritability in rice breeding lines based on morphological traits and caryopsis ultrastructure. Sci Rep 10(7830):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63976-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubiales D, Fondevilla S (2012) Future prospects for Ascochyta blight resistance breeding in cool season food legumes. Front Plant Sci 3:1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio J, Floresb F, Morenoa MT, Cuberoc JI, Gilc J (2004) Effects of the erect/bushy habit, single/double pod and late/early flowering genes on yield and seed size and their stability in chickpea. Field Crops Res 90:255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu JS, Gupta SK, Kaur L (2007) Wide hybridization in chickpea and pigeonpea. Pulses at a glance. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, pp 32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu JS, Gupta SK, Singh I, Gill BS, Bhardwaj R (2010) Genetics of bushy growth habit and its implications in chickpea improvement. Indian J Genet 70(4):383–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraf CS, Rupela OP, Hegde DM, Yadav RL, Shiv kumar BG, Bhattarai S, Razzaque MA, Sattar MA, (1998) Biological nitrogen fixation and residual effects of winter grain legumes in rice and wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic plain. In: Kumar JVDK, Johansen C, Rego TJ (eds) Residual effects of legumes in rice and wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic plain. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, pp 14–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari D, Sari H, Eker T, Ikten C, Uzun B, Toker C (2022) Intraspecific versus interspecific crosses for superior progeny in Cicer species. Crop Sci 62:2122–2137. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20765SAS(2013)SASinstitute.TheSASSystemforWindowsRelease9.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena KB, Sultana R, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Saxena RK, Chauhan YS, Kumar RV, Singh IP, Raje RS, Tikle AN (2016) Accomplishments and challenges of pigeonpea breeding research in India. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 76:467–482. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2016.00065.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S (2017) Pre-breeding using wild species for genetic enhancement of grain legumes at ICRISAT. Crop Sci 57:1132–1144. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2017.01.0033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Lavale SA, Kilian B (2022) Fully matured F1 seed formed in the cross between cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and the tertiary gene pool species, Cicer pinnatifidum without embryo rescue but Albinism persists. J Genet Genom 7:1–4. https://doi.org/10.24966/GGS-2485/100037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh I, Sharma P, Verma SK, Kumar S, Malik S, Mathpal P, Kumar U, Singh D, Kumar S, Chugh V, Dhaliwal HS (2016) Characterization of interspecific hybrids of Triticum aestivum × Aegilops sp. without 5B chromosome for induced homoeologous pairing. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 25:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-015-0307-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M, Bulyntsev SV, Chang PL, Korbu LB, Carrasquila-Garcia N, Vishnyakova MA, Samsonova MG, Cook DR, Nuzhdin SV (2019) Multi-trait analysis of domestication genes in Cicer arietinum – Cicer reticulatum hybrids with a multidimensional approach: modeling wide crosses for crop improvement. Plant Sci 285:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.04.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G (1999) Proposed rating scale for BGM of chickpea. BGM Newsl 2(1):5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KB, Reddy MV (1990) Patterns of resistance and susceptibility to races of Ascochyta rabiei among germ plasms and breeding lines of chickpea. Plant Dis 74:127–129. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-74-0127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Singh BD (1989) Recovery of rare interspecific hybrids of gram Cicer arietinum × C. cuneatum L. through tissue culture. Curr Sci 58:874–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Singh NP (2009) Estimation of genetic parameters in recombinant inbred population derived from interspecific cross of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed 69(02):122–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Singh NP (2012) Development of inter-specific hybrid between Cicer arietinum and C. judaicum and characterization of interspecific derivatives for economic traits. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 72(2):174–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KB, Hatwin GC, Nene YL, Reddy MV (1981) Resistance in chickpeas to Ascochyta blight. Plant Dis 65:586–587. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-65-586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Gumber RK, Joshi N, Singh K (2005) Introgression from wild Cicer reticulatum to cultivated chickpea for productivity and disease resistance. Plant Breed 124:477–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01146.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Sharma P, Varshney RK, Sharma SK, Singh NK (2008) Chickpea improvement: role of wild species and genetic markers. J Biotechnol Genet Eng 25:267–314. https://doi.org/10.5661/bger-25-267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh I, Sandhu JS, Gupta SK, Singh S (2013) Introgression of productivity and other desirable traits from ricebean (Vigna umbellata) into black gram (Vigna mungo). Plant Breed 132(4):401–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Rani S, Malhotra N, Katna G, Sarver A (2018) Transgression segregation for agronomy improvement using interspecific crosses between C. arietinum L. x C. reticulatum Ladiz. and C. arietinum L. x C. echinospermum Davis species. PLoS ONE 13: e0203082

  • Singh G, Singh I, Taggar GK, Rani U, Sharma P, Gupta M, Singh S (2020) Introgression of productivity enhancing traits, resistance to pod borer and Phytopthora stem blight from Cajanus scarabaeoides to cultivated pigeonpea. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 26(7):1399–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00827-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Kumar T, Sood S, Malhotra N, Rani U, Singh S, Singh I, Bindra S, Kumar S, Kumar S (2022) Identification of promising chickpea interspecific derivatives for agro-morphological and major biotic traits. Front Plant Sci 13:941372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.941372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Gumber RK, Virdi KS (2007) Inheritance of growth habit in Cicer: evidences for epistatic effect of C. reticulatum gene over C. arietinum. In: Proceedings of the 4th international food legumes research conference October 18–22, 2005, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, pp 146–51

  • Stamigna C, Mancinelli R, Crino P, Infantino A, Porta-Puglia A, Saccardo F (1998) Multiple resistance to diseases in wild relatives of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In: Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on grain legumes November 1998, Valladolid, Spain, pp 14–19

  • Stevenson PC, Anderson JC, Blaney WM, Simmonds MS (1993) Developmental inhibition of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) larvae by a novel caffeoylquinic acid from the wild groundnut, Arachis paraguariensis (Chod et Hassl.). J Chem Ecol 19(12):2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swamy AVSR, Khanna VK (1990) Application of special techniques to improve seed set in interspecific crosses in Cicer. Int Chickpea Newsl 28:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Grandillo S, Fulton TM, Zamir D, Eshed Y, Petiard V, Lopez J, Beck-Bunn T (1996) Advanced back cross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinnellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92:213–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur NR, Toprope VN, Phanindra KS (2018) Estimation of genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and yield contributing traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L,). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7:2298–2304. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toker C, Berger J, Eker T, Sari D, Sari H, Gokturk RS, Kahraman A, Aydin B, Wettberg EJV (2021) Cicer turcicum: a new cicer species and its potential to improve chickpea. Front Plant Sci 12:662891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.662891

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Berloo R (2008) GGT 2.0: versatile software for visualization and analysis of genetic data. J Hered 99(2):232–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esm109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dorrestein B, Baum M, Malhotra RS (1998) Interspecific hybridization between cultivated chickpea (C. arietinum L.) and the annual wild species C. judaicum, C. pinnatifidum. In: Proceedings of third European conference on grain legumes, Valladolid, Spain, pp 362–363

  • Varshney RK, Gaur PM, Chamarthi SK, Krishnamurthy L, Tripathi S, Kashiwagi J, Samineni S, Singh VK, Thudi M, Jaganathan D (2013) Fast-track introgression of “QTL-hotspot” for root traits and other drought tolerance traits in JG 11, an elite and leading variety of chickpea. Legume Genom 16:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2013.07.0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma MM, Sandhu JS, Brar HS, Brar JS (1990) Crossability studies in different species of Cicer (L.). Crop Improv 17:179–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma MM, Sandhu JS, Ravi (1991) Wide hybridization in chickpea. In: Sharma B (ed) Proc. Genetic Resources and Evaluation: Current Trends and next Fifty years. Indian Society of Genetics and Plant Breeding, New Delhi, pp 686–687

  • Williams PC, Singh U (1987) Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programs. In: Saxena MC, Singh KB (eds) The chickpea. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 329–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao J, Grandillo S, Ahn SN, McCouch SR, Tanksley SD, Li J et al (1996) Genes from wild rice to improve yield. Nature 384:223–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/384223a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yasar M, Ceylan FO, Ikten C, Toker C (2014) Comparison of expressivity and penetrance of the double podding trait and yield components based on reciprocal crosses of kabuli and desi chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 196:331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-1036-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research grant provided under the project ‘Incentivizing Research in Agriculture’ by Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi to SS for carrying out the research is highly acknowledged.

Funding

Funding is provided by National Rice Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (Grant No. CS/F.No.16-8/2017-I AIV).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141004, India

    Sonia Salaria, Shayla Bindra, Inderjit Singh, Upasana Rani, Aiswarya S. Kumar, B. S. Gill & Sarvjeet Singh

Authors
  1. Sonia Salaria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shayla Bindra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Inderjit Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Upasana Rani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aiswarya S. Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. B. S. Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sarvjeet Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Planning and designing of experiments: (Sonia S, SB and SS); Execution of experiments and data collection: (Sonia S, ASK and UR); Data analysis and interpretation: (Sonia S, SB, IS, BSG, UR and SS); Preparation of manuscript (Sonia S, SB, IS, BSG and SS).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarvjeet Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2177 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salaria, S., Bindra, S., Singh, I. et al. Introgression of morphological, phenological and productivity traits along with disease resistance from Cicer pinnatifidum into cultivated chickpea: a success story. Euphytica 219, 47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-023-03172-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-023-03172-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation