Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of linkage disequilibrium and epistasis in the studies of inheritance based on Hayman’s diallel and generation mean analysis

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This simulation-based study assessed the impact of linkage disequilibrium (LD) and epistasis on Hayman’s diallel and generation mean analysis, assuming hundreds of genes, variable degree of dominance, and seven types of digenic epistasis. The diallel parents were 15 doubled haploids from a high LD population. The generation mean analysis was based on seven generations, assuming association. Under low LD and no epistasis, the diallel analysis provided confident results about the inheritance of the quantitative trait and high correlation between number of recessive genes and Wr + Vr, but biased estimates of the dominance components and genetic parameters. The additional consequences of high LD under no epistasis were rejection of the additive-dominance model assuming high heritability and lower correlation. Assuming 100% of epistatic genes, for four epistasis types there was evidence of inadequacy of the additive-dominance model. Assuming 30% of epistatic genes, there was a tendency for accepting the additive-dominance model for low heritability traits and for rejecting for high heritability traits. Linkage and epistasis affect the estimates of the genetic components of the generation means. Even assuming 100% of interacting genes, for most epistasis types there was no statistical evidence of epistasis. Assuming positive partial dominance, the signs of the epistatic components do not allow discriminate complementary, recessive, dominant and recessive, duplicate genes with cumulative effects, and non-epistatic genic interaction. Negative epistatic components evidence dominant epistasis. When the additive × additive and dominance × dominance components are positive and the additive × dominance component is negative, there is duplicate epistasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16732888.v1.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Capes; Finance Code 001), and the Foundation for Research Support of Minas Gerais State (Fapemig) for financial support.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author planned the study, developed the theory, programmed the software, processed the data, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Marcelo Soriano Viana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interest to disclose. The author has no competing interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. The author certifies that he has no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 522 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

The expectation of the epistatic effects in the Fn+2 generation is \(E\left( I \right)^{\left( n \right)} = E\left( I \right)^{\left( 0 \right)} + p_{22}^{\left( n \right)} I_{22} + p_{21}^{\left( n \right)} I_{21} + p_{20}^{\left( n \right)} I_{20} + p_{12}^{\left( n \right)} I_{12} + p_{11}^{\left( n \right)} I_{11} + p_{10}^{\left( n \right)} I_{10} + p_{02}^{\left( n \right)} I_{02} + p_{01}^{\left( n \right)} I_{01} + p_{00}^{\left( n \right)} I_{00}\), where n is the number of selfing generations and

$$p_{22}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {F/2} \right)\left( {f_{21}^{\left( 0 \right)} + f_{12}^{\left( 0 \right)} } \right) + P_{1}^{\left( n \right)}$$
$$p_{21}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {1 - F} \right)\left[ {f_{21}^{\left( 0 \right)} + \left( {1 - c^{n} } \right)f_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)} /2} \right] - f_{21}^{\left( 0 \right)}$$
$$p_{20}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {F/2} \right)\left( {f_{21}^{\left( 0 \right)} + f_{10}^{\left( 0 \right)} } \right) + P_{2}^{\left( n \right)}$$
$$p_{12}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {1 - F} \right)\left[ {f_{12}^{\left( 0 \right)} + \left( {1 - c^{n} } \right)f_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)} /2} \right] - f_{12}^{\left( 0 \right)}$$
$$p_{11}^{\left( n \right)} = \left[ {\left( {1 - F} \right)c^{n} - 1} \right]f_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)}$$
$$p_{10}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {1 - F} \right)\left[ {f_{10}^{\left( 0 \right)} + \left( {1 - c^{n} } \right)f_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)} /2} \right] - f_{10}^{\left( 0 \right)}$$
$$p_{02}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {F/2} \right)\left( {f_{01}^{\left( 0 \right)} + f_{12}^{\left( 0 \right)} } \right) + P_{2}^{\left( n \right)}$$
$$p_{01}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {1 - F} \right)\left[ {f_{01}^{\left( 0 \right)} + \left( {1 - c^{n} } \right)f_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)} /2} \right] - f_{01}^{\left( 0 \right)}$$
$$p_{00}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {F/2} \right)\left( {f_{01}^{\left( 0 \right)} + f_{10}^{\left( 0 \right)} } \right) + P_{1}^{\left( n \right)}$$

where \(F = 1 - \left( {1/2} \right)^{n}\) is the inbreeding coefficient, \(f_{ij}^{\left( 0 \right)}\) is a genotype probability in F2 (i and j = 2, 1, or 0), \(c = 1 - 2r\left( {1 - r} \right)\), \(P_{1}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {1/4} \right)\left\{ {\left[ {F - \left( {1 - F} \right)\left( {1 - c^{n} } \right)} \right]f_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)} + c_{1}^{\left( n \right)} \left( {1 - 2r} \right)\Delta } \right\}\), \(P_{2}^{\left( n \right)} = \left( {1/4} \right)\left\{ {\left[ {F - \left( {1 - F} \right)\left( {1 - c^{n} } \right)} \right]f_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)} - c_{1}^{\left( n \right)} \left( {1 - 2r} \right)\Delta } \right\}\), \(c_{1}^{\left( n \right)} = \left\{ {2\left[ {1 - \left( {\left( {1 - 2r} \right)/2} \right)^{n} } \right]/\left( {1 + 2r} \right)} \right\}\), and \(\left| \Delta \right| = \left( {1 - 2r} \right)/4\) (positive for coupling and negative for repulsion). Defining \(P_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)}\), \(P_{10}^{\left( 0 \right)}\), \(P_{01}^{\left( 0 \right)}\), and \(P_{00}^{\left( 0 \right)}\) as the gamete probabilities of the F1, where, for example, \(P_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)} = P_{00}^{\left( 0 \right)} = \left( {1 - r} \right)/2\) and \(P_{10}^{\left( 0 \right)} = P_{01}^{\left( 0 \right)} = r/2\) for coupling, the probability of the genotype AABb in F2 is \(f_{21}^{\left( 0 \right)} = 2P_{11}^{\left( 0 \right)} P_{10}^{\left( 0 \right)}\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viana, J.M.S. The impact of linkage disequilibrium and epistasis in the studies of inheritance based on Hayman’s diallel and generation mean analysis. Euphytica 218, 63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-022-03010-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-022-03010-2

Keywords

Navigation