Skip to main content
Log in

How many test locations and replications are needed in crop variety trials for a target region?

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How many test locations and replications are needed in crop variety trials is a question every plant breeder has to ask. Simple formulas were developed to estimate the optimum number of replicates and test locations. The optimum number of replicates in a trial was estimated by the formula \( {\text{N}}_{{\text{r}}} {\text{ = 3}}\left( {\sigma _{\epsilon }^{{\text{2}}} /\sigma _{{\text{g}}}^{{\text{2}}} } \right) \), where \( \sigma_{\text{g}}^{2} \) and \( \sigma_{\epsilon }^{2} \) are the variance components for genotypic main effect and experimental error in the trial, respectively. The optimum number of test locations for a target region was estimated by \( {\text{N}}_{\text{e}} = 1 + 3\left( {{\raise0.7ex\hbox{${\sigma_{\text{ge}}^{2} }$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\sigma_{\text{ge}}^{2} } {\sigma_{\text{g}}^{2} }}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${\sigma_{\text{g}}^{2} }$}}} \right) \), where \( \sigma_{\text{g}}^{2} \) and \( \sigma_{\text{ge}}^{2} \) are the variance components for genotypic main effect and genotype-by-location interaction, respectively. These formulas were applied to data from the oat registration trials conducted in eastern Canada in 2006–2012. The optimum number of replicates within a trial at the Ottawa site was estimated to be fewer than three for all traits considered. The estimated optimum number of test locations for the whole eastern Canada was fewer than four for all traits except for grain yield and lodging scores. For grain yield, the estimated optimum number of test locations was 20, twice as many as the actual test locations used. Mega-environment analysis using a “GGL+GGE biplot” revealed two distinct subregions in eastern Canada. Analysis within mega-environment revealed that the number of test locations actually used was close to optimal for one mega-environment but severely inadequate for the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

G:

Genotypic main effect

GE:

Genotype-by-location interaction

GL:

Genotype-by-location interaction

GS:

Genotype-by-subregion interaction

GGE:

G+GE

GGL:

G+GL

GGS:

G+GS

H:

Heritability

Q:

Noise-signal quotient

References

  • Annicchiarico P, Bellah F, Chiari T (2005) Defining subregions and estimating benefits for a specific-adaptation strategy by breeding programs: a case study. Crop Sci 45:1741–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLacy IH, Basford KE, Cooper M, Bull JK, McLaren CG (1996) Analysis of multi-environment trials—a historical perspective. In: Cooper M, Hammer GL (eds) Plant adaptation and crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 39–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson WD, Brim CA (1963) Optimal allocation of test material for two-stage testing with an application to evaluation of soybean lines. Crop Sci 3:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GR (1997) Site-to-site genetic correlations and their implications on breeding zone size and optimum number of progeny test sites for coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genetica 46:280–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J-L, Wright K, Hanafi M (2013) Genotype plus genotype×block of environments biplots. Crop Sci 53:2332–2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC (2006) SAS. Wiley, Ltd

  • Mi X, Wegenast T, Utz HF, Dhillon BS, Melchinger AE (2011) Best linear unbiased prediction and optimal allocation of test resources in maize breeding with doubled haploids. Theor Appl Genet 123:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller BU, Kleinknecht K, Möhring J, Piepho HP (2010) Comparison of spatial models for sugar beet and barley trials. Crop Sci 50:794–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967). One-way classifications. Analysis of variance. Statistical methods, 258–298

  • Sprague GF, Federer WT (1951) A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials. II. Error, year×variety, location×variety and variety components. Agron J 43:535–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wricke G, Weber E (1986). Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. Walter de Gruyter

  • Yan W (2001) GGEbiplot—a windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron J 93:1111–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W (2013) Biplot analysis of incomplete two-way tables. Crop Sci 53:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W (2014a) Crop variety trials: data management and analysis. Wiley, Blackwell

  • Yan W (2014b) Mega-environment analysis and test location evaluation using unbalanced multiyear data. Crop Sci: in press

  • Yan W, Holland JB (2010) A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica 171(3):355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B-L, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE Biplot versus AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci 47:641–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Frégeau-Reid J, Pageau D, Martin R, Mitchell-Fetch J, Etienne M, Rowsell J, Scott P, Price M, de Haan B, Cummiskey A, Lajeunesse J, Durand J, Sparry E (2010) Identifying essential test locations for oat breeding in eastern Canada. Crop Sci 50:504–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Pageau D, Frégeau-Reid J, Durand J (2011) Assessing the representativeness and repeatability of test locations for genotype evaluation. Crop Sci 51:1603–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the useful comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers. We thank Brad de Haan, Dorothy Sibbitt, Sophie Dionne, Allan Cummiskey, Julie Lajeunesse, Isabelle Morasse, John Rowsell, Peter Scott, Julie Durand, Mark Etienne, Ellen Sparry, and John Kobler for conducting the trials and/or collecting the data used in the case study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weikai Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, W., Frégeau-Reid, J., Martin, R. et al. How many test locations and replications are needed in crop variety trials for a target region?. Euphytica 202, 361–372 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1253-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1253-7

Keywords

Navigation