Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation and comparative analysis of thrips resistance in glandless and glanded cotton under field conditions

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glandless cotton can be grown for cottonseed free of toxic gossypol to be used as food and feed for non-ruminant animals. However, one of the most important limiting factors preventing its commercial production is its higher insect damage than conventional glanded cotton. Thrips is the one of the most important insect pests in the early growing season that may cause yield losses. In this study, 28, 29, 26, and 2 glandless cotton lines were compared with glanded control Acala 1517-08 and other glanded lines for resistance to the Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) in four replicated field tests each containing 32 genotypes. In the same field, 28 glanded commercial cultivars and 78 glanded breeding lines were compared with Acala 1517-08 and Acala 1517-99 in three other tests with 32 genotypes each. The experimental layouts allowed a comprehensive comparative analysis of thrips resistance within and between glandless and glanded cotton. Overall, glandless cotton had similar or lower thrips damages than glanded cotton, indicating that the glandless trait may serve as a genetic factor for suppressing thrips damage. As compared with Acala 1517-08 which represented one of the most thrips resistant genotypes among glanded cotton tested, glandless Acala GLS and many selections from glandless germplasm were more resistant, while some were similar to Acala 1517-08, indicating that genetic factors other than the glandless trait also affect thrips resistance in cotton. The estimates for broad-sense heritability for thrips resistance were moderate, indicating that thrips resistance is selectable. This is corroborated by the identification of many thrips resistant lines from a cross between Acala 1517-08 and Acala GLS. This study has laid a foundation for a more detailed study using most resistant lines with desirable agronomic traits in multiple environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey JC, Meredith WR Jr (1983) Resistance of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., to natural field populations of twospotted spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). Environ Entomol 12:763–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard WW (1951) Varietal differences in susceptibility to thrips injury in Upland cotton. Agron J 43:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baloch AA, Soomro BA, Mallah GH (1982) Evaluation of some cotton varieties with known genetic markers for their resistance/tolerance against sucking and bollworm complex. Turk Bitki Koruma Derg 6:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict JH, Leigh TF, Frazier JL, Hyer AH (1981) Ovipositional behavior of Lygus hesperus on two cotton genotypes. Ann Entomol Soc Am 74:392–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar P, Sharma PD (1991) Comparative incidence of sucking insect pests on different isogenic lines of cotton variety H777. J Insect Sci 4:170–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourland FM, Benson NR (2002a) Registration of Arkot 8710 and Arkot 8717 cotton germplasm lines. Crop Sci 42:1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourland FM, Benson NR (2002b) Registration of Arkot 8727, a high glanding cotton germplasm line. Crop Sci 42:1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourland FM, Benson NR (2002c) Registration of Arkot 8918 and Arkot 9103 cotton germplasm lines. Crop Sci 42:1384–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourland FM, Jones DC (2005) Registration of Arkot 9111 germplasm line of cotton. Crop Sci 45:2127–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RG, Robert CL, Waddell C (2000) Registration of ‘Acala 1517-99’ cotton. Crop Sci 30:1200–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TY, Chu CC, Henneberry TJ (2006) Frankliniella occidentalis colonization on okra- and normal-leaf cotton strains and cultivars. Southwest Entomol 31:281–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook D, Herbert A, Akin DS, Reed J (2011) Biology, crop injury, and management of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) infesting cotton seedlings in the United States. J Integr Pest Manag 2:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook DR, Leonard BR, Burris E, Gore J (2013) Impact of thrips infesting cotton seedlings on cotton yield distribution and maturity. J Cotton Sci 17:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • de Silva FMA, Penna JCV, Forti LC, de Santana DG (2002) Occurrence of insect pests and their natural predators on glandless upland cotton genotypes. Biosci J 18:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs JH, Oakley R (2000) CPCSD Acala GLS: a glandless cotton variety for the San Joaquin Valley. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide cotton conferences, San Antonio, TX, 4–8 Jan 2000. National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, pp 115–118

  • Durant JA (1989) Yield response of cotton cultivars to early-season applications of chlordimeform and aldicarb. J Econ Entomol 82:626–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellington J, Cardenas M, Kiser K, Guerra L, Salguero V, Ferguson G (1984) Approach to the evaluation of some factors affecting insect resistance in one ‘Acala’ and seven sister genotypes of Stoneville cotton in New Mexico. J Econ Entomol 77:612–618

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Zik KM, Thaxton PM (1996) Registration of ‘Tamcot Sphinx’ cotton. Crop Sci 36:1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang WP, Wu ZD, Wu YF, Peng WC (1995) Advances in Chinese glandless cotton research. Sci Agric Sin 28:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins BS, Peacock HA, Steele TE (1966) Thrips injury to Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties. Crop Sci 6:256–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze L, Kohel RJ (2012) Chapter 9: cotton. In: Gupta SK (ed) Technical renovations in major world oilseed crops, Vol I. Breeding. Springer, Berlin, pp 226–228

  • Kohel RJ (1979) Gene arrangement in the duplicate linkage groups V and IX: nectariless, glandless, and withering bract in cotton. Crop Sci 19:831–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohel RJ, Lee JA (1984) Genetic analysis of Egyptian glandless cotton. Crop Sci 24:1119–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei TT, Wilson LJ (2004) Recovery of leaf area through accelerated shoot ontogeny in thrips-damaged cotton seedlings. Ann Bot 94:179–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh TF, Hyer AH, Benedict JH, Wynholds PF (1985) Observed population increase, nymphal weight gain, and oviposition nonpreference as indicators of Lygus hesperus Knight (Heteroptera: Miridae) resistance in glandless cotton. J Econ Entomol 78:1109–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael SC (1959) Hopi cotton, a source of cottonseed free of gossypol pigments. Agron J 51:663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael SC (1960) Combined effects of glandless genes g12 and g13 on pigment glands in the cotton plant. Agron J 52:385–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith WR Jr, Hanny BW, Bailey JC (1979) Genetic variability among glandless cottons for resistance to two insects. Crop Sci 19:651–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montandon R, Williams HJ, Sterling WL, Stipanovic RD, Vinson SB (1986) Comparison of the development of Alabama argillacea (Hübner) and Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fed glanded and glandless cotton leaves. Environ Entomol 15:128–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Montandon R, Stipanovic RD, Williams HJ, Sterling WL, Vinson SB (1987) Nutritional indices and excretion of gossypol by Alabama argillacea (Hübner) and Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fed glanded and glandless cotyledonary cotton leaves. J Econ Entomol 80:32–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins W, Pieters EP (1982) Effect of resistant and susceptible cotton strains on larval size, developmental time, and survival of the tobacco budworm. Environ Entomol 11:363–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen DF, Gannaway JR (1995) Twelve glandless cotton germplasms. Crop Sci 35:1515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott WL (1990) Plant resistance to insects in cotton. Fla Entomol 73:392–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quisenberry JE, Rummel DR (1979) Natural resistance to thrips injury in cotton as measured by differential leaf area reduction. Crop Sci 19:879–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Race SR (1961) Early-season thrips control on cotton in New Mexico. J Econ Entomol 54:974–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummel DR, Quisenberry JE (1979) Influence of thrips injury on leaf development and yield of various cotton genotypes. J Econ Entomol 72:706–709

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO, Wilson LJ (1998) Recovery of cotton crops after early season damage by thrips (Thysanoptera). Crop Sci 38:399–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler JA, Romano GA (2012) Registration of GVS1, GVS2, and GVS3 Upland cotton lines with varying gland densities and two near-isogenic lines, GVS4 and GVS5. J Plant Regist 6:190–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt KM, Benedict JH, Walmsley MH (1988) Behavioral responses (time budgets) of bollworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae for three cotton cultivars. Environ Entomol 17:350–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster MF, Maxwell FG, Jenkins JN (1972) Resistance to the twospotted spider mite in certain Gossypium hirsutum races, Gossypium species, and glanded–glandless counterpart cottons. Econ Entomol 65:1108–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh ID, Weaver JB Jr (1972) Growth and infestation of boll weevils on normal-glanded, glandless, and high-gossypol strains of cotton. J Econ Entomol 65:821–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton MA, Stewart JM, Tugwell NP (1992) Evaluation of Gossypium arboreum L. germplasm for resistance to thrips. Genet Resour Crop Evol 39:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaxton PM, El-Zik KM (2004) Registration of ‘Tamcot Pyramid’ cotton. Crop Sci 44:343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingey WM, Leigh TF, Hyer AH (1975) Glandless cotton: susceptibility to Lygus hesperus Knight. Crop Sci 15:251–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RL, Wilson FD, Abel GH Jr (1977) Mutants of Gossypium barbadense: effect on pink bollworm and cotton leafperforator in Arizona. J Econ Entomol 70:672–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RL, Wilson FD, George BW (1979) Mutants of Gossypium hirsutum: effect on pink bollworm in Arizona. J Econ Entomol 72:216–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JF, Flynn R, Hughs SE, Bajaj S, Waddell C, Jones DC (2011) Registration of ‘Acala 1517–08’ cotton. J Plant Regist 5:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JF, Fang H, Zhou HP, Hughs SE, Jones DC (2013) Inheritance and transfer of thrips resistance from Pima cotton to Upland cotton. J Cotton Sci 17:163–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JF, Idowu OJ, Flynn R, Wedegaertner T, Hughs SE (2014) Genetic variation and selection within glandless cotton germplasm. Euphytica. doi:10.1007/s10681-014-1083-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zummo GR, Benedict JH, Segers JC (1983) No-choice study of plant–insect interactions for Heliothis zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on selected cottons. Environ Entomol 12:1833–1836

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported in part by USDA-ARS, Cotton Incorporated and New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinfa Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Idowu, O.J., Wedegaertner, T. et al. Genetic variation and comparative analysis of thrips resistance in glandless and glanded cotton under field conditions. Euphytica 199, 373–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1137-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1137-x

Keywords

Navigation