Abstract
Risk and vulnerability analyses are a required decision support tool in processes to improve societal safety and crisis preparedness at national, regional and local levels in several European states. Analyses result in risk images, which are the stakeholders’ views of events that must be addressed in planning processes related to topics such as land use and crisis management. Hence, risk and vulnerability analyses are used to support decisions regarding which issue areas to prioritize, as well as to choose between alternatives. In Norway and Sweden, municipal risk and vulnerability analyses are mandated and described in regulations, laws and guidelines. This article examines how the two countries’ regulation regimes address, characterize and facilitate risk-based decision-making. We found that the Swedish regulation regime emphasizes use of risk and vulnerability analyses in decision-making regarding emergency preparedness. In Norway, this is also an important issue, but decision-making with regard to long-term and strategic planning is also emphasized. In both regulation regimes, decision-makers must determine on their own how they should use the analyses as a foundation for decision-making regarding emergency preparedness and societal safety. While the regulation regimes contain method and content prescriptions, they do not specify how criteria regarding desirable levels of preparedness and societal safety should be determined, nor who should be involved in such processes. These are challenges that should be addressed in regulation guidelines and in audits carried out by regional authorities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander D (2005) Towards the development of a standard in emergency planning. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 14:158–175
Aven T (2008) Risk analysis: assessing uncertainties beyond expected values and probabilities. Wiley, Chichester
Aven T (2009) Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context—review and discussion. Saf Sci 47:798–806
Aven T (2011) Quantitative risk assessment: the scientific platform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Aven T, Renn O (2010) Risk management and governance: concepts, guidelines and applications. Springer, Berlin
Aven T, Njå O, Boyesen M, Olsen KH, Sandve K (2004) Samfunnsikkerhet, Risiko- og Sårbarhetsanalyser [Societal safety, risk and vulnerability analyses] (in Norwegian). Universitetsforlaget, Oslo
Banfield EC (1959) Ends and means in planning. Int Soc Sci J XI:361–368
Boholm Å, Corvellec H, Karlsson M (2012) The practice of risk governance: lessons from the field. J Risk Res 15:1–20
Boreham N, Morgan C (2004) A socio-cultural analysis of organizational learning. Oxf Rev Edu 30:307–325
Braut GS, Rake E, Aanestad R, Njå O (2012) Risk images as basis for decisions related to provision of public services. Risk Manag 14:60–76
Charon R (2006) Narrative medicine: honoring the stories of illness. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24:522–537
Dahl RA (1957) The concept of power. Behav Sci 2:201–215
DSB (1994) Veileder for Kommunale Risiko- Og Sårbarhetsanalyser [Guideline for municipal risk and vulnerability analyses] (in Norwegian). Directorate for Civil Protection and emergency planning, Oslo
DSB (2012) Veiledning Til Forskrift Om Kommunal Beredskapsplikt [Guideline to regulation regarding municipal preparednessduties] (in Norwegian). Directorate for Civil Protection, Tønsberg
Enderud H (1976) Beslutninger I Organisationer: I Adfærdsteoretisk Perspektiv [Decisions in organizations: in behaviour theoretical perspective] (in Danish). Fremad, Copenhagen
Engeström Y, Sannino A (2012) Whatever happened to process theories of learning? Learn Cult Soc Interact 1:45–56
Flyvbjerg B (1991) Rationality and power. Akademisk Forlag, Odense
Fuller CW, Vassie LH (2004) Health and safety management: principles and best practice. FT Prentice Hall, Harlow
Gherardi S (2001) From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Hum Relat 54:131–139
Gouldson A, Morton A, Pollard SJT (2009) Better environmental regulation - contributions from risk-based decision making. Sci Total Environ 407(19):5283–5288
Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press, Boston
Habermas J (1991) Communication and the evolution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge
Healey P (1992) Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. Town Plan Rev 63:143–162
Hokstad P, Steiro T (2006) Overall strategy for risk evaluation and priority setting of risk regulations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:100–111
Hutter B (2005) The attractions of risk-based regulation: accounting for the emergence of risk ideas in regulation, vol 33. London School of Economics, London
Hutter B (2006) Risk, regulation and management. In: Taylor-Gooby P, Zinn J (eds) Risk in social science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 202–227
Innes JE (1988) Information in communicative planning. Am Plan Assoc J Winter 1988:52–63
ISO (2009) ISO 31000 Risk management—Principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
Kain P (1998) How to do a close reading. http://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/pages/how-do-close-reading. Accessed 20 April 2014
Klinke A, Renn O (2002) A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based and discourse-based strategies. Risk Anal 22(8):1071–1094
Kolluru RV, Bartell SM, Pitblado RM, Scott SR (eds) (1996) Risk assessment and management hanbook. For environmental, health, and safety professionals. McGraw-Hill, New York
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York
Lindøe P, Braut GS (2010) Risk regulation in the North Sea: robustness towards changing methods of operation. In: Bris R, Guedes Soares C, Martorell S (eds) Reliability, risk and safety. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 2247–2253
LOV 2010-06-25 nr 45 Sivilbeskyttelsesloven [Civil Protection Law] (in Norwegian). Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security
MSB (2012) Guide to risk and vulnerability analyses. Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, Stockholm
MSBFS 2010:6 Myndigheten För Samhällsskydd Och Beredskaps Föreskrifter Om Kommuners Och Landstings Risk- Och Sårbarhetsanalyser (Rules on municipalities’ and county councils’ rvas) (in Swedish). Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, Stockholm, Sweden
Nicolini D, Gherardi S, Yanow D (2003) Knowing in organizations: a practice-based approach. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk
Njå O, Solberg Ø (2010) Safety considerations in political decisions: a case study of changes to the norwegian aviation system. Rev Policy Res 27:595–619
OECD (2003) Emerging risks in the 21st century; an agenda for action. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
Pollard SJT, Davies GJ, Coley F, Lemon M (2008) Better environmental decision making—recent progress and future trends. Sci Total Environ 400:20–31
Pruyt E, Wijnmalen D (2010) National risk assessment in the Netherlands. In: Ehrgott M, Naujoks B, Stewart TJ, Wallenius J (eds) Multiple criteria decision making for sustainable energy and transportation systems, vol 634., Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systemsSpringer, Berlin, pp 133–143
Renn O (2005) White paper on risk governance; towards an integrative approach. International risk governance council, Geneva
Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London
SFS 2006:544 Lag Om Kommuners Och Landstings Åtgärder Inför Och Vid Extraordinära Händelser I Fredstid Och Höjd Beredskap [Act on municipal and county council measures prior to and during of extraordinary events and during high alert] (in Swedish). Swedish Ministry of Defence, Stockholm
Simon HA (1965) Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. Free Press, New York
Veland H, Amundrud Ø, Aven T (2013) Foundational issues in relation to national risk assessment methodologies proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. J Risk Reliab 227:348–358
Vlek C (2013) How solid Is the Dutch (and the British) national risk assessment? Overview and decision-theoretic evaluation. Risk Anal 33:948–971
Wolfreys J (2000) Readings: acts of close reading in literary theory. Edinburg University Press, Edinburgh
Zeleny M (1982) Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection as well as the Swedish Civil Contingency Agency for financing this research. In addition, we are grateful to the municipal employees who we interviewed as a part of the project presented in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vastveit, K.R., Eriksson, K. & Njå, O. Critical reflections on municipal risk and vulnerability analyses as decision support tools: the role of regulation regimes. Environ Syst Decis 34, 443–455 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9510-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9510-9