Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecological engineering or nature-based solutions: does the term matter?

  • Review
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attempting to find the most advantageous approach to address environmentally, economically, and politically acceptable environmental challenges has led many organizations to incorporate new terms such as nature-based and ecological. The difference in orientation and terms of reference creates a gap to cross in the search for mutual understanding since the inconsistent use of terminology makes it challenging to find a specific solution. This research aims to better understand the impact of using different terms and evaluate the connections and differences among them through a bibliometric analysis. A bibliometric analysis was performed using the bibliometrix package in RStudio on environmental engineering, ecological engineering, nature-based solutions, engineering with nature, constructed wetlands, green engineering, and ecological systems. A thorough database search of Web of Science and Scopus was conducted to retrieve all published articles containing these terms from 1945 to 2021. The results showed that these terms developed over different periods, with a recent increase in the scientific literature. The growth of ecological engineering is stagnant, while green engineering and nature-based solutions are becoming more popular, with the highest average number of citations per year. The term “constructed wetlands” was chosen as part of the Ecological engineering field; however, the strongest connection is with environmental engineering. Considering the latest publications, environmental engineering remains the predominant area, with nature-based solutions gaining popularity in lieu of ecological engineering. Bridging the conceptual gap between these terms is crucial for fostering a more cohesive understanding and application of environmentally friendly solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the Kansas State Research and Extension (KSRE) (23-508 185-J).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica de Oliveira Demarco.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that have no conflict of interest regarding the research and publication of this article. We have no financial, personal, or professional relationships that could potentially bias our research or the interpretation of its results. Additionally, we have received no financial or other support that may have influenced the outcome of this research. This paper represents our original work and has not been previously published or submitted for publication elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Oliveira Demarco, J., Hutchinson, S.L. & Moore, T. Ecological engineering or nature-based solutions: does the term matter?. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04581-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04581-x

Keywords

Navigation