Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating critical relationships among vulnerability, livelihoods, and non-migration strategies at the fishing communities in the Sundarbans

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates non-migration of fishermen communities living adjacent to the Sundarbans in Bangladesh. While analysing the regular livelihood patterns of these communities, this article explores a symbiotic relationship among livelihoods, risks, and natural resources in understanding fishermen’s choice of locations in the vulnerable areas. We have adopted a mixed method approach in conducting questionnaire survey, interviews, and focus group discussion at household level. We have employed a triangulation system in the study, i.e. collected data from different sources to compare and then used diverse methods to check whether the information was consistent. Upon analysing the data obtained from field investigation, it can be concluded that the critical relationships exist among livelihoods, risks, and immobility of fishermen community in the Sundarbans. Therefore, fishing households’ non-migration can be explained in-between voluntary and in-voluntary decision-making process. The study claims that the decision-making process depends on a symbiotic relationship between livelihoods, vulnerability, and natural resources management. The findings reveal that fishing households utilise assets and opportunities to build a blended livelihood strategies including natural resource extraction; diversifying income sources; borrowing and investment; asset pooling; and building social capital. Finally, this study concludes that this process of combining and transforming different assets for livelihood strategies can be explained as an autonomous adaptation process in the face of climate change. Particularly, the study accomplishes that this autonomous adaptation process defines the nature and dynamics of non-migration strategies of fishing communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available upon request to the author.

References

  • Ahmed, S., & Khan, A. M. (2022). Spatial overview of climate change impacts in Bangladesh: A systematic review. Climate and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2022.2062284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akter, S., & Mallick, B. (2013). The poverty–vulnerability–resilience nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh. Ecological Economics, 96, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, E., & Mallick, B. (2022). Climate change perceptions, impacts and adaptation practices of fishers in Southeast Bangladesh coast. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management., 14(2), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antwi-Agyei, P., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E. D. G., & Stringer, L. C. (2012). Characterising the nature of household vulnerability to climate variability: Empirical evidence from two regions of Ghana. Environment Development Sustainability, 15, 903–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9418-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmamaw, M., Mereta, S. T., & Ambelu, A. (2019). Exploring households’ resilience to climate change-induced shocks using climate resilience index in Dinki watershed, central highlands of Ethiopia. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0219393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) (2015a). Population and housing census 2011: Community report Bagerhat.

  • BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) (2015b). Population and housing Census 2011: Community report Khulna.

  • Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analysing peasant viability, rural livelihoods, and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, B., & Mallick, B. (2019). Livelihood diversification as key to long-term non-migration: Evidence from coastal Bangladesh. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 8924–8948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, B., & Mallick, B. (2020). Livelihood diversification as key to long-term non-migration: Evidence from coastal Bangladesh. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021(2), 8924–8948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R., Adger, N. W., Arnell, W. N., Dercon, S., Geddes, A., & Thomas, D. S. G. (2011). Environmental change on human migration. Global Environmental Change, 21(Supplement 1), S3–S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, O. (2008). Migration and climate change. IOM Migration Research Series, 31(2010), 5–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling, J. (2002). Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: Theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. Longman Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., & Conway, G.R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper.

  • Chambers, R. (1993). Challenging the professions: Frontiers for rural development. Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1989). Editorial introduction: Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bulletin, 20(2), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, R., van Ham, M., & Findlay, M. A. (2016). Re-thinking residential mobility: Linking lives through time and space. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515575417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, W. J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, D. J. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., Hossain, M. M., Huq, M., et al. (2018). Climate change, salinization and high-yield rice production in coastal Bangladesh. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 47(1), 66–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFID (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets framework introduction vulnerability transforming. Context, 26. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.

  • Ellis, F. (2003). A livelihoods approach to migration and poverty reduction. Overseas Development Group University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foresight. (2011). Migration and global environmental change: Future challenges and opportunities. The Government Office for Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaibazzi, P. (2010). Migration, soninke young men and the dynamics of staying behind. PhD Thesis, University of Milano-Bicocca.

  • German Environment Agency (2020). Migration, environment, and climate change: Impacts. Second report in the Migration, environment and climate change series, Umweltbundesamt, Wörlitzer Platz 1.

  • Gray, B. (2011). Becoming non-migrant: Lives worth waiting for. Gender, Place & Culture, 18(3), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.566403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, M. B., Riederer, A. M., & Foster, S. O. (2009). The livelihood vulnerability index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—a case study in Mozambique. Global Environment Change, 19(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha-Mim, M. N., Hossain, Z. M., Rahaman, R. K., & Mallick, B. (2019). Exploring vulnerability–resilience–livelihood nexus in the face of climate change: A multi-criteria analysis for Mongla, Bangladesh. Sustainability, 12(17), 7054. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjälm, A. (2014). The stayers: Dynamics of lifelong sedentary behaviour in an urban context. Population, Space and Place, 20(6), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, Z. M., & Rahman, A. U. M. (2018a). Adaptation to climate change as resilience for urban extreme poor: Lessons learned from targeted asset transfers programmes in Dhaka city of Bangladesh. Environment Development Sustainability, 20, 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9888-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, Z. M., & Rahman, A. U. M. (2018b). Pro-poor adaptation for the urban extreme poor in the context of climate change: A study on Dhaka City, Bangladesh. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 10(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-08-2016-0117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, D., Moore, K., & Shepherd, A. (2001). Chronic poverty: Meanings and analytical frameworks. CPRC Working Paper 2, Chronic Poverty Research Centre Manchester.

  • Huong, N. T. L., Yao, S., & Fahad, S. (2018). Assessing household livelihood vulnerability to climate change: The case of Northwest Vietnam. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 25(5), 1157–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1460801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ionesco, D., Mokhnacheva, D., & Gemenne, F. (2017). The atlas of environmental migration. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónsson, G. (2008). Migration aspirations and immobility in a Malian Soninke village. International Migration Institute Working Paper Series.

  • Kartiki, K. (2011). Climate change and migration: A case study from rural Bangladesh. Gender & Development, 19(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2011.554017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, B., Sultana, Z., & Bennett, M. C. (2020). How do sustainable livelihoods influence environmental (non-)migration aspirations? Applied Geography, 124, 102328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, B. (2019). The nexus between socio-ecological system, livelihood resilience, and migration decisions: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainability, 11(12), 3332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, B., Rogers, G. K., & Sultana, Z. (2022). In harm’s way: Non-migration decisions of people at risk of slow-onset coastal hazards in Bangladesh. Ambio, 51, 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01552-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, B., & Schanze, J. (2020). Trapped or voluntary? Non-migration despite climate risks. Sustainability, 12(11), 4718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmberg, G. (1997). Time and space in international migration. In: T. Hammar, G. Brochmann, K. Tamas, & T. Faist (Eds.) International migration, immobility, and development (1st ed., pp. 21–48), Routledge.

  • Massey, D.S. (1999). Why does immigration occur? A theoretical synthesis. In C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (Eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience (1st ed., pp. 34–52), Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Tylor, E. J. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata-Codesal, D. (2015). Ways of staying put in Ecuador: Social and embodied experiences of mobility–immobility interactions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(14), 2274–2290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1053850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. (2007). Asset accumulation policy and poverty reduction. In C. Moser (Ed.) Reducing global poverty: The case for asset accumulation (1st ed., pp. 83–103), Brookings Press.

  • Moser, C., Norton, A., Stein, A., & Georgieva, S. (2010). Pro-Poor adaptation to climate change in urban centres: Case studies of vulnerability and resilience in Kenya and Nicaragua, Report No. 54947-GLB, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

  • Moser, C. (2010). A conceptual and operational framework for pro-poor asset adaptation to urban climate change. In D. Hoornweg, M. Freire, J.M. Lee, P. Bhada-Tata, & B. Yuen (Eds.). Cities and climate change, urban development series (1st ed., pp. 225–253), The World Bank.

  • Mudasser, M., Hossain, Z. M., Rahaman, R. K., & Ha-Mim, M. N. (2020). Investigating the climate-induced livelihood vulnerability index in coastal areas of Bangladesh. World, 1(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.3390/world1020012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukaddim, S., Hossain, Z.M., & Sikder, K.S. (2020) Urban environmental migrants: Demand for a unique category of refugees to ensure their right to land and resettlement. In: A. Ley, A.U., Rahman, J. Fokdal (Eds.) Housing and human settlements in a world of change (1st edition, pp 165–186) transcript Verlag.

  • Mulvaney, K. K., Merril, N. H. and Mazzotta, M. J. (2020). Sense of place and water quality: applying sense of place metrics to better understand community impact of changes in water quality. [Online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91480.

  • Netherlands Enterprise Agency (2020). Coastal opportunities and agriculture solutions to tackle salinity in Bangladesh. SDG Partnership facility (SDGP) subsidy SDGP 2019 Project Proposal.

  • Okafor, C. G., Sadiku, O. E. S., Okhimamhe, A. O., & Eichie, J. (2017). Households’ vulnerability and adaptation to climate variability induced water stress on downstream Kaduna River basin. American Journal of Climate Change, 6, 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J. (2018). Immobility and insecure labour markets: An active response to precarious employment. Urban Studies, 55(8), 1783–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017736258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani, G., Cotton, M., & Friend, R. (2022). Climate change and non-migration—exploring the role of place relations in rural and Coastal Bangladesh. Population and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-022-00402-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. M., Zaman, U. M., & Haider, A. (2018). Opportunistic migration: A collateral promise for development in seasonal migration of southwest coastal Bangladesh. RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, 2(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, F., Dun, O., Warner, K., & Bogardi, J. (2011). A decision framework for environmentally induced migration. International Migration, 49(Supplementary 1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Third edition. Sage Publication Ltd.

  • Schewel, K. (2019). Understanding immobility: Moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. International Migration Review, 54, 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319831952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72. Institute of Development Studies.

  • Scott, L. (2006). Chronic poverty and the environment: a vulnerability perspective, CPRC Working Paper 62, Chronic Poverty Research Centre.

  • Siegel, P.B., & Alwang, J. (1999). An asset-based approach to social risk management: A conceptual framework, SP Discussion Paper 9926, The World Bank.

  • Siegel, P.B. (2005). Using an asset-based approach to identify drivers of sustainable rural growth and poverty reduction in Central America: Conceptual framework, WPS 3475, The World Bank.

  • Stark, O. (1991). The migration of labor. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2007). Human Development Reports. Available online: http://hdr.undp.org/en/ (accessed on 27 February 2019).

  • Usamah, M., Handmer, J., Mitchell, D., & Ahmed, I. (2014). Can the vulnerable be resilient? Co-existence of vulnerability and disaster resilience: Informal settlements in the Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2014(10), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, T. (2008). The economic case for pro-poor adaptation: What do we know? IDS Bulletin, 39(4), 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O.R., Agrawal, A., King, A.L., Sand, H.P., Underdal, A., & Wasson, M. (2005) Science plan: Institutional dimensions of global environmental change. IHDP Report 16, The International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khan Rubayet Rahaman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5, 6, 7.

Table 5 Resilience capacities, components and indicators, and their interrelationship with livelihood resilience
Table 6 Livelihood resilience index (LVI) sub-component values and minimum and maximum sub-component values for Chila and Banishanta Unions, Bangladesh
Table 7 Indexed sub-components, major components, and overall LRI for Banishanta and Chila Unions, Bangladesh

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hossain, M.Z., Rahman, M.A.U., Rahaman, K.R. et al. Investigating critical relationships among vulnerability, livelihoods, and non-migration strategies at the fishing communities in the Sundarbans. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03857-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03857-y

Keywords

Navigation