Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Target decomposition of regional CO2 emissions peaking under multiple allocation models: a case study in Jiangsu province, China

  • Case study
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Target decomposition of carbon emissions peaking is critical for fulfilling carbon peaking and carbon neutrality eventually. Decomposing the national target at the provincial and city levels provides a direction for multi-level governments to mitigate regional CO2 emissions effectively. Using 13 cities in China's Jiangsu Province as an example, this study built a top-down regional target decomposition scheme of CO2 emissions peaking, combined with selected emission allowance allocation models and linear planning model, to predict and coordinate carbon emissions and peaking times of the cities. The study showed that large variations exist in the CO2 emissions allowances for different cities under different emissions allowance allocation principles. The target decomposition scheme based on an efficiency-directed model with consideration of the current emissions situation, ability to pay, energy efficiency, and development potential was most feasible. This suggested a combination of economic efficiency, fair development, and functional zoning principles. According to the sequence of peaking times, the 13 cities were classified into three clusters: leading cities, province-synchronized cities, and delayed cities. The CO2 emission peak times of cities have linear relationships with regional per capita GDP, which also indicates differentiated CO2 mitigation responsibilities. Regional target decomposition scheme of carbon peaking provides effective guidance for regional low-carbon policies and national carbon neutrality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumert, K. A., Bhandari, R., & Kete, N. (1999). What might a developing country’ climate commitment look like? World Resources Institute.

  • Beckerman, W., & Pasek, J. (1995). The equitable international allocation of tradable carbon emission permits. Global Environmental Change, 5(5), 405–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretschger, L. (2013). Climate policy and equity principles: Fair burden sharing in a dynamic world. Environment and Development Economics, 18(5), 517–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, Q., & Xu, H. (2015). Modeling carbon emission peaking pathways in China based on integrated assessment model IAMC. China Population, Resources and Environment, 25(6), 37–46. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S., Chikkatur, A., de Coninck, H., Pacala, S., Socolow, R., & Tavoni, M. (2009). Sharing global CO2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(29), 11884–11888.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Wei, Y., Zhang, J., Xu, X., Zhang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Mitigating the greenhouse gas emissions from urban roadway lighting in China via energy-efficient luminaire adoption and renewable energy utilization. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105197.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Wu, Z., & He, J. (2005). Two-convergence approach for future global carbon permit allocation. Journal of Tsinghua University (sci and Tech), 45(6), 850–853. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. (2016). Decomposition of carbon cap targets at provincial level in China: A case study of Zhejiang. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(1), 23–30. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., & Moltmann, S. (2008). The Triptych approach revisited: A staged sectoral approach for climate mitigation. Energy Policy, 36(3), 1107–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L., Yang, Y., Wang, W., & Calin, A. C. (2019). Regional carbon emission efficiency and its dynamic evolution in China: A novel cross efficiency-malmquist productivity index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Z., Duan, X., Ge, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2009a). Control of atmospheric CO2 concentration by 2050: An allocation on the emission rights of different countries. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 39(8), 1009–1027. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Z., Duan, X., Ge, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2009b). On the major proposals for carbon emission reduction and some related issues. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 39(12), 1659–1671. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, F., Li, Y., Gao, Y., Zhu, J., Qin, C., & Zhang, X. (2022a). Energy transition and carbon neutrality: Exploring the non-linear impact of renewable energy development on carbon emission efficiency in developed countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 106002.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, F., Li, Y., Qin, C., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., & Wang, C. (2022b). Information infrastructure and greenhouse gas emission performance in urban China: A difference-in-differences analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, T., Soimakallio, S., Moltmann, S., Höhne, N., Syri, S., & Savolainen, I. (2010). Effort sharing in ambitious, global climate change mitigation scenarios. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1797–1810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, K., Zhang, Q., Long, Y., Yoshida, Y., Sun, L., Zhang, H., Dou, Y., & Li, S. (2019). How can China achieve its intended nationally determined contributions by 2030? A multi-criteria allocation of China’s carbon emission allowance. Applied Energy, 241, 380–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, J. S., Andres, R. J., & Marland, G. (2008). China: Emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(8), 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M. (1989). The greenhouse effect: negotiating targets. Retrieved from London

  • Grubler, A., & Nakic'enovic, N. (1994). International burden sharing in greenhouse gas reduction. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

  • Harrison, G. W., & Rutherford, T. F. (1999). Burden sharing, joint implementation, and carbon coalitions. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, J. (2013). Analysis of CO2 emissions peak: China’s objective and strategy. China Population, Resources and Environment, 23(12), 1–9. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, K., Hong, T., & Kim, J. (2018). Development of a CO2 emission benchmark for achieving the national CO2 emission reduction target by 2030. Energy and Buildings, 158, 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartha, S., Baer, P., Athanasiou, T., & Kemp-Benedict, E. (2009). The right to development in a climate constrained world: the Greenhouse Development Rights framework. In M. Voss (Ed.), Der Klimawandel. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, A., Vogt, C., & Ziegler, A. (2007). On the importance of equity in international climate policy: An empirical analysis. Energy Economics, 29(3), 545–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, K. (2012). Rawls’s theory of justice and the global burden sharing of greenhouse gas emission. World Economics and Politics, 3, 39–56. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Li, Y., Ye, F., & Zhang, L. (2018). Carbon dioxide emissions quotas allocation in the Pearl River Delta region: Evidence from the maximum deviation method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., & Ouyang, Y. (2021). Quantifying the role of technical progress towards China’s 2030 carbon intensity target. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(3), 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., Yu, Y., Cai, W., Liu, Q., Liu, Y., & Zhou, H. (2023). Interprovincial differences in the historical peak situation of building carbon emissions in China: Causes and enlightenments. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, 117347.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Hasnaoui, A. (2021). BRICS carbon neutrality target: Measuring the impact of electricity production from renewable energy sources and globalization. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T.-Y., Chiu, Y.-H., Lin, Y.-N., Chang, T.-H., & Lin, P.-Y. (2023). Greenhouse gas emission indicators, energy consumption efficiency, and optimal carbon emission allowance allocation of the EU countries in 2030. Gas Science and Engineering, 110, 204902.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Cai, B., Chen, C., & Wang, H. (2013). Review of carbon mitigation targets allocation in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33(9), 1089–1096. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Guan, D., Moore, S., Lee, H., Su, J., & Zhang, Q. (2015a). Climate policy: Steps to China’s carbon peak. Nature, 522(7556), 279–281.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Guan, D., Wei, W., Davis, S. J., Ciais, P., Bai, J., Peng, S., Zhang, Q., Hubacek, K., Marland, G., & Andres, R. J. (2015b). Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Nature, 524, 335–338.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, C. (2015). Climate justice in a carbon budget. Climatic Change, 133(3), 375–384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. R., & Revesz, R. L. (2007). Grandfathering and environmental regulation: The law and economics of new source review. Northwestern University Law Review, 101(4), 1677–1733.

    Google Scholar 

  • NDRC. (2014). China greenhouse gas inventory study 2005. China Environment Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.-W., Kim, C. U., & Isard, W. (2012). Permit allocation in emissions trading using the Boltzmann distribution. Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 391(20), 4883–4890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phylipsen, G. J. M., Bode, J. W., Blok, K., Merkus, H., & Metz, B. (1998). A Triptych sectoral approach to burden differentiation; GHG emissions in the European bubble. Energy Policy, 26(12), 929–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, S., Hao, Y., Xu, L., Wu, H., & Ba, N. (2021). Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China’s energy consumption? Energy Economics, 98, 105220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringius, L., Torvanger, A., & Underdal, A. (2000). Burden Differentiation: Fairness Principles and Proposals. Center for International Climate and Environmental Research—Oslo (CICERO).

  • Robertson, H. G. (1995). If your grandfather could pollute, so can you : environmental “grandfather clauses” and their role in environmental inequity. The Catholic University Law Review, 45(1), 131–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. (1990). Reducing conflict in global warming policy: The potential of equity as a unifying principle. Energy Policy, 18(10), 927–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A., Stevens, B., Edmonds, J., & Wise, M. (1998). International equity and differentiation in global warming policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 12(1), 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, C., Zhi, J., Yao, X., Zhang, H., Yu, Y., Zeng, Q., Li, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). How can China achieve the 2030 carbon peak goal—a crossover analysis based on low-carbon economics and deep learning. Energy, 269, 126776.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song, D., & Liu, X. (2013). Spatial distribution of provincial carbon emissions. China Population, Resources and Environment, 23(5), 7–13. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, B. (2008). Pathways to climate stabilisation. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3505–3509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, G., Li, J., & Wei, Y. (2011). Environmental learning curves and the allocation of carbon mitigation targets among different provinces in China. Research of Environmental Sciences, 24(10), 1194–1202. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, R., Su, C.-W., Xiao, Y., Dai, K., & Khalid, F. (2021). Robo advisors, algorithmic trading and investment management: Wonders of fourth industrial revolution in financial markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilton, J. E. (2016). Global climate policy and the polluter pays principle: A different perspective. Resources Policy, 50, 117–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. (2016). China’s carbon emissions could peak sooner than forecast. Nature, 531(7595), 425.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. (2017). World’s carbon emissions set to spike by 2% in 2017. Nature, 551(7680), 283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2019). Emissions Gap Report 2019. Retrieved from Nairobi

  • van den Bergh, J., & Savin, I. (2021). Impact of carbon pricing on low-carbon innovation and deep decarbonisation: Controversies and path forward. Environmental and Resource Economics, 80, 705–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Cai, B., Cao, D., Zhou, Y., & Liu, L. (2011). Scenario study on regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance in China. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 31(4), 680–685. in Chinese.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Zhang, X., Wei, Y.-M., & Yu, S. (2013). Regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020. Energy Policy, 54, 214–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Su, M. (2019). The effects of urbanization and industrialization on decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: A case study of China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51, 101758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Chen, Y., Chen, J., Mao, B., Peng, L., & Yu, A. (2022). China’s CO2 regional synergistic emission reduction: Killing two birds with one stone? Energy Policy, 168, 113149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Zhu, Y., & Shi, Y. (2016). Energy structure change and carbon emission trends in China. Energy, 115, 369–377.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, H., Spalding-Fecher, R., & Tyani, L. (2002). Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes. Climate Policy, 2(4), 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, B., Niu, D., & Guo, X. (2016). Can China achieve its 2020 carbon intensity target? A scenario analysis based on system dynamics approach. Ecological Indicators, 71(12), 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, L., Ma, Z., & Shan, B. (2013). Interpretation and reference of target decomposition method for EU carbon emission reduction. Environmental Protection, 41(1), 65–67. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Cai, W., Wang, C., & Wang, S. (2012). Regional allocation of CO2 intensity reduction targets based on cluster analysis. Progressus Inquisitiones De Mutatione Climatis, 8(4), 278–284. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F., & Lee, H. (2022). An innovative provincial CO2 emission quota allocation scheme for Chinese low-carbon transition. Technological forecasting & social change, 182, 121823.

  • Yi, W., Zou, L., Guo, J., Wang, K., & Wei, Y. (2011). How can China reach its CO2 intensity reduction targets by 2020? A regional allocation based on equity and development. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2407–2415.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J., Xu, Y., Hu, Z., Zhao, C., Xiong, M., & Guo, J. (2014). Peak energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China. Energy Policy, 68, 508–523.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2017). Correcting the uneven burden sharing of emission reduction across provinces in China. Energy Economics, 64, 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Karplus, V. J., Qi, T., Zhang, D., & He, J. (2016). Carbon emissions in China: How far can new efforts bend the curve? Energy Economics, 54, 388–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Feng, T. (2011). Research on the provincial decomposition method of carbon intensity target in 2020 in China. Money China, 2, 36–40. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Yin, H., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency and CO2 emissions of power plants in China. Applied Energy, 149, 238–247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Major Project of Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (No. 22DA003); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41871173; No. 42201317); and the Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (No. 19KJB170015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jiangsu Strategy and Development Research Center, 30 Pujiang Road, Nanjing, 210036, China

    Li Lai

  2. School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 West Focheng Road, Nanjing, 211000, China

    Xiaofeng Zhao

  3. School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, 3 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing, 210023, China

    Ying Li

Authors
  1. Li Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaofeng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ying Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. All authors contributed to the design and completion of this research, interpretation of data and conclusions. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Li Lai and all authors contributed to the revision on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved this submission.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, L., Zhao, X. & Li, Y. Target decomposition of regional CO2 emissions peaking under multiple allocation models: a case study in Jiangsu province, China. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 13537–13556 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03344-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03344-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation