Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the factors affecting environmental efficiency and technology inequality of Chinese cities: insights from production assumptions in data envelopment analysis

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Production assumptions play dominant roles in the modeling of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Few studies systematically investigate how the production assumptions in DEA influence the environmental efficiency and technology inequality measurements. This study aims to fill this research gap. The representative categories of production assumptions are considered, that is, disposability and returns to scale (RTS). Based on the given disposability and RTS, the corresponding DEA models are proposed. The proposed models are then applied to measure the environmental efficiency and technology inequality of Chinese cities. Fixed effects panel models are further adopted to explore the effect mechanism of production assumptions. The main findings are summarized as follows: (1) disposability and RTS have significant influences on the environmental efficiency of Chinese cities. Managerial disposability considers innovation efficiency and variable RTS captures scale efficiency; (2) disposability affects the technology inequality measurement, while the RTS has no significant impact. Managerial disposability is more sensitive to technological progress compared with natural and weak disposability; (3) the average efficiency is less than 0.803 and the efficiency Theil index is less than 0.04, indicating the environmental efficiency and technology inequality of Chinese cities are at low levels; (4) To improve efficiency, Chinese cities should decrease labor and increase capital. To mitigate technology inequality, the cities should decrease energy under managerial disposability, and decrease capital and labor under weak disposability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai, Y., Deng, X., Jiang, S., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Z. (2018). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and urban eco-efficiency: Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1487–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Thrall, R. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Returns to scale in different DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basso, A., & Funari, S. (2014). Constant and variable returns to scale DEA models for socially responsible investment funds. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(3), 775–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian, J., Ren, H., & Liu, P. (2020). Evaluation of urban ecological well-being performance in China: A case study of 30 provincial capital cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, B., Guo, H., Ma, Z., Wang, Z., Dhakal, S., & Cao, L. (2019). Benchmarking carbon emissions efficiency in Chinese cities: A comparative study based on high-resolution gridded data. Applied Energy., 242, 994–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Ning, S., Chen, W., Liu, E., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Spatial–temporal characteristics of industrial land green efficiency in China: Evidence from prefecture-level cities. Ecological Indicators., 113, 106256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal, S. (2009). Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications. Energy Policy, 37, 4208–4219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovel, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparison when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y., Dong, X., Zhao, X., & Zhu, A. (2020). Evaluation of urban green development transformation process for Chinese cities during 2005–2016. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, W. E., Laird, C. D., Watson, J.-P., Woodruff, D. L., Hackebeil, G. A., Nicholson, B. L., & Siirola, J. D. (2017). Pyomo–optimization modeling in python (2nd ed, vol. 67). Springer. https://www.pyomo.org/

  • He, Z., Xiao, L., Guo, Q., Liu, Y., Mao, Q., & Kareiva, P. (2020). Evidence of causality between economic growth and vegetation dynamics and implications for sustainability policy in Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M., Zhang, J., & Chao, C. (2019). Regional financial efficiency and its non-linear effects on economic growth in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 59, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Li, L., & Yu, Y. (2018). Does urban cluster promote the increase of urban eco-efficiency? Evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 957–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, H., Hua, M., Zhang, J., Cheng, P., Ye, Z., Huang, M., & Jin, Q. (2020). Sustainability efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in China: A data envelopment analysis based on cluster benchmarking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. (2021). Measuring the effects of undesirable outputs on the efficiency of production units. European Journal of Operational Research., 292(3), 996–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(4), 1077–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, B., Mohiuddin, M., & Liu, Q. (2019a). Determinants and differences of township. Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., He, H., Shan, J., & Cai, J. (2019b). Innovation efficiency of semiconductor industry in China: A new framework based on generalized three-stage DEA analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 66, 136–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., & Lin, B. (2018). How to promote energy efficiency through technological progress in China? Energy, 143, 812–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Wei, J., Jiang, F., Zhou, G., Jiang, R., Chen, M., Zhang, X., & Hu, W. (2020). Equity and efficiency of health care resource allocation in Jiangsu Province, China. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1), 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Yi, P. (2020). Assessment of city sustainability-coupling coordinated development among economy, society and environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Deng, X., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Evaluation and convergence analysis of socio-economic vulnerability to natural hazards of Belt and Road Initiative countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 125406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Ouyang, X., Du, K., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Does government transparency contribute to improved eco-efficiency performance? An empirical study of 262 cities in China. Energy Policy, 110, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Fei, R. (2015). Regional differences of CO2 emissions performance in China’s agricultural sector: A Malmquist index approach. European Journal of Agronomy, 70, 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, B., & Zhu, J. (2019). Impact of energy saving and emission reduction policy on urban sustainable development: Empirical evidence from China. Applied Energy, 239, 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., Li, B., & Mohiuddin, M. (2018). Prediction and decomposition of efficiency differences in Chinese provincial community health services. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 2265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., Li, J., Chen, J., & Song, Y. (2020). Regional Differences and Influencing Factors of Allocation Efficiency of Rural Public Health Resources in China. Healthcare., 8(3), 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Li, A., Qu, J., & Xie, C. (2022b). Measuring environmental efficiency and technology inequality of China’s power sector: Methodological comparisons among data envelopment analysis, free disposable hull, and super free disposable hull models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(32), 48607–48619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, B. (2022a). Evaluating the sustainability of Chinese cities: Indicators based on a new data envelopment analysis model. Ecological Indicators, 137, 108779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2009–2017). China city statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press.

  • Ren, Y., Fang, C., & Li, G. (2020). Spatiotemporal characteristics and influential factors of eco-efficiency in Chinese prefecture-level cities: A spatial panel econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production., 260, 120787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y., Sun, S., Yue, S., & Sun, X. (2020). Ecological development efficiency index of tropics and subtropics in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(2), 14160–14174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2012). Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries. Energy Economics, 34(3), 686–699.

  • Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2018). Environmental assessment on energy and sustainability by data envelopment analysis. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi, T., Liu, X., & Li, A. (2020). Evaluating the performance of Chinese fossil fuel power plants by data environment analysis: An application of three intermediate approaches in a time horizon. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 121992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C., Liu, X., & Li, A. (2018a). Measuring unified efficiency of Chinese fossil fuel power plants: Intermediate approach combined with group heterogeneity and window analysis. Energy Policy, 123, 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Wang, Z., & Li, G. (2018b). Measuring emission-reduction and energy-conservation efficiency of Chinese cities considering management and technology heterogeneity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X., Liu, X., Li, F., Tao, Y., & Song, Y. (2017). Comprehensive evaluation of different scale cities’ sustainable development for economy, society, and ecological infrastructure in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, S329–S337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., Jiao, L., Shuai, C., & Shen, L. (2018). A system dynamics model for simulating urban sustainability performance: A China case study. Journal of Cleaner Production., 199, 1107–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., Xu, H., Jiao, L., Ochoa, J. J., & Shen, L. (2017). A study of best practices in promoting sustainable urbanization in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 193, 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M., Li, Z., Hu, F., & Wu, B. (2020). How does land urbanization promote urban eco-efficiency? The mediating effect of industrial structure advancement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1967). Economics and information theory. North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Lv, K., Bian, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2017). Energy efficiency and marginal carbon dioxide emission abatement cost in urban China. Energy Policy, 105, 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., & Feng, Y. (2020). Research on China’s agricultural carbon emission efficiency evaluation and regional differentiation based on DEA and Theil models. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Kang, Z., & Zhang, N. (2017). Carbon emission reduction potentials under different polices in Chinese cities: A scenario-based analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production., 161, 1226–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, H., Shan, Y., Zhang, N., Zhou, Y., Wang, D., & Duan, Z. (2019). Comparisons of CO2 emission performance between secondary and service industries in Yangtze River Delta cities. Journal of Environmental Management, 252, 109667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., Wang, C., Quan, Y., Wu, G., & Zhao, J. (2018). Urban sustainable development efficiency towards the balance between nature and human well-being: Connotation, measurement, and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., & Lin, Y. (2020). Driving factors of total-factor substitution efficiency of chemical fertilizer input and related environmental regulation policy: A case study of Zhejiang Province. Environmental Pollution, 263, 114541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L., Li, X., & Ruiz-Menjivar, J. (2020). The effect of crop diversity on agricultural eco-efficiency in China: A blessing or a curse? Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, D., Shang, J., Yang, F., & Ang, S. (2019). Measuring energy supply chains’ efficiency with emission trading: A two-stage frontier-shift data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1462–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Lu, D., He, Y., & Chiu, Y. (2018a). The efficiencies of resource-saving and environment: A case study based on Chinese cities. Energy, 150, 493–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zeng, W., Wang, J., Yang, F., & Jiang, H. (2017). Regional low-carbon economy efficiency in China: Analysis based on the Super-SBM model with CO2 emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 202–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Xu, Y., Yeh, C., Liu, Y., & Zhou, D. (2016). City sustainability evaluation using multi-criteria decision making with objective weights of interdependent criteria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Wang, Q., Jiang, T., & Wang, J. (2018b). Equity and efficiency of primary health care resource allocation in mainland China. International Journal for Equity Health, 17, 140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Song, M., & Cui, L. (2020). Driving force for China’s economic development under Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Technological innovation or structural change? Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Li, J. (2013). Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy, 57, 43–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaohong Liu, Jingjing Qu and Baihui Wang have contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Center for Economic Research, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China

    Xiaohong Liu, Jingjing Qu & Baihui Wang

Authors
  1. Xiaohong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingjing Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Baihui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohong Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table A1.

Table A1 Average efficiency of Chinese cities from 2008 to 2016
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Qu, J. & Wang, B. Understanding the factors affecting environmental efficiency and technology inequality of Chinese cities: insights from production assumptions in data envelopment analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 14661–14692 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02683-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02683-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation