Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing a sustainable operational management system using hybrid Shapley value and Multimoora method: case study petrochemical supply chain

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, a new method to determine the supply chain performance based on its sustainable strategies is proposed. This method consists of a balanced scorecard, path analysis, and hybrid Shapley value and Multimoora method. The main contribution of this research is to design an intelligent performance evaluation system for different supply chains. In this intelligent performance evaluation method, first, a set of strategies are determined through the balanced scorecard, next, by applying the path analysis method, the best strategic paths are specified, and then the Shapely value of the listed paths is calculated. Among these, five with the highest Shapley value are selected through the hybrid Dematel-based analytical network process and Multimoora method. This method is implemented in the petrochemical supply chain in Iran, and the results are analyzed. This application revealed that the best policy in organizational–operational management optimization is subject to applying this up-to-date technological apparatus at its best. In this approach, the production and delivery time cycle would be reduced. This intelligent system reduces production costs as well. The findings here can be applied in any industry of concern as to improve operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaratunga, D., Kulatunga, U., Liyanage, C., Bigliardi, B. & Bottani, E. (2010). Performance measurement in the food supply chain: a balanced scorecard approach. Facilities.

  • Bhagwat, R., & Sharma, M. K. (2007). Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(1), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Liu, X., Xiao, Z., & Liu, J. (2009). Improving supply chain performance management: A systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment. Decision Support Systems, 46(2), 512–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, D. W., Lee, Y. H., Ahn, S. H., & Hwang, M. K. (2012). A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(3), 801–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomchaiya, S. & Esichaikul, V. (2016). Consolidated performance measurement framework for government e-procurement focusing on internal stakeholders. Information Technology & People.

  • El-Baz, M. A. (2011). Fuzzy performance measurement of a supply chain in manufacturing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 6681–6688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erol, I., Sencer, S., & Sari, R. (2011). A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain. Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1088–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Gunasekaran, A., & Farahani, R. (2017). Decision models for sustainable supply chain design and management. Annals of Operations Research, 250(2), 277–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganga, G. M. D., Carpinetti, L. C. R., & Politano, P. R. (2011). A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management. Gestão & Produção, 18(4), 755–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Tripathi, A. (2020). Performance measurement of micro & small scale enterprises in developingcountries-astudyin Ethiopia. SMART Journal of Business Management Studies, 16(1), 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervani, A.A., Helms, M.M. & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking. An International Journal.

  • Kazancoglu, Y., Ekinci, E., Mangla, S. K., Sezer, M. D., & Kayikci, Y. (2021). Performance evaluation of reverse logistics in food supply chains in a circular economy using system dynamics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Love, P. E., Davis, P. R., Smith, J., & Regan, M. (2015). Conceptual framework for the performance measurement of public-private partnerships. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21(1), 04014023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, H., Chia, A., Goh, M. & Hum, S.H. (2009). Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced scorecard perspective. Benchmarking An International Journal.

  • Pasaribu, S. W., Rajagukguk, E., Sitanggang, M., Rahim, R., & Abdillah, L. A. (2018). Implementasi multi-objective optimization On the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) Untuk Menentukan Kualitas Buah Mangga Terbaik. JURIKOM (jurnal Riset Komputer), 5(1), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrillo, A., De Felice, F., & Zomparelli, F. (2019). Performance measurement for world-class manufacturing: A model for the Italian automotive industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(7–8), 908–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainaghi, R., Phillips, P., & Zavarrone, E. (2017). Performance measurement in tourism firms: A content analytical meta-approach. Tourism Management, 59, 36–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangwa, N.R. & Sangwan, K.S. (2018). Development of an integrated performance measurement framework for lean organizations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

  • Sarkis, J., Shaw, S., Grant, D.B. & Mangan, J. (2010). Developing environmental supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking. An International Journal.

  • Uysal, F. (2012). An integrated model for sustainable performance measurement in supply chain. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 689–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horenbeek, A., & Pintelon, L. (2014). Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega, 42(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Goli.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 15 Coalition values of the model paths

15,

Table 16 Direct correlation matrix

16,

Table 17 Tc direct correlation matrix

17

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goli, A., Mohammadi, H. Developing a sustainable operational management system using hybrid Shapley value and Multimoora method: case study petrochemical supply chain. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 10540–10569 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01844-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01844-9

Keywords

Navigation