Abstract
Public open spaces (POSs) provide a forum for social gathering, health, leisure, and recreation opportunities for city dwellers. POSs are considered one of the city’s essential components that connect city dwellers to nature and improve their quality of life. India, a developing country, is rapidly urbanising. Indian cities are emerging with diverse and well-developed societies. These societies are looking for POSs that are not only inclusive, vibrant, functional, and sustainable, but also capable of providing people with social, economic, and environment benefits. It is therefore essential to evaluate existing POSs at the city, neighbourhood, and site scales using a modern approach. The evaluation aids in identifying the POSs’ strengths and weaknesses, which influence their character and use. This study evaluates city POSs using the ‘Lively planning integrative perspective’ (LPIP), which includes seven aspects: Livability, Sustainability, Successful spaces, Place-making, New Urbanism, Green planning intervention, and Public realm. The study also proposes the ‘Lively planning integrative perspective index’ (LPIPI) for evaluation. The study evaluates two POSs, i.e. parks, which located in the city of Nagpur. Both POSs provide free access to users. A mixed methods approach is used for data collection and includes tools such as self-administered questionnaire surveys, semi-structured interviews, and observation. A total of 747 respondents from both spaces participated in the main survey. The study’s results revealed that POSs have some functional and aesthetic strengths that support LPIP, but also have some weaknesses that limit their use. The study offers recommendations to assist planners and designers in making better decisions and developing inclusive POSs for city dwellers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelhamid, M. M., & Elfakharany, M. M. (2020). Improving urban park usability in developing countries: Case study of Al-Shalalat Park in Alexandria. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(1), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.042
Abhishek, N., Jenamani, M., & Mahanty, B. (2017). Urban growth in Indian cities: Are the driving forces really changing? Habitat International, 69, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.08.002
Akbar, P. N. G., & Edelenbos, J. (2020). Social Impacts of Place-Making in Urban Informal Settlements: A Case Study of Indonesian Kampungs. Social Sciences, 9(6), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9060104
Anderson, S. T., & West, S. E. (2006). Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(6), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.007
Aram, F., Solgi, E., & Holden, G. (2019). The role of green spaces in increasing social interactions in neighbourhoods with periodic markets. Habitat International, 84, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.12.004
Askari, A. H., & Soltani, S. (2019). Determinants of a successful public open space: The case of Dataran Merdeka in the city centre of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Landscape Research, 44(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1427221
Askari, A. H., Soltani, S., & Mohd, I. (2015). Engagement in public open spaces across age groups: The case of Merdeka Square in Kuala Lumpur city, Malaysia. Urban Design International, 20(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2014.5
Balsas, C. J. L. (2004). Measuring the livability of an urban centre: An exploratory study of key performance indicators. Planning Practice and Research, 19(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745042000246603
Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43–50.
Basiago, A. D. (1998). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. The Environmentalist, 19(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006697118620
Biswas, A. (2019). Why Indian cities are so chaotic? Decoding from the urban development efforts of Chandigarh. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(5), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2018-0023
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. The Architectural Press Ltd.
Carmona, M. (2019a). Place value: Place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. Journal of Urban Design, 24(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523
Carmona, M. (2019b). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 24(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., and Tiesdell, S. (2003). Urban spaces-public places: The dimensions of urban design. United Kingdom: Architectural Press. ISBN-10: 1856178277
Carr, S., Stephen, C., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
Census Data, India (2011) retrieved on Oct 3, 2020 from https://censusindia.gov.in/2011-common/censusdata2011.html
Chaudhry, P., Bagra, K., & Singh, B. (2011). Urban greenery status of some Indian cities: A short communication. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2011.V2.104
Chiu, R. L. (2019). Liveable Cities/Urban Liveability. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0184
Cilliers, E. J., Timmermans, W., Van den Goorbergh, F., & Slijkhuis, J. S. A. (2015). Designing public spaces through the lively planning integrative perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(6), 1367–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9610-1
Congress for the New Urbanism. (2000). Charter of the New Urbanism. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 20(4), 339–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046760002000417
Corley, E. A., Ahn, J. J., Kim, Y., Lucio, J., Rugland, E., & Molina, A. L. (2018). Conceptualizing lenses, dimensions, constructs, and indicators for urban park quality. Environmental Justice, 11(6), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2018.0017
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
Cullen, G. (1961). The concise townscape. Architectural Press.
Darkhani, F., Tahir, O. M., & Ibrahim, R. (2019). Sustainable urban landscape management: An insight into urban green space management practices in three different countries. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 12(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2019-0003
De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in Social Research. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203501054
Dziuban, C. D., Picciano, A. G., Graham, C. R., & Moskal, P. D. (2015). Conducting Research in Online and Blended Learning Environments: New Pedagogical Frontiers. Routledge.
El Din, H. S., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H. E., & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. Hbrc Journal, 9(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.02.007
Farr, D. (2011). Sustainable urbanism: Urban design with nature. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-471-77751-9
Fatima, F., & Eqbal, Y. (2018). Sustainable Urban Landscapes and Open Spaces: Case Studies & Strategies. International Conference on Urban Sustainability: Emerging Trends, Themes, Concepts & Practices (ICUS) 2018, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3208193 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3208193
Fink, A. (2003). Reliable and valid survey instruments. SAGE Publications, London.
Forsyth, A., & Peiser, R. (2019). The British new towns: Lessons for the world from the new-town experiment. Town Planning Review, 90(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2019.17
Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002
Friedman, A. (2021). Open spaces for healthy living. In Fundamentals of Sustainable Urban Design (pp. 267–276). Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60865-1
Gaikwad, A., & Shinde, K. (2019). Use of parks by older persons and perceived health benefits: A developing country context. Cities, 84, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.08.001
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.
Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment (GRIHA), Retrieved February 2, 2020 from https://www.grihaindia.org/
Haq, S. M. A. (2011). Urban green spaces and an integrative approach to sustainable environment. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2(05), 601. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2011.25069
Hardy, M. A., & Bryman, A. (Eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Data Analysis. Sage.
Harvey, C., & Rodriguez, D. A. (2017). What makes an active public realm? Opportunities and challenges for research. Preventive Medicine, 103, S5–S6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.017
Indian Green Building Council (IGBC), Retrieved February 3, 2020 from https://igbc.in/igbc
Imam, A. U., & Banerjee, U. K. (2016). Urbanisation and greening of Indian cities: Problems, practices, and policies. Ambio, 45(4), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0763-4
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House.
King, R. (1999). Sustainable Urban Design. Sustainable Cities in the 21st Century, 78–97.
Latham, A., & Layton, J. (2019). Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: Studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass, e12444. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12444
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the environment. In The image of the city (vol. 11, pp. 1–13). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262120043
Ma, B., Zhou, T., Lei, S. et al. (2019). Effects of urban green spaces on residents’ well-being. Environ Dev Sustain, 21, 2793–2809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0161-8
Madanipour, A. (1999). Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities? Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design, 26(6), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260879
Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating public space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
Mensah, C. A., Andres, L., Perera, U., & Roji, A. (2016). Enhancing quality of life through the lens of green spaces: A systematic review approach. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i1.445
Moulay, A., Ujang, N., Maulan, S., & Ismail, S. (2018). Understanding the process of parks’ attachment: Interrelation between place attachment, behavioural tendencies, and the use of public place. City, Culture and Society, 14, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.12.002
Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC), Retrieved February 5, 2020 from https://www.nmcnagpur.gov.in/
Nasar, J. L. (1990). The evaluative image of the city. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369008975742
Nijkamp, P., & Perrels, A. (2018). Sustainable cities in Europe. Routledge. ISBN 9781138996649
Panagopoulos, T., Duque, J. A. G., & Dan, M. B. (2016). Urban planning with respect to environmental quality and human well-being. Environmental Pollution, 208, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.038
Project for Public Spaces (PPS). (2015). Retrieved February 4, 2020 from ‘What is space making?’ http://www.pps.org/reference/what is place making?
Project for Public Spaces (PPS). (2019). Retrieved February 5, 2020 from ‘What makes a successful space?’ https://www.pps.org/article/grplacefeat
Ratcliffe, J., & Krawczyk, E. (2011). Imagineering city futures: The use of prospective through scenarios in urban planning. Futures, 43(7), 642–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.005
Romolini, M., Ryan, R. L., Simso, E. R., & Strauss, E. G. (2019). Visitors’ attachment to urban parks in Los Angeles, CA. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 41, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.015
Ryan, R. L. (2005). Exploring the effects of environmental experience on attachment to urban natural areas. Environment and Behavior, 37(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504264147
Saitluanga, B. L. (2014). Spatial pattern of urban livability in Himalayan Region: A case of Aizawl City, India. Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0362-3
Sakip, S. R. M., Akhir, N. M., & Omar, S. S. (2015). Determinant factors of successful public parks in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.003
Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann.
Schlebusch, S. (2015). Planning for sustainable communities: Evaluating place-making approaches. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 4(4), 59. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.s.2015040401.18
Shirazi, M. R., & Keivani, R. (2019). The triad of social sustainability: Defining and measuring social sustainability of urban neighbourhoods. Urban Research & Practice, 12(4), 448–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1469039
Shrinagesh, B., & Markandey, K. (2016). Rethinking urban space in cities-A study of parks in Hyderabad, India. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 012052). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/37/1/012052
Singh, V. S., Pandey, D. N., & Chaudhry, P. (2010). Urban forests and open green spaces: lessons for Jaipur, Rajasthan India (vol. 1). Jaipur: Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board. http://hdl.handle.net/10535/5458
Southworth, M. (2016). Learning to make liveable cities. Journal of Urban Design, 21(5), 570–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1220152
Sreetheran, M. (2017). Exploring the urban park use, preference and behaviours among the residents of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 25, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.003
Stanislav, A., & Chin, J. T. (2019). Evaluating livability and perceived values of sustainable neighborhood design: New Urbanism and original urban suburbs. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2019.101517
Stauskis, G., & Eckardt, F. (2011). Empowering public spaces as catalysers of social interactions in Urban communities. Town Planning and Architecture, 35(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.3846/tpa.2011.14
Subramanian, D., & Jana, A. (2018). Assessing urban recreational open spaces for the elderly: A case of three Indian cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 35, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060259
Talen, E. (2000). Measuring the public realm: A preliminary assessment of the link between public space and sense of community. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 344–360 Retrieved July 19, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030552
Thomas, R. M. (2003). Blending qualitative and quantitative research methods in theses and dissertations. Corwin Press Inc, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983525
Trudeau, D. (2019). New Urbanism. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0223
Vukovic, T., Salama, A. M., Mitrovic, B., & Devetakovic, M. (2021). Assessing public open spaces in Belgrade–A quality of urban life perspective. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-04-2020-0064
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. The Conservation Foundation.
Woolley, H. (2003). Urban open spaces. Taylor and Francis, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402146
United Nations' World Population Forecast. (2019). Retrieved February 7, 2020 from https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/population/index.html
World Health Organisation (WHO), Retrieved February 9, 2020 from https://www.who.int.
World Population Prospects (2019). Retrieved February 9, 2020 from https://population.un.org/wpp/.
Wu, J., & Plantinga, A. J. (2003). The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(2), 288–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00023-8
Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T., Bosman, C., & Coiacetto, E. (2019). Measuring experiential qualities of urban public spaces: Users’ perspective. Journal of Urban Design, 24(3), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1484664
Zanella, A., Camanho, A. S., & Dias, T. G. (2015). The assessment of cities’ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact. Annals of Operations Research, 226(1), 695–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1666-7
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Not seeking review for study is in accordance with policy of the institution since institutional review board does not exist in the Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahirrao, P., Khan, S. Evaluating public open spaces through the lively planning integrative perspective: a developing country context. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 5225–5257 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01656-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01656-x