Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Fisheries sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: an illustration

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a modified Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD) framework, this paper assesses progress towards sustainability over time with a case study of the demersal trawl fishery of Oman, which has been transformed and turned into the coastal fishery after the trawl ban. A multi-criteria decision analysis method is used for ranking the years and deciding on the best performing year under five alternative scenarios related to the core components involving humans and the environment. Under the environment component, the year 2001 stood out as the best across all scenarios. The combined results also echoed the same in four out of five scenarios. With reference to progress towards sustainability during the study period, no clear positive year-to-year trend was observed from the overall results. The analysis of the S2 scenario revealed that the closed fishing season during 1998–2001 yielded a positive spill-over effect on the local economy. The results from a comparative analysis indicated that the strengths (weaknesses) of the year 2001 were predominantly associated with the environment (human) component, and thereby, reflecting a comparatively higher conservation outcome in the year 2001. The findings from the comparative analysis would guide fishery managers in designing appropriate strategies for improving weaknesses of the preferred option and reducing the inter-scenario risk by combining positive features of the second-best option. The framework outlined in the present paper can be used to guide the sustainability assessment of other local fisheries (for instance, the lobster, abalone, and shrimp fisheries) including the recently developed coastal fishery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A score of zero on a relative scale does not indicate that the criterion has no value. This indicates that it is least preferred.

References

  • Adiga, M. S., Ananthan, P. S., Ramasubramanian, V., & Kumari, H. D. (2015). Validating RAPFISH sustainability indicators: Focus on multi-disciplinary aspects of Indian marine fisheries. Marine Policy, 60, 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Siyabi, M., & Bose, S. (2018). Capacity utilization in small-scale fisheries: A case of the Sultanate of Oman. Sri Lanka Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 23(2), 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Balushi, A. H., Bose, S., & Govender, A. (2016). Stakeholders’ views on management arrangements: A case of kingfish fishery in the Sultanate of Oman. Natural Resources, 7(05), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2016.75022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Masroori, H. S. (2008). An assessment of the commercial trawl fishery of the Sultanate of Oman using the ecologically sustainable development framework (PhD Thesis). University of Tasmania.

  • Al-Masroori, H. S., & Bose, S. (2009). Developing indicators for the assessment of sustainability of an industrial fishery: A case study in the Sultanate of Oman. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 35(2), 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Masroori, H. S., & Bose, S. (2011). Fisheries sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 6(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Masroori, H. S., & Bose, S. (2014). Towards developing index for the assessment of sustainable development: a case study of the Sultanate of Oman. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET) (pp. 7–11).

  • Al-Masroori, H. S., & Bose, S. (2016). Anchoring to determine negotiated catch limits: A case study of an industrial fishery in Oman. African Journal of Marine Science, 38(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2016.1159983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qartoubi, I. A., Al-Masroori, H., & Bose, S. (2020). Modelling compliance in small-scale fisheries: A case study from the Sultanate of Oman. Asian Fisheries Science, 33(2), 28–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Subhi, K. K. N., Bose, S., & Al-Masroori, H. S. (2013). Fishers’ compliance motivations: A case study of the Sultanate of Oman. Marine Policy, 37, 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2009). A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2535–2548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andalecio, M. N. (2011). Multi-criteria decision models for management of tropical coastal fisheries. In E. Lichtfouse, M. Hamelin, M. Navarrete, & P. Debaeke (Eds.), Sustainable Agriculture. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balana, B. B., Mathijs, E., & Muys, B. (2010). Assessing the sustainability of forest management: An application of multi-criteria decision analysis to community forests in northern Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(6), 1294–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S., Al Balushi, A. H., Al-Haddabi, A., & Al-Bulushi, R. (2020). Is co-management feasible in achieving fisheries sustainability? A case of Oman’s lobster fishery. Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences [JAMS], 24, 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, S., Al-Masroori, H. S., & Al-Habsi, A.-M.H.A. (2017). Traditional fisheries enforcement program: A case of three coastal villages in the eastern part of Oman. Marine Policy, 78, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, Shekar, Al-Mazrouai, A., Al-Habsi, S., Al-Busaidi, I., & Al-Nahdi, A. (2010). Fisheries and food security: The case of the Sultanate of Oman. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Food Security in the Arab Countries: New Challenges and Opportunities in the Context of Global Price Volatility (pp. 2–4).

  • Catalyze. (2003). Hiview 3: Enabling effective decisions (Starter Guide). Catalyze Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, A. T. (1994). Towards sustainability: The fishery experience. Ecological economics, 11(3), 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, A. T. (2008). Sustainable fishery systems. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, J., & Clayton, H. (1998). A framework for assessing fisheries with respect to ecologically sustainable development. Bureau of Resources Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, J., Clayton, H., & Whitworth, B. (1999). Evaluation of fisheries-management systems with respect to sustainable development. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56(6), 980–984. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Communities. (2000). Multi-criteria analysis manual. National Economic Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, A. L. (1995). Towards indicators of sustainability. Presented at the SCOPE Scientific Workshop on Indicators of Sustainable development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, P. C., Skaar, C., Brattebø, H., & Fet, A. M. (2020). Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway. Science of The Total Environment, 719, 137353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Balteiro, L., González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2017). Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D. C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & De Sherbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship (pp. 47–60). Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development of marine capture fisheries. Rome.

  • Fletcher, W. J. (2005). The application of qualitative risk assessment methodology to prioritize issues for fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62(8), 1576–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. W. (1999). Management of multi-species fisheries: From overfishing to sustainability. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56(6), 927–932. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, E. A., Smith, A. D. M., & Punt, A. E. (2005). Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing? ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62(3), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. M., Staples, D. J., & Chesson, J. (2000). The FAO guidelines for the development and use of indicators for sustainable development of marine capture fisheries and an Australian example of their application. Ocean & Coastal Management, 43(7), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(00)00045-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmendia, E., Prellezo, R., Murillas, A., Escapa, M., & Gallastegui, M. (2010). Weak and strong sustainability assessment in fisheries. Ecological Economics, 70(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti, D. (2010). Combining stakeholder analysis and spatial multicriteria evaluation to select and rank inert landfill sites. Waste Management, 30(2), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstone-Gallagher, R. V., Hope, J. A., Bulmer, R. H., Clark, D. E., Stephenson, F., Mangan, S., et al. (2019). Old tools, new ways of using them: Harnessing expert opinions to plan for surprise in marine socio-ecological systems. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaesel, H., & Simonitsch, M. (2001). The discourse of participatory democracy in marine fisheries management. In hlaggan, N., Brignall, C. and Wood, L.(eds.), Putting Fishers’ Knowledge to Work, Conference Proceedings (pp. 57–67).

  • Heenan, A., Pomeroy, R., Bell, J., Munday, P. L., Cheung, W., Logan, C., et al. (2015). A climate-informed, ecosystem approach to fisheries management. Marine Policy, 57, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegmann, G., & Yarranton, G. A. (2011). Alchemy to reason: Effective use of cumulative effects assessment in resource management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(5), 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, H. K., Jentoft, S., & Mikalsen, K. H. (2005). Fisheries Governance, Social Justice and Participatory Decision-Making. In T. S. Gray (Ed.), Participation in Fisheries Governance. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R., Stewart, I. J., Branch, T. A., & Jensen, O. P. (2012). Defining trade-offs among conservation of species diversity abundances, profitability, and food security in the California Current bottom-trawl fishery. Conservation Biology, 26, 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R., Fulton, E. A., Green, B. S., Hartmann, K., Tracey, S. R., & Watson, R. A. (2015). When is a fishery sustainable? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 72(9), 1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2015-0062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsman, K. K., Hazen, E. L., Haynie, A., Gourguet, S., Hollowed, A., Bograd, S. J., et al. (2019). Towards climate resiliency in fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 76(5), 1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends. Science of The Total Environment, 409(19), 3578–3594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jalilova, G., Khadka, C., & Vacik, H. (2012). Developing criteria and indicators for evaluating sustainable forest management: A case study in Kyrgyzstan. Forest Policy and Economics, 21, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. C. (2016). Cumulative effects assessment: theoretical underpinnings and big problems. Environmental Reviews, 24(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2015-0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, F. P., Borges, J. A. R., Meuwissen, M. P. M., de Boer, I. J. M., & Lansink, A. G. J. M. O. (2017). Sustainability assessment of agricultural systems: The validity of expert opinion and robustness of a multi-criteria analysis. Agricultural Systems, 157, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimani, P., Wamukota, A., Manyala, J. O., & Mlewa, C. M. (2020). Analysis of constraints and opportunities in marine small-scale fisheries value chain: A multi-criteria decision approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, 189, 105151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. E., & Stephenson, R. L. (1999). Fisheries-management science: A framework for the implementation of fisheries-management systems. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 56(6), 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, P. (2006). Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) applications in fishery management. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6(1–2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJETM.2006.008255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke, S., Hadjimichael, M., Mackinson, S., & Holm, P. (2020). Knowledge for Fisheries Governance: Participation, Integration and Institutional Reform. In P. Holm, M. Hadjimichael, S. Linke, & S. Mackinson (Eds.), Collaborative Research in Fisheries: Co-creating Knowledge for Fisheries Governance in Europe. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsman, J. E. (2019). Local knowledge and democracy in fisheries management: a case study of adaptation to the Anthropocene in southeast Louisiana. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11100-240420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, C. P., Al-Mamry, J., & Al-Habsy, S. (2001). Precautionary management of Oman’s demersal fishery. In Proc. 1st International Conference on Fisheries, Aquaculture and Environment in the NW Indian Ocean, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman (pp. 29–38).

  • McCay, B. J., & Jentoft, S. (1996). From the bottom up: Participatory issues in fisheries management. Society & Natural Resources, 9(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929609380969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIlwain, J., Hermosa, G. V., Claereboudt, M., Al-Oufi, H. S., & Al-Awi, M. (2006). Spawning and reproductive patterns of six exploited finfish species from the Arabian Sea, Sultanate of Oman. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00723.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli, F., Leo, G. D., Butner, C., Martone, R. G., & Shester, G. (2014). A risk-based framework for assessing the cumulative impact of multiple fisheries. Biological Conservation, 176, 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montibeller, G., & Franco, A. (2010). Multi-criteria decision analysis for strategic decision making. In C. Zopounidis & P. M. Pardalos (Eds.), Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis (pp. 25–48). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2013). Uncertainty analysis in the application of multi-criteria decision-making methods in Australian strategic environmental decisions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(8), 1097–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.717886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillas, A., Prellezo, R., Garmendia, E., Escapa, M., Gallastegui, C., & Ansuategi, A. (2008). Multidimensional and intertemporal sustainability assessment: A case study of the Basque trawl fisheries. Fisheries Research, 91(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.11.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piontkovski, S. A., & Claereboudt, M. R. (2012). Interannual changes of the Arabian Sea productivity. Marine Biology Research, 8(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2011.615325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, T. (2003). Sustainability Indicators in Marine Capture Fisheries (phd). University of Tasmania. Retrieved from http://adt.lib.utas.edu.au/public/adt-TU20050302.145859/

  • Rossetto, M., Bitetto, I., Spedicato, M. T., Lembo, G., Gambino, M., Accadia, P., & Melià, P. (2015). Multi-criteria decision-making for fisheries management: A case study of Mediterranean demersal fisheries. Marine Policy, 53, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, C. A. (2012). The US Forest Service’s analysis of cumulative effects to wildlife: A study of legal standards current practice and ongoing challenges on a National Forest. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEAFDEC. (2003). Regional guidelines for responsible fisheries in Southeast Asia: Fisheries Management. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC) Secretariat. MFRDMD/SP/3.

  • Shmelev, S. E. (2011). Dynamic sustainability assessment: The case of Russia in the period of transition (1985–2008). Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2039–2049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddeek, M. S. M., Fouda, M. M., & Hermosa, G. V. (1999). Demersal fisheries of the Arabian Sea, the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Gulf. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 49, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(99)80013-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Sittert, L., Branch, G., Hauck, M., & Sowman, M. (2006). Benchmarking the first decade of post-apartheid fisheries reform in South Africa. Marine Policy, 30(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2005.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzenmüller, V., Coll, M., Mazaris, A. D., Giakoumi, S., Katsanevakis, S., Portman, M. E., et al. (2018). A risk-based approach to cumulative effect assessments for marine management. Science of The Total Environment, 612, 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talukder, B., Hipel, K. W., & vanLoon, G. W. (2018). Using multi-criteria decision analysis for assessing sustainability of agricultural systems. Sustainable Development, 26(6), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell, C. A. (Ed.). (2005). Economics of Environmental Conservation (2 edition.). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton. Edward Elgar Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne, I. B. (2007). System evaluation of sustainability in the Norwegian cod-fisheries. Marine Policy, 31(4), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2006.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weninger, Q., & Just, R. E. (2002). Firm dynamics with tradable output permits. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(3), 572–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. J., & Kyhn, L. A. (2015). Practical management of cumulative anthropogenic impacts with working marine examples. Conservation Biology, 29(2), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12425

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Science and Fisheries, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Sultanate, Oman

    Hussein Samh Al-Masroori

  2. Department of Natural Resources Economics, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Sultanate, Oman

    Shekar Bose

Authors
  1. Hussein Samh Al-Masroori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shekar Bose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Hussein Al-Masroori has been involved in designing the research, collecting, processing and analysing data, interpreting results, and in preparing the initial draft of the manuscript. Shekar Bose has been involved in supervising the work, verifying the analytical methods, refining interpretation of results with implications, and providing critical revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hussein Samh Al-Masroori.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Masroori, H.S., Bose, S. Fisheries sustainability assessment and sensitivity analysis: an illustration. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 16283–16303 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01347-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01347-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation