Abstract
Urban university campuses may be a substantial producer of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions into the environment, through either campus operations or research activities. To date, there is little research on GHG emission reduction in higher education institutions—particularly in developing countries—so this work presents such an initiative from an urban university located in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Higher education institutions in Malaysia are progressively integrating similar strategies to apply the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) to education-translational research activities. The paper presents the GHG emission reduction data from campus activities and a living laboratory project conducted within Universiti Malaya (UM) main campus. Emissions reduction was categorised based on the standard GHG Protocol from the Kyoto Protocol into Scope 1, 2 and 3. GHG Scope 1 contributes the most activities and yielded the main GHG emission reductions in electricity consumption (in kg CO2-eq/kWh) with a 90.72% decline for the year 2016–2017. The highest reduction for total annual GHG emissions was found for the year 2017–2018, with a reduction of 6,590,000 kg CO2-eq/year. Most of the living laboratory research activities in that year were categorised in the change management core area. These activities benefitted from continuous funding and were more successful when the research was in mature phase, regardless of research constraints and difficulties.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACUPCC (American College and University President’s Climate Commitment) (2020) Retrieved April 5 2020, from http://rs.acupcc.org/stats/tangible-actions/.
Aerts, J., & Botzen, W. (2014). Adaptation: Cities’ response to climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 4, 759–760.
Amaral, A. R., Rodrigues, E., Gaspar, A. R., & Gomes, A. (2020). A review of empirical data of sustainability initiatives in university campus operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119558.
Antony, K. (2013). Carbon footprint report Minnesota State University Mankato. Mankato, MN, USA: Minnesota State University.
Brander, M., Sood, A., Wylie, C., Haughton, A., & Lovell, J. (2011). Electricity-specific emission factors for grid electricity. Ecometrica. https://ecometrica.com/assets/Electricity-specific-emission-factors-for-grid-electricity.pdf.
Conway, T., Dalton, C., Loo, J., & Benakoun, L. (2008). Developing ecological footprint scenarios on university campuses: A case study of the University of Toronto at Mississauga. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 4–20.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2020). Sustainable development goals (SDG) indicators Malaysia. Retrieved Dec 10 2020, from https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss-portalx/ep/epFreeDownloadContentSearch.seam?cid=552273.
Escobedo, A., Briceno, S., Juarez, H., Castillo, D., Imaz, M., & Sheinbaum, C. (2014). Energy consumption and GHG emission scenarios of a university campus in Mexico. Energy for Sustainable Development, 18, 49–57.
Green, J. (2014). Rethinking private authority. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Guereca, L. P., Toress, N., & Noyola, A. (2013). Carbon footprint as a basis for a cleaner research institute in Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 396–403.
Kaplan, D. (2015). Transportation sustainability on a university campus. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16, 173–186.
Klein-Banai, C., & Theis, T. L. (2013). Quantitative analysis of factors affecting greenhouse gas emissions at institutions of higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 29–38.
Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D., & Lambrechts, W. (2013). Declarations for sustainability in higher education: Becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 10–19.
Melati, W. (2018). Malaysia ready to do more than what’s expected. Retrieved Sep 11 2020 from, https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2018/03/343216/malaysia-ready-do-more-whats-expected.
Moerschbaecher, M., & Day, J. W. (2010). The greenhouse gas inventory of Louisiana State University: A case study of the energy requirements of public higher education in the United States. Sustainability, 2, 2117–2134.
Nagpal, S., Hanson, J., & Reinhart, C. (2019). A framework for using calibrated campus-wide building energy models for continuous planning and greenhouse gas emissions reduction tracking. Applied Energy, 241, 82–97.
Ofori, B. Y., Stow, A. J., Baumgartner, J. B., & Beaumont, L. J. (2017). Influence of adaptive capacity on the outcome of climate change vulnerability assessment. Scientific Reports, 7, 12979.
Ozawa-Meida, L., Brockway, P., Letten, K., Davies, J., & Fleming, P. (2011). Measuring carbon performance in a UK University through a consumption-based carbon footprint: De Monfort University case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 185–198.
Patchell, J. (2018). Can the implications of the GHG Protocol’s scope 3 standard be realized? Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 941–958.
Posner, S., & Stuart, R. (2013). Understanding and advancing campus sustainability using a systems framework. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14, 264–277.
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). (2015). INDC Malaysia Final 27 November 2015 Revised Final UNFCCC. Retrieved Sep 11 2020 from, https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/INDC/.
Vasquez, L., Iriarte, A., Almeida, M., & Villalobos, P. (2015). Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and proposals for their reduction at a university campus in Chile. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 924–930.
Venetoulis, J. (2001). Assessing the ecological impact of a university. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2, 180–197.
WRI/WBCSD (World Resources Institute / World Business Council for Sustainable Development). (2020). Greenhouse gas protocol. Retrieved Dec 15 2020 from, https://ghgprotocol.org/.
World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD). (2004). The greenhouse gas protocol: A corporate accounting and reporting standard. Washington: Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative.
Ye, B., Jiang, J., Liu, J., Zheng, Y., & Zhou, N. (2021). Research on quantitative assessment of climate change risk at an urban scale: Review of recent progress and outlook of future direction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110415.
Acknowledgements
This presented work is framed under the UM Living Labs (UMLL) administration (Grant no.: LL001-15SUS), Sustainability Programme: Low Carbon Initiative and Green Index (Grant no.: GA001-2020), and UM Sustainability & Living Labs Secretariat (UMSLLS). Authors are thankful to the Universiti Malaya’s Deputy Vice Chancellor (Research and Innovation) office for the financial support. Moreover, this campus sustainability initiative would not be possible without the tireless continuous support and partial funding from the Deputy Vice Chancellor (Development) and the Department of Development and Estate Maintenance (JPPHB), Universiti Malaya.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SY involved in the conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing and reviewing. AAB involved in the conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing and original draft preparation, FRF resources, validation and visualisation. AZA participated in data curation, resources, writing, reviewing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors affirm that they have no conflicting monetary interests or personal relationships which might have influenced the study presented in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yusoff, S., Abu Bakar, A., Rahmat Fakri, M.F. et al. Sustainability initiative for a Malaysian university campus: living laboratories and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 14046–14067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01250-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01250-1