Abstract
This study proposes an information-entropy-based stochastic multi-criteria preference model (SMCPM) to assess the sustainability of groundwater remediation strategies. The model was applied to a real-world site, which includes the following steps: (1) selecting fifty remediation alternatives with four criteria, including total pumping rate, remediation cost, average contaminant concentration and general cancer risk in light of uncertainty parameter (e.g., slope factor); (2) evaluating the health risks associated with the strategies under three confidence levels (i.e., 68.3%, 95.4% and 99.7%); (3) computing the weight by information entropy; and (4) determining the ranking of remedial alternatives by establishing a random evaluation matrix. Results from the case study indicate that: (1) the most desirable actions are action A39 (i.e., the pumping rates at six wells are 3.499, 2.722, 2.624, 1.458, 7.776 and 2.527 m3/h, respectively) for the 5-year; (2) action A25 (i.e., the six pumping rates at injecting and extracting wells are 2.819, 2.722, 0, 3.791, 0.972 and 1.166 m3/h, respectively) for the 10-year; (3) action A24 (i.e., the pumping rates of wells P1–P6 are 1.944, 1.555, 1.166, 3.110, 7.193 and 0.583 m3/h, respectively) for the 15-year; (4) action A37 (i.e., the optimal pumping rates of P1 to P6 become 2.138, 2.722, 3.694, 2.722, 3.694 and 7.582 m3/h, respectively) for the 20-year remediation, respectively. Compared to the traditional MCPM, the proposed SMCPM would be more acceptable and reasonable since various uncertainties be addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlfeld, D. P., Mulvey, J. M., & Pinder, G. F. (1988). Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory: 2. Analysis of a field site. Water Resources Research, 24, 443–452.
Bayer, P., Burger, C. M., & Finkel, M. (2008). Computationally efficient stochastic optimization using multiple realizations. Advances in Water Research, 31, 399–417.
Borden, R. C., & Bedient, P. B. (1986). Transport of dissolved hydrocarbons influenced by oxygen-limited biodegradation: 1. Theoretical development. Water Resources Research, 22, 1973–1982.
Canzano, S., Capasso, S., Natale, M. D., Erto, A., Iovino, P., & Musmarra, D. (2014). Remediation of groundwater polluted by aromatic compounds by means of adsorption. Sustainability, 6, 4807–4822.
Chen, T. Y. (2014). A PROMETHEE-based outranking method for multiple criteria decision analysis with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Soft Computing, 18, 923–940.
Chen, Y. C., & Ma, H. W. (2006). Model comparison for risk assessment: A case study of contaminated groundwater. Chemosphere, 63, 751–761.
Das, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2018). Application of multi-criteria decision making technique for the assessment of groundwater potential zones: A study on Birbhum district, West Bengal, India. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0227-7.
Fessi, B. A., Benabdallah, S., Boudriga, N., & Hamdi, M. (2014). A multi-attribute decision model for intrusion response system. Information Sciences, 270, 237–254.
Garrido-Baserba, M., Reif, R., Molinos-Senante, M., Larrea, L., Castillo, A., Verdaguer, M., et al. (2016). Application of a multi-criteria decision model to select of design choices for WWTPs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18, 1097–1109.
He, L., Huang, G. H., & Lu, H. W. (2008). Health-risk-based groundwater remediation system optimization through clusterwise linear regression. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 9237–9243.
He, L., Huang, G. H., & Lu, H. W. (2009). A coupled simulation optimization approach for groundwater remediation design under uncertainty: An application to a petroleum-contaminated site. Environmental Pollution, 157, 2485–2492.
Hyde, K. M., & Maier, H. R. (2006). Distance-based and stochastic uncertainty analysis for multi-criteria decision analysis in Excel using Visual Basic for Applications. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21, 1695–1710.
Kaveh, M., & Jay, R. (2011). A Monte-Carlo game theoretic approach for multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty. Advances in Water Resources, 34, 607–616.
Li, J. (2016). Development and application of petroleum contaminated groundwater management models with consideration of health risk. PhD dissertation. North China Electric Power University, China.
Li, J. B., Rahman, M. H., & Thring, R. W. (2010). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis approach for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 42, 220–239.
Liu, S., Proctor, W., & Cook, D. (2010). Using an integrated fuzzy set and deliberative multicriteria evaluation approach to facilitate decision-making in invasive species management. Ecological Economics, 69, 2374–2382.
Lu, H. W., Feng, M., Ren, L. X., & He, L. (2015). Optimization-based multicriteria decision analysis for identification of desired petroleum-contaminated groundwater remediation strategies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 9505–9514.
Lu, H. W., Li, J., Ren, L. X., & Chen, Y. Z. (2018). Optimal groundwater security management policies by control of inexact health risks under dual uncertainty in slope factors. Chemosphere, 198, 161–173.
Lu, H. W., Ren, L. X., Chen, Y. Z., Tian, P. P., & Liu, J. (2017). A cloud model based multi-attribute decision making approach for selection and evaluation of groundwater management schemes. Journal of Hydrology, 555, 881–893.
Luo, J. N., & Lu, W. X. (2014). Comparison of surrogate models with different methods in groundwater remediation process. Journal of Earth System Science, 123, 1579–1589.
Mantoglou, A., & Kourakos, G. (2007). Optimal groundwater remediation under uncertainty using multi-objective optimization. Water Resources Management, 21, 835–847.
Md Azamathulla, H., Wu, F. C., Ghani, A. A., Narulkar, S. M., Zakaria, N. A., & Chang, C. K. (2008). Comparison between genetic algorithm and linear programming approach for real time operation. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, 2, 172–181.
Nazari, A., Salarirad, M. M., & Bazzazi, A. A. (2012). Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method. Environmental Earth Sciences, 65, 1631–1642.
Parameswari, K., Mudgal, B. V., & Nelliyat, P. (2012). Evaluation of groundwater contamination and its impact: An interdisciplinary approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 725–744.
Schaerlaekens, J., Mertens, J., Van Linden, J., Vermeiren, G., Carmeliet, J., & Feyen, J. (2006). A multi-objective optimization framework for surfactant-enhanced remediation of DNAPL contaminations. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 86, 176–194.
Singh, K. P., Gupta, S., & Mohan, D. (2012). Assessment of the impact of anthropogenic activities on the groundwater hydrology and chemistry in Tarsus coastal plain (Mersin, SE Turkey) using fuzzy clustering. Journal of Hydrology, 414–415, 435–451.
Singh, K. L., Sudhakar, G., Swaminathan, S. K., & Muralidhar, Rao C. (2015). Identification of elite native plants species for phytoaccumulation and remediation of major contaminants in uranium tailing ponds and its affected area. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(1), 57–81.
Tartakovsky, D. M. (2013). Assessment and management of risk in subsurface hydrology: A review and perspective. Advances in Water Resources, 51, 247–260.
Tromboni, F., Bortolini, L., & Morábito, J. A. (2014). Integrated hydrologic–economic decision support system for groundwater use confronting climate change uncertainties in the Tunuyán River basin, Argentina. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16(6), 1317–1336.
Yang, A. L., Huang, G. H., Fan, Y. R., & Zhang, X. D. (2012a). A fuzzy simulation-based optimization approach for groundwater remediation design at contaminated aquifers. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/986867.
Yang, A. L., Huang, G. H., Qin, X. S., & Fan, Y. R. (2012b). Evaluation of remedial options for a benzene-contaminated site through a simulation-based fuzzy-MCDA approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 213–214, 421–433.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0407201), Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51621092), and College-level Research Fund Project of Shanxi Institute of Energy (ZB-2018007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, L., Shao, F. & Ren, L. Sustainability appraisal of desired contaminated groundwater remediation strategies: an information-entropy-based stochastic multi-criteria preference model. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 1759–1779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00650-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00650-z